User talk:Mirrored7

Hello

Hi, sorry if I'm not doing this correctly, I'm not very skilled in editing on Wikipedia. But I noticed there was some incorrect information etc on the page for singer Allie X, I want to correct it but I messed up with the references. Could you help me out?Beminemylove (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Please read WP:POINT

Hi. Re this edit, I know it can be tempting when you disagree with something to try to make a point, but please read WP:POINT and understand that that kind of behaviour is nothing new to us here, and in fact just makes you look rather sulky and pouting. That's just advice, of course, make of it what you will. -- Begoon 13:25, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

March 2020

Your recent editing history at Ariana Grande shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ariana Grande. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 05:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Mirrored, your editing is veering into edit warring territory again. Please be sure to minimize reverting and instead work through disputes on talk pages, or you may be blocked for this again. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 14:52, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

I was open to discussing the issues with the user, but he didn't respond well or not at all. I see that he has some problems with other editors. He was warned yesterday, and doesn't seem to take critism very well. I hope you can look it up. x Mirrored7 (talk) 16:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Mirrored, I’m aware of the situation. You’ve both been warned about edit warring. Bawin has agreed to discuss on the talk page. If you are deciding to pursue enforcing your stance, then you are required to participate in the discussion. That goes for both of you. You both have two options. Discuss on the talk page and get a WP:CONSENSUS on your stance. Or drop it, and let the other editor move forward with their stance. Anyone who continues to revert without discussing or a consensus is going to be blocked. So please participate, or say you’re dropping it. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 17:50, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Signatures

Probably better to ask at the WP:Teahouse or WP:Helpdesk, try the Teahouse first. Doug Weller talk 14:51, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! :-) Mirrored7 (talk) 22:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Mirrored7, I would hope that you took on board what I replied to you on my talk page, but you clearly have not. Please refrain from vandalising articles through adding puffery e.g. "streaming pioneer". Also, do not remove information as your way of what I believe is your sort of "vengeance". The information added to Frank Ocean was supported by sources in the body of the article--you could take some "influence" from that. Isaacsorry (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

You are no better than me You don't seem to know Grande's music AT ALL. I will now undo my editing, and you your Frank Ocean page, and we will pretend nothing has happened. Mirrored7 (talk) 20:11, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Although I disagree with Isaacsorry in that I believe your edits are being done in good faith and are thus not vandalism, you need to stop edit warring right now. You are well past the 3RR. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:06, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

It's good that you notice it. I only notice things that are not always treated objectively. This user complains about Grande's lead, but does the same with his favorite artists. Mirrored7 (talk) 22:22, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Ariana discography

Am I missing out something here? I really want to know. Repeatedly pointing out not just by you that she is a streaming artist and that those worldwide numbers don't matter while at the time you are in a sales section that has noting to with nothing but sales.

If you can find other ww sales, add them up as well, it is welcomed to contribute. We work here with information that is available in the end.

Dhoffryn (talk) 06:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Why do you care so much? I clearly said that it doesn't make sense if we don't have sources for their other album sales either. As mentioned earlier, Grande is more of a streaming artist. Therefore, it would make more sense to include units (sales plus streaming), but they are no sources for this either. To get to the point, why only include worldwide sales of ONE album when if she's clearly not someone who sells albums anyway? Why not let it go completely then? Mirrored7 (talk) 07:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

• Even if there was a ww source of sales+streaming of her album it won't be included on the sales section of a discography of that page because it is ment only for pure sales (like it says sales, not adjusted sales, Nielsen report in detail breaks down sections about sales/adjusted sales/tracks/streams). And how can you say she does not sell albums when a reliable source IFPI publishes that in the streaming era she is a on a list pure sales on a global scale she is amongst top 10 seller list? Dhoffryn (talk) 07:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

I mean in general, she's not an album seller. This is her first year in the top ten there. That's why we don't have any sources of the years before. Her certification and sales doesn't add up. She's one of the biggest artist right now, and these numbers simply don't show it. Mirrored7 (talk) 09:56, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hannah Lux Davis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Drake and Halsey. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. BawinV (talk) 10:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —valereee (talk) 10:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi! Do you notice that the specific user is doing exactly the same thing? (puffery, unconstructive edits on page of his favourite artist). I always try to reasonably clear it up with him, but he's doing an edit war out of it. I tried to clear it up on the Taylor Swift talk page, but there were no reactions. Many users disagree with his edits and consider them to be extremely annoying and not objective. I wouldn't write anything if I knew I would be in wrong.Mirrored7 (talk) 11:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes, and I've warned blocked them, too. I don't really care who's right, here. I just want the edit warring to stop. —valereee (talk) 11:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

When your block expires, if you want to return to this, I'd suggest bringing your specific concerns to the talk page. Rather than saying that the page is full of puffy, specify which words and phrases you have a problem with. Best GirthSummit _(blether) 11:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Mirrored7, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, D🎅ggy54321 (ho-ho-ho) 14:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

D🎅ggy54321 ^(ho-ho-ho) 14:08, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Mirrored7, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, BawinV (talk) 14:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

BawinV (talk) 14:11, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Valentine Greets!!!

Valentine Greets!!!

Hello Mirrored7, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve, Happy editing, D💘ggy54321 (xoxo😘) 03:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Moving forward: please read

You have been told multiple times by multiple editors to stop your disruptive behaviour: [1] [2] [3] [4]. In particular, I have tried everything: I was nice, I warned you, I left you tips on how to be a better Wikipedian, etc. Wugapodes, an admin who knows a lot of stuff, cited the latter comment while closing your ANI case, saying "it’s generally good advice". I don’t have a diff (because I don’t wanna dig through the history at ANI to find something from two months ago), you’re just gonna have to trust me. And guess what? You haven’t taken a stitch of that advice. Edit warring? Still doing that. Communicating through edit summary? Still doing that. Bias? Still have that.

The point is: multiple editors on multiple occasions have told you to stop your disruptive behaviour. The examples above are just from your talk page, I’d be happy to provide examples outside of your talk. This has been happening for five months now. You are on very thin ice: you were reported at ANI in December, you have continued to disrupt Wikipedia, and, in the five months that we have been interacting, I have had two civil conversations with you where I haven't discussed your conduct.

Moving forward, here’s what I would like to see change. I’d like for you to read all the polices at WP:CONDUCT, all 12 of them. I'd also like for you to read WP:BRD, an extension of WP:CONSENSUS (listed at WP:CONDUCT). As well, I’d like to see you immediately halt communication through edit summary. Long story short: if your edit summary does not describe the edit you made, rewrite it. If you remove a period, your edit summary should be "minor: removed a period where it didn’t belong". There are no exceptions. I’d also like to see you abide to a strict voluntary 1RR. Long story short: if you have already reverted once on a page regarding the same content, do not revert again, regardless of the 24 hour time frame. Instead, follow WP:BRD and discuss on a relevant talk page until consensus is formed. Last but not least: maybe don’t remove most of your talk page comments. Removing warnings and discussions means you have acknowledged that the discussion exists, yet you are choosing to not respond to it and instead remove it. If you followed the four pieces of advice I’ve given here, you would be in a much better place. Remember that all of what I’ve said in the last paragraph comes from a place of tough love. Ah, but what do I know. Use this talk post as you will. D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 01:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

You'd do well to heed Doggy54321's advice to you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 06:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Greetings

Hello how are you Chloemimi (talk) 13:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Taylor Swift. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Amaury • 18:43, 2 September 2021 (UTC)