Jump to content

Unilateralism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverting possible vandalism by 67.186.88.131 to version by Neutrality. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3794720) (Bot)
m Reverted edits by 82.132.186.117 (talk): disruptive edits (HG) (3.4.11)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Doctrine or agenda that supports one-sided action}}
{{redirect|Unilateral}}
{{redirect|Unilateral}}
{{hatnote|"Unilateral engagement" and "Unilateral disengagement" redirect here. For other uses, see [[Engagement (disambiguation)]] and [[Disengagement (disambiguation)]].}}
{{hatnote|"Unilateral engagement" and "Unilateral disengagement" redirect here. For other uses, see [[Engagement (disambiguation)]] and [[Disengagement (disambiguation)]].}}
Line 8: Line 9:
Unilateralism may be preferred in those instances when it is assumed to be the most efficient, i.e., in issues that can be solved without cooperation. However, a government may also have a principal preference for unilateralism or multilateralism, and, for instance, strive to avoid policies that cannot be realized unilaterally or alternatively to champion multilateral solutions to problems that could well have been solved unilaterally.
Unilateralism may be preferred in those instances when it is assumed to be the most efficient, i.e., in issues that can be solved without cooperation. However, a government may also have a principal preference for unilateralism or multilateralism, and, for instance, strive to avoid policies that cannot be realized unilaterally or alternatively to champion multilateral solutions to problems that could well have been solved unilaterally.


Unilateralism as first course of action can be viewed as an act of aggression or hard power, unilateral sanctions violate the United Nations Charter and inhibit development of developing countries.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://reliefweb.int/report/world/confrontation-unilateral-action-interference-states-internal-affairs-must-yield-dialogue-cooperation-speakers-stress-annual-general-assembly-debate | title=Confrontation, Unilateral Action, Interference in States' Internal Affairs Must Yield to Dialogue, Cooperation, Speakers Stress at Annual General Assembly Debate - World &#124; ReliefWeb | date=24 September 2022 }}</ref>
Typically, governments may argue that their ultimate or middle-term goals are served by a strengthening of multilateral schemes and institutions, as was many times the case during the period of the [[Concert of Europe]].

Unilateral action is often elected on behalf of independent leaders with nationalist tendencies and a strong distrust for the intentions of other countries' intervention. In recent years, unilateral action is adjacent with nationalism, protectionism and rejection towards institutions that embody multilateral approach. i.e, the United States adopting protectionist trade policy during the mid-2010s against the multilateral interests of the World Trade Organization.<ref> Essentials of International Relations (Ninth Edition) 9th Edition, Kindle Edition
by Karen A. Mingst </ref>

Unilateralism, if unprovoked, has the potential to disrupt the peaceful upholding of sovereignty and territorial integrity that global security depends upon. Unilateral coercive measures against smaller states put a strain on goals of sustainable development. Examples include arbitrarily imposed economic sanctions such as the [[United States embargo against Cuba]].{{Fact|date=January 2023}}

Typically, governments may argue that their ultimate or middle-term goals are served by a strengthening of multilateral schemes and institutions, as was many times the case during the period of the [[Concert of Europe]].{{Fact|date=January 2023}}


==References==
==References==
Line 14: Line 22:


==Further reading==
==Further reading==
*Walter A. McDougall, ''Promised Land, Crusader State'' (1997)
* Walter A. McDougall, ''Promised Land, Crusader State'' (1997)
*John Lewis Gaddis, ''Surprise, Security, and the American Experience'' (2004)
* John Lewis Gaddis, ''Surprise, Security, and the American Experience'' (2004)
*[[Bradley F. Podliska]], ''Acting Alone'' (2010)
* [[Bradley F. Podliska]], ''Acting Alone'' (2010)

{{wiktionary}}
==External links==
* {{Wiktionary-inline|unilateralism}}


[[Category:International relations theory]]
[[Category:International relations theory]]

Latest revision as of 04:06, 5 December 2023

Unilateralism is any doctrine or agenda that supports one-sided action. Such action may be in disregard for other parties, or as an expression of a commitment toward a direction which other parties may find disagreeable. As a word, unilateralism is attested from 1926, specifically relating to unilateral disarmament. The current, broader meaning emerges in 1964.[1] It stands in contrast with multilateralism, the pursuit of foreign policy goals alongside allies.

Unilateralism and multilateralism represent different policy approaches to international problems. When agreement by multiple parties is absolutely required—for example, in the context of international trade policies—bilateral agreements (involving two participants at a time) are usually preferred by proponents of unilateralism.

Unilateralism may be preferred in those instances when it is assumed to be the most efficient, i.e., in issues that can be solved without cooperation. However, a government may also have a principal preference for unilateralism or multilateralism, and, for instance, strive to avoid policies that cannot be realized unilaterally or alternatively to champion multilateral solutions to problems that could well have been solved unilaterally.

Unilateralism as first course of action can be viewed as an act of aggression or hard power, unilateral sanctions violate the United Nations Charter and inhibit development of developing countries.[2]

Unilateral action is often elected on behalf of independent leaders with nationalist tendencies and a strong distrust for the intentions of other countries' intervention. In recent years, unilateral action is adjacent with nationalism, protectionism and rejection towards institutions that embody multilateral approach. i.e, the United States adopting protectionist trade policy during the mid-2010s against the multilateral interests of the World Trade Organization.[3]

Unilateralism, if unprovoked, has the potential to disrupt the peaceful upholding of sovereignty and territorial integrity that global security depends upon. Unilateral coercive measures against smaller states put a strain on goals of sustainable development. Examples include arbitrarily imposed economic sanctions such as the United States embargo against Cuba.[citation needed]

Typically, governments may argue that their ultimate or middle-term goals are served by a strengthening of multilateral schemes and institutions, as was many times the case during the period of the Concert of Europe.[citation needed]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Unilateralism (n.)." Online Etymology Dictionary.
  2. ^ "Confrontation, Unilateral Action, Interference in States' Internal Affairs Must Yield to Dialogue, Cooperation, Speakers Stress at Annual General Assembly Debate - World | ReliefWeb". 24 September 2022.
  3. ^ Essentials of International Relations (Ninth Edition) 9th Edition, Kindle Edition by Karen A. Mingst

Further reading[edit]

  • Walter A. McDougall, Promised Land, Crusader State (1997)
  • John Lewis Gaddis, Surprise, Security, and the American Experience (2004)
  • Bradley F. Podliska, Acting Alone (2010)

External links[edit]