Talk:Single-track railway: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:Single track to Talk:Single track (rail): Seperating mountain biking single track and single track rail |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Trains}}. Tag: |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject Trains|importance=mid|unref=yes}} |
|||
}} |
|||
==Page title== |
==Page title== |
||
Would it be better to move this to [[Single track railway]], or maybe [[Single track (rail)]], and use [[Single track]] as a disambiguation page? That would help avoid confusion with [[Single track road]]. [[User:Blisco|Blisco]] 19:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC) |
Would it be better to move this to [[Single track railway]], or maybe [[Single track (rail)]], and use [[Single track]] as a disambiguation page? That would help avoid confusion with [[Single track road]]. [[User:Blisco|Blisco]] 19:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Erroneous Information == |
|||
" Single track is significantly cheaper to build, though it has operational disadvantages. If the single-track section is say 15 minutes long, the line would have capacity for only two trains per hour in each direction. Double track can allow up to 15 trains per hour in each direction if signal boxes are four minutes apart. This hindrance on the capacity of a single track may be partly overcome by making the track one-way on alternate days, if the single track is not used for public transit. " |
|||
It is limited to 2 trains per hour if you try to run trains in opposite directions at 15 minute intervals. |
|||
If signal boxes are 4 minutes apart, you can run 4 (or maybe 5?) trains in one direction in half an hour and then run another 4 (or 5?) in the opposite direction in the other half-hour. |
|||
I have no idea how to edit the para quoted to reflect that possibility. -- [[User:SGBailey|SGBailey]] ([[User talk:SGBailey|talk]]) 09:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 10:31, 9 February 2024
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Page title
[edit]Would it be better to move this to Single track railway, or maybe Single track (rail), and use Single track as a disambiguation page? That would help avoid confusion with Single track road. Blisco 19:43, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Erroneous Information
[edit]" Single track is significantly cheaper to build, though it has operational disadvantages. If the single-track section is say 15 minutes long, the line would have capacity for only two trains per hour in each direction. Double track can allow up to 15 trains per hour in each direction if signal boxes are four minutes apart. This hindrance on the capacity of a single track may be partly overcome by making the track one-way on alternate days, if the single track is not used for public transit. "
It is limited to 2 trains per hour if you try to run trains in opposite directions at 15 minute intervals. If signal boxes are 4 minutes apart, you can run 4 (or maybe 5?) trains in one direction in half an hour and then run another 4 (or 5?) in the opposite direction in the other half-hour.
I have no idea how to edit the para quoted to reflect that possibility. -- SGBailey (talk) 09:39, 13 October 2015 (UTC)