Jump to content

Talk:HVDC DolWin1: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Clampower (talk | contribs)
Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Energy|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|
{{WikiProject Energy|importance=low}}
}}


== Merge ==
== Merge ==

Latest revision as of 22:11, 31 January 2024

Merge

[edit]

Not long enough or notable enough. Makes more sense to be one big article with sections for 1, 2 and 3. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree - most HVDC projects have their own unique Wikipedia pages, and these offshore HVDC projects are bigger and more complex than normal (some costing over 1B€). Moreover, all three projects in this group have significant technical differences and are built by two different manufacturers. In my opinion they either need to stay as separate articles or to combine all 9 of the German offshore HVDC projects (from the Dolwin, Helwin, Sylwin and Borwin clusters) into a single article.Clampower (talk) 19:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]