Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comet (Santa Claus's reindeer): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 04:01, 6 February 2023

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Santa Claus's reindeer. Courcelles 00:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comet (Santa Claus's reindeer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is already an article for this subject, Santa Claus's reindeer, so we don't need this article. The new material here is dubious and only appears to be supported by unreliable sources. Bennyhui (talk) 11:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A seperate article for each reindeer is totally unecessary. They are not independently notable, and having their own article is disproportionate to the sources and material available.--Korruski^Talk 12:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable reindeer. Totally unnecessary to have a separate article. Redirect to main article at Santa Claus's reindeer. -- Brangifer (talk) 14:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any reliably sourced material to Santa Claus's reindeer and redirect. Rlendog (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect as with the other seven reindeer. --MelanieN (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - And to those advocating a merge, what exactly is there to merge? Note that WikiAnswers is not a reliable source so the article's verifiable content is essentially that this is one of Santa's reindeer which is pretty much covered by Santa Claus's reindeer. -- Whpq (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was    '''merge to [[Santa Claus's reindeer]]'''. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 00:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 ===[[Comet (Santa Claus's reindeer)]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}}
 :{{la|Comet (Santa Claus's reindeer)}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comet (Santa Claus&#39;s reindeer)|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2011 January 5#{{anchorencode:Comet (Santa Claus's reindeer)}}|View log]]</noinclude>)
 :({{Find sources|Comet (Santa Claus's reindeer)}})
 There is already an article for this subject, Santa Claus's reindeer, so we don't need this article. The new material here is dubious and only appears to be supported by unreliable sources. [[User:Bennyhui|Bennyhui]] ([[User talk:Bennyhui|talk]]) 11:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
-*'''Delete'''. A seperate article for each reindeer is totally unecessary. They are not independently notable, and having their own article is disproportionate to the sources and material available.--[[User:Korruski|<strong><font color="#96C8A2">K</font><font color="black">orr</font><font color="#96C8A2">u</font><font color="black">ski</font></strong>]]<sup>[[User talk:Korruski|<font color="#96C8A2">Talk</font>]]</sup> 12:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. A seperate article for each reindeer is totally unecessary. They are not independently notable, and having their own article is disproportionate to the sources and material available.--[[User:Korruski|<strong><span style="color:#96C8A2;">K</span><span style="color:black;">orr</span><span style="color:#96C8A2;">u</span><span style="color:black;">ski</span></strong>]]<sup>[[User talk:Korruski|<span style="color:#96C8A2;">Talk</span>]]</sup> 12:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. Non notable reindeer. Totally unnecessary to have a separate article. Redirect to main article at [[Santa Claus's reindeer]]. -- [[User:BullRangifer|Brangifer]] ([[User talk:BullRangifer|talk]]) 14:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Merge''' any reliably sourced material to [[Santa Claus's reindeer]] and '''redirect'''. [[User:Rlendog|Rlendog]] ([[User talk:Rlendog|talk]]) 22:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Merge/redirect''' as with the other seven reindeer. --[[User:MelanieN|MelanieN]] ([[User talk:MelanieN|talk]]) 15:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - And to those advocating a merge, what exactly is there to merge?  Note that WikiAnswers is not a reliable source so the article's verifiable content is essentially that this is one of Santa's reindeer which is pretty much covered by [[Santa Claus's reindeer]]. -- [[User:Whpq|Whpq]] ([[User talk:Whpq|talk]]) 17:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>