User talk:Skyring: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted |
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Skyring/Archive 12) (bot |
||
| (35 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| minthreadsleft = 0 |
| minthreadsleft = 0 |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{archives|auto=yes|search=yes}} |
|||
== Your draft == |
|||
Hey there, you may have accidentally created Draft:Australian Wikipedians' notice board/Indigenous place names in draft space rather than user/project space? Cheers [[User:MaxnaCarta|MaxnaCarta]] ([[User talk:MaxnaCarta|talk]]) 09:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:No. Read it, hmm? --[[User:Skyring|Pete]] ([[User talk:Skyring#top|talk]]) 10:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== June 2022 == |
|||
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:List of longest-reigning monarchs]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|the bold, revert, discuss cycle]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. |
|||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 02:44, 26 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
*Please note you have ''already'' broken [[WP:3RR]]. I highly suggest you take it to the talk page and stop edit-warring; it's clear your edit is contentious, saying "discussion is closed" over and over like you have any authority in that matter does not change that.. You don't. - [[User:Aoidh|Aoidh]] ([[User talk:Aoidh|talk]]) 02:47, 26 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Barring an avalanche of Option A supporters in the next few days, it's highly likely that Option B is adopted. If that's so? I hope your version of Option B will be the one. In the meantime, wouldn't it be best to just let the RFC run it's course? It's not worth getting yourself blocked over, is it? [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 02:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 14:09, 25 May 2024