Jump to content

User talk:Migsmigss: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Resolved.
Notice: Incorrect use of minor edits check box on Frederika Alexis Cull.
Tags: Twinkle Reverted
Line 101: Line 101:
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1124425186 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1124425186 -->

== July 2023 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hi Migsmigss! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at [[:Frederika Alexis Cull]] that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as [[typographical error|typo corrections]] or reverting obvious [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. Any edit that changes the ''meaning'' of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see [[Help:Minor edit]] for more information. ''This is the 3rd time I've raised this with you, after you removed the last two times saying it was resolved, but you are still continuing to mark edits as minor as they are not. If you continue this may be taken as disruptive editing. Thanks.'' <!-- Template:uw-minor --> [[User:Kj cheetham|Kj cheetham]] ([[User talk:Kj cheetham|talk]]) 09:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:23, 10 July 2023

Let's Talk

Welcome to my Talk page!


Looking forward to working with you in creating, maintaining, and developing Wiki articles, pages, and media! Let's foster an open-minded, collaborative, and fun environment here, where seasoned editors engage in a friendly and cooperative manner in enriching both the quantity and quality of Wikipedia content, while also embracing, guiding, and even mentoring new contributors.

If you have any topic or issue you wish to discuss with me, you're welcome to create a new section down below. Let's discuss with propriety, respect, open-mindedness, and kindness—as all human beings should.

Cheers!


Migsmigss 12:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Migsmigss, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Migsmigss! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Overlinking

Please actually read WP:OVERLINKING. It is not always about the amount of links.

"Unless a term is particularly relevant to the context in the article, the following are usually not linked:

  • Everyday words understood by most readers in context.
  • The names of subjects with which most readers will be at least somewhat familiar:
    • This generally includes major examples of: geographic features (e.g., the Himalayas, Pacific Ocean, South America), locations (e.g., Berlin; New York City, or just New York if the city context is already clear; London, if the context rules out London, Ontario; Japan, Brazil, Southeast Asia), languages (e.g., English, Arabic, Korean, Spanish), nationalities and ethnicities (e.g., English, British, Chinese, Turkish, African-American, Hispanic), and religions (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism)
  • Common occupations
  • Common units of measurement, e.g. units relating to currency, time, temperature, length, area, or volume. If both non-metric and metric equivalents are provided, as in 5 centimetres (2.0 in), usually neither unit needs to be linked, because almost all readers will understand at least one of the units.
  • Dates (see § Chronological items, below)"

Countries generally should not be linked. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 03:09, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Should?" We are observing best practices and guidelines, not hard and fast rules. If it is helpful in the overall development of an article, then it must be accommodated. If it helps the content, then it is preferred, as it adheres to the principles of Wikipedia, rather than limiting an article. Thanks.

Migsmigss (talk) 18:40, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

help me in the page Marco D'Elia

the page is gone to speedy deletion and i don't know do anything extra,, please helpp!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinaGamal11 (talkcontribs) 19:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm traveling right now and won't be able to do the nitty-gritty on why the article got deleted. If you're planning to create a new one, please make sure all sources and references are acceptable and verifiable, and all information included in said article are provided and supplemented with the right sources/references. Hoping you successfully publish an article this time. Will help in copyediting and then some, once I find the time.

Cheers.

Migsmigss (talk) 07:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MinaGamal11. I see you've restarted work on this page. Keep it up! To improve the quality of the article and avoid it getting deleted, include sufficient and verifiable information on the topic/subject, and also back all edits with reliable sources and references. Will visit the article as soon as I can, and hopefully help improve it. I'm still traveling now, but will try to help as soon as I can. All the best!

Migsmigss (talk) 17:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time.--MinaGamal11 (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Information icon Hi Migsmigss! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Frederika Alexis Cull that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. This is the 3rd time I've raised this with you, after you removed the last two times saying it was resolved, but you are still continuing to mark edits as minor as they are not. If you continue this may be taken as disruptive editing. Thanks. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]