Jump to content

Bill of Peace: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BattyBot (talk | contribs)
m Removed non-content empty section(s), performed general fixes
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Cn}}
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
The Bill was limited until 1873 to equitable relief, including an [[injunction]], an accounting or a type of [[declaratory judgment]] called a “decree.” It could not be used for monetary relief and in this respect was similar to a representative action.<ref>Markt & Co Ltd. v Knight Steamship [1910] 2 K.B. 1021 at 1034 per Fletcher-Moulton LJ (Note however that in this case, which has determined the place of the representative action in English law ever since, that it is possible that the Bill of Peace and representative action were substantially confused in the minds of all the judges.)</ref>
The Bill was limited until 1873 to equitable relief, including an [[injunction]], an accounting or a type of [[declaratory judgment]] called a “decree.” It could not be used for monetary relief and in this respect was similar to a representative action.<ref>Markt & Co Ltd. v Knight Steamship [1910] 2 K.B. 1021 at 1034 per Fletcher-Moulton LJ (Note however that in this case, which has determined the place of the representative action in English law ever since, that it is possible that the Bill of Peace and representative action were substantially confused in the minds of all the judges.)</ref>


The practice was also used in the United States in [[mass tort]] or similar situations in the 19th and early 20th centuries.<ref name="duke">[http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=faculty_scholarship A DISTANT MIRROR: THE BILL OF PEACE IN EARLY AMERICAN MASS TORTS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN CLASS ACTIONS, Thomas D. Rowe, Jr.]</ref> Justice [[Joseph Story]], who served on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1811 to 1845, advocated the development of the Bill of Peace in the United States.<ref name="jrank">[http://law.jrank.org/pages/5271/Class-Action.html], Class Action - Should Class Actions Be Restricted?, Further Readings.</ref> The [[Supreme Court of the United States]] used the Bill of Peace concepts in development of the implementation of [[class action]] litigation. This evolution continued with [[Federal Equity Rules|Federal Equity Rule]] 48, in place in the United States from 1842 to 1912, which provided for a class action.<ref name="rutgers">[http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/lawjournal/37_2/fuoco.pdf LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD IN THE GARDEN STATE: A GUIDE TO NEW JERSEY CLASS ACTION CASE LAW]{{dead link|date=November 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, page 5</ref>
The practice was also used in the United States in [[mass tort]] or similar situations in the 19th and early 20th centuries.<ref name="duke">[http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=faculty_scholarship A DISTANT MIRROR: THE BILL OF PEACE IN EARLY AMERICAN MASS TORTS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN CLASS ACTIONS, Thomas D. Rowe, Jr.]</ref> Justice [[Joseph Story]], who served on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1811 to 1845, advocated the development of the Bill of Peace in the United States.{{cn|date=August 2022}} The [[Supreme Court of the United States]] used the Bill of Peace concepts in development of the implementation of [[class action]] litigation. This evolution continued with [[Federal Equity Rules|Federal Equity Rule]] 48, in place in the United States from 1842 to 1912, which provided for a class action.<ref name="rutgers">[http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/lawjournal/37_2/fuoco.pdf LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD IN THE GARDEN STATE: A GUIDE TO NEW JERSEY CLASS ACTION CASE LAW]{{dead link|date=November 2016 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}, page 5</ref>


The origins of the Bill of Peace practices, as well as [[class action]] lawsuits, may be centuries earlier, beginning as early as 1309 in the decisions of the English quasi-judicial counsel then known as the “General Eyre."<ref name="abanet">[http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/blt/2002-07-08/spence.html American Bar Association, Looking Back . . . In a Collective Way, A short history of class action law, By Susan T. Spence]</ref>
The origins of the Bill of Peace practices, as well as [[class action]] lawsuits, may be centuries earlier, beginning as early as 1309 in the decisions of the English quasi-judicial counsel then known as the “General Eyre."<ref name="abanet">{{Cite web |url=http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/blt/2002-07-08/spence.html |title=American Bar Association, Looking Back . . . In a Collective Way, A short history of class action law, By Susan T. Spence |access-date=2009-12-06 |archive-date=2005-02-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050216075307/http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/blt/2002-07-08/spence.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 19:09, 20 August 2022

Bill of Peace was an English court practice used in the 17th and 18th centuries for legal disputes involving multiple parties that shared common aspects. It allowed the English Court of Chancery to settle the rights of parties, a group known as the "multitude", in one suit, in equity court.[1]

If the equity court allowed the matter to proceed as a Bill of Peace, the results of the suit would bind all members of the “multitude,” whether they actually appeared in the case or not.

The Bill was limited until 1873 to equitable relief, including an injunction, an accounting or a type of declaratory judgment called a “decree.” It could not be used for monetary relief and in this respect was similar to a representative action.[2]

The practice was also used in the United States in mass tort or similar situations in the 19th and early 20th centuries.[3] Justice Joseph Story, who served on the U.S. Supreme Court from 1811 to 1845, advocated the development of the Bill of Peace in the United States.[citation needed] The Supreme Court of the United States used the Bill of Peace concepts in development of the implementation of class action litigation. This evolution continued with Federal Equity Rule 48, in place in the United States from 1842 to 1912, which provided for a class action.[4]

The origins of the Bill of Peace practices, as well as class action lawsuits, may be centuries earlier, beginning as early as 1309 in the decisions of the English quasi-judicial counsel then known as the “General Eyre."[5]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ FindLaw, Litigation Issues: What is a Class Action?
  2. ^ Markt & Co Ltd. v Knight Steamship [1910] 2 K.B. 1021 at 1034 per Fletcher-Moulton LJ (Note however that in this case, which has determined the place of the representative action in English law ever since, that it is possible that the Bill of Peace and representative action were substantially confused in the minds of all the judges.)
  3. ^ A DISTANT MIRROR: THE BILL OF PEACE IN EARLY AMERICAN MASS TORTS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN CLASS ACTIONS, Thomas D. Rowe, Jr.
  4. ^ LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD IN THE GARDEN STATE: A GUIDE TO NEW JERSEY CLASS ACTION CASE LAW[permanent dead link], page 5
  5. ^ "American Bar Association, Looking Back . . . In a Collective Way, A short history of class action law, By Susan T. Spence". Archived from the original on 2005-02-16. Retrieved 2009-12-06.