Jump to content

User talk:Nsaa: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)
597,462 edits
m Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 60d) to User talk:Nsaa/User talk 2010.
2over0 (talk | contribs)
17,247 edits
→‎Ratel: new section
Line 170: Line 170:
In the absence of the filing party, or others, I would advise you that you have been named as a party at [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement#marknutley .26 Nsaa|WP:CC probation/Requests for enforcement#marknutley & Nsaa]]. You may respond in the appropriate section, if desired. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 15:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
In the absence of the filing party, or others, I would advise you that you have been named as a party at [[Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation/Requests for enforcement#marknutley .26 Nsaa|WP:CC probation/Requests for enforcement#marknutley & Nsaa]]. You may respond in the appropriate section, if desired. [[User:LessHeard vanU|LessHeard vanU]] ([[User talk:LessHeard vanU|talk]]) 15:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks for making the notification. [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa#top|talk]]) 18:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks for making the notification. [[User:Nsaa|Nsaa]] ([[User talk:Nsaa#top|talk]]) 18:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

== Ratel ==

{{user|Ratel}} is currently indefinitely blocked for abusive sockpuppetry. You are of course free to present whatever diffs you like at your evidence section in the climate change arbitration, but I thought I might save you the time of gathering evidence with an eye to proposing remedies involving Ratel. Diffs involving Ratel might, of course, still be useful for highlighting the behaviour of others or the editing environment in general. Good luck, - [[User talk:2over0|2/0]] <small>([[Special:Contributions/2over0|cont.]])</small> 20:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:50, 7 July 2010

Status: Offline




I believe you asked for help with your English?

I'm not an English teacher (my older brother is) and so I probably can't articulate why some of your grammer is incorrect but I can correct it for you. So, to help you in this function, I'll present a post of yours I just read and then attempt to fix it.

This is so bad. I have no word for it. Why the heck should my language be subject to Atmoz comments at all? Why not just keep the discussion about what was discussed? I find it totally counterproductive and it harms Wikipedia. So yes give him a long block or a long topic ban for this so other people can start working. What do Atmoz try to achieve? Getting people angry so they make "mistakes" and can get them blocked/topic banned? Nsaa (talk) 01:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Corrected (hopefully!):

This is so bad. I have no words for it. Why the heck should my language be subject to Atmoz's comments at all? Why not just keep the discussion on topic? I find it to be totally counterproductive and it harms Wikipedia. So yes, give him a long block or a long topic ban for this so other people can start working. What is Atmoz trying to achieve? Getting people angry so they make "mistakes" and are then blocked/topic banned? Nsaa (talk) 01:29, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

I tried not to rewrite them too much, but hopefully you find this helpful. Cheers. TheGoodLocust (talk) 02:05, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - Nsaa remember to always reread what you post - :-) Nsaa (talk) 21:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

Revert

Hey Nsaa!! Here you reverted an edit that justified itself by referencing the talkpage. You said you didn't see it as in line with the section titled "Outcome" I believe what was meant was the similarly titled "Outcome again". Would you mind checking in on that latter section? If you still stand by your revert you have my blessing, if not, self-revert?--Heyitspeter (talk) 18:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. I will self revert. Nsaa (talk) 21:18, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Self Revert Done. Providing links to the discussion can help when editing, especially when we talk about something with more than one discussion ongoing. Nsaa (talk) 21:23, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note

HI, just a note you commented on: User talk:137.219.252.3; just wanted to let you know that this is a university IP (JCU, Townsville, QLD, AUS) Everyone on the university outsources through it so for example; I saw a "message for me; from you" even though I personally never did anything to wiki. Thought you might want to know so you don't keep posting to that IP.

Note that user talk pages receive messages for everyone who uses that IP to edit. If you want to avoid irrelevant messages, create an account.—Tetracube (talk) 19:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite web3

Template:Cite web3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 19:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

Language Barrier

Hei Officer :) I mean this Schulz guy repeated the smear, doubnting I would be able to convey irony or sarkasm in a second language. I gave him a sort of example in my reply and insofar I dont see the need to bring him to court. I strongly believe he will try it the other way round. Polentario (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see that you can manage to write Norwegian :-). Keep up the good work and just don't bother when people says "he's also the creator of the utterly dreadful de:Gore-Effekt article, which makes this one look like featured article quality by comparison. I'll AfD that too shortly. -- ChrisO (talk) 18:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)"[1]. Nsaa (talk) 23:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Youre welcome. I translated no:Terje Rollem from Norwegian into German and expanded the articel, it has been mentioned on the main page as well, but I wouldnt go in the other direction. The Climatist Gang in the German WP tried an AfD against de:Gore-Effekt as well but its been accepted. So Signore Schulz has to provide more than hot air to get further. Lets see. Ha de bra !Polentario (talk) 23:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! I've not read about Terje Rollem (hm. we need an article here also :-) before. I've asked JakeInJoisey (talk · contribs) to be more polite in his comments also. Nsaa (talk) 00:01, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Al Gore Effect"

Per [2] at least some if not all of sources 8, 9, 10, and 11 use "Al Gore effect". Active Banana (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will add it :-) Nsaa (talk) 21:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at The Gore Effect

I've reverted them all. We're discussing the lead on the talk page and you're changing it radically. Your other radical changes will need consensus. You don't have it. Try to get it first. Then change the article in those radical ways if you get consensus. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 00:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've not changed the lead? I've only done very small changes, and technical movements of references. Did I remove this? Where did I do that? Nsaa (talk) 00:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I"m sorry. I think I misinterpreted what was going on. Your edits reverted to the radically different new lead (your combined edits here [3]) while a discussion was taking place (near the bottom of the talk page). Was that unintentional? I know Mackan79 and I told him I was sure he wouldn't make a change if he understood the matter was under discussion. You've actually made many good edits to the article today. I'm sorry for thinking you'd rewritten the lead, and I see you've reverted per discussion in another edit today, so you know all about that. I guess I'm just sick of CC shenanigans today. I should have toned down the edit summary too. I'll look over your edits and self-revert to retain all your technical changes. I'll get back to you when I'm done, and if you think I should self-revert more, I'm happy to discuss it. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 00:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh. I'm not so into the article yet that I spot what I did wrong here. As fare as I know, the only change I did to the lead today was adding a "-" to the quote (as the source says) [4], pinpointed the source to the Toronto based newspaper Globe and Mail [5], and the most radical editing done, by adding "some" here: [6]. As fare as I see I've not done anything else to the lead (except moving down to the ref section and updating the refs). Nsaa (talk) 01:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your ten edits ending here [7] also changed the lead paragraph. Was that unintentional? I'm trying to restore all your technical improvements, but it's confusing. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 01:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As best I can tell, this edit [8] restores your changes, but I'm not sure I identified them all. If you see anything else, please tell me and I'll restore it. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 01:44, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

Notice of Probation enforcement request

In the absence of the filing party, or others, I would advise you that you have been named as a party at WP:CC probation/Requests for enforcement#marknutley & Nsaa. You may respond in the appropriate section, if desired. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the notification. Nsaa (talk) 18:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ratel

Ratel (talk · contribs) is currently indefinitely blocked for abusive sockpuppetry. You are of course free to present whatever diffs you like at your evidence section in the climate change arbitration, but I thought I might save you the time of gathering evidence with an eye to proposing remedies involving Ratel. Diffs involving Ratel might, of course, still be useful for highlighting the behaviour of others or the editing environment in general. Good luck, - 2/0 (cont.) 20:50, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nsaa&oldid=372276112"