Jump to content

Diploma privilege: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic: added a better source about U4DP
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2020}}
In the United States, the '''diploma privilege''' is a method for lawyers to be [[Admission to the bar in the United States|admitted to the bar]] without taking a [[bar examination]]. Once used by as many as 32 [[U.S. state]]s and the [[District of Columbia]], [[Wisconsin]] has the longest-running diploma privilege for admission to its state bar. The state of Iowa considered reinstating diploma privilege in 2014.<ref>The program began in 2005, but its first class of students did not graduate until 2008 and the Iowa Bar Association considered reinstating diploma privilege in 2014.</ref> The state of New Hampshire does not have diploma privilege, but its only law school has an alternative licensing program called the Daniel Webster Honors Program that allows a limited number of students who have completed certain curricula and a separate exam to bypass the regular bar exam.<ref>https://law.unh.edu/academics/daniel-webster-scholar-honors-program</ref> Originally used as a method to foster the growth of formal [[legal education]], the privilege started to fall into disuse early in the 20th century, in common with the tightening of requirements in other learned professions. The privilege was abolished in [[California]] in 1917. Most recently, [[West Virginia]] did away with the privilege in 1988, preceded by [[Montana]] and [[South Dakota]] in 1983 and [[Mississippi]] in 1981.
{{short description|Method for licensing lawyers in the United States}}
In the United States, the '''diploma privilege''' is a method for lawyers to be [[Admission to the bar in the United States|admitted to the bar]] (i.e. authorized to [[Practice of law|practice law]]) without taking a [[bar examination]]. Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction that currently allows diploma privilege as an alternative to the bar examination.


In 25 states, attorneys who were initially admitted to practice by another state's diploma privilege are eligible for admission to the state bar on motion of the admission committee.<ref>"Reciprocity, Comity, and Attorneys Exams" (chart), ''[http://www.ncbex.org/fileadmin/mediafiles/downloads/Comp_Guide/CompGuide.pdf Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2008] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080704164926/http://www.ncbex.org/fileadmin/mediafiles/downloads/Comp_Guide/CompGuide.pdf |date=2008-07-04 }}'', National Conference of Bar Examiners and American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar, 2008, p. 28.</ref>
In 25 states, attorneys who were initially admitted to practice by another state's diploma privilege are eligible for admission to the state bar on motion of the admission committee.<ref>{{cite web |title = Reciprocity, Comity, and Attorneys Exams |type = Chart |url = http://www.ncbex.org/fileadmin/mediafiles/downloads/Comp_Guide/CompGuide.pdf |work = Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080704164926/http://www.ncbex.org/fileadmin/mediafiles/downloads/Comp_Guide/CompGuide.pdf |archive-date = July 4, 2008 |author = National Conference of Bar Examiners |author2 = American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar |publisher = National Conference of Bar Examiners |year = 2008 |page = 28 }}</ref>


==History==
==Diploma privilege in Wisconsin==
Diploma privilege arose as a method for admission to the bar along with the rise of [[Law school in the United States|law schools in the United States]]. Prior to the 1870s, most aspiring lawyers trained through apprenticeships under a lawyer or a judge, a practice called "[[reading law]]".<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last = Goforth |first = Carol |date = February 18, 2015 |title = Why the Bar Examination Fails to Raise the Bar |url = https://scholarworks.uark.edu/lawpub/6 |journal = Ohio Northern University Law Review |volume = 42 |issue = 1 |pages = 47–88 |access-date = July 22, 2020 |archive-date = July 21, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200721003227/https://scholarworks.uark.edu/lawpub/6/ |url-status = live }}</ref><ref name=":3">{{Cite journal |last = Goldman |first = Thomas |date = January 1, 1974 |title = Use of the Diploma Privilege in the United States |url = https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol10/iss1/6 |journal = Tulsa Law Review |volume = 10 |issue = 1 |pages = 36 |access-date = July 22, 2020 |archive-date = July 21, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200721003819/https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/tlr/vol10/iss1/6/ |url-status = live }}</ref> In the 1870s, law schools began to emerge across the country as an alternative form of [[legal education]]. To incentivize aspiring lawyers to attend law schools, many states offered "diploma privilege" to graduates of law schools, wherein they would receive automatic admission to the bar. This practice reached its peak between 1879 and 1917.<ref name=":2">{{Cite journal |last = Hansen |first = Daniel |date = January 1, 1995 |title = Do We Need the Bar Examination—A Critical Evaluation of the Justifications for the Bar Examination and Proposed Alternatives? |url = https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol45/iss4/32 |journal = Case Western Reserve Law Review |volume = 45 |issue = 4 |pages = 1191–1235 |issn = 0008-7262 |access-date = July 22, 2020 |archive-date = July 21, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200721011559/https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol45/iss4/32/ |url-status = live }}</ref>
In Wisconsin, J.D. graduates of the two [[American Bar Association]]-accredited law schools in the state ([[Marquette University Law School]] and the [[University of Wisconsin Law School]]) may seek admission to the State Bar of Wisconsin without having to sit for a bar examination. (LLM and SJD graduates of these law schools are not eligible for diploma privilege.)


The practice of diploma privilege declined in favor of formal, written bar examinations from the late 1910s onward.<ref name=":3" /> The privilege was abolished in [[California]] in 1917. In 1921, the [[American Bar Association]] formally expressed opposition to diploma privilege. By 1948, only 9 states maintained diploma privilege.<ref name=":2" /> The most recent states to abolish diploma privilege and require law school graduates to sit for a bar examination were [[Mississippi]] in 1981, [[Montana]] and [[South Dakota]] in 1983, and [[West Virginia]] in 1988.{{Citation needed|date=July 2020}}
The diploma privilege in Wisconsin dates to 1870, when it was passed by the [[Wisconsin State Legislature]] in the same legislation that established the [[University of Wisconsin Law School]]. At that time a law department was established in the State University and a course of study under able instructors was prescribed for students in the law department. The 1870 law provided that graduates of this department should be entitled to admission to the bar upon their certificate of [[graduation]]—that is, their [[law degree]]. It was offered to encourage future lawyers to get a formal legal education instead of simply "[[reading law]]," which was the typical legal training of the time.<ref>Steven Levine, "[http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search&template=/cm/htmldisplay.cfm&contentid=48646#pro End Separate-But-Equal Bar Admission] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20051119084535/http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search |date=2005-11-19 }}", ''Wisconsin Lawyer'', Vol. 75, No. 12, December 2002.</ref> This has ever since been known as "diploma privilege."


As of 2024, Wisconsin is the only state that allows graduates of in-state law schools to gain admission to the bar through diploma privilege rather than a bar examination.<ref>{{Cite web |last=School |first=University of Wisconsin Law |title=Diploma Privilege {{!}} University of Wisconsin Law School |url=https://law.wisc.edu/current/diploma_privilege/ |access-date=2024-06-14 |website=law.wisc.edu |language=en}}</ref> New Hampshire does not have diploma privilege, but its only law school has an alternative licensing program called the Daniel Webster Honors Program that allows a limited number of students who have completed certain curricula and a separate exam to bypass the regular bar exam.<ref>{{Cite web |date = September 10, 2018 |title = Daniel Webster Scholar Honors Program |url = https://law.unh.edu/academics/daniel-webster-scholar-honors-program |access-date = July 22, 2020 |publisher = University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law |language = en |archive-date = July 22, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200722153920/https://law.unh.edu/academics/daniel-webster-scholar-honors-program |url-status = live }}</ref> Iowa considered reinstating diploma privilege in 2014.<ref name=hylton>{{cite web |last = Hylton |first = J. Gordon |date = January 21, 2014 |title = Iowa Supreme Court Contemplating Diploma Privilege |work = Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog |url = https://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2014/01/iowa-supreme-court-contemplating-diploma-privilege/ |access-date = July 22, 2020 |archive-date = July 22, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200722153608/https://law.marquette.edu/facultyblog/2014/01/iowa-supreme-court-contemplating-diploma-privilege/ |url-status = live }}</ref>
Graduates of out-of-state law schools, even if they are Wisconsin residents, must still take the Wisconsin bar exam to be admitted in Wisconsin. Likewise, graduates of Wisconsin law schools must take the bar exam in many other states in which they are going to practice. A number of U.S. states do not grant reciprocal admission for attorneys who obtained their bar admission through the diploma privilege, requiring those attorneys to take that state's bar exam, regardless of the length of that attorney's practice. The policy reasoning behind diploma privilege is to incentivize Wisconsin residents to attend in-state law schools and to keep Wisconsin residents working in-state. Another policy consideration is preventing "brain drain" in Wisconsin. This theory holds that without the diploma privilege, the smartest from the state will leave Wisconsin for their education or for their career, specifically to nearby [[Chicago]], (The Iowa Bar Association cited similar territorial concerns).<ref>{{cite web |last1=Newman |first1=John |title=Fairer ways to stop the lawyer brain drain |url=https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/08/27/fairer-ways-stop-lawyer-brain-drain/14660741/ |website=desmoinesregister.com |publisher=Des Moines Register}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web |title=IOWA SUPREME COURT CONTEMPLATING DIPLOMA PRIVILEGE |website=law.marquette.edu |publisher=law.marquette.edu}}</ref>Another advantage is that state of Wisconsin subsidizes in-state resident tuition for law students, and therefore incentives them to stay to retain the state's educational investment. It is also claimed that the diploma privilege helps keep youth in Wisconsin.


==Diploma privilege in Wisconsin==
In ''Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki'', a [[class action]] [[lawsuit]] certified in the [[United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin]] in June 2008, the petitioners assert that the Wisconsin diploma privilege discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the [[United States Constitution|U.S. Constitution's]] [[Commerce Clause]] because it affords a diploma privilege in lieu of a bar examination only to lawyers graduating from Wisconsin's law schools. The suit sought [[injunction|injunctive relief]] to expand the privilege to all applicants to the Wisconsin Bar who obtain a J.D. degree from any school accredited by the American Bar Association.<ref>2008 WL 2415459 (W.D. Wis., 2008).</ref> The district court subsequently dismissed the case for failure to state a cause of action.
In Wisconsin, [[Juris Doctor|J.D.]] graduates of the two [[American Bar Association]]-accredited law schools in the state, [[Marquette University Law School]] and the [[University of Wisconsin Law School]], may seek admission to the State Bar of Wisconsin without having to sit for a bar examination. [[Master of Laws|LLM]] and SJD graduates of these law schools are not eligible for diploma privilege.


The diploma privilege in Wisconsin dates to 1870, when it was passed by the [[Wisconsin State Legislature]] in the same legislation that established the [[University of Wisconsin Law School]]. At that time a law department was established in the State University and a course of study under able instructors was prescribed for students in the law department. The 1870 law provided that graduates of this department should be entitled to admission to the bar upon their certificate of [[graduation]]—that is, their [[law degree]]. It was offered to encourage future lawyers to get a formal legal education instead of simply "[[reading law]]," which was the typical legal training of the time.<ref>{{cite journal |first = Steven |last = Levine |url = http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search&template=/cm/htmldisplay.cfm&contentid=48646#pro |title = End Separate-but-Equal Bar Admission |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20051119084535/http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Search |archive-date = November 19, 2005 |journal = Wisconsin Lawyer |volume = 75 |issue = 12 |date = December 2002 }}</ref>
On July 9, 2009, the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of the case, saying "we find ourselves in an evidentiary vacuum created by the early termination of the case," and remanded the case to the district court.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20090720011452/http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx?submit=rss_sho&shofile=08-2527_004.pdf The Seventh Circuit opinion].</ref>


Graduates of out-of-state law schools, even if they are Wisconsin residents, must still take the Wisconsin bar exam to be admitted in Wisconsin. Likewise, graduates of Wisconsin law schools must take the bar exam in many other states in which they are going to practice. A number of U.S. states do not grant reciprocal admission for attorneys who obtained their bar admission through the diploma privilege, requiring those attorneys to take that state's bar exam, regardless of the length of that attorney's practice. The policy reasoning behind diploma privilege is to incentivize Wisconsin residents to attend in-state law schools and to keep Wisconsin residents working in-state. Another policy consideration is preventing "brain drain" in Wisconsin. This theory holds that without the diploma privilege, the smartest from the state will leave Wisconsin for their education or for their career, specifically to nearby [[Chicago]] (the Iowa Bar Association cited similar territorial concerns<ref name=hylton/><ref>{{cite web |last1 = Newman |first1 = John |date = August 26, 2014 |title = Fairer Ways to Stop the Lawyer Brain Drain |url = https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/08/27/fairer-ways-stop-lawyer-brain-drain/14660741/ |website = Des Moines Register |access-date = June 21, 2018 |archive-date = April 9, 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230409160034/https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/2014/08/27/fairer-ways-stop-lawyer-brain-drain/14660741/ |url-status = live }}</ref>). Another advantage is that state of Wisconsin subsidizes in-state resident tuition for law students, and therefore incentivizes them to stay to retain the state's educational investment. It is also claimed that the diploma privilege helps keep youth in Wisconsin.{{Citation needed|date=July 2020}}
==Diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic==
There has been a renewed interest in diploma privilege as an alternative to the bar examination, which is generally administered in large conference rooms and auditoriums every July and February, in light of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]].


In ''Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki'', a [[class action]] [[lawsuit]] certified in the [[United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin]] in June 2008, the petitioners asserted that the state's policy discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the [[Commerce Clause]] because it affords a diploma privilege in lieu of a bar examination only to lawyers graduating from Wisconsin's law schools. The suit sought [[injunction|injunctive relief]] to expand the privilege to all applicants to the Wisconsin Bar who obtain a J.D. from any law school accredited by the American Bar Association.<ref>{{cite court |litigants = Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki |volume = 2008 |reporter = WL |opinion = 2415459 |court = W.D. Wis. |date = 2008 }}</ref> The district court subsequently dismissed the case for failure to state a cause of action. On July 9, 2009, the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of the case, saying "we find ourselves in an evidentiary vacuum created by the early termination of the case," and remanded the case to the district court.<ref>{{cite court |litigants = Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090720011452/http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx?submit=rss_sho&shofile=08-2527_004.pdf |archive-date = July 20, 2009 |url = http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/fdocs/docs.fwx?submit=rss_sho&shofile=08-2527_004.pdf |court =7th Cir. }}</ref>
Several legal scholars who study licensure identified "emergency diploma privilege" as an alternative that showed "considerable promise" in a working paper discussing how states may continue to license new lawyers during the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Angelos |first1=Claudia |last2=Berman |first2=Sara |last3=Bilek |first3=Mary Lu |last4=Chomsky |first4=Carol L. |last5=Curcio |first5=Andrea Anne |last6=Griggs |first6=Marsha |last7=Howarth |first7=Joan W. |last8=Kaufman |first8=Eileen R. |last9=Merritt |first9=Deboarh Jones |last10=Salkin |first10=Patricia E. |last11=Wegner |first11=Judith W. |date=March 22, 2020 |title=The Bar Exam and the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Need for Immediate Action |url=https://ssrn.com/abstract=3559060 |institution= Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 537 (2020); UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper|access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> The National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), which writes the [[Uniform Bar Exam]] (UBE), came out in opposition of diploma privilege in a [[white paper]] in which it argued that bar exams ensure lawyer competency.<ref>{{cite journal |author=National Conference of Bar Examiners |date=April 9, 2020 |title=Bar Admissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluating Options for the Class of 2020 |url=http://www.ncbex.org/pdfviewer/?file=%2Fdmsdocument%2F239 |publisher=National Conference of Bar Examiners |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> Several legal news outlets criticized the NCBE's position, noting that the NCBE has a conflict of interest as the developer of the UBE and that the NCBE's President and CEO, Judith Gundersen, is a recipient of diploma privilege herself.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.law.com/2020/04/13/ditching-the-bar-exam-puts-public-at-risk-says-test-maker/ |title=Ditching the Bar Exam Puts Public at Risk, Says Test Maker |last=Sloan |first=Karen |date=April 13, 2020 |website=law.com |publisher=Law.com |access-date=July 5, 2020 |quote=It’s not surprising that the NCBE is against eliminating the test for admission. Developing the exam is the core function of the organization, which has nearly 100 employees and reported $26.6 million in revenue in 2018, according to tax filings.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://abovethelaw.com/2020/04/the-nations-top-defender-of-the-bar-exam-knows-exactly-how-to-value-diploma-privilege-systems/ |title=The Nation’s Top Defender Of The Bar Exam Knows Exactly How To Value Diploma Privilege Systems |last=Patrice |first=Joe |date=April 15, 2020 |website=abovethelaw.com |publisher=Above the Law |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref>

==Diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic==
There has been a renewed interest in diploma privilege as an alternative to the bar examination, which is generally administered in large conference rooms and auditoriums every July and February, in light of the [[COVID-19 pandemic]]. On March 22, 2020, several legal scholars who study licensure identified "emergency diploma privilege" as an alternative that showed "considerable promise" in a working paper discussing how states may continue to license new lawyers during the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref>{{cite journal |last1 = Angelos |first1 = Claudia |last2 = Berman |first2 = Sara |last3 = Bilek |first3 = Mary Lu |last4 = Chomsky |first4 = Carol L. |last5 = Curcio |first5 = Andrea Anne |last6 = Griggs |first6 = Marsha |last7 = Howarth |first7 = Joan W. |last8 = Kaufman |first8 = Eileen R. |last9 = Merritt |first9 = Deboarh Jones |last10 = Salkin |first10 = Patricia E. |last11 = Wegner |first11 = Judith W. |date = March 22, 2020 |title = The Bar Exam and the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Need for Immediate Action |url = https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/context/faculty/article/1704/viewcontent/The_Bar_Exam_and_the_COVID_19_Pandemic__The_Need_for_Immediate_Action__article___cover_sheet_.pdf |journal = Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 537 (2020) UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper |doi = 10.2139/ssrn.3559060 |s2cid = 216316636 |access-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-date = |archive-url = |url-status = }}</ref> The National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), which writes the [[Uniform Bar Exam]] (UBE), came out in opposition of diploma privilege in a [[white paper]] in which it argued that bar exams ensure lawyer competency.<ref>{{cite web |author = National Conference of Bar Examiners |date = April 9, 2020 |title = Bar Admissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluating Options for the Class of 2020 |url = http://www.ncbex.org/pdfviewer/?file=%2Fdmsdocument%2F239 |publisher = National Conference of Bar Examiners |access-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-date = June 24, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200624222306/http://www.ncbex.org/pdfviewer/?file=%2Fdmsdocument%2F239 |url-status = live }}</ref> Several legal news outlets criticized the NCBE's position, noting that the NCBE has a conflict of interest as the developer of the UBE and that the NCBE's President and CEO, Judith Gundersen, is a recipient of diploma privilege herself.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.law.com/2020/04/13/ditching-the-bar-exam-puts-public-at-risk-says-test-maker/ |title = Ditching the Bar Exam Puts Public at Risk, Says Test Maker |last = Sloan |first = Karen |date = April 13, 2020 |website = Law.com |access-date = July 5, 2020 |quote = It's not surprising that the NCBE is against eliminating the test for admission. Developing the exam is the core function of the organization, which has nearly 100 employees and reported $26.6 million in revenue in 2018, according to tax filings. |archive-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200705202710/https://www.law.com/2020/04/13/ditching-the-bar-exam-puts-public-at-risk-says-test-maker/ |url-status = live }}</ref><ref name=":0">{{cite web |url = https://abovethelaw.com/2020/04/the-nations-top-defender-of-the-bar-exam-knows-exactly-how-to-value-diploma-privilege-systems/ |title = The Nation's Top Defender of the Bar Exam Knows Exactly How to Value Diploma Privilege Systems |last = Patrice |first = Joe |date = April 15, 2020 |website = Above the Law |access-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-date = April 9, 2023 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230409150043/https://abovethelaw.com/2020/04/the-nations-top-defender-of-the-bar-exam-knows-exactly-how-to-value-diploma-privilege-systems/ |url-status = live }}</ref> A number of petitions for emergency diploma privilege by law school deans, professors, and recent graduates in other states have grown.<ref>{{cite web|last=Skolnik|first=Sam|date=June 30, 2020|title=States Pressured to Waive Bar Exam for New Lawyers in Pandemic|url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/states-pressured-to-waive-bar-exam-for-new-lawyers-in-pandemic|access-date=July 5, 2020|website=Bloomberg Law|archive-date=July 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200705210924/https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/states-pressured-to-waive-bar-exam-for-new-lawyers-in-pandemic|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Sloan|first=Karen|date=June 30, 2020|title=National Momentum Builds for Diploma Privilege as Oregon Makes Bar Exam Optional|url=https://www.law.com/2020/06/30/national-momentum-builds-for-diploma-privilege-as-oregon-makes-bar-exam-optional/|access-date=July 5, 2020|website=Law.com|archive-date=July 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200705224416/https://www.law.com/2020/06/30/national-momentum-builds-for-diploma-privilege-as-oregon-makes-bar-exam-optional/|url-status=live}}</ref> Organizations like United for Diploma Privilege have hosted [[webinar|webinars]] and organized recent graduates to circulate similar petitions in over 30 states.<ref>{{cite web|date=June 22, 2020|title=Washington Graduates to Host Webinar on How They Won Diploma Privilege|url=http://www.unitedfordiplomaprivilege.org/2020/06/22/washington-graduates-to-host-webinar-on-how-they-won-diploma-privilege/|access-date=July 6, 2020|publisher=United for Diploma Privilege|archive-date=July 7, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200707112637/http://www.unitedfordiplomaprivilege.org/2020/06/22/washington-graduates-to-host-webinar-on-how-they-won-diploma-privilege/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Stone|first=Rachel|date=July 8, 2020|title=Push for Diploma Privilege Unites Law Grads Nationwide|url=https://www.law360.com/newyork/articles/1289972/push-for-diploma-privilege-unites-law-grads-nationwide|access-date=July 8, 2020|website=Law360|archive-date=July 9, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200709004636/https://www.law360.com/newyork/articles/1289972/push-for-diploma-privilege-unites-law-grads-nationwide|url-status=live}}</ref>


On March 27, 2020, [[New York (state)|New York]] became the first state to announce the postponement of its July 2020 bar examination as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2020/03/27/fall-bar-exam-added-fate-of-july-test-uncertain-amid-covid-19-pandemic-389-99573/ |title=New York Postpones July Bar Exam Amid COVID-19 Pandemic |last=Sloan |first=Karen |date=March 27, 2020 |website=law.com |publisher=Law.com |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> Several states and territories followed suit by postponing their exams to August, September, or October, while others have looked for alternative options to an in-person examination, including remote examinations or offering diploma privilege to qualified individuals. The NCBE is tracking changes regarding the July 2020 bar exam by each state and territory.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ncbex.org/ncbe-covid-19-updates/july-2020-bar-exam-jurisdiction-information/ |title=July 2020 Bar Exam: Jurisdiction Information |website=ncbex.org |publisher=National Conference of Bar Examiners |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref>
On March 27, [[New York (state)|New York]] became the first state to announce the postponement of its July 2020 bar examination as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2020/03/27/fall-bar-exam-added-fate-of-july-test-uncertain-amid-covid-19-pandemic-389-99573/ |title = New York Postpones July Bar Exam amid COVID-19 Pandemic |last = Sloan |first = Karen |date = March 27, 2020 |website = Law.com |access-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200705203305/https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2020/03/27/fall-bar-exam-added-fate-of-july-test-uncertain-amid-covid-19-pandemic-389-99573/ |url-status = live }}</ref> Several states and territories followed suit by postponing their exams to August, September, or October, while others have looked for alternative options to an in-person examination, including remote examinations or offering diploma privilege to qualified individuals. 39 jurisdictions postponed or canceled their July bar examinations, with postponed exams taking place in September, October, or other dates.<ref name=":6" /> 25 jurisdictions are offered remotely-administered examinations.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web|title=July 2020 Bar Exam Status by Jurisdiction|url=http://www.ncbex.org/ncbe-covid-19-updates/july-2020-bar-exam-jurisdiction-information/status-table/|access-date=2020-09-29|website=National Conference of Bar Examiners|language=en-US|archive-date=July 21, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200721190134/http://www.ncbex.org/ncbe-covid-19-updates/july-2020-bar-exam-jurisdiction-information/status-table/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=July 2020 Bar Exam: Jurisdiction Information|url=http://www.ncbex.org/ncbe-covid-19-updates/july-2020-bar-exam-jurisdiction-information/|access-date=2020-09-29|publisher=National Conference of Bar Examiners|archive-date=July 5, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200705202709/http://www.ncbex.org/ncbe-covid-19-updates/july-2020-bar-exam-jurisdiction-information/|url-status=live}}</ref>


On April 21, 2020, [[Utah]] became the first state to grant temporary, emergency diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/utah-first-state-to-grant-diploma-privilege-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic |title=Utah is first state to grant diploma privilege during novel coronavirus pandemic |last=Ward |first=Stephanie Francis |date=April 22, 2020 |website=abajournal.com |publisher=ABA Journal |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> The [[Utah Supreme Court]] granted diploma privilege to all individuals who were registered for July 2020 bar examination in Utah and who graduated from an [[American Bar Association|ABA]]-accredited law school with a first-time bar passage rate at or above 86%. [[Washington (state)|Washington]] became the second state to grant emergency diploma privilege on June 12, 2020. <ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.law.com/2020/06/15/second-state-lets-law-grads-skips-the-bar-exam-amid-covid-19/ |title=Second State Lets Law Grads Skip the Bar Exam Amid COVID-19 |last=Sloan |first=Karen |date=June 15, 2020 |website=law.com |publisher=Law.com |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> The [[Washington Supreme Court]] granted diploma privilege to all individuals who were registered for the postponed July 2020 bar exam (then scheduled to take place in September) and who graduated from an ABA-accredited law school. The Washington Supreme Court gave individuals the option either to opt for diploma privilege or to take the exam in-person in September to receive a [[Uniform Bar Exam]] score. However, some Washington legal employers have told recent graduates that they will not recognize diploma privilege and want them to sit for the test regardless.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/lawyer-coronavirus-diploma-privilege/despite-diploma-privilege-in-wa-some-firms-want-grads-to-take-bar-exam-idUSL1N2DZ0L3 |title=Despite diploma privilege in WA, some firms want grads to take bar exam |last=Spiezio |first=Caroline |date=June 22, 2020 |website=reuters.com |publisher=Reuters |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> The [[Oregon Supreme Court]] subsequently granted emergency diploma privilege in [[Oregon]] to 2020 graduates of ABA-accredited law schools with a first-time bar passage rate at or above 86% on June 29, 2020, in response to requests by the deans of [[University of Oregon School of Law]], [[Lewis & Clark Law School]], and [[Willamette University College of Law]].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.wweek.com/news/2020/06/29/the-oregon-supreme-court-agrees-to-waive-july-bar-exam-for-2020-oregon-law-school-grads/ |title=Oregon Supreme Court Agrees to Waive July Bar Exam for 2020 Oregon Law School Grads |last=Jaquiss |first=Nigel |date=June 29, 2020 |website=wweek.com |publisher=Willamette Week |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> On July 6, 2020, [[New York State Senate|New York State Senator]] [[Brad Hoylman]] introduced legislation to provide 2020 graduates with diploma privilege. <ref>{{cite web |url=https://trackbill.com/bill/new-york-senate-bill-8682-makes-a-temporary-change-to-the-system-of-examination-of-candidates-for-admission-to-practice-as-attorneys-and-counselors-in-the-state-of-new-york-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-repealer/1930183/ |title=New York S8682: Makes a temporary change to the system of examination of candidates for admission to practice as attorneys and counselors in the state of New York during the COVID-19 pandemic;repealer |last=Hoylman |first=Brad |date=July 6, 2020 |website=trackbill.com |publisher=PolicyEngage LLC |access-date=July 6, 2020}}</ref>
On April 21, [[Utah]] became the first state to grant temporary, emergency diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic.<ref name=":4">{{cite web |url = https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/utah-first-state-to-grant-diploma-privilege-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic |title = Utah is First State to Grant Diploma Privilege During Novel Coronavirus Pandemic |last = Ward |first = Stephanie Francis |date = April 22, 2020 |website = ABA Journal |access-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-date = July 14, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200714101539/https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/utah-first-state-to-grant-diploma-privilege-during-the-coronavirus-pandemic |url-status = live }}</ref> Since then, Washington, Oregon, Louisiana, and the District of Columbia have all instituted temporary diploma privilege policies, as detailed in the table below. However, some Washington legal employers have told recent graduates that they will not recognize diploma privilege and want them to sit for the test regardless.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://www.reuters.com/article/lawyer-coronavirus-diploma-privilege/despite-diploma-privilege-in-wa-some-firms-want-grads-to-take-bar-exam-idUSL1N2DZ0L3 |title = Despite Diploma Privilege in WA, Some Firms Want Grads to Take Bar Exam |last = Spiezio |first = Caroline |date = June 22, 2020 |publisher = Reuters |access-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-date = July 5, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200705224416/https://www.reuters.com/article/lawyer-coronavirus-diploma-privilege/despite-diploma-privilege-in-wa-some-firms-want-grads-to-take-bar-exam-idUSL1N2DZ0L3 |url-status = live }}</ref> In the District of Columbia, candidates who choose the diploma privilege option rather than taking the bar examination must be supervised for three years by a qualified attorney admitted to the D.C. bar.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web|last=Atkinson|first=Khorri|date=September 24, 2020|title=DC To Allow Limited Diploma Privilege Amid Pandemic - Law360|url=https://www.law360.com/articles/1313391/dc-to-allow-limited-diploma-privilege-amid-pandemic|access-date=2020-09-29|website=Law360|language=en|archive-date=September 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200928161209/https://www.law360.com/articles/1313391/dc-to-allow-limited-diploma-privilege-amid-pandemic|url-status=live}}</ref> On July 6, [[New York State Senate|New York State Senator]] [[Brad Hoylman]] introduced legislation to provide 2020 graduates with diploma privilege.<ref>{{cite web |url = https://trackbill.com/bill/new-york-senate-bill-8682-makes-a-temporary-change-to-the-system-of-examination-of-candidates-for-admission-to-practice-as-attorneys-and-counselors-in-the-state-of-new-york-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-repealer/1930183/ |title = New York S8682: Makes a Temporary Change to the System of Examination of Candidates for Admission to Practice as Attorneys and Counselors in the State of New York During the COVID-19 Pandemic; Repealer |last = Hoylman |first = Brad |date = July 6, 2020 |website = trackbill.com |publisher = PolicyEngage LLC |access-date = July 6, 2020 |archive-date = July 7, 2020 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200707173756/https://trackbill.com/bill/new-york-senate-bill-8682-makes-a-temporary-change-to-the-system-of-examination-of-candidates-for-admission-to-practice-as-attorneys-and-counselors-in-the-state-of-new-york-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-repealer/1930183/ |url-status = live }}</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
|+Temporary provision of diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic
!Jurisdiction
!Date announced
!Eligibility requirements
!Responsible authority
|-
|'''Utah'''
|April 21, 2020
|
* Registered for the July 2020 bar exam.
* Graduated from an [[American Bar Association|ABA]]-accredited law school with a first-time bar passage rate at or above 86%.
|[[Utah Supreme Court]]<ref name=":4" />
|-
|'''Washington'''{{Efn|Option offered between diploma privilege and in-person September examination.|name=|group=lower-alpha}}
|June 12, 2020
|
* Registered for the July 2020 bar exam (which had been postponed to September).
* Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school.
|[[Washington Supreme Court]]<ref>{{cite web|last=Sloan|first=Karen|date=June 15, 2020|title=Second State Lets Law Grads Skip the Bar Exam amid COVID-19|url=https://www.law.com/2020/06/15/second-state-lets-law-grads-skips-the-bar-exam-amid-covid-19/|access-date=July 5, 2020|website=Law.com|archive-date=June 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200628220404/https://www.law.com/2020/06/15/second-state-lets-law-grads-skips-the-bar-exam-amid-covid-19/|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
|'''Oregon'''
|June 29, 2020
|
* Registered for the July 2020 bar exam.
* Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school with a first-time bar passage rate at or above 86%.
|[[Oregon Supreme Court]]<ref>{{cite web|last=Jaquiss|first=Nigel|date=June 29, 2020|title=Oregon Supreme Court Agrees to Waive July Bar Exam for 2020 Oregon Law School Grads|url=https://www.wweek.com/news/2020/06/29/the-oregon-supreme-court-agrees-to-waive-july-bar-exam-for-2020-oregon-law-school-grads/|access-date=July 5, 2020|website=Willamette Week|archive-date=July 4, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200704162612/https://www.wweek.com/news/2020/06/29/the-oregon-supreme-court-agrees-to-waive-july-bar-exam-for-2020-oregon-law-school-grads/|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
|'''Louisiana'''
|July 22, 2020
|
* Registered for the July or October 2020 bar exams.
* Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school.
* Have not previously sat for any other bar exam in another state.
* By the end of 2021, must complete 25 hours of [[continuing legal education]] and a mentoring program.
|[[Louisiana Supreme Court]]<ref>{{Cite web|last=Gallo|first=Andrea|date=July 22, 2020|title=Supreme Court grants 'diploma privilege' to let recent grads practice without bar exam|url=https://www.nola.com/news/courts/article_411d4088-cb94-11ea-88cd-c74f58da6f9f.html|access-date=2020-07-22|website=NOLA.com|language=en|archive-date=July 24, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200724044733/https://www.nola.com/news/courts/article_411d4088-cb94-11ea-88cd-c74f58da6f9f.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
|-
|'''District of Columbia{{Efn|Option offered between diploma privilege and online October examination.|name=|group=lower-alpha}}'''
|September 24, 2020
|
* Registered for the 2020 or 2021 bar exams.
* Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school in 2019 or 2020.
* Have not previously sat for any bar exam or had a bar application denied.
* Passed the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam.
* Will be directly supervised while practicing for the next three years by a qualified attorney.
|[[District of Columbia Court of Appeals]]<ref name=":5" />
|}


==Notes==
A number of petitions for emergency diploma privilege by law school deans, professors, and recent graduates in other states have subsequently grown in response to the success of similar petitions in Washington and Oregon.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/states-pressured-to-waive-bar-exam-for-new-lawyers-in-pandemic |title=States Pressured to Waive Bar Exam for New Lawyers in Pandemic |last=Skolnik |first=Sam |date=June 30, 2020 |website=news.bloomberglaw.com |publisher=Bloomberg Law |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.law.com/2020/06/30/national-momentum-builds-for-diploma-privilege-as-oregon-makes-bar-exam-optional/ |title=National Momentum Builds for Diploma Privilege as Oregon Makes Bar Exam Optional |last=Sloan |first=Karen |date=June 30, 2020 |website=law.com |publisher=Law.com |access-date=July 5, 2020}}</ref> Organizations like United for Diploma Privilege have hosted [[webinar|webinars]] and organized recent graduates in over 30 other states to circulate similar petitions to those used in California and Washington. <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unitedfordiplomaprivilege.org/2020/06/22/washington-graduates-to-host-webinar-on-how-they-won-diploma-privilege/ |title=Washington Graduates to host webinar on how they won diploma privilege |date=June 22, 2020 |website=unitedfordiplomaprivilege.org |publisher=United for Diploma Privilege |access-date=July 6, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.law360.com/newyork/articles/1289972/push-for-diploma-privilege-unites-law-grads-nationwide |title=Push For Diploma Privilege Unites Law Grads Nationwide |last=Stone |first=Rachel |date=July 8, 2020 |website=law360.com |publisher=Law360 |access-date=July 8, 2020}}</ref>
{{Reflist|group=lower-alpha}}


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 06:33, 14 June 2024

In the United States, the diploma privilege is a method for lawyers to be admitted to the bar (i.e. authorized to practice law) without taking a bar examination. Wisconsin is the only jurisdiction that currently allows diploma privilege as an alternative to the bar examination.

In 25 states, attorneys who were initially admitted to practice by another state's diploma privilege are eligible for admission to the state bar on motion of the admission committee.[1]

History

[edit]

Diploma privilege arose as a method for admission to the bar along with the rise of law schools in the United States. Prior to the 1870s, most aspiring lawyers trained through apprenticeships under a lawyer or a judge, a practice called "reading law".[2][3] In the 1870s, law schools began to emerge across the country as an alternative form of legal education. To incentivize aspiring lawyers to attend law schools, many states offered "diploma privilege" to graduates of law schools, wherein they would receive automatic admission to the bar. This practice reached its peak between 1879 and 1917.[4]

The practice of diploma privilege declined in favor of formal, written bar examinations from the late 1910s onward.[3] The privilege was abolished in California in 1917. In 1921, the American Bar Association formally expressed opposition to diploma privilege. By 1948, only 9 states maintained diploma privilege.[4] The most recent states to abolish diploma privilege and require law school graduates to sit for a bar examination were Mississippi in 1981, Montana and South Dakota in 1983, and West Virginia in 1988.[citation needed]

As of 2024, Wisconsin is the only state that allows graduates of in-state law schools to gain admission to the bar through diploma privilege rather than a bar examination.[5] New Hampshire does not have diploma privilege, but its only law school has an alternative licensing program called the Daniel Webster Honors Program that allows a limited number of students who have completed certain curricula and a separate exam to bypass the regular bar exam.[6] Iowa considered reinstating diploma privilege in 2014.[7]

Diploma privilege in Wisconsin

[edit]

In Wisconsin, J.D. graduates of the two American Bar Association-accredited law schools in the state, Marquette University Law School and the University of Wisconsin Law School, may seek admission to the State Bar of Wisconsin without having to sit for a bar examination. LLM and SJD graduates of these law schools are not eligible for diploma privilege.

The diploma privilege in Wisconsin dates to 1870, when it was passed by the Wisconsin State Legislature in the same legislation that established the University of Wisconsin Law School. At that time a law department was established in the State University and a course of study under able instructors was prescribed for students in the law department. The 1870 law provided that graduates of this department should be entitled to admission to the bar upon their certificate of graduation—that is, their law degree. It was offered to encourage future lawyers to get a formal legal education instead of simply "reading law," which was the typical legal training of the time.[8]

Graduates of out-of-state law schools, even if they are Wisconsin residents, must still take the Wisconsin bar exam to be admitted in Wisconsin. Likewise, graduates of Wisconsin law schools must take the bar exam in many other states in which they are going to practice. A number of U.S. states do not grant reciprocal admission for attorneys who obtained their bar admission through the diploma privilege, requiring those attorneys to take that state's bar exam, regardless of the length of that attorney's practice. The policy reasoning behind diploma privilege is to incentivize Wisconsin residents to attend in-state law schools and to keep Wisconsin residents working in-state. Another policy consideration is preventing "brain drain" in Wisconsin. This theory holds that without the diploma privilege, the smartest from the state will leave Wisconsin for their education or for their career, specifically to nearby Chicago (the Iowa Bar Association cited similar territorial concerns[7][9]). Another advantage is that state of Wisconsin subsidizes in-state resident tuition for law students, and therefore incentivizes them to stay to retain the state's educational investment. It is also claimed that the diploma privilege helps keep youth in Wisconsin.[citation needed]

In Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki, a class action lawsuit certified in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in June 2008, the petitioners asserted that the state's policy discriminates against interstate commerce in violation of the Commerce Clause because it affords a diploma privilege in lieu of a bar examination only to lawyers graduating from Wisconsin's law schools. The suit sought injunctive relief to expand the privilege to all applicants to the Wisconsin Bar who obtain a J.D. from any law school accredited by the American Bar Association.[10] The district court subsequently dismissed the case for failure to state a cause of action. On July 9, 2009, the Seventh Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of the case, saying "we find ourselves in an evidentiary vacuum created by the early termination of the case," and remanded the case to the district court.[11]

Diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic

[edit]

There has been a renewed interest in diploma privilege as an alternative to the bar examination, which is generally administered in large conference rooms and auditoriums every July and February, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 22, 2020, several legal scholars who study licensure identified "emergency diploma privilege" as an alternative that showed "considerable promise" in a working paper discussing how states may continue to license new lawyers during the COVID-19 pandemic.[12] The National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), which writes the Uniform Bar Exam (UBE), came out in opposition of diploma privilege in a white paper in which it argued that bar exams ensure lawyer competency.[13] Several legal news outlets criticized the NCBE's position, noting that the NCBE has a conflict of interest as the developer of the UBE and that the NCBE's President and CEO, Judith Gundersen, is a recipient of diploma privilege herself.[14][15] A number of petitions for emergency diploma privilege by law school deans, professors, and recent graduates in other states have grown.[16][17] Organizations like United for Diploma Privilege have hosted webinars and organized recent graduates to circulate similar petitions in over 30 states.[18][19]

On March 27, New York became the first state to announce the postponement of its July 2020 bar examination as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.[20] Several states and territories followed suit by postponing their exams to August, September, or October, while others have looked for alternative options to an in-person examination, including remote examinations or offering diploma privilege to qualified individuals. 39 jurisdictions postponed or canceled their July bar examinations, with postponed exams taking place in September, October, or other dates.[21] 25 jurisdictions are offered remotely-administered examinations.[21][22]

On April 21, Utah became the first state to grant temporary, emergency diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic.[23] Since then, Washington, Oregon, Louisiana, and the District of Columbia have all instituted temporary diploma privilege policies, as detailed in the table below. However, some Washington legal employers have told recent graduates that they will not recognize diploma privilege and want them to sit for the test regardless.[24] In the District of Columbia, candidates who choose the diploma privilege option rather than taking the bar examination must be supervised for three years by a qualified attorney admitted to the D.C. bar.[25] On July 6, New York State Senator Brad Hoylman introduced legislation to provide 2020 graduates with diploma privilege.[26]

Temporary provision of diploma privilege during the COVID-19 pandemic
Jurisdiction Date announced Eligibility requirements Responsible authority
Utah April 21, 2020
  • Registered for the July 2020 bar exam.
  • Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school with a first-time bar passage rate at or above 86%.
Utah Supreme Court[23]
Washington[a] June 12, 2020
  • Registered for the July 2020 bar exam (which had been postponed to September).
  • Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school.
Washington Supreme Court[27]
Oregon June 29, 2020
  • Registered for the July 2020 bar exam.
  • Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school with a first-time bar passage rate at or above 86%.
Oregon Supreme Court[28]
Louisiana July 22, 2020
  • Registered for the July or October 2020 bar exams.
  • Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school.
  • Have not previously sat for any other bar exam in another state.
  • By the end of 2021, must complete 25 hours of continuing legal education and a mentoring program.
Louisiana Supreme Court[29]
District of Columbia[b] September 24, 2020
  • Registered for the 2020 or 2021 bar exams.
  • Graduated from an ABA-accredited law school in 2019 or 2020.
  • Have not previously sat for any bar exam or had a bar application denied.
  • Passed the Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam.
  • Will be directly supervised while practicing for the next three years by a qualified attorney.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals[25]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Option offered between diploma privilege and in-person September examination.
  2. ^ Option offered between diploma privilege and online October examination.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ National Conference of Bar Examiners; American Bar Association Section of Legal Education and Admissions to the Bar (2008). "Reciprocity, Comity, and Attorneys Exams" (PDF). Comprehensive Guide to Bar Admission Requirements 2008 (Chart). National Conference of Bar Examiners. p. 28. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 4, 2008.
  2. ^ Goforth, Carol (February 18, 2015). "Why the Bar Examination Fails to Raise the Bar". Ohio Northern University Law Review. 42 (1): 47–88. Archived from the original on July 21, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  3. ^ a b Goldman, Thomas (January 1, 1974). "Use of the Diploma Privilege in the United States". Tulsa Law Review. 10 (1): 36. Archived from the original on July 21, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  4. ^ a b Hansen, Daniel (January 1, 1995). "Do We Need the Bar Examination—A Critical Evaluation of the Justifications for the Bar Examination and Proposed Alternatives?". Case Western Reserve Law Review. 45 (4): 1191–1235. ISSN 0008-7262. Archived from the original on July 21, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  5. ^ School, University of Wisconsin Law. "Diploma Privilege | University of Wisconsin Law School". law.wisc.edu. Retrieved June 14, 2024.
  6. ^ "Daniel Webster Scholar Honors Program". University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law. September 10, 2018. Archived from the original on July 22, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  7. ^ a b Hylton, J. Gordon (January 21, 2014). "Iowa Supreme Court Contemplating Diploma Privilege". Marquette University Law School Faculty Blog. Archived from the original on July 22, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  8. ^ Levine, Steven (December 2002). "End Separate-but-Equal Bar Admission". Wisconsin Lawyer. 75 (12). Archived from the original on November 19, 2005.
  9. ^ Newman, John (August 26, 2014). "Fairer Ways to Stop the Lawyer Brain Drain". Des Moines Register. Archived from the original on April 9, 2023. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
  10. ^ Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki, WL 2415459 (W.D. Wis. 2008).
  11. ^ Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki (7th Cir.), Text, archived from the original on July 20, 2009.
  12. ^ Angelos, Claudia; Berman, Sara; Bilek, Mary Lu; Chomsky, Carol L.; Curcio, Andrea Anne; Griggs, Marsha; Howarth, Joan W.; Kaufman, Eileen R.; Merritt, Deboarh Jones; Salkin, Patricia E.; Wegner, Judith W. (March 22, 2020). "The Bar Exam and the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Need for Immediate Action" (PDF). Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 537 (2020) UNLV William S. Boyd School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3559060. S2CID 216316636. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  13. ^ National Conference of Bar Examiners (April 9, 2020). "Bar Admissions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evaluating Options for the Class of 2020". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original on June 24, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  14. ^ Sloan, Karen (April 13, 2020). "Ditching the Bar Exam Puts Public at Risk, Says Test Maker". Law.com. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020. It's not surprising that the NCBE is against eliminating the test for admission. Developing the exam is the core function of the organization, which has nearly 100 employees and reported $26.6 million in revenue in 2018, according to tax filings.
  15. ^ Patrice, Joe (April 15, 2020). "The Nation's Top Defender of the Bar Exam Knows Exactly How to Value Diploma Privilege Systems". Above the Law. Archived from the original on April 9, 2023. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  16. ^ Skolnik, Sam (June 30, 2020). "States Pressured to Waive Bar Exam for New Lawyers in Pandemic". Bloomberg Law. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  17. ^ Sloan, Karen (June 30, 2020). "National Momentum Builds for Diploma Privilege as Oregon Makes Bar Exam Optional". Law.com. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  18. ^ "Washington Graduates to Host Webinar on How They Won Diploma Privilege". United for Diploma Privilege. June 22, 2020. Archived from the original on July 7, 2020. Retrieved July 6, 2020.
  19. ^ Stone, Rachel (July 8, 2020). "Push for Diploma Privilege Unites Law Grads Nationwide". Law360. Archived from the original on July 9, 2020. Retrieved July 8, 2020.
  20. ^ Sloan, Karen (March 27, 2020). "New York Postpones July Bar Exam amid COVID-19 Pandemic". Law.com. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  21. ^ a b "July 2020 Bar Exam Status by Jurisdiction". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original on July 21, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  22. ^ "July 2020 Bar Exam: Jurisdiction Information". National Conference of Bar Examiners. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  23. ^ a b Ward, Stephanie Francis (April 22, 2020). "Utah is First State to Grant Diploma Privilege During Novel Coronavirus Pandemic". ABA Journal. Archived from the original on July 14, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  24. ^ Spiezio, Caroline (June 22, 2020). "Despite Diploma Privilege in WA, Some Firms Want Grads to Take Bar Exam". Reuters. Archived from the original on July 5, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  25. ^ a b Atkinson, Khorri (September 24, 2020). "DC To Allow Limited Diploma Privilege Amid Pandemic - Law360". Law360. Archived from the original on September 28, 2020. Retrieved September 29, 2020.
  26. ^ Hoylman, Brad (July 6, 2020). "New York S8682: Makes a Temporary Change to the System of Examination of Candidates for Admission to Practice as Attorneys and Counselors in the State of New York During the COVID-19 Pandemic; Repealer". trackbill.com. PolicyEngage LLC. Archived from the original on July 7, 2020. Retrieved July 6, 2020.
  27. ^ Sloan, Karen (June 15, 2020). "Second State Lets Law Grads Skip the Bar Exam amid COVID-19". Law.com. Archived from the original on June 28, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  28. ^ Jaquiss, Nigel (June 29, 2020). "Oregon Supreme Court Agrees to Waive July Bar Exam for 2020 Oregon Law School Grads". Willamette Week. Archived from the original on July 4, 2020. Retrieved July 5, 2020.
  29. ^ Gallo, Andrea (July 22, 2020). "Supreme Court grants 'diploma privilege' to let recent grads practice without bar exam". NOLA.com. Archived from the original on July 24, 2020. Retrieved July 22, 2020.
[edit]
  • Moran, Beverly. The Wisconsin Diploma Privilege: Try It, You'll Like It, 2000 Wis. L. Rev. 645 (2000).
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules, Chapter 40, relating to bar admission
  • Reed, Alfred Zantzinger. Training for the Public Profession of the Law (Foundation 1921) pp. 266 (noting the abolition of the diploma privilege in California).
  • In re Yanni, 2005 SD 59, ¶ 13, 697 N.W.2d 394, 399 (describing the privilege's abolition in S.D.)