Talk:Wagner family: Difference between revisions
JJMC89 bot (talk | contribs) m subst /Comments to discontinue comments subpage) (AWB [12009] |
m Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Richard Wagner}}, {{WikiProject Germany}}. Tag: |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| |
||
{{WikiProject |
{{WikiProject Richard Wagner}} |
||
{{WikiProject Germany|importance=Low}} |
|||
}} |
|||
[[Category:Start-Class Richard Wagner articles]] |
|||
==Making a colour graphic?== |
==Making a colour graphic?== |
||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
Difficult to rate, but I suppose Start is about right if there's more to be added (is there?), and because it would look better as a real family tree (plenty of examples to choose from at [[List of family trees]]). --[[User:GuillaumeTell|GuillaumeTell]] 17:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)}} |
Difficult to rate, but I suppose Start is about right if there's more to be added (is there?), and because it would look better as a real family tree (plenty of examples to choose from at [[List of family trees]]). --[[User:GuillaumeTell|GuillaumeTell]] 17:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)}} |
||
Substituted at 10:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC) |
Substituted at 10:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Symbols need explanation (∞, *, †) == |
|||
This article needs a key to symbols. The symbols ∞, *, † may be standard when documenting family trees, but they're not familiar to the average reader. It would be easy to have a "key to symbols" so people understand what they mean. Is there a Wikipedia guideline/style/standard for documenting family trees? [[User:Omc|Omc]] ([[User talk:Omc|talk]]) 17:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 22:04, 10 February 2024
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Making a colour graphic?
[edit]I don't know if we want to convert this into a graphic, but a good model exists on this page Franz, Duke of Bavaria. -- Kleinzach 02:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Children by marriage.
[edit]I've not decoded how to make the mark-up work, but shouldn't Wolfgang's children be distinguished by marriage along the lines of:
Wife1
- child1
- child2
Wife2
- child3
--Peter cohen (talk) 14:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Wagner's younger siblings
[edit]Wagner's mother had children by Geyer after Richard's Birth, including one Caecilie, who became the mother of philosopher Richard Heinrich Ludwig Avenarius. Though, half-siblings, they too should be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.107.7 (talk) 11:11, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Wagner family/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Start class. Could be improved by turning into a graphic - after text has been finished. -- Kleinzach 11:26, 25 September 2007 (UTC) Difficult to rate, but I suppose Start is about right if there's more to be added (is there?), and because it would look better as a real family tree (plenty of examples to choose from at List of family trees). --GuillaumeTell 17:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 17:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 10:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Symbols need explanation (∞, *, †)
[edit]This article needs a key to symbols. The symbols ∞, *, † may be standard when documenting family trees, but they're not familiar to the average reader. It would be easy to have a "key to symbols" so people understand what they mean. Is there a Wikipedia guideline/style/standard for documenting family trees? Omc (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2017 (UTC)