Jump to content

Abhimāna: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Invokingvajras moved page Abhimana to Abhimāna over redirect: proper transliteration
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Hindu philosophy}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2019}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2019}}
{{Use Indian English|date=August 2019}}
{{Use Indian English|date=August 2019}}
{{Hinduism}}
{{Hinduism}}
'''Abhimāna''' ([[Sanskrit]]:अभिमान) variously means – pride, false prestige, desire, an impression, the conception, by self-conception, from the misconception;<ref>{{cite web|title=Meaning of the Sanskrit word – abhimana|publisher=Sanskritdictionary.org|url=http://sanskritdictionary.org/abhimana}}</ref> in [[Hindu philosophy]], it means – prideful attachment of "I-sense" i.e. ''man'' (to think) + ''māna'' (too much); it also means – identify or identification<ref>{{cite book|title=Be Free From "Me|author=Paul Bahder|publisher=Vision of Vedanta|page=|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PdGwAAAAQBAJ&pg=PT191&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=_efyVNmwCo6OuASq1YKoAw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false }}</ref> and also refers to selfish conviction, for ''abhimāna'' is the function of ''[[ahamkara]]'' (ego) as the state of mind which interprets experience as " mine ".<ref>{{cite book|title=Encyclopaedia of the Hindu World Part 1|publisher=Concept Publishing|page=107|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w9pmo51lRnYC&pg=PA107&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n-PyVN64Mc6WuATfq4G4Cg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref>
'''Abhimāna''' ([[Sanskrit]]:अभिमान) variously means – pride, false prestige, desire, an impression, the conception, by self-conception, from the misconception;<ref>{{cite web|title=Meaning of the Sanskrit word – abhimana|publisher=Sanskritdictionary.org|url=http://sanskritdictionary.org/abhimana}}</ref> in [[Hindu philosophy]], it means – prideful attachment of "I-sense" i.e. ''man'' (to think) + ''māna'' (too much); it also means – identify or identification<ref>{{cite book|title=Be Free From "Me|author=Paul Bahder|date=28 August 2013|publisher=Vision of Vedanta|isbn=9781908720955|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PdGwAAAAQBAJ&q=abhimana&pg=PT191 }}</ref> and also refers to selfish conviction, for ''abhimāna'' is the function of ''[[ahamkara]]'' (ego) as the state of mind which interprets experience as " mine ".<ref>{{cite book|title=Encyclopaedia of the Hindu World Part 1|year=1992|publisher=Concept Publishing|page=107|isbn=9788170223740|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w9pmo51lRnYC&q=abhimana&pg=PA107}}</ref>


The psychological sense of "I" am experience is ''ahamkāra'' which comes about as and when owing to '' [[Avidya (Hinduism)|avidya]] '', [[Brahman]], the Universal transcendental Self, is distinguished from the [[Jiva]], the empirical individual self. ''Sanga'' (one's associations), ''mamkāra'' (attachments) and ''moha'' (attractions) are the three aspects of abhimāna (ego-consciousness)<ref>{{cite book|title=Psychology in India Vol. 4|publisher=Pearson Publications|pages=130–131|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fXQzo7LGfuIC&pg=PA131&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n-PyVN64Mc6WuATfq4G4Cg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref> which produces ''katrtva'' (the sense agency) as the deliberate consciousness of ''niścaya'' (decision) without which there would be no difference between the self and other material objects; '' [[buddhi]] '' (intellect), which manifests according to ''[[vāsanā]]s'' (impressions), is deliberate decision.<ref>{{cite book|title=A History of Indian Philosophy Vol.5|author=Surendranathh Dasgupta|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|pages=34–35|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aohGsuUuXuMC&pg=PA35&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=g-fyVI6xB86KuASYvIHACQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref>
The psychological sense of "I" am experience is ''ahamkāra'' which comes about as and when owing to '' [[Avidya (Hinduism)|avidya]] '', [[Brahman]], the Universal transcendental Self, is distinguished from the [[Jiva]], the empirical individual self. ''Sanga'' (one's associations), ''mamkāra'' (attachments) and ''moha'' (attractions) are the three aspects of abhimāna (ego-consciousness)<ref>{{cite book|title=Psychology in India Vol. 4|publisher=Pearson Publications|pages=130–131|isbn=9788131718179|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fXQzo7LGfuIC&q=abhimana&pg=PA131}}</ref> which produces ''katrtva'' (the sense agency) as the deliberate consciousness of ''niścaya'' (decision) without which there would be no difference between the self and other material objects; '' [[buddhi]] '' (intellect), which manifests according to ''[[vāsanā]]s'' (impressions), is deliberate decision.<ref>{{cite book|title=A History of Indian Philosophy Vol.5|author=Surendranathh Dasgupta|year=1975|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|pages=34–35|isbn=9788120804166|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aohGsuUuXuMC&q=abhimana&pg=PA35}}</ref>
{{Quote|
<poem>
अन्तःकरणमेतेषु चक्षुरादिषु वर्ष्मणि |
अहमित्यभिमानेन तिष्ठत्याभासतेजसा ||


"The antahkarana (internal organ, the mind) has its seat in these, the eye and other organs of the body identifying itself with them with the sense of "I" by reflection of the ātman in it."
: अन्तःकरणमेतेषु चक्षुरादिषु वर्ष्मणि |
</poem>
: अहमित्यभिमानेन तिष्ठत्याभासतेजसा ||
|[[Vivekachudamani]], 105}}
: " The antahkarana (internal organ, the mind) has its seat in these, the eye and other organs of the body identifying itself with them with the sense of "I" by reflection of the ātman in it. " – [[Vivekachudamani]] (105)


[[Adi Shankara|Shankara]] tells us that the mind or manas dwells in the organs and body as ''aham'' (ego) with ''abhimāna'' – अहमित्यभिमानेन in the reflected brightness of the atman as the ''kartā'' (doer) and the ''bhoktā'' (enjoyer) experiencing all three states of consciousness but the atman, the witness of everything, limited by ''buddhi'' is not tainted by anything that ''buddhi'' does – अशेषसाक्षी for the taint of action attaches only to the actor, the ātman does not act. This ''abhimāna'' or identification with names and forms dependent on the perishable body, as also with the subtle body, needs to be given up entirely in order to realize ''akhanda ānanda'' (inseparable bliss).<ref>{{cite book|title=Foundations of Indian Psychology Vol.1|author=Cormelissen R.M.Matthijs|publisher=Pearson Education|page=139|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xmiJWZnCH1oC&pg=PA139&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n-PyVN64Mc6WuATfq4G4Cg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref> [[Vācaspati Miśra]] explains that it is ''ahamkāra'' (empirical ego) which presides over the objects intuited by the sense-organs and then definitely perceived by the mind; and that the sense-organ intuits the object, ''manas'' reflects on it, ''ahamkāra'' appropriates it and finally ''buddhi'' (intellect) resolves which way the intended action must proceed.<ref>{{cite book|title=Ancient Indian Education|author=Radha Kumud Mookerji|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=294|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mjFfqpq7HhkC&pg=PA294&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7uTyVKHQLMSHuATkzYCgBA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false }}</ref>
[[Adi Shankara|Shankara]] tells us that the mind or manas dwells in the organs and body as ''aham'' (ego) with ''abhimāna'' – अहमित्यभिमानेन in the reflected brightness of the atman as the ''kartā'' (doer) and the ''bhoktā'' (enjoyer) experiencing all three states of consciousness but the atman, the witness of everything, limited by ''buddhi'' is not tainted by anything that ''buddhi'' does – अशेषसाक्षी for the taint of action attaches only to the actor, the ātman does not act. This ''abhimāna'' or identification with names and forms dependent on the perishable body, as also with the subtle body, needs to be given up entirely in order to realize ''akhanda ānanda'' (inseparable bliss).<ref>{{cite book|title=Foundations of Indian Psychology Vol.1|author=Cormelissen R.M.Matthijs|year=2010|publisher=Pearson Education|page=139|isbn=9788131730843|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xmiJWZnCH1oC&q=abhimana&pg=PA139}}</ref> [[Vācaspati Miśra]] explains that it is ''ahamkāra'' (empirical ego) which presides over the objects intuited by the sense-organs and then definitely perceived by the mind; and that the sense-organ intuits the object, ''manas'' reflects on it, ''ahamkāra'' appropriates it and finally ''buddhi'' (intellect) resolves which way the intended action must proceed.<ref>{{cite book|title=Ancient Indian Education|author=Radha Kumud Mookerji|year=1989|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=294|isbn=9788120804234|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mjFfqpq7HhkC&q=abhimana&pg=PA294 }}</ref>


''Abhimāna'' is the false sense of "I" and "mine"; it is because of the emphatic identity (''abhimāna'') with one's body etc., that there is ''pramata'' (cognising subject) and involvement with ''pramānas'' (acts or processes of knowing, perception, inference and the rest) owing to functioning of the senses as resulting from ''avidyā'' (ignorance) and resulting in bondage.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Philosophy of Sankar’s Advaita Vedanta|author=Shyama Kumar Chattopadhyaya|publisher=Sarup & Sons|pages=41,366|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IPasbJW-1PwC&pg=PA366&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=S-jyVIefOIeRuASBwIKYBA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref> Examined from the level of social consciousness, ātman or the transcendental consciousness is certainly essential for man's being but ''[[upadhi]]s'' (limitations) are its accidental parts the self-identification with which gives rise to ''abhimāna'' (identification with the body) that makes man a socio-spiritual being subjective and objective, both, and becomes the basis for his ''adhikāra'' (social and ritual eligibility).<ref>{{cite book|title=Foundations of Indian Culture Vol.1|author=Govind Chandra Pande|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=3|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VMf-isGALqQC&pg=PA3&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n-PyVN64Mc6WuATfq4G4Cg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref> According to the Shudha Advaita school of [[Vallabha Acharya]], ''saguna'' means – one having the ''abhimāna'' of gunas (forming part of one's own self), the ''nirguna'' is one having no abhimāna.<ref>{{cite book|title=Kalatattvakosa|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=18|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_YHYrni9wckC&pg=PA186&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7uTyVKHQLMSHuATkzYCgBA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref>
''Abhimāna'' is the false sense of "I" and "mine"; it is because of the emphatic identity (''abhimāna'') with one's body etc., that there is ''pramata'' (cognising subject) and involvement with ''pramānas'' (acts or processes of knowing, perception, inference and the rest) owing to functioning of the senses as resulting from ''avidyā'' (ignorance) and resulting in bondage.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita Vedanta|author=Shyama Kumar Chattopadhyaya|year=2000|publisher=Sarup & Sons|pages=41,366|isbn=9788176252225|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IPasbJW-1PwC&q=abhimana&pg=PA366}}</ref> Examined from the level of social consciousness, ātman or the transcendental consciousness is certainly essential for man's being but ''[[upadhi]]s'' (limitations) are its accidental parts the self-identification with which gives rise to ''abhimāna'' (identification with the body) that makes man a socio-spiritual being subjective and objective, both, and becomes the basis for his ''adhikāra'' (social and ritual eligibility).<ref>{{cite book|title=Foundations of Indian Culture Vol.1|author=Govind Chandra Pande|year=1990|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=3|isbn=9788120807129|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VMf-isGALqQC&q=abhimana&pg=PA3}}</ref> According to the Shudha Advaita school of [[Vallabha Acharya]], ''saguna'' means – one having the ''abhimāna'' of gunas (forming part of one's own self), the ''nirguna'' is one having no abhimāna.<ref>{{cite book|title=Kalatattvakosa|year=1988|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=18|isbn=9788120815476|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_YHYrni9wckC&q=abhimana&pg=PA186}}</ref>


The [[Lakshmi Tantra]] tells us that "''ahamkāra'' which is a cognitive-sense, is identical with ''abhimāna''" and "the awareness of the knower in relating time and place to himself is called ''abhimāna''".<ref>{{cite book|title=Lakshmi Tantra|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=33|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pENlKmZ4r94C&pg=PA33&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=vubyVLmMIIKSuQTn5IIg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref> For most people desiring success, incidental gains and weighed down by sense of self-respect ''abhimāna'' is a virtue but for those who are wise and contented, it is mere pride associated with arrogance.<ref>{{cite book|title=Design and Rhetoric in Sanskrit Court Epic|publisher=SUNY Press|page=81|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tTm5RVOAEnMC&pg=PA81&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7uTyVKHQLMSHuATkzYCgBA&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref>
The [[Lakshmi Tantra]] tells us that "''ahamkāra'' which is a cognitive-sense, is identical with ''abhimāna''" and "the awareness of the knower in relating time and place to himself is called ''abhimāna''".<ref>{{cite book|title=Lakshmi Tantra|year=2000|publisher=Motilal Banarsidass|page=33|isbn=9788120817357|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pENlKmZ4r94C&q=abhimana&pg=PA33}}</ref> For most people desiring success, incidental gains and weighed down by sense of self-respect ''abhimāna'' is a virtue but for those who are wise and contented, it is mere pride associated with arrogance.<ref>{{cite book|title=Design and Rhetoric in Sanskrit Court Epic|date=27 March 2003|publisher=SUNY Press|page=81|isbn=9780791456149|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tTm5RVOAEnMC&q=abhimana&pg=PA81}}</ref> [[Bhoja]], who outlined the theory of [[Rasa (aesthetics)|Rasa]] (experience of delight), attaches great importance to ''abhimāna'' or ''ahankāra'' (ego). He states that the ''[[rasika]]'' who has ''rasa'' in him has it because of ''[[sringara]]'' (peak), ''ahamkāra'' and ''abhimāna'', enjoyable as a ''[[Guṇa|guna]]'' of his atman; he uses the term ''abhimāna'' in a good sense.<ref>{{cite book|title=I.A.Richards and Indian Theory of Rasa|author=Gupteshwar Prasad|year=1994|publisher=Sarup & Sons|pages=16–25|isbn=9788185431376|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hmy5cnSbsWYC&q=abhimana&pg=PA25}}</ref> From ''ahamkāra'' rises ''abhimāna'' that originates ''sringāra'', and from ''abhimāna'' rises ''[[rati]]'' (love, amorousness), and from ''rati'' are originated all ''rasas''.<ref>{{cite book|title=Glimpses of Indian Poetics|author=Satya Dev Chaudhari|year=2002|publisher=Sahitya Akademi|page=106|isbn=9788126014088|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hnB8-TPF7pYC&q=abhimana&pg=PA106}}</ref>
[[Bhoja]], who outlined the theory of [[Rasa (aesthetics)|Rasa]] (experience of delight), attaches great importance to ''abhimāna'' or ''ahankāra'' (ego). He states that the ''[[rasika]]'' who has ''rasa'' in him has it because of ''[[sringara]]'' (peak), ''ahamkāra'' and ''abhimāna'', enjoyable as a ''[[guna]]'' of his atman; he uses the term ''abhimāna'' in a good sense.<ref>{{cite book|title=I.A.Richards and Indian Theory of Rasa|author=Gupteshwar Prasad|publisher=Sarup & Sons|pages=16–25|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hmy5cnSbsWYC&pg=PA25&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=P-byVJTjLdCOuATbwIC4Bw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref> From ''ahamkāra'' rises ''abhimāna'' that originates ''sringāra'', and from ''abhimāna'' rises ''[[rati]]'' (love, amorousness), and from ''rati'' are originated all ''rasas''.<ref>{{cite book|title=Glimpses of Indian Poetics|author=Satya Dev Chaudhari|publisher=Sahitya Akademi|page=106|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hnB8-TPF7pYC&pg=PA106&dq=abhimana&hl=en&sa=X&ei=n-PyVN64Mc6WuATfq4G4Cg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=abhimana&f=false}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
Line 21: Line 25:
{{Indian philosophy|state=collapsed}}
{{Indian philosophy|state=collapsed}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Abhimana}}
[[Category:Vedanta]]
[[Category:Vedanta]]
[[Category:Concepts in aesthetics]]
[[Category:Concepts in aesthetics]]
[[Category:Literary theory]]
[[Category:Literary theory]]
[[Category:Hindu philosophical concepts]]
[[Category:Hindu philosophical concepts]]
[[Category:Indian culture]]
[[Category:Culture of India]]
[[Category:Theatre in India]]
[[Category:Theatre of India]]
[[Category:Performing arts in India]]
[[Category:Performing arts in India]]
[[Category:Hindu terminology]]
[[Category:Buddhist terminology]]
[[Category:Adi Shankara]]
[[Category:Adi Shankara]]
[[Category:Words and phrases with no direct English translation]]
[[Category:Words and phrases with no direct English translation]]

Latest revision as of 21:33, 25 April 2024

Abhimāna (Sanskrit:अभिमान) variously means – pride, false prestige, desire, an impression, the conception, by self-conception, from the misconception;[1] in Hindu philosophy, it means – prideful attachment of "I-sense" i.e. man (to think) + māna (too much); it also means – identify or identification[2] and also refers to selfish conviction, for abhimāna is the function of ahamkara (ego) as the state of mind which interprets experience as " mine ".[3]

The psychological sense of "I" am experience is ahamkāra which comes about as and when owing to avidya , Brahman, the Universal transcendental Self, is distinguished from the Jiva, the empirical individual self. Sanga (one's associations), mamkāra (attachments) and moha (attractions) are the three aspects of abhimāna (ego-consciousness)[4] which produces katrtva (the sense agency) as the deliberate consciousness of niścaya (decision) without which there would be no difference between the self and other material objects; buddhi (intellect), which manifests according to vāsanās (impressions), is deliberate decision.[5]

अन्तःकरणमेतेषु चक्षुरादिषु वर्ष्मणि |
अहमित्यभिमानेन तिष्ठत्याभासतेजसा ||

"The antahkarana (internal organ, the mind) has its seat in these, the eye and other organs of the body identifying itself with them with the sense of "I" by reflection of the ātman in it."

— Vivekachudamani, 105

Shankara tells us that the mind or manas dwells in the organs and body as aham (ego) with abhimāna – अहमित्यभिमानेन in the reflected brightness of the atman as the kartā (doer) and the bhoktā (enjoyer) experiencing all three states of consciousness but the atman, the witness of everything, limited by buddhi is not tainted by anything that buddhi does – अशेषसाक्षी for the taint of action attaches only to the actor, the ātman does not act. This abhimāna or identification with names and forms dependent on the perishable body, as also with the subtle body, needs to be given up entirely in order to realize akhanda ānanda (inseparable bliss).[6] Vācaspati Miśra explains that it is ahamkāra (empirical ego) which presides over the objects intuited by the sense-organs and then definitely perceived by the mind; and that the sense-organ intuits the object, manas reflects on it, ahamkāra appropriates it and finally buddhi (intellect) resolves which way the intended action must proceed.[7]

Abhimāna is the false sense of "I" and "mine"; it is because of the emphatic identity (abhimāna) with one's body etc., that there is pramata (cognising subject) and involvement with pramānas (acts or processes of knowing, perception, inference and the rest) owing to functioning of the senses as resulting from avidyā (ignorance) and resulting in bondage.[8] Examined from the level of social consciousness, ātman or the transcendental consciousness is certainly essential for man's being but upadhis (limitations) are its accidental parts the self-identification with which gives rise to abhimāna (identification with the body) that makes man a socio-spiritual being subjective and objective, both, and becomes the basis for his adhikāra (social and ritual eligibility).[9] According to the Shudha Advaita school of Vallabha Acharya, saguna means – one having the abhimāna of gunas (forming part of one's own self), the nirguna is one having no abhimāna.[10]

The Lakshmi Tantra tells us that "ahamkāra which is a cognitive-sense, is identical with abhimāna" and "the awareness of the knower in relating time and place to himself is called abhimāna".[11] For most people desiring success, incidental gains and weighed down by sense of self-respect abhimāna is a virtue but for those who are wise and contented, it is mere pride associated with arrogance.[12] Bhoja, who outlined the theory of Rasa (experience of delight), attaches great importance to abhimāna or ahankāra (ego). He states that the rasika who has rasa in him has it because of sringara (peak), ahamkāra and abhimāna, enjoyable as a guna of his atman; he uses the term abhimāna in a good sense.[13] From ahamkāra rises abhimāna that originates sringāra, and from abhimāna rises rati (love, amorousness), and from rati are originated all rasas.[14]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Meaning of the Sanskrit word – abhimana". Sanskritdictionary.org.
  2. ^ Paul Bahder (28 August 2013). Be Free From "Me. Vision of Vedanta. ISBN 9781908720955.
  3. ^ Encyclopaedia of the Hindu World Part 1. Concept Publishing. 1992. p. 107. ISBN 9788170223740.
  4. ^ Psychology in India Vol. 4. Pearson Publications. pp. 130–131. ISBN 9788131718179.
  5. ^ Surendranathh Dasgupta (1975). A History of Indian Philosophy Vol.5. Motilal Banarsidass. pp. 34–35. ISBN 9788120804166.
  6. ^ Cormelissen R.M.Matthijs (2010). Foundations of Indian Psychology Vol.1. Pearson Education. p. 139. ISBN 9788131730843.
  7. ^ Radha Kumud Mookerji (1989). Ancient Indian Education. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 294. ISBN 9788120804234.
  8. ^ Shyama Kumar Chattopadhyaya (2000). The Philosophy of Sankar's Advaita Vedanta. Sarup & Sons. pp. 41, 366. ISBN 9788176252225.
  9. ^ Govind Chandra Pande (1990). Foundations of Indian Culture Vol.1. Motilal Banarsidass. p. 3. ISBN 9788120807129.
  10. ^ Kalatattvakosa. Motilal Banarsidass. 1988. p. 18. ISBN 9788120815476.
  11. ^ Lakshmi Tantra. Motilal Banarsidass. 2000. p. 33. ISBN 9788120817357.
  12. ^ Design and Rhetoric in Sanskrit Court Epic. SUNY Press. 27 March 2003. p. 81. ISBN 9780791456149.
  13. ^ Gupteshwar Prasad (1994). I.A.Richards and Indian Theory of Rasa. Sarup & Sons. pp. 16–25. ISBN 9788185431376.
  14. ^ Satya Dev Chaudhari (2002). Glimpses of Indian Poetics. Sahitya Akademi. p. 106. ISBN 9788126014088.