Jump to content

Dark star (Newtonian mechanics): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Sp
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.2
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Object with escape velocity exceeding the speed of light}}
{{About|astronomical objects described by Newtonian mechanics|the modern concept based on dark matter|dark star (dark matter)|the modern concept based on dark energy|dark energy star}}
{{About|astronomical objects described by Newtonian mechanics|the modern concept based on dark matter|dark star (dark matter)|the modern concept based on dark energy|dark energy star}}
{{no footnotes|date=March 2013}}
{{no footnotes|date=March 2013}}

A '''dark star''' is a theoretical object compatible with [[Newtonian mechanics]] that, due to its large mass, has a surface [[escape velocity]] that equals or exceeds the [[speed of light]]. Whether light is affected by gravity under [[Newtonian mechanics]] is unclear but if it were accelerated the same way as projectiles, any [[light]] emitted at the surface of a dark star would be trapped by the star's [[gravity]], rendering it dark, hence the name. Dark stars are analogous to [[black hole]]s in [[general relativity]].
A '''dark star''' is a theoretical object compatible with [[Newtonian mechanics]] that, due to its large mass, has a surface [[escape velocity]] that equals or exceeds the [[speed of light]]. Whether light is affected by gravity under [[Newtonian mechanics]] is unclear but if it were accelerated the same way as projectiles, any [[light]] emitted at the surface of a dark star would be trapped by the star's [[gravity]], rendering it dark, hence the name. Dark stars are analogous to [[black hole]]s in [[general relativity]].


==Dark star theory history==
==Dark star theory history==

===John Michell and dark stars===
===John Michell and dark stars===
During 1783 geologist [[John Michell]] wrote a letter to [[Henry Cavendish]] outlining the expected properties of dark stars, published by [[The Royal Society]] in their 1784 volume. Michell calculated that when the escape velocity at the surface of a star was equal to or greater than lightspeed, the generated light would be gravitationally trapped so that the star would not be visible to a distant astronomer.
During 1783 geologist [[John Michell]] wrote a letter to [[Henry Cavendish]] outlining the expected properties of dark stars, published by [[The Royal Society]] in their 1784 volume. Michell calculated that when the escape velocity at the surface of a star was equal to or greater than lightspeed, the generated light would be gravitationally trapped so that the star would not be visible to a distant astronomer.
Line 22: Line 21:


Because of the development of the wave theory of light, Laplace may have removed it from later editions as light came to be thought of as a massless wave, and therefore not influenced by gravity and as a group, physicists dropped the idea although the German physicist, mathematician, and astronomer [[Johann Georg von Soldner]] continued with [[Isaac Newton|Newton]]'s [[corpuscular theory of light]] as late as 1804.
Because of the development of the wave theory of light, Laplace may have removed it from later editions as light came to be thought of as a massless wave, and therefore not influenced by gravity and as a group, physicists dropped the idea although the German physicist, mathematician, and astronomer [[Johann Georg von Soldner]] continued with [[Isaac Newton|Newton]]'s [[corpuscular theory of light]] as late as 1804.

===Indirect radiation===
Dark stars and [[black hole]]s both have a surface escape velocity equal or greater than lightspeed, and a critical radius of ''r'' ≤ 2''M''.

However, the dark star is capable of emitting '''indirect radiation''' – outward-aimed light and matter can leave the ''r'' = 2''M'' surface briefly before being recaptured, and while outside the critical surface, can interact with other matter, or be accelerated free from the star through such interactions. A dark star, therefore, has a rarefied atmosphere of "visiting particles", and this ghostly halo of matter and light can radiate, albeit weakly. Also as [[Faster than light]] speeds are possible in Newtonian mechanics, it is possible for particles to escape.


==Comparisons with black holes ==
==Comparisons with black holes ==
; Indirect radiation
:Dark stars and [[black hole]]s both have a surface escape velocity equal or greater than lightspeed, and a critical radius of ''r'' ≤ 2''M''.
:However, the dark star is capable of emitting '''indirect radiation''' – outward-aimed light and matter can leave the ''r'' = 2''M'' surface briefly before being recaptured, and while outside the critical surface, can interact with other matter, or be accelerated free from the star through such interactions. A dark star, therefore, has a rarefied atmosphere of "visiting particles", and this ghostly halo of matter and light can radiate, albeit weakly. Also as [[Faster than light|faster-than-light]] speeds are possible in Newtonian mechanics, it is possible for particles to escape.
; Radiation effects
; Radiation effects
: A dark star may emit indirect radiation as described above. Black holes as described by current theories about quantum mechanics emit radiation through a different process, [[Hawking radiation]], first postulated in 1975. The radiation emitted by a dark star depends on its composition and structure; Hawking radiation, by the [[no-hair theorem]], is generally thought of as depending only on the black hole's mass, charge, and angular momentum, although the [[black hole information paradox]] makes this controversial.
: A dark star may emit indirect radiation as described above. Black holes as described by current theories about quantum mechanics emit radiation through a different process, [[Hawking radiation]], first postulated in 1975. The radiation emitted by a dark star depends on its composition and structure; Hawking radiation, by the [[no-hair theorem]], is generally thought of as depending only on the black hole's mass, charge, and angular momentum, although the [[black hole information paradox]] makes this controversial.
Line 41: Line 38:


==References==
==References==
* {{Citation |last1= Michell |first1= John |title= On the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &c. of the Fixed Stars, in Consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Their Light, in Case Such a Diminution Should be Found to Take Place in any of Them, and Such Other Data Should be Procured from Observations, as Would be Farther Necessary for That Purpose. By the Rev. John Michell, B. D. F. R. S. In a Letter to Henry Cavendish, Esq. F. R. S. and A. S |jstor= 106576 |date= 1784 |journal= [[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London]] |issn= 0080-4614 |volume= 74 |pages= 35–57 |bibcode= 1784RSPT...74...35M |doi= 10.1098/rstl.1784.0008 |url= https://zenodo.org/record/1432270/files/article.pdf }}
* {{Citation |last1= Michell |first1= John |title= On the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &c. of the Fixed Stars, in Consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Their Light, in Case Such a Diminution Should be Found to Take Place in any of Them, and Such Other Data Should be Procured from Observations, as Would be Farther Necessary for That Purpose. By the Rev. John Michell, B. D. F. R. S. In a Letter to Henry Cavendish, Esq. F. R. S. and A. S |jstor= 106576 |date= 1784 |journal= [[Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London]] |issn= 0080-4614 |volume= 74 |pages= 35–57 |bibcode= 1784RSPT...74...35M |doi= 10.1098/rstl.1784.0008 |url= https://zenodo.org/record/1432270 |doi-access= free }}
* {{cite journal |author-link= Simon Schaffer |first= Simon |last= Schaffer |title= John Michell and black holes |url= http://jha.sagepub.com/content/10/1/42.extract |journal= Journal for the History of Astronomy |volume= 10 |pages= 42–43 |date= 1979 |doi= 10.1177/002182867901000104 |bibcode= 1979JHA....10...42S }}
* {{cite journal |author-link= Simon Schaffer |first= Simon |last= Schaffer |title= John Michell and black holes |url= http://jha.sagepub.com/content/10/1/42.extract |journal= Journal for the History of Astronomy |volume= 10 |pages= 42–43 |date= 1979 |doi= 10.1177/002182867901000104 |bibcode= 1979JHA....10...42S |s2cid= 123958527 |access-date= 2016-02-04 |archive-date= 2020-05-22 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200522223131/http://jha.sagepub.com/content/10/1/42.extract/ |url-status= dead }}
* {{cite journal |first= Gary |last= Gibbons |title= The man who invented black holes [his work emerges out of the dark after two centuries] |journal= New Scientist |date= 28 June 1979 |page= 1101 }}
* {{cite journal |first= Gary |last= Gibbons |title= The man who invented black holes [his work emerges out of the dark after two centuries] |journal= New Scientist |date= 28 June 1979 |page= 1101 }}
* {{cite book |first= Werner |last= Israel |chapter= Dark stars: The evolution of an idea |pages= 199–276 |editor-first1= Stephen W |editor-last1= Hawking |editor-first2= Wemer |editor-last2= Israel |title= Three hundred years of gravitation |date= 1987 |isbn= 9780521379762 }}
* {{cite book |first= Werner |last= Israel |chapter= Dark stars: The evolution of an idea |pages= 199–276 |editor-first1= Stephen W |editor-last1= Hawking |editor-first2= Wemer |editor-last2= Israel |title= Three hundred years of gravitation |date= 1987 |isbn= 9780521379762 }}
* {{cite journal |first= J |last= Eisenstaedt |title= De L'influence de la gravitation sur la propagation de la lumière en théorie Newtonienne. L'archéologie des trous noirs |trans-title= The influence of gravity on the propagation of light in Newtonian theory. The archeology black holes |journal= Archive for History of Exact Sciences |volume= 42 |issue= 4 |pages= 315–386 |date= Dec 1991 |doi= 10.1007/BF00375157 |bibcode= 1991AHES...42..315E }}
* {{cite journal |first= J |last= Eisenstaedt |title= De L'influence de la gravitation sur la propagation de la lumière en théorie Newtonienne. L'archéologie des trous noirs |trans-title= The influence of gravity on the propagation of light in Newtonian theory. The archeology black holes |journal= Archive for History of Exact Sciences |volume= 42 |issue= 4 |pages= 315–386 |date= Dec 1991 |doi= 10.1007/BF00375157 |bibcode= 1991AHES...42..315E |s2cid= 121763556 }}
* {{cite book |author-link= Kip Thorne |last= Thorne |first= Kip |title= Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy |publisher= [[W. W. Norton & Company]] |edition= Reprint |date= January 1, 1995 |isbn= 978-0-393-31276-8 |quote= See Chapter 3 "Black holes discovered and rejected" |title-link= Black Holes and Time Warps }}
* {{cite book |author-link= Kip Thorne |last= Thorne |first= Kip |title= Black Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy |publisher= [[W. W. Norton & Company]] |edition= Reprint |date= January 1, 1995 |isbn= 978-0-393-31276-8 |quote= See Chapter 3 "Black holes discovered and rejected" |title-link= Black Holes and Time Warps }}
* {{Cite journal |first1= Katherine |last1= Freese |first2= Paolo |last2= Gondolo |first3= Douglas |last3= Spolyar |title= The Effect of Dark Matter on the First Stars: A New Phase of Stellar Evolution |volume= 990 |pages= 42–44 |year= 2008 |doi= 10.1063/1.2905656 |journal= AIP Conference Proceedings |arxiv = 0709.2369 |bibcode= 2008AIPC..990...42F |citeseerx= 10.1.1.245.379}}
* {{cite journal |first= Maggie |last= McKee |title= Universe's first stars may have been dark |journal= New Scientist |date= Dec 3, 2007 }}
* {{cite journal |first= Douglas |last= Spolyar |first2= Katherine |last2= Freese |first3= Paolo |last3= Gondolo |title= Dark Matter and the First Stars: A New Phase of Stellar Evolution |journal= [[Physical Review Letters]] |volume= 100 |issue= 5 |page= 051101 |year= 2008 |doi= 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.051101 |bibcode= 2008PhRvL.100e1101S |arxiv= 0705.0521 |pmid=18352355}}


{{black holes}}
{{black holes}}
Line 55: Line 49:


{{DEFAULTSORT:Dark Star (Newtonian Mechanics)}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Dark Star (Newtonian Mechanics)}}
[[Category:Dark concepts in astrophysics]]
[[Category:Obsolete theories in physics]]
[[Category:Stellar black holes]]
[[Category:Stellar black holes]]
[[Category:History of physics]]
[[Category:Star types]]
[[Category:Obsolete scientific theories]]

Latest revision as of 14:33, 11 October 2022

A dark star is a theoretical object compatible with Newtonian mechanics that, due to its large mass, has a surface escape velocity that equals or exceeds the speed of light. Whether light is affected by gravity under Newtonian mechanics is unclear but if it were accelerated the same way as projectiles, any light emitted at the surface of a dark star would be trapped by the star's gravity, rendering it dark, hence the name. Dark stars are analogous to black holes in general relativity.

Dark star theory history

[edit]

John Michell and dark stars

[edit]

During 1783 geologist John Michell wrote a letter to Henry Cavendish outlining the expected properties of dark stars, published by The Royal Society in their 1784 volume. Michell calculated that when the escape velocity at the surface of a star was equal to or greater than lightspeed, the generated light would be gravitationally trapped so that the star would not be visible to a distant astronomer.

If the semi-diameter of a sphere of the same density as the Sun were to exceed that of the Sun in the proportion of 500 to 1, a body falling from an infinite height towards it would have acquired at its surface greater velocity than that of light, and consequently supposing light to be attracted by the same force in proportion to its vis inertiae, with other bodies, all light emitted from such a body would be made to return towards it by its own proper gravity. This assumes that gravity influences light in the same way as massive objects.

Michell's idea for calculating the number of such "invisible" stars anticipated 20th century astronomers' work: he suggested that since a certain proportion of double-star systems might be expected to contain at least one "dark" star, we could search for and catalogue as many double-star systems as possible, and identify cases where only a single circling star was visible. This would then provide a statistical baseline for calculating the amount of other unseen stellar matter that might exist in addition to the visible stars.

Dark stars and gravitational shifts

[edit]

Michell also suggested that future astronomers might be able to identify the surface gravity of a distant star by seeing how far the star's light was shifted to the weaker end of the spectrum, a precursor of Einstein's 1911 gravity-shift argument. However, Michell cited Newton as saying that blue light was less energetic than red (Newton thought that more massive particles were associated with bigger wavelengths), so Michell's predicted spectral shifts were in the wrong direction. It is difficult to tell whether Michell's careful citing of Newton's position on this may have reflected a lack of conviction on Michell's part over whether Newton was correct or just academic thoroughness.

Wave theory of light

[edit]

In 1796, the mathematician Pierre-Simon Laplace promoted the same idea in the first and second editions of his book Exposition du système du Monde, independently of Michell.

Because of the development of the wave theory of light, Laplace may have removed it from later editions as light came to be thought of as a massless wave, and therefore not influenced by gravity and as a group, physicists dropped the idea although the German physicist, mathematician, and astronomer Johann Georg von Soldner continued with Newton's corpuscular theory of light as late as 1804.

Comparisons with black holes

[edit]
Indirect radiation
Dark stars and black holes both have a surface escape velocity equal or greater than lightspeed, and a critical radius of r ≤ 2M.
However, the dark star is capable of emitting indirect radiation – outward-aimed light and matter can leave the r = 2M surface briefly before being recaptured, and while outside the critical surface, can interact with other matter, or be accelerated free from the star through such interactions. A dark star, therefore, has a rarefied atmosphere of "visiting particles", and this ghostly halo of matter and light can radiate, albeit weakly. Also as faster-than-light speeds are possible in Newtonian mechanics, it is possible for particles to escape.
Radiation effects
A dark star may emit indirect radiation as described above. Black holes as described by current theories about quantum mechanics emit radiation through a different process, Hawking radiation, first postulated in 1975. The radiation emitted by a dark star depends on its composition and structure; Hawking radiation, by the no-hair theorem, is generally thought of as depending only on the black hole's mass, charge, and angular momentum, although the black hole information paradox makes this controversial.
Light-bending effects
If Newtonian physics does have a gravitational deflection of light (Newton, Cavendish, Soldner), general relativity predicts twice as much deflection in a light beam skimming the Sun. This difference can be explained by the additional contribution of the curvature of space under modern theory: while Newtonian gravitation is analogous to the space-time components of general relativity's Riemann curvature tensor, the curvature tensor only contains purely spatial components, and both forms of curvature contribute to the total deflection.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]