Word-initial ff: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→In Spanish: more on this |
m Kerning |
||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Origin and use of double "f" at the beginning of a word}} |
|||
The digraph {{char|ff}} at the beginning of a word is an anomalous feature, in [[lower case]], of a few [[proper name]]s in English. In that setting it has no phonetic difference from {{char|F}}, and has been explained as a misunderstanding of [[palaeography]]. In other words, {{char|ff}}, which is "Latin small ligature ''ff''{{hair space}}", a [[stylistic ligature]] from [[Unicode]], available now in some [[Latin script]] fonts, represented in certain traditional handwriting styles the upper case {{char|F}}. |
|||
In [[Spanish orthography]], on the other hand, word-initial {{char|ff}} had a phonetic meaning, over a period of some centuries. |
|||
==In English== |
==In English== |
||
[[File:Court hand alphabet and abbreviations.png|thumb|Early modern [[court hand]] alphabet, showing "ff" used as the equivalent of a capital F]] |
|||
[[Mark Antony Lower]] in his ''Patronymica Brittanica'' (1860) called this spelling an [[wikt:affectation|affectation]]. He stated that it originated in "a foolish mistake concerning the ff of old manuscripts, which is no duplication, but simply a capital f."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lower |first1=Mark Antony |title=Patronymica Britannica: A Dictionary of the Family Names of the United Kingdom |date=1860 |publisher=J.R. Smith |page=112 |url=https:// |
[[Mark Antony Lower]] in his ''Patronymica Brittanica'' (1860) called this spelling an [[wikt:affectation|affectation]]. He stated that it originated in "a foolish mistake concerning the ''ff'' of old manuscripts, which is no duplication, but simply a capital ''f''."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Lower |first1=Mark Antony |title=Patronymica Britannica: A Dictionary of the Family Names of the United Kingdom |date=1860 |publisher=J. R. Smith |page=[https://archive.org/details/patronymicabrita00lowerich/page/112 112] |url=https://archive.org/details/patronymicabrita00lowerich |language=en}}</ref> Later in the 19th century the palaeographer [[Edward Maunde Thompson]] wrote from the [[British Museum]]:<ref>{{cite book |last1=New England Historic Genealogical Society Staff |title=The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Volume 47, 1893 |date=2016 |publisher=Heritage Books |isbn=978-0-7884-0652-2 |page=212 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=E7LMFLDeNU0C&pg=PA212 |language=en}}</ref> |
||
{{blockquote|The English legal handwriting of the Middle Ages has no capital ''F''. A double ''f'' (''ff'') was used to represent the capital letter. In transcribing, I should write ''F'', not ''ff''; e. g. Fiske, not ffiske.}} |
|||
The replacement of manuscript word-initial {{char|ff}} by {{char|F}} is now a scholarly convention.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Freidel |first1=Frank Burt |last2=Showman |first2=Richard K. |title=Harvard Guide to American History |date=1974 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-37560-4 |page=29 note 7|volume=1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4raksrLitUAC&pg=PA29}}</ref> |
|||
Usage in names such as [[Charles ffoulkes]] and [[Richard ffrench-Constant]] persists. The initial {{char|Ff}} in Welsh spelling of imported proper names has been attributed to the standing of {{char|ff}} as part of normal [[Welsh orthography]].<ref>{{cite book |title=Notes and Queries |date=1879 |publisher=Oxford University Press |page=391 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UOY4AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA391 |language=en}}</ref> Citing Trevor Davenport-Ffoulkes, [[H. L. Mencken]] in a supplement to ''[[The American Language]]'' wrote that "The initial ''Ff'' is sometimes written ''ff'', but this is an error."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Mencken |first1=H. L. |title=The American Language, Supplement II |url=https://archive.org/details/americanlanguag00menc |url-access=registration |date=1962 |page=[https://archive.org/details/americanlanguag00menc/page/460 460] note 2 |language=en}}</ref> [[David Crystal]] cites both Welsh-derived proper names, such as [[Ffion]] (where single {{char|F}} would sound like English ''v'' in Welsh phonetics), and English-derived names such as [[Ffoulkes]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Crystal |first1=David |title=Spell It Out: The singular story of English spelling |date=2012 |publisher=Profile |isbn=978-1-84765-822-7 |page=171 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XBZKMSX8MggC&pg=PT171 |language=en}}</ref> |
|||
==In Spanish== |
==In Spanish== |
||
It has been argued that word-initial ff was used in written Spanish around 1500, to indicate the phonetic difference between an f-sound and an aspirated h.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Dworkin |first1=Steven N. |title=A Guide to Old Spanish |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-151098-4 |page=24 |url=https://books.google. |
It has been argued that word-initial {{char|ff}} was used in written Spanish around 1500, to indicate the phonetic difference between an ''f''-sound and an aspirated ''h''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Dworkin |first1=Steven N. |title=A Guide to Old Spanish |date=2018 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-151098-4 |page=24 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=h45lDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA24 |language=en}}</ref> It can be observed to have come in strongly for Spanish spelling during the 13th century.<ref>William B. Hawkins, ''Flight from Assimilation and Trial and Error in Spanish Linguistics'', Hispanic Review Vol. 10, No. 4 (Oct., 1942), pp. 273–284, at p. 277. {{JSTOR|469896}}</ref> The actual pronunciation was dynamic, with the aspiration being dropped from the time when [[Madrid]] became the Spanish capital (1561). The word-initial {{char|ff}} spelling convention lagged behind current phonetics, providing a way of tracking pronunciations after they had become obsolete.<ref>Sonia Kania, ''The Probanza de méritos of Vicente de Zaldívar: Edition and Notes to Part 4'', Romance Philology Vol. 67, No. 2 (Fall 2013), pp. 261–316, at p. 268. Published by: Brepols; University of California Press {{JSTOR|44742013}}</ref> |
||
==Notes== |
==Notes== |
||
{{reflist}} |
{{reflist}} |
||
[[Category:Latin-script orthographies]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 20:04, 30 January 2024
The digraph ff at the beginning of a word is an anomalous feature, in lower case, of a few proper names in English. In that setting it has no phonetic difference from F, and has been explained as a misunderstanding of palaeography. In other words, ff, which is "Latin small ligature ff ", a stylistic ligature from Unicode, available now in some Latin script fonts, represented in certain traditional handwriting styles the upper case F.
In Spanish orthography, on the other hand, word-initial ff had a phonetic meaning, over a period of some centuries.
In English
[edit]
Mark Antony Lower in his Patronymica Brittanica (1860) called this spelling an affectation. He stated that it originated in "a foolish mistake concerning the ff of old manuscripts, which is no duplication, but simply a capital f."[1] Later in the 19th century the palaeographer Edward Maunde Thompson wrote from the British Museum:[2]
The English legal handwriting of the Middle Ages has no capital F. A double f (ff) was used to represent the capital letter. In transcribing, I should write F, not ff; e. g. Fiske, not ffiske.
The replacement of manuscript word-initial ff by F is now a scholarly convention.[3]
Usage in names such as Charles ffoulkes and Richard ffrench-Constant persists. The initial Ff in Welsh spelling of imported proper names has been attributed to the standing of ff as part of normal Welsh orthography.[4] Citing Trevor Davenport-Ffoulkes, H. L. Mencken in a supplement to The American Language wrote that "The initial Ff is sometimes written ff, but this is an error."[5] David Crystal cites both Welsh-derived proper names, such as Ffion (where single F would sound like English v in Welsh phonetics), and English-derived names such as Ffoulkes.[6]
In Spanish
[edit]It has been argued that word-initial ff was used in written Spanish around 1500, to indicate the phonetic difference between an f-sound and an aspirated h.[7] It can be observed to have come in strongly for Spanish spelling during the 13th century.[8] The actual pronunciation was dynamic, with the aspiration being dropped from the time when Madrid became the Spanish capital (1561). The word-initial ff spelling convention lagged behind current phonetics, providing a way of tracking pronunciations after they had become obsolete.[9]
Notes
[edit]- ^ Lower, Mark Antony (1860). Patronymica Britannica: A Dictionary of the Family Names of the United Kingdom. J. R. Smith. p. 112.
- ^ New England Historic Genealogical Society Staff (2016). The New England Historical and Genealogical Register, Volume 47, 1893. Heritage Books. p. 212. ISBN 978-0-7884-0652-2.
- ^ Freidel, Frank Burt; Showman, Richard K. (1974). Harvard Guide to American History. Vol. 1. Harvard University Press. p. 29 note 7. ISBN 978-0-674-37560-4.
- ^ Notes and Queries. Oxford University Press. 1879. p. 391.
- ^ Mencken, H. L. (1962). The American Language, Supplement II. p. 460 note 2.
- ^ Crystal, David (2012). Spell It Out: The singular story of English spelling. Profile. p. 171. ISBN 978-1-84765-822-7.
- ^ Dworkin, Steven N. (2018). A Guide to Old Spanish. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 978-0-19-151098-4.
- ^ William B. Hawkins, Flight from Assimilation and Trial and Error in Spanish Linguistics, Hispanic Review Vol. 10, No. 4 (Oct., 1942), pp. 273–284, at p. 277. JSTOR 469896
- ^ Sonia Kania, The Probanza de méritos of Vicente de Zaldívar: Edition and Notes to Part 4, Romance Philology Vol. 67, No. 2 (Fall 2013), pp. 261–316, at p. 268. Published by: Brepols; University of California Press JSTOR 44742013