Abortion doping: Revision history

1 February 2024

• curprev 00:1600:16, 1 February 2024‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 12,332 bytes −177‎ Undid revision 1201552333 by 82.20.240.239 (talk) You'd need secondary coverage connecting the two subjects to include this. undo Tag: Undo

31 January 2024

• curprev 22:1822:18, 31 January 2024‎ 82.20.240.239 talk‎ 12,509 bytes +177‎ Added mention of TV show that uses this subject as a theme. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

8 September 2023

• curprev 05:2505:25, 8 September 2023‎ GreenC bot talk contribs‎ 12,332 bytes +102‎ Reformat 1 URL (Wayback Medic 2.5) undo

26 July 2023

• curprev 04:0904:09, 26 July 2023‎ RadioactiveBoulevardier talk contribs‎ m 12,230 bytes +1‎ →‎Claims undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:0704:07, 26 July 2023‎ RadioactiveBoulevardier talk contribs‎ m 12,229 bytes −9‎ MOS:REFERS undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:0604:06, 26 July 2023‎ RadioactiveBoulevardier talk contribs‎ 12,238 bytes +122‎ Adding local short description: "Rumoured practice of purposely inducing pregnancy for performance-enhancing benefits, then aborting", overriding Wikidata description "the rumoured practice of purposely inducing pregnancy for performance-enhancing benefits, then aborting" undo Tag: Shortdesc helper

20 June 2023

• curprev 14:2014:20, 20 June 2023‎ Thomas1048576 talk contribs‎ 12,116 bytes +734‎ →‎Claims: rearrange events in chronological order, add guardian source on 2015 undo
• curprev 02:1402:14, 20 June 2023‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 11,382 bytes −2‎ →‎Claims: merge single sentence para undo

19 June 2023

• curprev 16:1116:11, 19 June 2023‎ Thomas1048576 talk contribs‎ 11,384 bytes +908‎ →‎Claims: Add new sources, Anna Posbergh's 2023 paper claim, and the name shuold be Renate Huch according to other sources undo

8 June 2023

• curprev 13:3313:33, 8 June 2023‎ ButterCashier talk contribs‎ 10,476 bytes −40‎ Reverting edit(s) by 2A02:1210:566A:A00:2531:C3D5:B809:7911 (talk) to rev. 1120398329 by 2A02:1811:50D:B700:D5F8:CF5D:1E74:E676: non-constructive (RW 16.1) undo Tags: RW Undo
• curprev 13:3013:30, 8 June 2023‎ 2a02:1210:566a:a00:2531:c3d5:b809:7911 talk‎ 10,516 bytes +40‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Reverted

6 November 2022

• curprev 20:1120:11, 6 November 2022‎ 2a02:1811:50d:b700:d5f8:cf5d:1e74:e676 talk‎ 10,476 bytes −1‎ →‎Claims undo

3 July 2022

• curprev 12:3012:30, 3 July 2022‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ m 10,477 bytes +1‎ →‎Claims: sp undo

12 February 2022

• curprev 00:1500:15, 12 February 2022‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 10,476 bytes +27‎ Add: id. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_toolbar undo

29 October 2021

• curprev 11:0011:00, 29 October 2021‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 10,449 bytes −215‎ Alter: url. URLs might have been anonymized. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 1017/2143 undo

22 October 2021

• curprev 09:5409:54, 22 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 10,664 bytes −17‎ 1. "1988" sounds akwardly specific, unless we specify why this is a relevant date (it's the date of the Ottawa conference). 2. Some of these people did not publish it themselves but were quoted in publishings. undo

21 October 2021

• curprev 18:4418:44, 21 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 10,681 bytes +197‎ →‎Claims: Attempted to fix references. undo
• curprev 18:3818:38, 21 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 10,484 bytes +482‎ →‎Claims: It may be that the "problem" referred to by Dr. Hoch is not abortion doping but pregnancy doping, but it's similar enough to be relevant. undo
• curprev 18:1918:19, 21 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 10,002 bytes 0‎ →‎Claims: Changed the position of "in an attempt to enhance their athletic performance" to reflect the text of the original Toronto Star article. undo
• curprev 18:1618:16, 21 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 10,002 bytes +274‎ →‎Claims: The Toronto Star says "performed" but Guardian says "performs". The additional text in the Toronto Star makes the reading "performed" more likely, IMO. I don't know how to fix the CS1 error. undo
• curprev 16:5016:50, 21 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 9,728 bytes +422‎ →‎Claims: A fuller quote from a publication shortly after Dr. Erkkola's comment's first publication. undo
• curprev 08:3608:36, 21 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ m 9,306 bytes −1‎ →‎Claims: rm space undo
• curprev 08:3508:35, 21 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 9,307 bytes −15‎ →‎Potential physical benefits: ce undo
• curprev 08:2808:28, 21 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 9,322 bytes +45‎ →‎Claims: "discussions" make it sound like informal talks, social media posts, blog posts etc. But Dr. Erkkola is also quoted in scientific papers (by authors who just assume...), as detailed in the Debunking Myth paper. undo
• curprev 00:3800:38, 21 October 2021‎ Neils51 talk contribs‎ m 9,277 bytes +6‎ replaced: the the → the, typo(s) fixed: ’s → 's undo Tag: AWB

20 October 2021

• curprev 23:1323:13, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 9,271 bytes +136‎ →‎Legality: please don't add bare urls to Wikipedia as per Wikipedia:Bare URLs undo
• curprev 23:1323:13, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ m 9,135 bytes +19‎ →‎Potential physical benefits: ce undo
• curprev 23:1023:10, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 9,116 bytes +523‎ Another example of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It's very clear Snopes are referring to the IOC. undo
• curprev 23:0123:01, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 8,593 bytes +816‎ →‎Claims: please don't add bare urls to Wikipeida as per Wikipedia:Bare URLs undo
• curprev 22:5022:50, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,777 bytes +153‎ →‎Claims: this seems very relevant regarding his claims undo
• curprev 22:4522:45, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,624 bytes −37‎ →‎Claims: actually this isn't neccessary at all undo
• curprev 22:4422:44, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,661 bytes +94‎ →‎Claims: wikilink and remove unnecessary overdetail undo
• curprev 22:3722:37, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,567 bytes −1‎ Please read WP:LEAD. The lead is supposed to summarise the content in the article, you absolutely CANNOT include information in the lead that is not in the body of the article undo
• curprev 22:3422:34, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,568 bytes −5‎ Why the obsession with two sentence paragraphs? undo
• curprev 22:3322:33, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,573 bytes 0‎ See WP:LEAD undo
• curprev 22:3222:32, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,573 bytes −13‎ What's your source that it is currently controversial? undo
• curprev 22:2322:23, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,586 bytes −48‎ →‎Claims: copyedits undo
• curprev 22:2022:20, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,634 bytes −27‎ →‎Potential physical benefits: there is absolutely no need to specify the organisation who did the interview if they are highly reliable. I don't understand why you felt the need to replace the original version with a direct quote in the first place undo
• curprev 22:1822:18, 20 October 2021‎ Damien Linnane talk contribs‎ 7,661 bytes +192‎ I don't see how the original sentence was editorialising, but I'm changing to an exact quote to address your concern, rather than throwing the baby out with the bathwater. There's no consensus for this removal, so please discuss on the talk page. It's also unnecessary to specify the exact date, and I don't understand why you feel the need to remove the wikilink to snopes undo
• curprev 21:1021:10, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 7,469 bytes +57‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 21:0421:04, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 7,412 bytes +424‎ Added another oft-cited quote. undo
• curprev 20:5220:52, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 6,988 bytes +481‎ →‎Legality: I changed this bit of editorializing to something more objective from a scientific paper. undo
• curprev 20:3920:39, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 6,507 bytes +382‎ (sorry, I broke the reference...) undo
• curprev 20:3720:37, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 6,125 bytes −604‎ →‎Claims: Sorry, but Peter Larkins is not a particularly notable person, and he was just one of many people who commented on this issue at that particular time. The fact that he has a negative opinion about East German sports is not relevant here. undo
• curprev 20:3520:35, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 6,729 bytes −5‎ Oxford Dictionary says "an allegation a claim or assertion that someone has done something illegal or wrong...." undo
• curprev 20:2920:29, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 6,734 bytes +228‎ I fleshed out this rather vague statement with some more specific facts (and context). That said, I'm not sure this line should be in the article at all. It's just two journalists commenting on something that happened 20 years previously. undo
• curprev 20:1920:19, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 6,506 bytes −116‎ The Snopes.com article says "By Alex Kasprak, Published 12 February 2002", not "2017". Also, Snopes.com doesn't "accuse" anyone of anything. undo
• curprev 20:1120:11, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 6,622 bytes −18‎ I myself would not even include a paragraph about what Snopes.com thinks (I would rather mine it for direct references), but if this paragraph must be in the article, then it belongs in the introduction, not under "allegations" or "claims". undo
• curprev 20:0920:09, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ 6,640 bytes +96‎ →‎Allegations: The newspaper article and the television interview were two separate events, and she did not sue (or win against) the television station. undo
• curprev 19:5119:51, 20 October 2021‎ Leuce talk contribs‎ m 6,544 bytes 0‎ →‎Allegations: The Sports Reference LLC reference is about the claim specifically and not about the lawsuit. undo