Template:Conservatism sidebar: Revision history

1 August 2024

• curprev 12:0912:09, 1 August 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,953 bytes −93‎ Undid revision 1237956854 by Biohistorian15 (talk) - reversion of good faith edit; the organization is not notable enough to merit inclusion, although it might be added to the Western template; a link to anti-immigration is already included in the Related section, which is enough Tag: Undo
• curprev 10:1810:18, 1 August 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 12,046 bytes +93‎ No edit summary Tag: Reverted

29 July 2024

• curprev 17:5617:56, 29 July 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ m 11,953 bytes 0‎ Stylized properly as NatCon, rather than NATCON
• curprev 09:0909:09, 29 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,953 bytes +62‎ Undid revision 1237338438 by Biohistorian15 (talk) -reversion of good faith edit: the article gives examples from all over the world; also the universal Catholic Church has adherents on all continents Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:0808:08, 29 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,891 bytes −62‎ I'd think "principles" would be too strong an assertion considering many European or Asian conservative movements Tag: Reverted

28 July 2024

• curprev 13:3813:38, 28 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ m 11,953 bytes −4‎ No edit summary
• curprev 12:4212:42, 28 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,957 bytes +50‎ No edit summary

23 July 2024

• curprev 16:3316:33, 23 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,907 bytes +46‎ Fits in well, insofar as he was not really rooted anywhere in particular

10 July 2024

• curprev 22:5622:56, 10 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,861 bytes +16‎ No edit summary

8 July 2024

• curprev 06:2406:24, 8 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,845 bytes −60‎ reversion of good faith edits: only articles with a direct connection to the topic ought to be included; there is no explicit mention of conservatism in the respective articles; in fact there are many leftist scholars mentioned in the article on Philosophical anthropology
• curprev 01:5101:51, 8 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,905 bytes +30‎ Much like "Philosophical anthropology" before: a field that is (de facto) VERY conservative for reasons I am not entirely sure about

6 July 2024

• curprev 15:4115:41, 6 July 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ 11,875 bytes +18‎ Readd natural law, I'm not sure I grasp why it was removed. It is hard to think of a more central concept in conservative thought. It is the kernel upon which Aristotle, Aquinas, and the various Catholic reactionaries build their thought. Liberalism has this concept as well, but how liberalism transforms the meaning of this is important. Liberalism doesn't own the idea. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• curprev 11:1411:14, 6 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,857 bytes −55‎ removal of "natural law" which is a central concept of classical liberalism

5 July 2024

• curprev 19:3819:38, 5 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,912 bytes −7‎ some reversions: ”oikos” and ”kyrios” are too obscure to count as central terms; Gottfried has already been removed one time for not being as notable as the other American intellectuals represented; Kondylis is not notable either; the historical significance of Savigny, Ranke, and Röpke is major; the article on ”unit cohesion” is obscure and the term seems peripheral; ”Philosophers” is the word used in articles when that section of the template is expanded
• curprev 18:4718:47, 5 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,919 bytes +80‎ No edit summary
• curprev 18:4018:40, 5 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,839 bytes −51‎ Savigny, Röpke, Koselleck and Ranke are just not well-known today, hence best relegated to "Conservatism in Germany" template etc.
• curprev 16:3716:37, 5 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,890 bytes +38‎ No edit summary

3 July 2024

• curprev 03:1303:13, 3 July 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 11,852 bytes +33‎ Highly conservative philo. discipline

2 July 2024

• curprev 21:0821:08, 2 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,819 bytes +29‎ No edit summary

1 July 2024

• curprev 21:5621:56, 1 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,790 bytes −56‎ see articles
• curprev 19:1019:10, 1 July 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,846 bytes −455‎ removal of small section: since conservatism tends to be nationalist, a section for international conservative organisations does not make much sense; the European orgs have been transferred to the Western template

29 June 2024

• curprev 14:1614:16, 29 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,301 bytes +65‎ No edit summary

24 June 2024

• curprev 18:0718:07, 24 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ m 12,236 bytes +18‎ No edit summary
• curprev 14:5914:59, 24 June 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 12,218 bytes +18‎ No edit summary
• curprev 14:5214:52, 24 June 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 12,200 bytes +23‎ No edit summary

21 June 2024

• curprev 15:2715:27, 21 June 2024‎ Fajnymat10 talk contribs‎ m 12,177 bytes +118‎ No edit summary

19 June 2024

• curprev 10:3710:37, 19 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,059 bytes −7‎ addition of a prominent Islamic scholar in order to make the list more global; removal of Hitchens after an insightful comment by GreenLoeb
• curprev 00:0000:00, 19 June 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ 12,066 bytes +173‎ Undid revision 1229838633 by GreenLoeb (talk) Self-revert of the Mishima edit for now, as I can see an argument though I'm not wholly convinced. I do think we should hash out at some point where to draw the line between conservatism and reaction/extreme right, for purposes of inclusion in this template. Tag: Undo

18 June 2024

• curprev 23:5723:57, 18 June 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ m 11,893 bytes −173‎ Rem. Mishima. I like his novels, but I think with a figure like him we are really blurring the lines between conservatism and straightforward reactionary modernism. I agree with the desire to make this list more global, but there must be a better representative of Japan. Also, not sure to what extent he qualifies as an intellectual (his novels are not quite the same in terms of philosophical exploration as, say, Dostoevsky, who I do think belongs here) Tag: Reverted
• curprev 23:4223:42, 18 June 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ m 12,066 bytes +46‎ Readd Mansfield, who is a major thinker. I can see the argument for excluding him because of notability for a non-US template, but he is certainly more relevant to worldwide conservatism as a thinker than Hitchens (who is primarily a journalist) or Sowell (whose international relevance is dubious, and whose books lack philosophic heft)
• curprev 23:2923:29, 18 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,020 bytes +33‎ addition of four prominent intellectuals and removal of another four who, although brilliant, are not as notable as the other ones on the list
• curprev 23:0623:06, 18 June 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ 11,987 bytes 0‎ fixing inverted invisible text
• curprev 23:0123:01, 18 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,987 bytes +270‎ addition of an Israeli, a Hungarian, a Brazilian, and a Japanese in order to make the section more global; also addition of Eliot, who was missing from the list

17 June 2024

• curprev 14:3714:37, 17 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 11,717 bytes −1,133‎ removal of two sections that have been incorporated into a separate template called Conservatism in the Western world since they focused exclusively on Western conservatism
• curprev 11:4511:45, 17 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ m 12,850 bytes −79‎ removal of links to articles that do not deal exclusively with conservatism
• curprev 10:5710:57, 17 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,929 bytes −797‎ removal of a newly added section that does not cover the topic from a global perspective: however, on a template called European conservatism or Western conservatism, this section would be excellent
• curprev 10:1210:12, 17 June 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ m 13,726 bytes 0‎ No edit summary
• curprev 10:1110:11, 17 June 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 13,726 bytes +820‎ Supplemented a slightly broader "Media" section this time

13 June 2024

• curprev 19:2219:22, 13 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,906 bytes +30‎ No edit summary
• curprev 09:2809:28, 13 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,876 bytes −716‎ Undid revision 1228803815 by Biohistorian15 (talk) - unnecessary; too eurocentric; some of these journals are not even that notable Tag: Undo
• curprev 08:2808:28, 13 June 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 13,592 bytes +44‎ No edit summary
• curprev 08:2408:24, 13 June 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 13,548 bytes +716‎ Cf. invisible comment for special rationale Tag: Reverted

11 June 2024

• curprev 19:5319:53, 11 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,832 bytes −37‎ although much appreciated by conservatives, Bloom did not consider himself a conservative; however, he deserves representation in the US template
• curprev 19:5219:52, 11 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,869 bytes −45‎ a brilliant scholar, just not notable enough; there are more notable Americans represented in this list already
• curprev 19:5019:50, 11 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,914 bytes +56‎ Undid revision 1228503716 by GreenLoeb (talk) - Lefebvre was heavily involved in politics and was highly influential and published many works; see his article Tag: Undo
• curprev 19:4719:47, 11 June 2024‎ Trakking talk contribs‎ 12,858 bytes +23‎ although controversial, it is an associated ideology [Iron Guard in Romania, Rexist party in Belgium etc.]
• curprev 17:1517:15, 11 June 2024‎ Biohistorian15 talk contribs‎ 12,835 bytes −8‎ Kk @GreenLoeb, while I might reformat it in the future, I will do it along different lines... - meanwhile more elementary edits like this one...
• curprev 16:0816:08, 11 June 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ 12,843 bytes −40‎ Rem. Sowell because 1. he is primarily an economist, 2. his "philosophical" works are more appropriately works of political commentary and intervention, 3. his relevance outside the United States is dubious, and 4. he considers himself a libertarian. He merits inclusion on the US Conservatism template, but not here. If you don't agree though, I'm open to being convinced on the talk page.
• curprev 16:0416:04, 11 June 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ 12,883 bytes −56‎ Removing Lefebvre; he is not in any significant way important as a thinker/intellectual. He was a traditionalist Catholic bishop who held frankly unoriginal and boilerplate traditional Catholic views on politics, but made no major contribution to thought. His importance lies in his office as a priest who opposed Vatican II. Tag: Reverted
• curprev 16:0216:02, 11 June 2024‎ GreenLoeb talk contribs‎ 12,939 bytes +168‎ I agree with Trakking re:the formatting of this list; please do not alter it again and if you have a problem take it to talk. I do think some of the figures Biohistorian added merit inclusion; Bloom and Voegelin are major thinkers who unquestionably deserve inclusion, and Weaver and Gottfried are certainly more important and influential than some figures already included here, like Hitchens or Lefebvre.