Wikipedia:WikiProject Death/Assessment

Main page

Assessment

Templates

Kategorien

Ressourcen

Participants

Suicide task force

Death articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top Hoch Mid Niedrig NA ??? Total FA 2 8 29 64 103 FL 1 3 9 13 A 1 1 GA 3 23 59 207 292 B 15 102 336 1,157 7 1,617 C 18 131 660 3,716 16 4,541 Start 7 80 786 7,672 32 8,577 Stub 1 44 1,428 7 1,480 List 6 37 238 1,436 2 1,719 Kategorie 28,884 28,884 Disambig 101 101 File 141 141 Portal 1 1 Project 52 52 Template 173 173 NA 1 2 20 1,363 1,386 Other 1 41 42 Assessed 51 384 2,158 15,710 30,756 64 49,123 Unassessed 13 2 15 Total 51 384 2,158 15,723 30,756 66 49,138 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 75,365 Ω = 4.54 The assessment department of the Death WikiProject focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's death-related articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program. The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Death}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Death articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. FAQ See also the general assessment FAQ 1. What is the purpose of the article ratings? The rating system allows the project to monitor the quality of articles in our subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. It is also utilized by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content. Please note, however, that these ratings are primarily intended for the internal use of the project, and do not necessarily imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole. 2. How do I add an article to the WikiProject? Just add {{WikiProject Death}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else. 3. Someone put a {{WikiProject Death}} template on an article, but it doesn't seem to be within the project's scope. What should I do? Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the project talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article). 4. Who can assess articles? Any member of the Death WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Editors who are not participants in this project are also welcome to assess articles, but should defer to consensus within the project in case of procedural disputes. 5. How do I rate an article? Check the quality scale and select the level that best matches the state of the article; then, follow the instructions below to add the rating to the project banner on the article's talk page. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale. 6. Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. 7. What if I don't agree with a rating? You can ask any member of the project to rate the article again. Please note that some of the available levels have an associated formal review process; this is documented in the assessment scale. 8. Aren't the ratings subjective? Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know! Assessment instructions An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Death}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax): {{WikiProject Death| class=??? }} The following values may be used: FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Death articles) A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Death articles) GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Death articles) B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Death articles) C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Death articles) Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Death articles) Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Death articles) FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class Death articles) List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Death articles) Dab (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Death articles) Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Death articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below. Quality scale Grading scheme WikiProject article quality grading scheme Class Criteria Reader's experience Editing suggestions Example  FA The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria: A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate. Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. Cleopatra (as of June 2018)  FL The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria: Prose. It features professional standards of writing. Lead. It has an engaging lead that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria. Comprehensiveness. (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items. (b) statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations. (c) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for stand-alone lists; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities. Style. It complies with the Manual of Style and its supplementary pages. (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, tables, and colour; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked. (b) Media files. It has images and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. (c) Accessibility. It uses proper formating to be accessible to all readers. Bulleted and unbulleted lists and tables are structured correctly. Visual media, if included, utilize alternative (alt) text. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process. Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)  A The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)  GA The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria A good article is: Well-written: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) B The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but does not need to be of the standard of featured articles. The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams, an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. The article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. Psychology (as of January 2024) C The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow. Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. Wing (as of June 2018) Start An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. Ball (as of September 2014) Stub A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) List Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. List of literary movements Importance scale Need: A measure of a subject's importance, regardless of its quality Top {{top-importance}} Subject is a must-have for a print encyclopedia. High {{high-importance}} Subject is exceptionally important. Mid {{mid-importance}} Subject contributes a depth of knowledge. Low {{low-importance}} Subject fills in important details. NA {{NA-importance}} Subject importance is not applicable. Log Death articles by quality, assessment log September 6, 2024 Renamed 1985 Oklahoma City shooting renamed to Murder of Linda Reaves. Reassessed Pan Am Flight 812 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Undertakers sketch (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Assessed 2003 Route 60 vehicle shooting (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Category:2019 murders in the State of Palestine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:2020s murders in the State of Palestine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:2022 murders in the State of Palestine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:2023 murders in the State of Palestine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:2024 murders in Kenya (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:2024 murders in South Africa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:2024 murders in the State of Palestine (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Katabasis in classical mythology (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Draft:Massacre of Tlemcen (1145) (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Muranë (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Murder of Linda Reaves (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Removed File:Box with Hitler's alleged corpse.png (talk) removed. September 5, 2024 Renamed Suspicious deaths of notable Russians (2022–2024) renamed to Suspicious deaths of notable Russians in 2022–2024. Reassessed 1993 murders in Prasanthi Nilayam (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Assessed 1985 Oklahoma City shooting (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t) 2024 Apalachee High School shooting (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Akhirah (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t) Alan Eugene Miller (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Jane Ying Wu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Michael Ihde (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Murder of Hannah Cornelius (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Murder of Leesa Gray (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Paul Wellstone memorial event (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Suicide attacks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Suicide terrorism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Suspicious deaths of notable Russians in 2022–2024 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) September 4, 2024 Reassessed Golovinskoye Cemetery (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Obafemi Awolowo University massacre (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Assessed 1997 Saint-Casimir mass suicide (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) 2022 Gudauri helicopter crash (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Aeroflot Flight B-608 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) File:Box with Hitler's alleged corpse.png (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Massacres in Piaśnica (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Medo Halimy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Phillip Dean Hancock (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) September 3, 2024 Renamed 1993 murders in Prashanthi Nilayam renamed to 1993 murders in Prasanthi Nilayam. 2024 India–Bangladesh floods renamed to 2024 India floods. List of people died in July massacre renamed to List of people who died in the July massacre. Reassessed 2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Murder of Darlene VanderGiesen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Sizzlers massacre (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Assessed 1993 murders in Prasanthi Nilayam (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) 2024 India floods (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) 2024 Tarqumiyah shooting (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Category:Accidents and incidents involving the Bombardier Challenger 600 series (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Killing of Aniah Blanchard (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Killing of Jared Bridegan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) List of people who died in the July massacre (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Lists of last words (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Mel Ignatow (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) NKVD prisoner massacre in Berezhany (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Category:Sportspeople who died by suicide (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Vadim Boyko (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Removed Category:Massacres in 1762 (talk) removed. September 2, 2024 Renamed 2024 India floods renamed to 2024 India–Bangladesh floods. Aeroflot Flight 1770 renamed to August 1969 Il-18 crash. Eridanos (mythological river) renamed to Eridanos (river of Hades). Heoninneung renamed to Heonilleung. Reassessed Australian War Memorial (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Bangabandhu Memorial Museum attack (2024) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) Carl Tanzler (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Lehi Street bombing (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t) Assessed 2024 India–Bangladesh floods (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) 2024 Kamchatka Mil Mi-8 crash (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Category:And Then There Were None (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) August 1969 Il-18 crash (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Category:Burials at Georgetown Cemetery (Georgetown, Kentucky) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Burials at Lexington Cemetery (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Burials at Paris Cemetery (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Category:Burials in Kentucky by cemetery (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Eridanos (river of Hades) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Har Jehuda Cemetery (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Heonilleung (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Murder of Darlene VanderGiesen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Murder of William Clayton Jr. (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Tomb of Nur Jahan (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Tomb of Tahir Khan Nahar (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Tomb of the Hakims (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) September 1, 2024 Renamed Template:UBX/DS renamed to User:UBX/DS. Reassessed Bangabandhu Memorial Museum attack (2024) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to NA-Class. (rev · t) CAAC Flight 5109 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Killing of Leah Croucher (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Assessed 1970 Batagay An-24 crash (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) 2011 Marrakesh bombing (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Aeroflot Flight 205 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Elisabeth Käsemann (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Murder of Emma Walker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Sizzlers massacre (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Szczucin massacre (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Removed 2017 Aerogaviota Antonov An-26 crash (talk) removed. Category:Peter Sutcliffe victims (talk) removed. August 31, 2024 Renamed 2024 Barsalogho battle renamed to 2024 Barsalogho attack. Death of Leah Croucher renamed to Killing of Leah Croucher. Palestinian suicide terrorism renamed to Palestinian suicide attacks. Reassessed 1962 Paraná da Eva Panair do Brasil Lockheed Constellation crash (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) 2024 Solingen stabbing (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Chouf massacres (1977) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t) Killing of Hae Min Lee (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class. (rev · t) Assessed 2024 Barsalogho attack (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) 2024 Delta Air Lines tire explosion (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Aeroflot-Yugavia Flight 519 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Homicide of Nikole Bakoles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Killing of Leah Croucher (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Larnaca yacht killings (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) List of members of the Canadian Parliament who died in office (1900–1949) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Mary Millington (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t) Palestinian suicide attacks (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t) Draft:Radha Murder (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t) Rafael Calzada school shooting (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)