Jump to content

Preon star: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Replacing deprecated latex syntax mw:Extension:Math/Roadmap
m target to section name
Tag: Redirect target changed
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[Exotic star#Preon stars]]
A '''preon star'''<ref name="Phys.Lett.B616,1(2005">
{{R from merge}}
{{cite journal
|last1=Hansson |first1=J
|last2=Sandin |first2=F
|date=2005
|title=Preon stars: a new class of cosmic compact objects
|journal=[[Physics Letters B]]
|volume=616 |issue= 1-2|pages=1-7
|arxiv=astro-ph/0410417
|doi=10.1016/j.physletb.2005.04.034
}}</ref> is a theoretical type of [[compact star]] made of [[preon]]s, which are [[point particle|"point-like" particles]] conceived to be subcomponents of [[quark]]s and [[lepton]]s.<ref>{{cite book|last1=D'Souza |first1=I.A.|last2=Kalman|first2=C.S.|year=1992|title=Preons: Models of Leptons, Quarks and Gauge Bosons as Composite Objects|publisher=[[World Scientific]]|isbn=978-981-02-1019-9}}</ref> Their existence was first theorized in
2005 by [[Fredrik Sandin]] and [[Johan Hansson (theorist)|Johan Hansson]], both from the [[Luleå University of Technology]], [[Sweden]].<ref name="b">{{cite news|last1=Dorminey|first1=Bruce|title=Focus: Nuggets of New Physics|url=https://physics.aps.org/story/v20/st18|accessdate=19 January 2017|work=Physics|date=20 November 2007}}</ref> The theory behind them was that the sub-subatomic particles would have come before subatomic particles, which came before particles, and that the original stars were made of these sub-subatomic particles, with most gradually becoming made of sub-particles, and then particles. However, the theory postulates that it is possible for some stars made of the sub-subatomic particles to remain.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Ball|first1=Philip|title=Splitting the quark|url=http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071130/full/news.2007.292.html|website=Nature News|accessdate=20 January 2017|language=en|doi=10.1038/news.2007.292|date=30 November 2007}}</ref> It is believed that they may also form out of massive stars that collapse too unstably to become neutron stars, but not enough to become black holes.<ref name="PDF"/>

==Properties==
The equation for the mass of a preon star is predicted to be: <math>M \sim 2 \times 10^{24} kg \left ( \frac{Te V}{\land} \right )^\tfrac{3}{2}</math>.<ref name="PDF">{{cite thesis |last= Sandin|first=Fredrik |date=2007 |title=Exotic Phases of Matter in Compact Stars|type= |chapter=1 |publisher=Luleå University of Technology |docket= |oclc= 185216905 |url=http://epubl.ltu.se/1402-1544/2007/05/LTU-DT-0705-SE.pdf |access-date=20 January 2017}}</ref> Where:
: {{var|M}} is the mass of the star.
: {{math|<math>{\land}</math>}} is the top quark compositeness energy scale.
: {{var|TeV}} is the number of tera-[[Electronvolt|electron volt]]s.
The equation for the radius of a preon star is estimated to be: <math>R \sim 3 \times 10^{-3} m \left ( \frac{Te V}{\land} \right )^\tfrac{3}{2}</math>.<ref name="PDF"/> Where:
: {{var|R}} is the radius of the star.
: {{math|<math>{\land}</math>}} is the top quark compositeness energy scale.
: {{var|TeV}} is the number of tera-[[Electronvolt|electron volt]]s.
The maximum mass of a preon star is predicted to be: <math> \sim 10^{2} M_\oplus</math>.<ref name="PDF"/> Where:
: {{var|<math>M_\oplus</math>}} is the mass of the earth.
The maximum radius of a preon star is predicted to be: <math>R \sim 1 m</math>.<ref name="PDF"/>
The average density of a preon star is predicted to be: <math> \sim 10^{23} g/cm^{3}</math>; however, the density of the center is predicted to be greater.<ref name="PDF"/>

If they exist, the eigenmode frequency for radial oscillations of a preon star will be 10<sup>6</sup> greater than that of a neutron star. As the radius will be roughly 10<sup>5</sup> smaller than the radius of a neutron star, if sound travels through preons at the same speed it does neutrons, then the frequency will be increased by 10<sup>5</sup>, giving [[GHz]] frequencies. If sound travels faster in preons than it does neutrons, the frequency cannot exceed <math> \sim 10^{8} m s^{-1} / 0.1m \eqsim 1 GHz</math> even if the speed of light is approached.<ref name="PDF"/>

The existence of preons could explain [[ultra-high-energy cosmic ray]]s, as no known type of star or object can project cosmic rays with as much energy as they have, going up to 10<sup>21</sup> eV. The possibility of a massive star collapsing and, being too unstable to collapse only to a pulsar star, collapsing all the way to a pulsar preon star with a radius of a meter and a mass of 100 earths, would allow pulsar yields of up to <math> \sim 10^{34} V/m </math>, which would be more than enough for an ultra-high-energy cosmic ray. It is believed that any preon star under the maximum mass will be stable.<ref name="PDF"/>

If preons exist, they, and by extension preon stars, will not perform [[nucleosynthesis]]. Nor will such stars emit [[Hawking radiation]]. It is believed that a preon star will have a large magnetic field, and rapid rotation.<ref name="PDF"/>

==Theory and evidence==
One of the reasons that the theory of preon stars has so few backers, is that the existence of preons would contradict not only the theory of the [[Higgs boson]], but also the [[Standard Model|Standard Model of Physics]].<ref>{{cite news|last1=Wilkins|first1=Alasdair|title=Stars so weird that they make black holes look boring|url=http://io9.gizmodo.com/5710012/quark-stars-and-strange-matter-a-guide-to-the-weirdest-stars-in-the-universe|accessdate=19 January 2017|work=io9}}</ref> As the Higgs boson was tentatively confirmed by [[CERN]], the prevailing theory at present is that preons' existence is impossible.<ref>{{cite web|last=O'Luanaigh |first=C.|date=14 March 2013|title=New results indicate that new particle is a Higgs boson|url=http://home.web.cern.ch/about/updates/2013/03/new-results-indicate-new-particle-higgs-boson|publisher=[[CERN]]|accessdate=19 January 2017}}</ref> The two methods that are used to try to find preons – [[gravitational femtolensing]] and searching for [[gravitational waves]] – have so far yielded nothing.<ref name="b"/>

Preons, if they exist, will be impossible to create even with the [[Large Hadron Collider]], as it would require conditions similar to those of the [[Big Bang]].<ref>{{cite web|title=The Odd Case of Preon Stars|url=http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/08/preons-splitting-the-quark-because-subatomic-physics-wasnt-complicated-enough.html|website=The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel|accessdate=20 January 2017}}</ref>

==References==
{{reflist}}

{{Star}}

[[Category:Star types]]
[[Category:Hypothetical stars]]

Latest revision as of 19:42, 2 July 2021

  • From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.