Jump to content

United States ship naming conventions: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 1052817233 by 207.161.86.162 (talk)
Tags: Undo Reverted
Undid revision 1052882012 by Thewolfchild (talk) – Unexplained reversion of standard copy-editing
Tags: Undo references removed
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2018}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2018}}
'''United States ship naming conventions''' for the [[United States Navy|U.S. Navy]] were established by Congressional action at least as early as 1862. Title Thirteen, Chapter Six, of the [[United States Code|U.S. Code]], enacted in that year, reads, in part,
'''United States ship naming conventions''' for the [[United States Navy|U.S. Navy]] were established by congressional action at least as early as 1862. Title 13, section 1531, of the [[United States Code|U.S. Code]], enacted in that year, reads, in part,


{{Quotation|"The vessels of the Navy shall be named by the Secretary of the Navy under direction of the President according to the following rule:
{{Quotation|The vessels of the Navy shall be named by the Secretary of the Navy under direction of the President according to the following rule:
Sailing-vessels of the first class shall be named after the States of the Union, those of the second class after the rivers, those of the third class after the principal cities and towns and those of the fourth class as the President may direct."
Sailing-vessels of the first class shall be named after the States of the Union, those of the second class after the rivers, those of the third class after the principal cities and towns and those of the fourth class as the President may direct.}}
|''Section 1531''}}


Further clarification was made by [[executive order]] of [[President of the United States|President]] [[Theodore Roosevelt]] in 1907.<ref name="NHHC">{{cite web |url=https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/heritage/customs-and-traditions/ship-naming.html |publisher=Naval History and Heritage Command |title=Ship Naming in the United States Navy |access-date=24 July 2016}}</ref> However, elements had existed since before his time. If a ship is reclassified, for example a destroyer is converted to a mine layer, it retains its original name.
Further clarification was made by [[executive order]] of [[President of the United States|President]] [[Theodore Roosevelt]] in 1907.<ref name="NHHC">{{cite web |url=https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/heritage/customs-and-traditions/ship-naming.html |publisher=Naval History and Heritage Command |title=Ship Naming in the United States Navy |access-date=24 July 2016}}</ref> However, elements had existed since before his time. If a ship is reclassified, for example a destroyer is converted to a mine layer, it retains its original name.
Line 11: Line 10:
* '''[[Battleship]]s (BB)''', by law, were named for states, except for {{USS|Kearsarge|BB-5}}, which was named after a mountain in Merrimack County and a civil war sloop.
* '''[[Battleship]]s (BB)''', by law, were named for states, except for {{USS|Kearsarge|BB-5}}, which was named after a mountain in Merrimack County and a civil war sloop.
* '''[[Lexington-class battlecruiser|Battlecruisers]] (CC)''' under the 1916 program were to receive names of battles or famous U.S Navy ships with significant overlap since several famous U.S. Navy ships were named after Revolutionary War battles.
* '''[[Lexington-class battlecruiser|Battlecruisers]] (CC)''' under the 1916 program were to receive names of battles or famous U.S Navy ships with significant overlap since several famous U.S. Navy ships were named after Revolutionary War battles.
* '''[[Aircraft carriers]] (CV, CVL and CVA)''', ships {{USS|Lexington|CV-2}} and {{USS|Saratoga|CV-3}} were completed as carriers after the battle cruisers were cancelled under the [[Washington Naval Treaty]] and this became the standard for aircraft carriers with the exception of {{USS|Langley|CV-1}}, {{USS|Franklin D. Roosevelt|CVB-42}}, {{USS|Wright|CVL-49}}, {{USS|Forrestal|CVA-59}}, and {{USS|Kitty Hawk|CVA-63}}, Langley, Wright and Kitty Hawk all being references to aviation.<ref>And the possible exception of {{USS|Shangri-La|CV-38}}, which can be said to have been named after a "battle," the [[Doolittle Raid]]</ref><ref>Technically the ''Essex''-class carriers ''Franklin'', ''Randolph'' and ''Hancock'' were named for the Continental Navy ships which bore the names of those men, not the men themselves.</ref>
* '''[[Aircraft carriers]] (CV, CVL and CVA)''', ships {{USS|Lexington|CV-2}} and {{USS|Saratoga|CV-3}} were completed as carriers after the battle cruisers were cancelled under the [[Washington Naval Treaty]] and this became the standard for aircraft carriers with the exception of {{USS|Langley|CV-1}}, {{USS|Franklin D. Roosevelt|CVB-42}}, {{USS|Wright|CVL-49}}, {{USS|Forrestal|CVA-59}}, and {{USS|Kitty Hawk|CVA-63}}, Langley, Wright and Kitty Hawk all being references to aviation.{{efn|And the possible exception of {{USS|Shangri-La|CV-38}}, which can be said to have been named after a "battle," the [[Doolittle Raid]]}}{{efn|Technically the ''Essex''-class carriers ''Franklin'', ''Randolph'' and ''Hancock'' were named for the Continental Navy ships which bore the names of those men, not the men themselves.}}
* '''[[Escort Carrier]]s (CVE)''' were initially named after bays and sounds though many received battle names while under construction. Escort carriers that appear to be named for cities or islands like {{USS|Casablanca|CVE-55}} or {{USS|Guadalcanal|CVE-60}} were actually named for battles fought at those locations.
* '''[[Escort Carrier]]s (CVE)''' were initially named after bays and sounds though many received battle names while under construction. Escort carriers that appear to be named for cities or islands like {{USS|Casablanca|CVE-55}} or {{USS|Guadalcanal|CVE-60}} were actually named for battles fought at those locations.
* '''[[Alaska-class cruiser|Large cruisers]] (CB)''' under the 1940 program were named for United States territories.
* '''[[Alaska-class cruiser|Large cruisers]] (CB)''' under the 1940 program were named for United States territories.
* '''[[Cruiser]]s, both light and heavy (CL and CA)''', were named for cities in the United States and its territories, with the exception of {{USS|Canberra|CA-70}}, which is named after {{HMAS|Canberra|D33}} and [[Canberra]], the capital of [[Australia]], making USS ''Canberra'' the only U.S. warship named for a foreign warship and foreign capital city.
* '''[[Cruiser]]s, both light and heavy (CL and CA)''', were named for cities in the United States and its territories, with the exception of {{USS|Canberra|CA-70}}, which is named after {{HMAS|Canberra|D33}} and [[Canberra]], the capital of [[Australia]], making USS ''Canberra'' the only U.S. warship named for a foreign warship and foreign capital city.
* '''[[Nuclear-powered cruisers of the United States Navy|Cruisers, guided missile, nuclear powered]] (CGN)''', after the first nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser, {{USS|Long Beach|CGN-9}},<ref>''Long Beach'' was the last U.S. warship built on a true cruiser hull</ref> CGNs of the {{sclass|California|cruiser|5}} and {{sclass|Virginia|cruiser|4}}es were named for states, with the exception of;
* '''[[Nuclear-powered cruisers of the United States Navy|Cruisers, guided missile, nuclear powered]] (CGN)''', after the first nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser, {{USS|Long Beach|CGN-9}},{{efn|''Long Beach'' was the last U.S. warship built on a true cruiser hull.}} CGNs of the {{sclass|California|cruiser|5}} and {{sclass|Virginia|cruiser|4}}es were named for states, with the exception of;
**{{USS|Bainbridge|CGN-25|6}} and {{USS|Truxtun|CGN-35|6}}, which were commissioned as frigates.
**{{USS|Bainbridge|CGN-25|6}} and {{USS|Truxtun|CGN-35|6}}, which were commissioned as frigates.
* '''[[Destroyer]]s (DD) and [[Destroyer Escort]]s (DE)''' were named for Navy and Marine Corps heroes, with the exception of;
* '''[[Destroyer]]s (DD) and [[Destroyer Escort]]s (DE)''' were named for Navy and Marine Corps heroes, with the exception of;
Line 102: Line 101:


==See also ==
==See also ==
* [[List of current United States Navy ships]]
* [[List of current ships of the United States Navy]]
* [[List of Military Sealift Command ships]]
* [[List of Military Sealift Command ships]]
* [[List of U.S. military vessels named after women]]
* [[List of U.S. military vessels named after women]]
Line 108: Line 107:
* [[Hull classification symbol]]
* [[Hull classification symbol]]


==Notes and references ==
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References ==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


Line 117: Line 119:
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120913075148/http://www.history.navy.mil/download/Shipnamingreport.pdf A Report on Policies and Practices of the U.S. Navy for Naming the Vessels of the Navy (2012)]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20120913075148/http://www.history.navy.mil/download/Shipnamingreport.pdf A Report on Policies and Practices of the U.S. Navy for Naming the Vessels of the Navy (2012)]
* [https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RS22478.pdf Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress] [[Congressional Research Service]]
* [https://fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RS22478.pdf Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress] [[Congressional Research Service]]

{{US Navy navbox}}


[[Category:Ship naming conventions|United States]]
[[Category:Ship naming conventions|United States]]

Revision as of 01:25, 1 November 2021

United States ship naming conventions for the U.S. Navy were established by congressional action at least as early as 1862. Title 13, section 1531, of the U.S. Code, enacted in that year, reads, in part,

The vessels of the Navy shall be named by the Secretary of the Navy under direction of the President according to the following rule: Sailing-vessels of the first class shall be named after the States of the Union, those of the second class after the rivers, those of the third class after the principal cities and towns and those of the fourth class as the President may direct.

Further clarification was made by executive order of President Theodore Roosevelt in 1907.[1] However, elements had existed since before his time. If a ship is reclassified, for example a destroyer is converted to a mine layer, it retains its original name.

Traditional conventions

Contemporary ship naming conventions and their exceptions

After the 30th boat and with only two available state names remaining, the Navy began using legacy names of previous attack submarines.[5] Navy Secretary Kenneth Braithwaite stated that he;
"...supports naming future submarines after past vessels with historic naval legacies."[6]
The next four boats of the class (SSN-804 to SSN-807) have so far followed this naming scheme, (with all four also being names of fish, a previous naming convention of submarines). A report to Congress on 4 February 2021, advised the Navy had not indicated these exceptions as being a change to the policy for naming ships.[5]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ And the possible exception of USS Shangri-La (CV-38), which can be said to have been named after a "battle," the Doolittle Raid
  2. ^ Technically the Essex-class carriers Franklin, Randolph and Hancock were named for the Continental Navy ships which bore the names of those men, not the men themselves.
  3. ^ Long Beach was the last U.S. warship built on a true cruiser hull.

References

  1. ^ "Ship Naming in the United States Navy". Naval History and Heritage Command. Retrieved 24 July 2016.
  2. ^ "About ARCO". cap.navy.mil. Retrieved 23 March 2019.
  3. ^ "Now Hear This – The Right Destroyer at the Right Time". U.S. Naval Institute. Retrieved 27 October 2015.
  4. ^ "Navy History and Heritage Command: Ship Naming". history.navy.mil. Retrieved 10 January 2018.
  5. ^ a b c "Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress" (PDF). fas.org.
  6. ^ "SECNAV Names Two Future Virginia-Class Submarines Tang and Wahoo". navy.mil.
  7. ^ Congressional Research Service (12 June 2013). "Navy Ship Names". United States Naval Institute. Retrieved 7 November 2013.