Orchestrated objective reduction: Revision history

8 July 2024

• curprev 00:0700:07, 8 July 2024‎ JCW-CleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 53,270 bytes −295‎ task, replaced: Physical Chemistry. B → Physical Chemistry B undo Tag: AWB

29 June 2024

• curprev 16:3016:30, 29 June 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 53,565 bytes +451‎ Alter: template type, url. URLs might have been anonymized. Add: pmid, doi, pages, issue, volume, journal, pmc, date, authors 1-6. Removed URL that duplicated identifier. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 3611/3850 undo

24 June 2024

• curprev 06:3706:37, 24 June 2024‎ Muhandes talk contribs‎ 53,114 bytes −114‎ →‎Related experimental results: WP:EL undo
• curprev 06:3406:34, 24 June 2024‎ Muhandes talk contribs‎ 53,228 bytes −72‎ →‎Neuroscience: WP:EL undo

19 June 2024

• curprev 06:3206:32, 19 June 2024‎ WikiCleanerBot talk contribs‎ m 53,300 bytes −1‎ v2.05b - Bot T20 CW#61 - Fix errors for CW project (Reference before punctuation) undo Tag: WPCleaner

10 June 2024

• curprev 17:4717:47, 10 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ m 53,301 bytes +2‎ I added quotation marks to a citation from a study. undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 17:4417:44, 10 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ 53,299 bytes +2,621‎ I added a similar paragraph, but without copy pasting without quotation marks in order to avoid the copyright issues. I also added another sentence in another paragraph, citing another study. undo Tag: Visual edit

9 June 2024

• curprev 17:0617:06, 9 June 2024‎ Diannaa talk contribs‎ 50,678 bytes −1,484‎ remove copyright content copied from https://scienmag.com/quantum-fiber-optics-in-the-brain-enhance-processing-may-protect-against-degenerative-diseases/
• curprev 16:3216:32, 9 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ 52,162 bytes +438‎ I organised the Related experimental results section better and added another sentence from an already cited article. Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 00:2800:28, 9 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ 51,724 bytes +307‎ I added another sentence from an already cited study. Tag: Visual edit

8 June 2024

• curprev 21:5121:51, 8 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ 51,417 bytes +302‎ I added the 2024 tryptophan study with citations. Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:1921:19, 8 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ m 51,115 bytes +2‎ I added a link to Superradiance page. Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 21:1321:13, 8 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ m 51,113 bytes +57‎ I have added a link. Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:5420:54, 8 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ m 51,056 bytes +34‎ I added more citations and sources. Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:5320:53, 8 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ m 51,022 bytes +620‎ I added citations and sources. Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 20:4320:43, 8 June 2024‎ Book with a pencil talk contribs‎ 50,402 bytes +1,425‎ I have added another relevant study/experimental result

19 May 2024

• curprev 05:1805:18, 19 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ 48,977 bytes −243‎ →‎Microtubule quantum vibration theory of anesthetic action: seems inaccurate, don't see any falsification mentioned in source, and literally linking to the next section? undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 05:1605:16, 19 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ 49,220 bytes −63‎ ce intro statement undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 04:0004:00, 19 May 2024‎ DolyaIskrina talk contribs‎ 49,283 bytes +2‎ "contentious" denotes being argumentative. I prefer "fringe" despite its special meaning in wikipedia policy, but I'm only seeing it in a headline so far. So lel's go with "controversial" for now. There is at least one source that uses that term and it's been in the body of this article for a while now. undo Tag: Visual edit

17 May 2024

• curprev 10:5710:57, 17 May 2024‎ 81.134.249.186 talk‎ 49,281 bytes −19‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 10:5610:56, 17 May 2024‎ 81.134.249.186 talk‎ 49,300 bytes +25‎ No edit summary undo

15 May 2024

• curprev 23:5823:58, 15 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ 49,275 bytes −5,903‎ MOS:LEADCITE, put these somewhere in the body if needed undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 23:5623:56, 15 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ m 55,178 bytes −4‎ linked above undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 18:0318:03, 15 May 2024‎ Epgui talk contribs‎ 55,182 bytes −819‎ Edited quotes in the citations to remove less savoury parts-- Quotes now better reflect the position of the scientific community on the merits of the ideas; we want to avoid the perception of ad hominem criticism. undo
• curprev 17:5217:52, 15 May 2024‎ Epgui talk contribs‎ 56,001 bytes +610‎ And another citation undo
• curprev 17:3817:38, 15 May 2024‎ Epgui talk contribs‎ 55,391 bytes +6,180‎ Added citations from around the scientific community. Nobody anywhere takes the core idea seriously. Nobody has published research tying these quantum effects to consciousness. There is plenty of research on the quantum effects, and those are interesting, but they have nothing to do with consciousness and any claim to the contrary is clearly and obviously pseudoscience. No published research supports the core idea that consciousness comes from microtubule quantum effects. undo
• curprev 06:0606:06, 15 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ 49,211 bytes −17‎ Undid revision 1223877231 by Epgui (talk) i don’t understand your agument. suggesting taking to talk page or adding sources simply calling it pseudoscientific, before stating as objective in wikivoice undo Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

14 May 2024

• curprev 22:1822:18, 14 May 2024‎ Epgui talk contribs‎ 49,228 bytes +17‎ Undo: hard disagree. All published evidence and "scientific support" is irrelevant to the core idea of the emergence of consciousness. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
• curprev 21:5821:58, 14 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ 49,211 bytes −17‎ seems to fall under 'questionable science' category, with both scientific support & dissent. Not an obvious case of pseudoscience undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
• curprev 21:1221:12, 14 May 2024‎ Epgui talk contribs‎ 49,228 bytes +30‎ Clearly characterize the theory as "pseudoscientific", and change "mainstream" to "more generally accepted" undo
• curprev 13:1613:16, 14 May 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 49,198 bytes +19‎ Add: date, authors 1-2. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Articles with bare URLs for citations from April 2023 | #UCB_Category 531/716 undo
• curprev 06:3606:36, 14 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ m 49,179 bytes −54‎ ce refs undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 06:3506:35, 14 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ 49,233 bytes +359‎ link cleanup, add undo Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 06:2006:20, 14 May 2024‎ UpdateNerd talk contribs‎ 48,874 bytes −26‎ →‎Background: trim apparent WP:SYNTH, seems less relevant to this article anyways undo Tag: Visual edit

17 March 2024

• curprev 13:5413:54, 17 March 2024‎ Julen Artano talk contribs‎ m 48,900 bytes +1‎ →‎Neuroscience: Contraction fixed. undo

8 March 2024

• curprev 05:3005:30, 8 March 2024‎ Citation bot talk contribs‎ 48,899 bytes −74‎ Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Jay8g | #UCB_toolbar undo
• curprev 05:2005:20, 8 March 2024‎ DolyaIskrina talk contribs‎ 48,973 bytes −47‎ →‎Criticism: Criticisms of a theory are SECONDARY by definition. Perhaps you want to argue that the sources are not RS or there is some OR in the section. However, these cannot be primary if they are commenting on a theory. It's as basic as the difference between a movie and a review of the movie. One is cinema the other is about cinema. undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
• curprev 05:1305:13, 8 March 2024‎ DolyaIskrina talk contribs‎ 49,020 bytes −37‎ →‎Background: WP:LINKCLARITY undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

6 March 2024

• curprev 16:0716:07, 6 March 2024‎ Conan The Librarian talk contribs‎ 49,057 bytes −13‎ Conventional seems to imply there is some settled idea of what consciousness is. If it's a quote from one of the references it should be highlighted. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

23 January 2024

• curprev 14:0014:00, 23 January 2024‎ GhostInTheMachine talk contribs‎ m 49,070 bytes −1‎ →‎Microtubule quantum vibration theory of anesthetic action: sp undo

21 January 2024

• curprev 18:5018:50, 21 January 2024‎ 62.48.155.6 talk‎ 49,071 bytes +86‎ →‎Decoherence in living organisms undo

10 January 2024

• curprev 01:1901:19, 10 January 2024‎ Regulov talk contribs‎ m 48,985 bytes +1‎ →‎Microtubule computation undo
• curprev 01:1601:16, 10 January 2024‎ Regulov talk contribs‎ m 48,984 bytes −1‎ No edit summary undo Tag: Manual revert

12 December 2023

• curprev 01:0501:05, 12 December 2023‎ 2600:2b00:ad01:a300:9dc:1246:7702:b62f talk‎ 48,985 bytes +1‎ Added typo fix undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 01:0401:04, 12 December 2023‎ 2600:2b00:ad01:a300:9dc:1246:7702:b62f talk‎ 48,984 bytes −21‎ Hameroff is not a psychologist. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

11 December 2023

• curprev 04:4504:45, 11 December 2023‎ OAbot talk contribs‎ m 49,005 bytes +68‎ Open access bot: doi updated in citation with #oabot. undo

25 November 2023

• curprev 12:2512:25, 25 November 2023‎ John32768 talk contribs‎ 48,937 bytes +1‎ →‎Microtubule quantum vibration theory of anesthetic action: Fix typo. undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

18 November 2023

• curprev 22:3222:32, 18 November 2023‎ Alenoach talk contribs‎ m 48,936 bytes −34‎ Incompatible reference parameter undo Tag: Visual edit

25 October 2023

• curprev 20:4420:44, 25 October 2023‎ 207.229.103.66 talk‎ 48,970 bytes −4‎ →‎Decoherence in living organisms undo

28 June 2023

• curprev 14:4314:43, 28 June 2023‎ Potestade talk contribs‎ m 48,974 bytes −101‎ Such argument has been alredy extended in the Lucas-Penrose argument page undo Tag: Visual edit