Jump to content

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 141: Difference between revisions

Add links
Coordinates: 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m →‎External links: clearing manual creation of category
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|None}}

{{Use American English|date=September 2020}}
{{Use American English|date=September 2020}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2021}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2021}}
Line 5: Line 7:
| image = Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
| image = Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
| imagesize = 180
| imagesize = 180
⚫
| established = {{start date and age|1789|3|4}}
| established = {{start date and age|1789|3|4}}<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lawson|first1=Gary|last2=Seidman|first2=Guy|title=When Did the Constitution Become Law?|journal=Notre Dame Law Review|volume=77|pages=1–37|year=2001|url=http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol77/iss1/1/}}</ref>
| location = [[Washington, D.C.]]
| location = [[Washington, D.C.]]
| coordinates = {{Coord|38|53|26|N|77|00|16|W|type:landmark_region:US-DC|display=inline,title}}
| coordinates = {{Coord|38|53|26|N|77|00|16|W|type:landmark_region:US-DC|display=inline,title}}
| type = Presidential nomination with Senate [[advice and consent|confirmation]]
| type = Presidential nomination with Senate [[advice and consent|confirmation]]
| authority = [[Constitution of the United States]], Art. III, §{{nbsp}}1
| authority = [[Constitution of the United States]], Art. III, §{{nbsp}}1
| terms = life tenure, subject to [[Impeachment in the United States|impeachment]] and removal
| terms = life tenure, subject to [[Federal impeachment in the United States|impeachment]] and removal
| positions = 9 (by statute)
| positions = 9 (by statute)
| website = {{URL|supremecourt.gov}}
| website = {{URL|supremecourt.gov}}
| chiefjudgetitle = [[Chief Justice of the United States]]
| chiefjudgename = [[John Roberts]]
⚫
| termstart = {{Start date and age|2005|09|29}}
}}
}}
{{SCOTUS series}}
{{SCOTUS series}}


{{United States constitutional law}}
{{United States constitutional law}}
This is a '''list of the 72 cases reported in volume 141 of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] in 1891.
This is a '''list of cases reported in volume 141 of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] in 1891.


== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 141 U.S. ==
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 141 U.S. ==
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States}}
{{see also|List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office}}
{{see also|List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office}}
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}

⚫
{{see also|Fuller Court}}
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice).
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=April 7, 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice).


When the cases in volume 141 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
When the cases in volume 141 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:
Line 32: Line 32:
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Portrait
! Portrait !! Justice !! Office !! Home State !! Succeeded !! Date confirmed by the Senate<br />(Vote) !! Tenure on Supreme Court
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Justice
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Office
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Home State
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Succeeded
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Date confirmed by the Senate<br />(Vote)
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Tenure on Supreme Court
|-
|-
| [[File:Melville Weston Fuller Chief Justice 1908.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Melville Weston Fuller Chief Justice 1908.jpg|75px]]
| [[Melville Fuller]]
| [[Melville Fuller]]
| [[Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Chief Justice]]
| [[Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Chief Justice]]
Line 42: Line 48:
| {{dts|October 8, 1888}}<br />–<br />July 4, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|October 8, 1888}}<br />–<br />July 4, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Stephen Johnson Field, photo half length seated, 1875.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Stephen Johnson Field, photo half length seated, 1875.jpg|75px]]
| [[Stephen Johnson Field]]
| [[Stephen Johnson Field]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 50: Line 56:
|{{dts|May 10, 1863}}<br />–<br />December 1, 1897<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
|{{dts|May 10, 1863}}<br />–<br />December 1, 1897<br /><small>(Retired)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Joseph Philo Bradley - Brady-Handy.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Joseph Philo Bradley - Brady-Handy.jpg|75px]]
| [[Joseph P. Bradley]]
| [[Joseph P. Bradley]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 58: Line 64:
| {{dts|March 23, 1870}}<br />–<br />January 22, 1892<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|March 23, 1870}}<br />–<br />January 22, 1892<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:JudgeJMHarlan.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:JudgeJMHarlan.jpg|75px]]
| [[John Marshall Harlan]]
| [[John Marshall Harlan]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 66: Line 72:
| {{dts|December 10, 1877}}<br />–<br />October 14, 1911<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|December 10, 1877}}<br />–<br />October 14, 1911<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Horacegrayphoto.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Horacegrayphoto.jpg|75px]]
| [[Horace Gray]]
| [[Horace Gray]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 74: Line 80:
| {{dts|January 9, 1882}}<br />–<br />September 15, 1902<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|January 9, 1882}}<br />–<br />September 15, 1902<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Samuel Blatchford, US Supreme Court Justice.png|100px]]
| [[File:Samuel Blatchford, US Supreme Court Justice.png|75px]]
| [[Samuel Blatchford]]
| [[Samuel Blatchford]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 82: Line 88:
| {{dts|April 3, 1882}}<br />–<br />July 7, 1893<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|April 3, 1882}}<br />–<br />July 7, 1893<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar II - Brady-Handy.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar II - Brady-Handy.jpg|75px]]
| [[Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar]]
| [[Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 90: Line 96:
| {{dts|January 18, 1888}}<br />–<br />January 23, 1893<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|January 18, 1888}}<br />–<br />January 23, 1893<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:DavidBrewer.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:DavidBrewer.jpg|75px]]
| [[David Josiah Brewer]]
| [[David Josiah Brewer]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 98: Line 104:
| {{dts|January 6, 1890}}<br />–<br />March 28, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
| {{dts|January 6, 1890}}<br />–<br />March 28, 1910<br /><small>(Died)</small>
|-
|-
| [[File:Portrait of Henry Billings Brown.jpg|100px]]
| [[File:Portrait of Henry Billings Brown.jpg|75px]]
| [[Henry Billings Brown]]
| [[Henry Billings Brown]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
| [[Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States|Associate Justice]]
Line 110: Line 116:
==Notable Case in 141 U.S.==
==Notable Case in 141 U.S.==
===''Marshall v. Holmes''===
===''Marshall v. Holmes''===
In ''[[Marshall v. Holmes]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93180/marshall-v-holmes/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 141 U.S. 589 (1891)], the Supreme Court held it [[Unconscionability|unconscionable]] to allow a state court's decision to stand that had been based on documents later exposed as forgeries. It permitted a federal case seeking to set that verdict aside to go forward. Other courts noted shortly afterwards that the invocation of unconscionability seemed to conflict with the Court's holding 13 years earlier in ''[[United States v. Throckmorton]]'' that equitable relief could not be granted in cases of [[intrinsic fraud]]. The Court was asked later in ''[[Graver v. Faurot]]'' to reconcile the two cases, but declined. As of the early 21st century this issue remains unresolved; some state courts and the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit|Third Circuit Court of Appeals]] have held that ''Marshall'' overruled ''Throckmorton'' while others have reaffirmed the latter case.
In ''[[Marshall v. Holmes]]'', [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93180/marshall-v-holmes 141 U.S. 589 (1891)], the Supreme Court held it [[Unconscionability|unconscionable]] to allow a state court's decision to stand that had been based on documents later exposed as forgeries. It permitted a federal case seeking to set that verdict aside to go forward. Other courts noted shortly afterwards that the invocation of unconscionability seemed to conflict with the Court's holding 13 years earlier in ''[[United States v. Throckmorton]]'' that equitable relief could not be granted in cases of [[intrinsic fraud]]. The Court was asked later in ''[[Graver v. Faurot]]'' to reconcile the two cases, but declined. As of the early 21st century this issue remains unresolved; some state courts and the [[United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit|Third Circuit Court of Appeals]] have held that ''Marshall'' overruled ''Throckmorton'' while others have reaffirmed the latter case.


== Citation style ==
== Citation style ==
{{see also|United States district court}}
{{see also|United States district court}}
{{see also|United States circuit court}}
{{see also|United States court of appeals}}
{{see also|United States court of appeals}}
{{see also|United States federal courts}}
{{see also|United States federal courts}}
Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited [[Original jurisdiction|original jurisdiction]] (''i.e.,'' in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited [[original jurisdiction]] (''i.e.,'' in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.


The [[Judiciary Act of 1891]], created the [[United States Courts of Appeals]] and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the [[United States district court|district]] and [[United States circuit court|circuit]] courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States circuit courts of appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by [[writ of certiorari]]. The change resulted in an immediate reduction in the Supreme Court's workload (from 623 cases filed in 1890 to 379 in 1891 and 275 in 1892).
The [[Judiciary Act of 1891]] created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by [[writ of certiorari]]. The change resulted in an immediate reduction in the Supreme Court's workload (from 623 cases filed in 1890 to 379 in 1891 and 275 in 1892).


[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
Line 136: Line 143:


== List of cases in volume 141 U.S. ==
== List of cases in volume 141 U.S. ==

⚫
{{see also|Fuller Court}}


{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
|-
|-
! scope="col" style="width: 433px;" | Case Name
! scope="col" style="width: 380px;" | Case Name
! scope="col" style="width: 90px;" | Page & year
! scope="col" style="width: 95px;" | Page and year
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)
! scope="col" style="width: 133px;" | Lower Court
! scope="col" style="width: 155px;" | Lower Court
! scope="col" style="width: 233px;" | Disposition of case
! scope="col" style="width: 133px;" | Disposition
|-
|-
| ''In re Garnett''
| ''In re Garnett''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93123/in-re-garnett/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 1 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93123/in-re-garnett/ 1 (1891)]
| Bradley
| Bradley
| none
| none
Line 155: Line 164:
| [[writ of prohibition|prohibition]] denied
| [[writ of prohibition|prohibition]] denied
|-
|-
| ''[[Pullman Company|Pullman's Palace-Car Co.]] v. [[Pennsylvania]]''
| ''[[Pullman Company|Pullman's Palace Car Company]] v. [[Pennsylvania]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93124/pullmans-palace-car-co-v-pennsylvania/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 18 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93124/pullmans-palace-car-co-v-pennsylvania/ 18 (1891)]
| Gray
| Gray
| none
| none
Line 163: Line 172:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''[[Pullman Company|Pullman's Palace-Car Co.]] v. Hayward''
| ''[[Pullman Company|Pullman's Palace Car Company]] v. Hayward''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93125/pullmans-palace-car-co-v-hayward/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 36 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93125/pullmans-palace-car-co-v-hayward/ 36 (1891)]
| Gray
| Gray
| none
| none
Line 171: Line 180:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''[[Massachusetts]] v. [[Western Union]] Tel. Co.''
| ''[[Massachusetts]] v. [[Western Union]] Telegraph Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93126/mass-v-western-un-tel-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 40 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93126/mass-v-western-un-tel-co/ 40 (1891)]
| Gray
| Gray
| none
| none
Line 180: Line 189:
|-
|-
| ''Crutcher v. [[Kentucky]]''
| ''Crutcher v. [[Kentucky]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93127/crutcher-v-kentucky/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 47 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93127/crutcher-v-kentucky/ 47 (1891)]
| Bradley
| Bradley
| none
| none
Line 188: Line 197:
|-
|-
| ''Voight v. Wright''
| ''Voight v. Wright''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93128/voight-v-wright/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 62 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93128/voight-v-wright/ 62 (1891)]
| Bradley
| Bradley
| none
| none
Line 195: Line 204:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Stein v. Bienville Water Supply Co.''
| ''Stein v. Bienville Water Supply Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93129/stein-v-bienville-water-supply-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 67 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93129/stein-v-bienville-water-supply-co/ 67 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 204: Line 213:
|-
|-
| ''Parker v. Ormsby''
| ''Parker v. Ormsby''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93130/parker-v-ormsby/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 81 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93130/parker-v-ormsby/ 81 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 212: Line 221:
|-
|-
| ''Carpenter v. Strange''
| ''Carpenter v. Strange''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93131/carpenter-v-strange/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 87 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93131/carpenter-v-strange/ 87 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 220: Line 229:
|-
|-
| ''Evans v. State Bank''
| ''Evans v. State Bank''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1216059/evans-v-state-bank/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 107 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1216059/evans-v-state-bank/ 107 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 228: Line 237:
|-
|-
| ''In re Mayfield''
| ''In re Mayfield''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93132/in-re-mayfield/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 107 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93132/in-re-mayfield/ 107 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
Line 236: Line 245:
|-
|-
| ''Reynolds v. Burns''
| ''Reynolds v. Burns''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93133/reynolds-v-burns/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 117 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93133/reynolds-v-burns/ 117 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Denny v. Pironi''
| ''Denny v. Pironi''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93134/denny-v-pironi/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 121 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93134/denny-v-pironi/ 121 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
Line 251: Line 260:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[St. Louis–San Francisco Railway|St. Louis & S.F. Ry. Co.]] v. McBride''
| ''[[St. Louis–San Francisco Railway|St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company]] v. McBride''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93135/st-louis-san-francisco-r-co-v-mcbride/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 127 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93135/st-louis-san-francisco-r-co-v-mcbride/ 127 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
Line 260: Line 269:
|-
|-
| ''Briggs v. Spaulding''
| ''Briggs v. Spaulding''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93136/briggs-v-spaulding/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 132 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93136/briggs-v-spaulding/ 132 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 268: Line 277:
|-
|-
| ''McAllister v. United States''
| ''McAllister v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93137/mcallister-v-united-states/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 174 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93137/mcallister-v-united-states/ 174 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 276: Line 285:
|-
|-
| ''Wingard v. United States''
| ''Wingard v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93138/wingard-v-united-states/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 201 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93138/wingard-v-united-states/ 201 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 284: Line 293:
|-
|-
| ''Gorman v. Havird''
| ''Gorman v. Havird''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93139/gorman-v-havird/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 206 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93139/gorman-v-havird/ 206 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Idaho Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Idaho]]
| [[Idaho Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Idaho]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Caldwell v. [[Texas]]''
| ''Caldwell v. [[Texas]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93140/caldwell-v-state-of-texas/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 209 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93140/caldwell-v-state-of-texas/ 209 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Texas Courts of Appeals|Tex. Ct. App.]]
| [[Texas Courts of Appeals|Tex. Civ. App.]]
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
Line 308: Line 317:
|-
|-
| ''Schutz v. Jordan''
| ''Schutz v. Jordan''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93142/schutz-v-jordan/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 213 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93142/schutz-v-jordan/ 213 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
Line 315: Line 324:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Gregory Consol. Mining Co. v. Starr''
| ''Gregory Consolidated Mining Company v. Starr''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93143/gregory-consol-mining-co-v-starr/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 222 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93143/gregory-consol-mining-co-v-starr/ 222 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Montana Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Mont.]]
| [[Montana Supreme Court|Sup. Ct. Terr. Mont.]]
| multiple
| affirmed (1st); dismissed for want of jurisdiction (2d)
|-
|-
| ''Pacific Nat'l Bank v. Eaton''
| ''Pacific National Bank v. Eaton''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93144/pacific-nat-bank-v-eaton/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 227 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93144/pacific-nat-bank-v-eaton/ 227 (1891)]
| Bradley
| Bradley
| none
| none
Line 332: Line 341:
|-
|-
| ''Thayer v. Butler''
| ''Thayer v. Butler''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93145/thayer-v-butler/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 234 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93145/thayer-v-butler/ 234 (1891)]
| Bradley
| Bradley
| none
| none
Line 340: Line 349:
|-
|-
| ''Butler v. Eaton''
| ''Butler v. Eaton''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93146/butler-v-eaton/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 240 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93146/butler-v-eaton/ 240 (1891)]
| Bradley
| Bradley
| none
| none
Line 347: Line 356:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Tuskaloosa N. Ry. Co. v. Gude''
| ''Tuskaloosa Northern Railway Company v. Gude''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93147/tuskaloosa-n-ry-co-v-gude/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 244 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93147/tuskaloosa-n-ry-co-v-gude/ 244 (1891)]
| ''[[per curiam]]''
| ''[[per curiam]]''
| none
| none
Line 355: Line 364:
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Williams v. Passumpsic Sav. Bank''
| ''Williams v. Passumpsic Savings Bank''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93148/williams-v-passumpsic-sav-bank/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 249 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93148/williams-v-passumpsic-sav-bank/ 249 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 363: Line 372:
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''[[Union Pacific Railroad|Union P. Ry. Co.]] v. Botsford''
| ''[[Union Pacific Railroad]] Company v. Botsford''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93149/union-pacific-r-co-v-botsford/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=1 250 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93149/union-pacific-r-co-v-botsford/ 250 (1891)]
| Gray
| Gray
| none
| none
Line 372: Line 381:
|-
|-
| ''Griswold v. Hazard''
| ''Griswold v. Hazard''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93151/griswold-v-hazard/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 260 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93151/griswold-v-hazard/ 260 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
| Brewer
| Brewer
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.D.R.I.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.D.R.I.]]
| multiple
| affirmed (1st, 3d); reversed (2d, 4th)
|-
|-
| ''Potter v. Couch''
| ''Potter v. Couch''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93152/potter-v-couch/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 296 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93152/potter-v-couch/ 296 (1891)]
| Gray
| Gray
| none
| none
Line 388: Line 397:
|-
|-
| ''In re Green''
| ''In re Green''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93153/in-re-green/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 325 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93153/in-re-green/ 325 (1891)]
| Field
| Field
| none
| none
Line 396: Line 405:
|-
|-
| ''McNulta v. Lochridge''
| ''McNulta v. Lochridge''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93154/mcnulta-v-lochridge/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 327 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93154/mcnulta-v-lochridge/ 327 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
Line 403: Line 412:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Magowan v. [[New York Belting and Packing Co.|N.Y. Belting & Packing Co.]]''
| ''Magowan v. [[New York Belting and Packing Co.|New York Belting and Packing Company]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93155/magowan-v-new-york-belting-packing-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 332 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93155/magowan-v-new-york-belting-packing-co/ 332 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
Line 412: Line 421:
|-
|-
| ''Gage v. Bani''
| ''Gage v. Bani''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93156/gage-v-bani/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 344 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93156/gage-v-bani/ 344 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 419: Line 428:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''United States v. [[Missouri–Kansas–Texas Railroad|Missouri K. & T. Ry. Co.]]''
| ''United States v. [[Missouri–Kansas–Texas Railroad|Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93157/united-states-v-missouri-k-tr-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 358 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93157/united-states-v-missouri-k-tr-co/ 358 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 427: Line 436:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Fowler v. Equitable Tr. Co. I''
| ''Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company I''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93158/fowler-v-equitable-trust-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 384 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93158/fowler-v-equitable-trust-co/ 384 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 435: Line 444:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Fowler v. Equitable Tr. Co. II''
| ''Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company II''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93159/fowler-v-equitable-trust-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 408 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93159/fowler-v-equitable-trust-co/ 408 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 443: Line 452:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Fowler v. Equitable Tr. Co. III''
| ''Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company III''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93158/fowler-v-equitable-trust-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 411 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93158/fowler-v-equitable-trust-co/ 411 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 452: Line 461:
|-
|-
| ''Hickman v. [[Fort Scott, Kansas|City of Ft. Scott]]''
| ''Hickman v. [[Fort Scott, Kansas|City of Ft. Scott]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93160/hickman-v-fort-scott/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 415 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93160/hickman-v-fort-scott/ 415 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 460: Line 469:
|-
|-
| ''McClain v. Ortmayer''
| ''McClain v. Ortmayer''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93161/mcclain-v-ortmayer/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 419 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93161/mcclain-v-ortmayer/ 419 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
Line 468: Line 477:
|-
|-
| ''McLean v. Clapp''
| ''McLean v. Clapp''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93162/mclean-v-clapp/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=2 429 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93162/mclean-v-clapp/ 429 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
Line 476: Line 485:
|-
|-
| ''Kneeland v. Luce I''
| ''Kneeland v. Luce I''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93163/kneeland-v-luce/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 437 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93163/kneeland-v-luce/ 437 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
Line 483: Line 492:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Crosby Steam-Gage Valve Co. v. Consolidated Safety-Valve Co.''
| ''Crosby Steam Gage and Valve Company v. Consolidated Safety Valve Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93164/crosby-steam-gage-valve-co-v-consolidated-safety-valve-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 441 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93164/crosby-steam-gage-valve-co-v-consolidated-safety-valve-co/ 441 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
Line 491: Line 500:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''McCreary v. [[Pennsylvania Canal]] Co.''
| ''McCreary v. [[Pennsylvania Canal]] Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93165/mccreary-v-pennsylvania-canal-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 459 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93165/mccreary-v-pennsylvania-canal-co/ 459 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
Line 499: Line 508:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''American Net Twine Co. v. Worthington''
| ''American Net and Twine Company v. Worthington''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93166/american-net-twine-co-v-worthington/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 468 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93166/american-net-twine-co-v-worthington/ 468 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
Line 507: Line 516:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Leadville Coal Co. v. McCreery''
| ''Leadville Coal Company v. McCreery''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93167/leadville-coal-co-v-mccreery/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 475 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93167/leadville-coal-co-v-mccreery/ 475 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
Line 516: Line 525:
|-
|-
| ''Davis v. Patrick''
| ''Davis v. Patrick''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93168/davis-v-patrick/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 479 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93168/davis-v-patrick/ 479 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
Line 524: Line 533:
|-
|-
| ''Kneeland v. Luce II''
| ''Kneeland v. Luce II''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93169/kneeland-v-luce/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 491 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93169/kneeland-v-luce/ 491 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.D. Ind.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.D. Ind.]]
| multiple
| affirmed (1st); dismissed for want of jurisdiction (2d)
|-
|-
| ''Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating Mach. Co.''
| ''Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating Machine Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93170/seitz-v-brewers-refrigerating-machine-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 510 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93170/seitz-v-brewers-refrigerating-machine-co/ 510 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 539: Line 548:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Metropolitan Nat'l Bank v. Claggett''
| ''Metropolitan National Bank v. Claggett''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93171/metropolitan-nat-bank-v-claggett/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 520 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93171/metropolitan-nat-bank-v-claggett/ 520 (1891)]
| Lamar
| Lamar
| none
| none
Line 548: Line 557:
|-
|-
| ''Cross v. Allen''
| ''Cross v. Allen''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93172/cross-v-allen/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 528 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93172/cross-v-allen/ 528 (1891)]
| Lamar
| Lamar
| none
| none
Line 555: Line 564:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Adams v. Bellaire Stamping Co.''
| ''Adams v. Bellaire Stamping Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93173/adams-v-bellaire-stamping-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 539 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93173/adams-v-bellaire-stamping-co/ 539 (1891)]
| Field
| Field
| none
| none
Line 564: Line 573:
|-
|-
| ''Olcott v. Headrick''
| ''Olcott v. Headrick''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93174/olcott-v-headrick/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 543 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93174/olcott-v-headrick/ 543 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
Line 572: Line 581:
|-
|-
| ''Rogers v. United States''
| ''Rogers v. United States''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93175/rogers-v-united-states/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 548 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93175/rogers-v-united-states/ 548 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
Line 580: Line 589:
|-
|-
| ''Rector v. Lipscomb''
| ''Rector v. Lipscomb''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93176/rector-v-lipscomb/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 557 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93176/rector-v-lipscomb/ 557 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Patent Clothing Co. v. Glover''
| ''Patent Clothing Company, Ltd. v. Glover''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93177/patent-clothing-co-v-glover/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 560 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93177/patent-clothing-co-v-glover/ 560 (1891)]
| Brewer
| Brewer
| none
| none
Line 595: Line 604:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Fire Ins. Ass'n v. Wickham''
| ''Fire Insurance Association, Ltd. v. Wickham''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93178/fire-ins-assn-ltd-v-wickham/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 564 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93178/fire-ins-assn-ltd-v-wickham/ 564 (1891)]
| Brown
| Brown
| none
| none
Line 603: Line 612:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''[[In re Lau Ow Bew]]''
| ''In re Lau Ow Bew''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93179/lau-ow-bew/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 583 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93179/lau-ow-bew/ 583 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.N.D. Cal.]]
| [[United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit|9th Cir.]]
| [[certiorari]] granted
| [[certiorari]] granted
|-
|-
| ''[[Marshall v. Holmes]]''
| ''[[Marshall v. Holmes]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93180/marshall-v-holmes/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 589 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93180/marshall-v-holmes/ 589 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 619: Line 628:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Johnson v. [[St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway|St Louis, I.M. & S. Ry. Co.]]''
| ''Johnson v. [[St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway]] Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93181/johnson-v-st-louis-im-sr-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 602 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93181/johnson-v-st-louis-im-sr-co/ 602 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
| Lamar
| Lamar
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| [[United States Circuit Court|C.C.E.D. Ark.]]
| multiple
| affirmed (1st); dismissed for want of jurisdiction (2d)
|-
|-
| ''Moline Plow Co. v. Webb''
| ''Moline Plow Company v. Webb''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93182/moline-plow-co-v-webb/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 616 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93182/moline-plow-co-v-webb/ 616 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 635: Line 644:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''[[James Edward Allen Gibbs|Willcox & Gibbs Sewing-Mach. Co.]] v. Ewing''
| ''[[James Edward Allen Gibbs|Willcox and Gibbs Sewing Machine Company]] v. Ewing''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93183/willcox-gibbs-sewing-machine-co-v-ewing/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=3 627 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93183/willcox-gibbs-sewing-machine-co-v-ewing/ 627 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 643: Line 652:
| reversed
| reversed
|-
|-
| ''Craig v. Continental Ins. Co.''
| ''Craig v. Continental Insurance Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93184/craig-v-continental-ins-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 638 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93184/craig-v-continental-ins-co/ 638 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
Line 652: Line 661:
|-
|-
| ''Thompson v. Barer''
| ''Thompson v. Barer''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93185/thompson-v-baker/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 648 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93185/thompson-v-baker/ 648 (1891)]
| Harlan
| Harlan
| none
| none
Line 659: Line 668:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Smyth v. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co.''
| ''Smyth v. New Orleans Canal and Banking Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93186/smyth-v-new-orleans-canal-banking-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 656 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93186/smyth-v-new-orleans-canal-banking-co/ 656 (1891)]
| Field
| Field
| none
| none
Line 668: Line 677:
|-
|-
| ''McLish v. Roff''
| ''McLish v. Roff''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93187/mclish-v-roff/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 661 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93187/mclish-v-roff/ 661 (1891)]
| Lamar
| Lamar
| none
| none
Line 675: Line 684:
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Ferry v. [[King County, Washington|King Cnty.]] I
| ''Ferry v. [[King County, Washington|King County]] I''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93188/ferry-v-king-county/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 668 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93188/ferry-v-king-county/ 668 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 683: Line 692:
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Ferry v. [[King County, Washington|King Cnty.]] II
| ''Ferry v. [[King County, Washington|King County]] II''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93188/ferry-v-king-county/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 673 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93188/ferry-v-king-county/ 673 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 691: Line 700:
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''Myers v. Groom Shovel Co.''
| ''Myers v. Groom Shovel Company''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93189/myers-v-groom-shovel-co/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 674 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93189/myers-v-groom-shovel-co/ 674 (1891)]
| Fuller
| Fuller
| none
| none
Line 699: Line 708:
| affirmed
| affirmed
|-
|-
| ''Henderson Bridge Co. v. [[Henderson, Kentucky|City of Henderson]]''
| ''Henderson Bridge Company v. [[Henderson, Kentucky|City of Henderson]]''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93190/henderson-bridge-co-v-henderson-city/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 679 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93190/henderson-bridge-co-v-henderson-city/ 679 (1891)]
| Blatchford
| Blatchford
| none
| none
| none
| none
| [[Kentucky Court of Appeals|Ky.]]
| [[Kentucky Court of Appeals|Ky.]]
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''[[Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway|Chicago, S.P.M. & O. Ry. Co.]] v. Roberts''
| ''[[Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway]] Company v. Roberts''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93191/chicago-st-p-m-or-co-v-roberts/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 690 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93191/chicago-st-p-m-or-co-v-roberts/ 690 (1891)]
| Lamar
| Lamar
| none
| none
Line 715: Line 724:
| dismissed
| dismissed
|-
|-
| ''[[Singer Corporation|Singer Mfg. Co.]] v. Wright''
| ''[[Singer Corporation|Singer Manufacturing Company]] v. Wright''
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93192/singer-mfg-co-v-wright/?q=%22141+U.S.+%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled+asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus&page=4 696 (1891)]
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93192/singer-mfg-co-v-wright/ 696 (1891)]
| Field
| Field
| none
| none
Line 730: Line 739:


==External links==
==External links==
* [https://www.loc.gov/search/?in=&q=us+reports+volume+141&new=true&st=] Case reports in volume 141 from Library of Congress
* [https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=%22141%20U.S.%20%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled%20asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus] Case reports in volume 141 from Court Listener
* [https://www.courtlistener.com/?q=%22141%20U.S.%20%22&type=o&order_by=dateFiled%20asc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1891&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1892&court=scotus] Case reports in volume 141 from Court Listener
* [https://cite.case.law/us/141] Case reports in volume 141 from the Caselaw Access Project of [[Harvard Law School]]
* [https://cite.case.law/us/141] Case reports in volume 141 from the Caselaw Access Project of [[Harvard Law School]]
* [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=4%2C60&as_ylo=1891&as_yhi=1891&q=%22141+U.S.%22&btnG=] Case reports in volume 141 from Google Scholar
* [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=4%2C60&as_ylo=1891&as_yhi=1891&q=%22141+U.S.%22&btnG=] Case reports in volume 141 from Google Scholar
* [https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/141] Case reports in volume 141 of Justia
* [https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/141] Case reports in volume 141 from Justia
* [https://openjurist.org/141/us] Case reports in volume 141 from Open Jurist
* [https://openjurist.org/141/us] Case reports in volume 141 from Open Jurist
* [https://www.supremecourt.gov/ Website of the United States Supreme Court]
* [https://www.supremecourt.gov/ Website of the United States Supreme Court]
Line 740: Line 750:
* [https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/after-the-bar/essentials/how-does-the-supreme-court-work/ American Bar Association, How Does the Supreme Court Work?]
* [https://www.americanbar.org/groups/young_lawyers/publications/after-the-bar/essentials/how-does-the-supreme-court-work/ American Bar Association, How Does the Supreme Court Work?]
* [https://supremecourthistory.org/ The Supreme Court Historical Society]
* [https://supremecourthistory.org/ The Supreme Court Historical Society]
{{Portal bar|Law}}
{{SCOTUSCases|141}}
{{SCOTUSCases|141}}
{{SCOTUScaselists}}
⚫
[[Category: 1891 in United States case law]]

{{DEFAULTSORT:United States Supreme Court cases by volume}}
⚫
[[Category:1891 in United States case law]]

Latest revision as of 23:59, 9 March 2023

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov
This article is part of a series on the
Supreme Court
of the United States
The Court
Current membership
Chief Justice
Associate justices
Retired justices
Lists of justices
Specialty lists
All nominations
Unsuccessful nominations
Justices who served in Congress
Burial places of justices
Court functionaries
Constitutional law
of the United States
Overview
Principles
Government structure
Individual rights
Theory

This is a list of cases reported in volume 141 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1891.

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 141 U.S.

[edit]
See also: List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
See also: List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office
See also: List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 141 U.S. were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote) 		Tenure on Supreme Court
Melville Fuller Chief Justice Illinois Morrison Waite July 20, 1888
(41–20) 		October 8, 1888
–
July 4, 1910
(Died)
Stephen Johnson Field Associate Justice California newly-created seat March 10, 1863
(Acclamation) 		May 10, 1863
–
December 1, 1897
(Retired)
Joseph P. Bradley Associate Justice New Jersey newly-created seat March 21, 1870
(46–9) 		March 23, 1870
–
January 22, 1892
(Died)
John Marshall Harlan Associate Justice Kentucky David Davis November 29, 1877
(Acclamation) 		December 10, 1877
–
October 14, 1911
(Died)
Horace Gray Associate Justice Massachusetts Nathan Clifford December 20, 1881
(51–5) 		January 9, 1882
–
September 15, 1902
(Died)
Samuel Blatchford Associate Justice New York Ward Hunt March 22, 1882
(Acclamation) 		April 3, 1882
–
July 7, 1893
(Died)
Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar Associate Justice Mississippi William Burnham Woods January 16, 1888
(32–28) 		January 18, 1888
–
January 23, 1893
(Died)
David Josiah Brewer Associate Justice Kansas Stanley Matthews December 18, 1889
(53–11) 		January 6, 1890
–
March 28, 1910
(Died)
Henry Billings Brown Associate Justice Michigan Samuel Freeman Miller December 29, 1890
(Acclamation) 		January 5, 1891
–
May 28, 1906
(Retired)

Notable Case in 141 U.S.

[edit]

Marshall v. Holmes

[edit]

In Marshall v. Holmes, 141 U.S. 589 (1891), the Supreme Court held it unconscionable to allow a state court's decision to stand that had been based on documents later exposed as forgeries. It permitted a federal case seeking to set that verdict aside to go forward. Other courts noted shortly afterwards that the invocation of unconscionability seemed to conflict with the Court's holding 13 years earlier in United States v. Throckmorton that equitable relief could not be granted in cases of intrinsic fraud. The Court was asked later in Graver v. Faurot to reconcile the two cases, but declined. As of the early 21st century this issue remains unresolved; some state courts and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals have held that Marshall overruled Throckmorton while others have reaffirmed the latter case.

Citation style

[edit]
See also: United States district court
See also: United States circuit court
See also: United States court of appeals
See also: United States federal courts

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari. The change resulted in an immediate reduction in the Supreme Court's workload (from 623 cases filed in 1890 to 379 in 1891 and 275 in 1892).

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 141 U.S.

[edit]
See also: Fuller Court
Case Name Page and year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion(s) Dissenting opinion(s) Lower Court Disposition
In re Garnett 1 (1891) Bradley none none S.D. Ga. prohibition denied
Pullman's Palace Car Company v. Pennsylvania 18 (1891) Gray none Bradley Pa. affirmed
Pullman's Palace Car Company v. Hayward 36 (1891) Gray none none C.C.D. Kan. affirmed
Massachusetts v. Western Union Telegraph Company 40 (1891) Gray none none C.C.D. Mass. reversed
Crutcher v. Kentucky 47 (1891) Bradley none none Ky. reversed
Voight v. Wright 62 (1891) Bradley none none Va. Corp. Ct. reversed
Stein v. Bienville Water Supply Company 67 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.S.D. Ala. affirmed
Parker v. Ormsby 81 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.D. Neb. reversed
Carpenter v. Strange 87 (1891) Fuller none none Tenn. reversed
Evans v. State Bank 107 (1891) Fuller none none C.C.E.D. La. affirmed
In re Mayfield 107 (1891) Brown none none W.D. Ark. habeas corpus granted
Reynolds v. Burns 117 (1891) Brown none none C.C.E.D. Ark. dismissed
Denny v. Pironi 121 (1891) Brown none none C.C.N.D. Tex. reversed
St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company v. McBride 127 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.W.D. Ark. affirmed
Briggs v. Spaulding 132 (1891) Fuller none Gray C.C.N.D.N.Y. affirmed
McAllister v. United States 174 (1891) Harlan none Field Ct. Cl. affirmed
Wingard v. United States 201 (1891) Harlan none Field Ct. Cl. affirmed
Gorman v. Havird 206 (1891) Brown none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Idaho dismissed
Caldwell v. Texas 209 (1891) Fuller none none Tex. Civ. App. dismissed
United States v. Griffith 212 (1891) Fuller none none Ct. Cl. dismissed
Schutz v. Jordan 213 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Gregory Consolidated Mining Company v. Starr 222 (1891) Brewer none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Mont. multiple
Pacific National Bank v. Eaton 227 (1891) Bradley none none Mass. reversed
Thayer v. Butler 234 (1891) Bradley none none C.C.D. Mass. affirmed
Butler v. Eaton 240 (1891) Bradley none none C.C.D. Mass. reversed
Tuskaloosa Northern Railway Company v. Gude 244 (1891) per curiam none none C.C.N.D. Ala. dismissed
Williams v. Passumpsic Savings Bank 249 (1891) Fuller none none C.C.N.D. Fla. dismissed
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Botsford 250 (1891) Gray none Brewer C.C.D. Ind. affirmed
Griswold v. Hazard 260 (1891) Harlan none Brewer C.C.D.R.I. multiple
Potter v. Couch 296 (1891) Gray none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
In re Green 325 (1891) Field none none Colo. mandamus denied
McNulta v. Lochridge 327 (1891) Brown none none Ill. affirmed
Magowan v. New York Belting and Packing Company 332 (1891) Blatchford none none C.C.D.N.J. affirmed
Gage v. Bani 344 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
United States v. Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway Company 358 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.D. Kan. reversed
Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company I 384 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.S.D. Ill. reversed
Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company II 408 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.S.D. Ill. reversed
Fowler v. Equitable Trust Company III 411 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.S.D. Ill. affirmed
Hickman v. City of Ft. Scott 415 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.D. Kan. affirmed
McClain v. Ortmayer 419 (1891) Brown none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
McLean v. Clapp 429 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.N.D. Ill. affirmed
Kneeland v. Luce I 437 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.D. Ind. affirmed
Crosby Steam Gage and Valve Company v. Consolidated Safety Valve Company 441 (1891) Blatchford none none C.C.D. Mass. affirmed
McCreary v. Pennsylvania Canal Company 459 (1891) Brown none none C.C.E.D. Pa. affirmed
American Net and Twine Company v. Worthington 468 (1891) Brown none none C.C.D. Mass. reversed
Leadville Coal Company v. McCreery 475 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.N.D. Ohio affirmed
Davis v. Patrick 479 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.D. Neb. affirmed
Kneeland v. Luce II 491 (1891) Blatchford none none C.C.D. Ind. multiple
Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating Machine Company 510 (1891) Fuller none none C.C.E.D.N.Y. affirmed
Metropolitan National Bank v. Claggett 520 (1891) Lamar none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
Cross v. Allen 528 (1891) Lamar none none C.C.D. Or. affirmed
Adams v. Bellaire Stamping Company 539 (1891) Field none none C.C.S.D. Ohio affirmed
Olcott v. Headrick 543 (1891) Blatchford none none C.C.E.D. Tenn. affirmed
Rogers v. United States 548 (1891) Blatchford none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Rector v. Lipscomb 557 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.E.D. Ark. dismissed
Patent Clothing Company, Ltd. v. Glover 560 (1891) Brewer none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Fire Insurance Association, Ltd. v. Wickham 564 (1891) Brown none none C.C.E.D. Mich. affirmed
In re Lau Ow Bew 583 (1891) Fuller none none 9th Cir. certiorari granted
Marshall v. Holmes 589 (1891) Harlan none none La. Ct. App. reversed
Johnson v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain and Southern Railway Company 602 (1891) Blatchford none Lamar C.C.E.D. Ark. multiple
Moline Plow Company v. Webb 616 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.W.D. Tex. reversed
Willcox and Gibbs Sewing Machine Company v. Ewing 627 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.E.D. Pa. reversed
Craig v. Continental Insurance Company 638 (1891) Blatchford none none C.C.E.D. Mich. affirmed
Thompson v. Barer 648 (1891) Harlan none none C.C.N.D. Tex. affirmed
Smyth v. New Orleans Canal and Banking Company 656 (1891) Field none none C.C.E.D. La. affirmed
McLish v. Roff 661 (1891) Lamar none none U.S. Ct. Indian Terr. dismissed
Ferry v. King County I 668 (1891) Fuller none none Wash. dismissed
Ferry v. King County II 673 (1891) Fuller none none Wash. dismissed
Myers v. Groom Shovel Company 674 (1891) Fuller none none C.C.W.D. Pa. affirmed
Henderson Bridge Company v. City of Henderson 679 (1891) Blatchford none none Ky. dismissed
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha Railway Company v. Roberts 690 (1891) Lamar none none C.C.D. Minn. dismissed
Singer Manufacturing Company v. Wright 696 (1891) Field none none C.C.N.D. Ga. dismissed

Notes and references

[edit]
  1. ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_141&oldid=1143799560"