Jump to content

Talk:Second circle of hell: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
WugBot (talk | contribs)
m This article has been nominated at WP:DYKN to be featured on the main page. WugBot v0.4.0-dev
GAN
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|15:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Grapple X|ᵹʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ]] [[User talk:Grapple X|ꭗ]]|page=1|subtopic=Language and literature|status=|note=}}
{{WikiProject Poetry|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Poetry|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|class=start|importance=low}}

Revision as of 15:26, 28 November 2021

WikiProject iconPoetry Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMiddle Ages Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconChristianity Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPhilosophy Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
NiedrigThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk05:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The second circle of hell, by William Blake
The second circle of hell, by William Blake
Rodin's The Kiss
Rodin's The Kiss

Created by Grapple X (talk). Self-nominated at 22:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment, not review - Added the second picture and adjusted hooks. Earwig's complains about identical text in First circle of hell but you wrote that, so not a problem. If one of these alts are chosen, I think it should be in the image slot, the reader learns a lot more through these. The first image just needs a US-PD tag on commons. Urve (talk) 10:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Approve Main Hook and first image I see this is going to be a long-term project for you. I look forward to seeing all the other circles of hell. Anyways, article was moved to mainspace today, so is new enough. It is more than long enough and properly uses inline citations and I'll AGF on the offline sources. For the hooks...hmm...I think I'm leaning toward the main hook, just because I feel it's more likely to get people to click, which is one of the main points after all. The hook is interesting and cited inline. The QPQ has been done and image looks to be PD, so is good to be used. Everything seems good to go. SilverserenC 20:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting the main hook with image to Prep 2Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]