Jump to content

Anti-Judaism: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

4 September 2024

  • curprev 12:3512:35, 4 September 2024PaintTrash talk contribs 57,109 bytes +1,772 In lieu of removing section entirely, have added some other interpretations of Marx's On the Jewish question to balance the view of Nirenberg, sourced from the article on that piece; added see also link to that article undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 02:3802:38, 4 September 2024Nishidani talk contribs 55,337 bytes +998 Undid revision 1243893183 by PaintTrash (talk) Describing what you did iis not a reason for cancelling reliable sourc es. I've removed Aidan Beatty's paper only because it is on his website rather than published, but he is a solid historian on this. e undo
  • curprev 00:0000:00, 4 September 2024PaintTrash talk contribs 54,339 bytes −1,511 Removed sections on Marx from lead and deleted section on "Modernist and Enlightenment Antijudaism" which framed Marx's anti-capitalism as rooting from antisemitism/antijudaism. The lead inaccurately describe Marx as believing that capitalism is evil because it is "essentially Jewish", and the removed section claimed that his anti-capitalism was a program "to liberate the world from Judaism". undo Tag: Visual edit

24 August 2024

23 August 2024

23 July 2024

10 June 2024

30 May 2024

30 April 2024

25 April 2024

18 April 2024

17 April 2024

1 April 2024

19 March 2024

24 February 2024

31 December 2023

9 December 2023

10 November 2023

3 September 2023

2 September 2023

16 August 2023

14 August 2023

4 August 2023

13 July 2023

8 July 2023

23 May 2023

21 May 2023

  • curprev 17:0317:03, 21 May 20232601:5ce:4380:3a0:b96a:5680:6dbf:998d talk 53,532 bytes −316 The first Christians were jews interpreting the text to point towards the Messiah as Jesus. This is a historical error. It is not "appropriation". They came from the same communities and existed together. Perhaps the Islamic view could be considered an appropriation but Jews and Christians lived together and were even considered the same before the fall of the second temple. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

9 May 2023

1 April 2023

31 March 2023

7 March 2023

6 March 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)