Talk:Anti-oppressive education: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Tag: |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
{{WikiProject Education}} |
{{WikiProject Education}} |
||
}} |
|||
== Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point == |
== Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point == |
||
<div class="metadata"> |
<div class="metadata"> |
||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
|}</div> |
|}</div> |
||
I notice this article does not give one single example, counter example, solution, or referent (NOT reference). It reads like it was written by a philosopher getting paid by the word.[[User:71.197.106.123|71.197.106.123]] 06:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC) |
I notice this article does not give one single example, counter example, solution, or referent (NOT reference). It reads like it was written by a philosopher getting paid by the word.[[User:71.197.106.123|71.197.106.123]] 06:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
This is like something straight from The People's Cube. I'd fix it, but already want to vomit based on the given text. It reminds me of content-free corporate-speak. [[User:bigstudsteve|bigstudsteve]] ([[User talk:bigstudsteve|talk]]) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/137.186.41.143|137.186.41.143]] ([[User talk:137.186.41.143|talk]]) 18:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Yes, completely content-free... It also speaks volumes that common sense is spelled wrong in an article on education. Since it's between quotes, I assume that's how someone else spelled it... <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/207.241.137.116|207.241.137.116]] ([[User talk:207.241.137.116|talk]]) 00:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== POV == |
|||
I've noticed that the article doesn't seem to list any criticisms, even though what's described is a very ideological sort of education (with an ideology of intersectional feminism), so it's naturally controversial. Would be good to see more balance. -[[Special:Contributions/2003:CA:83C9:DD00:A0F5:E451:F5CB:B7D9|2003:CA:83C9:DD00:A0F5:E451:F5CB:B7D9]] ([[User talk:2003:CA:83C9:DD00:A0F5:E451:F5CB:B7D9|talk]]) 18:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 04:12, 25 January 2024
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point
[edit]| Cleanup Co-ordination | |
|---|---|
|
This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style. As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page. |
Discussion[edit] | |
I notice this article does not give one single example, counter example, solution, or referent (NOT reference). It reads like it was written by a philosopher getting paid by the word.71.197.106.123 06:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
This is like something straight from The People's Cube. I'd fix it, but already want to vomit based on the given text. It reminds me of content-free corporate-speak. bigstudsteve (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.186.41.143 (talk) 18:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Yes, completely content-free... It also speaks volumes that common sense is spelled wrong in an article on education. Since it's between quotes, I assume that's how someone else spelled it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.241.137.116 (talk) 00:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
POV
[edit]I've noticed that the article doesn't seem to list any criticisms, even though what's described is a very ideological sort of education (with an ideology of intersectional feminism), so it's naturally controversial. Would be good to see more balance. -2003:CA:83C9:DD00:A0F5:E451:F5CB:B7D9 (talk) 18:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC)