Jump to content

The Hockey Stick Illusion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 354815333 by William M. Connolley (talk) Per WP:V. Unsourced.
oh well. try this instead.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pov}}

{{Infobox Book
{{Infobox Book
| name = The Hockey Stick Illusion;Climategate and the Corruption of Science
| name = The Hockey Stick Illusion;Climategate and the Corruption of Science

Revision as of 21:24, 8 April 2010

The Hockey Stick Illusion;Climategate and the Corruption of Science
AuthorA.W. Montford
SpracheEnglisch
SubjectClimate change
GenreNon-Fiction
PublisherStacey International
Publication date
2010
Publication placeVereinigtes Königreich
Pages482
ISBN978 1 906768 35 5

The Hockey Stick Illusion (subtitle Climategate and the Corruption of Science) is a book written by Andrew Montford, author of the Bishop Hill Blog. Stacey International published the book in 2010.

The book covers the history of Michael E. Mann's hockey stick graph (MBH98) from when it was first published to its prominent use by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Criticisms by Ross McKitrick and Stephen McIntyre, as well as the ensuing hockey stick controversy, are also included in the book.

As of early April 2010, 34 out of 34 reviewers gave the book five stars on Amazon.co.uk.[1]

Phillip Bratby, in his submission to the Climategate inquiry, recommended that the committee members should read Chapter 15 of the book.[2]

Background

In 2005, Andrew Montford followed a link from a British political blog to the Climate Audit Web site. He said new visitors were pleading for an introduction to the controversy and that there was nothing to help people get up to speed on the science.

Over the course of a few days, Montford summarized a series of Climate Audit posts into a long article on his blog which he called "Caspar and the Jesus Paper."[3] He said this article made his site go from a couple of hundred hits a day to 30,000 hits over three days. From these beginnings, the author took the first steps in writing his book.

Synopsis

File:Hockey stick chart ipcc large.jpg
Figure 1(b) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment Report

In its seventeen chapters, The Hockey Stick Illusion relates the story of Michael Mann's hockey stick graph. Starting with a brief summary of the consensus view prior to 1998, and the first incarnation of the hockey stick graph, the book traces the history of what it claims is the slow unraveling of that same graph.

The last few chapters of the book deal with the Climategate controversy. Here, the author compares several e-mails to the evidence he presents in The Hockey Stick Illusion. Montford focuses on those e-mails which dealt with the peer review process and how these pertained to McIntyre's efforts to get the data and methodology from Mann's and other paleoclimatologists published works.

Reception

Writing in Prospect magazine, Matt Ridley, the former science editor of The Economist, said that this book was one of the best science books written in years.

"It exposes in delicious detail, datum by datum, how a great scientific mistake of immense political weight was perpetrated, defended and camouflaged by a scientific establishment that should now be red with shame," Ridley said.[4]

George Gilder, writing in Discovery News, said, "In this story, the Columbo figure is Steve McIntyre, a Canadian mining consultant, and A.W. Montford's book tells the gripping and suspenseful details of McIntyre's pursuit of the self-denominated "hockey team" led by Michael Mann, who wrote the key chapters on his own work for the IPCC, and Phil Jones, who maintains the temperature record used by the IPCC to document the "Hockey Stick" claiming allegedly unprecedented and anomalous anthropogenic global warming in the Twentieth Century while denying that any comparable or greater warming occurred in the Medieval period." "Don't miss this definitive book," Gilder said.[5]

In an article for The Daily Telegraph, Christopher Booker wrote, "We can now read in shocking detail the truth of the outrageous efforts made to ensure that the same 2007 report was able to keep on board IPCC's most shameless stunt of all: the notorious "hockey stick" graph purporting to show that in the late 20th century, temperatures had been hurtling up to unprecedented levels."[6][7]

Nigel Calder, former editor of the New Scientist magazine and co-author of The Chilling Stars, wrote, "This is a thriller about codebreaking: computer codes that generated a false signal to the world about runaway global warming."[8]

References

  1. ^ "Five Star Reviews On Amazon". Archived from the original on 2010-04-07. Retrieved 2010-04-07.
  2. ^ "Memorandum submitted by Phillip Bratby (CRU 17)".
  3. ^ "Casper and the Jesus paper". www.bishophill.squarespace.com. Retrieved Thursday, Apr 01 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  4. ^ Matt Ridley (2010-03-10). "The case against the hockey stick". Prospect. Retrieved 2010-04-03.
  5. ^ George Gilder (February 25, 2010 6:12 PM). "George Gilder Hails "The Hockey Stick Illusion" on the Science Scandal of Global Warming". www.discoverynews.org. Retrieved February 25, 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ Christopher Booker (7:49PM GMT 27 Feb 2010). "A perfect storm is brewing for the IPCC". www.telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved Saturday, Apr 03 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  7. ^ Christopher Booker (MARCH 6, 2010). "The global warming alarmists". www.vancouversun.com. Retrieved Saturday, Apr 03 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  8. ^ "The Hockey Stick Illusion, Back Cover". www.amazon.co.uk. Retrieved Thursday, Apr 01 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

Bibliography

Further reading

See Also