Climate Audit: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Auditing: rm strange, possibly malicious link, and untrue sentence. |
merge content to Stephen McIntyre |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#REDIRECT [[Stephen McIntyre#ClimateAudit.org]] {{R from merge}} |
|||
'''Climate Audit''' is a [[blog]] run by [[Stephen McIntyre]] devoted to auditing the statistical methods and data used in [[Temperature record of the past 1000 years|historical reconstructions]] of past climate, especially [[multiproxy]] reconstructions such as the 1998 reconstruction by Mann, Bradley and Hughes ("MBH98"), which was prominently featured in the 2001 [[IPCC Third Assessment Report]]. |
|||
===Inspiration=== |
|||
McIntyre became interested in these issues after advocates of the [[Kyoto Protocol]] used the [[Hockey Stick graph]] from MBH98 in ways that he found similar to [[Bre-X]] and other [[stock]] [[fraud]]s, leading him to try to [[Financial audit|audit]] the MBH98 data and analysis. He launched the blog in January 2005 just before ''[[Geophysical Research Letters]]'' published a paper by McIntyre and [[Ross McKitrick]] critiquing MBH98. The blog is largely concerned with McIntyre's efforts to audit current climate publications. It supports comments, but topics not related to auditing results in climate science are generally discouraged. |
|||
===Auditing=== |
|||
The ClimateAudit blog was credited with spurring two hearings on the Hockey Stick Graph, open documentation and the reliability of peer review in government-funded science research by the U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee in 2006 at which Stephen McIntyre testified. Of the role of the Climate Audit blog in inspiring the hearings, the Prometheus blog of the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research of the University of Colorado at Boulder said, referring to ClimateAudit, "[McIntyre and McKitrick] also have provided a case study in the power of blogs in today's worlds of science and politics".<ref>[http://sciencepolicy.colorado.edu/prometheus/archives/climate_change/000882hockey_stick_hearing.html Prometheus: Hockey Stick Hearing Number Two Archives<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
|||
Climate Audit has been highlighted by the press including ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]''<ref>{{cite web |title=Global-Warming Skeptics Under Fire |url=http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB113027943843479277-5reMaU4_37mSf3Us8BhDeHITDyA_20061026.html?mod=blogs}}</ref> and [[United Press International]],<ref>{{cite web|title=Article in ''The Washington Times''|url=http://www.washtimes.com/upi-breaking/20050225-011112-4288r.htm}}</ref> and was co-winner of the 2007 Best Science Blog award.<ref>[http://2007.weblogawards.org/polls/best-science-blog-1.php Best Science Blog - The 2007 Weblog Awards<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
|||
In 2007, McIntyre started auditing the various corrections made to temperature records, in particular those relating to the [[Urban Heat Island]] effect. In the course of his analysis of the records for individual sites, he discovered a small discontinuity in some US records in the [[Goddard Institute for Space Studies]] (GISS) dataset starting in January 2000. He emailed GISS advising them of the problem and within a couple of days GISS issued a new, corrected set of data<ref>[http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/ Data @ NASA GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis (GISTEMP)<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> and "thank[ed] Stephen McIntyre for bringing to our attention that such an adjustment is necessary to prevent creating an artificial jump in year 2000". The adjustment caused the average temperatures for the continental United States to be reduced about 0.15 °C during the years 2000-2006. Changes in other portions of the record did not exceed 0.03 °C, and it made no discernible difference to the global mean anomalies. |
|||
McIntyre later commented:<ref>[http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=1885 Climate Audit - by Steve McIntyre » Does Hansen’s Error “Matter”?<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> |
|||
<blockquote>[M]y original interest in GISS adjustment procedures was not an abstract interest, but a specific interest in whether GISS adjustment procedures were equal to the challenge of “fixing” bad data. If one views the above assessment as a type of limited software audit (limited by lack of access to source code and operating manuals), one can say firmly that the GISS software had not only failed to pick up and correct fictitious steps of up to 1 deg C, but that GISS actually introduced this error in the course of their programming. According to any reasonable audit standards, one would conclude that the GISS software had failed this particular test. While GISS can (and has) patched the particular error that I reported to them, their patching hardly proves the merit of the GISS (and USHCN <ref>United States Historical Climate Network </ref>) adjustment procedures. These need to be carefully examined.</blockquote> |
|||
==See also== |
|||
*[[Hockey stick controversy]] |
|||
*[[Stephen McIntyre]] |
|||
== References == |
|||
{{Reflist|3}} |
|||
==External links== |
|||
*[http://www.climateaudit.org/ Climate Audit website] |
|||
*[http://homepages.tesco.net/~kate-and-david/2007/Holland(2007).pdf Analysis of the "Hockey Stick" affair, by David Holland (2007, Energy & Environment)] |
|||
*[[wikispot:climateaudit101|Climate Audit 101 Wiki]], for new or occasional Climate Audit readers. |
|||
[[Category:Science blogs]] |
|||
[[Category:Publications established in 2005]] |
|||
[[Category:Climate change]] |
|||
Revision as of 22:05, 5 February 2009
Redirect to:
- From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
- For redirects with substantive page histories that did not result from page merges use {{R with history}} instead.