Jump to content

Crime against peace: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

9 July 2023

27 March 2022

6 March 2022

2 March 2022

27 February 2022

26 February 2022

25 February 2022

1 December 2021

4 November 2021

12 February 2021

9 February 2021

31 January 2021

29 January 2021

6 December 2020

22 November 2020

29 April 2020

  • curprev 04:0404:04, 29 April 202039d9 talk contribs 11,118 bytes −13 "Added an example that is still of significance in international relations," but is so ambiguous or debated by scholars; Wikipedia has half a page dedicated to whether preemptive action by Israel was justified in light of the crushing economic blockade and military mobilizations. Not that there's no place for the Arab–Israeli conflict in the crime against peace page, but it ought to be addressed separately and with due recognition to the legitimate debate. undo Tag: Visual edit

8 April 2020

19 January 2020

  • curprev 20:4920:49, 19 January 2020Nakashchit talk contribs 11,143 bytes +73 Added an example that is still of significance in international relations, unlike the other examples given which are now primarily of historic interest. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

21 December 2019

1 December 2019

7 November 2019

  • curprev 13:5013:50, 7 November 2019190.16.163.116 talk 11,078 bytes +31 added 2003 invasion of Iraq to the list of examples based on Nuremberg principles, article 50 of U.N. Charter ("Crimes against peace") and ICC examination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court_and_the_2003_invasion_of_Iraq undo Tag: Visual edit

27 July 2019

11 June 2019

  • curprev 07:2907:29, 11 June 2019109.245.33.247 talk 11,040 bytes −269 "War tribunal" what concluded it, is one private enterprise with no legal basis. So it is pov not neutral with legal standpoint. undo Tags: references removed Mobile edit Mobile web edit

4 May 2019

22 February 2019

21 February 2019

12 February 2019

2 January 2019

9 February 2018

1 February 2018

3 June 2017

28 January 2017

14 December 2016

13 October 2016

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)