User talk:Reddi: Difference between revisions
Pruner: You have been pruned from a list Tag: Reverted |
→FAR notice: new section |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
''From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; see history if you want the archive''. [[User:Reddi|J. D. Redding]] 22:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC) |
''From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; see history if you want the archive''. [[User:Reddi|J. D. Redding]] 22:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
<br style="clear:both;"> |
<br style="clear:both;"> |
||
== Nomination of [[:Devon (actress)]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Devon (actress)]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Telegeodynamics]] == |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devon (actress)  (2nd nomination)]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Telegeodynamics]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
|||
<blockquote>'''[[WP:NOTMIRROR]] / single primary source public domain source material, not a real thing. Also self promotion of one editors book.'''</blockquote> |
|||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] <sup>''[[User talk:Spartaz|Humbug!]]''</sup> 21:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC) |
|||
== "SF Author" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] == |
|||
[[File:Information.svg|30px]] |
|||
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect [[:SF Author]] and has thus listed it [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|for discussion]]. This discussion will occur at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 1#SF Author]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> [[User:Steel1943|<span style="color: #3F00FF;">'''''Steel1943'''''</span>]] ([[User talk:Steel1943|talk]]) 19:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC) |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
== You have been pruned from a list == |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Telegeodynamics|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
'''Hi Reddi!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants]], but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months. |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr|Fountains of Bryn Mawr]] ([[User talk:Fountains of Bryn Mawr|talk]]) 16:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC) |
|||
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting [[Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants]]. |
|||
== FAR notice == |
|||
'''Thank you!''' |
|||
Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) | Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. | Sent at 18:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC) |
|||
I have nominated [[Middle Ages]] for a [[Wikipedia:Featured article review/Middle Ages/archive1|featured article review here]]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the [[Wikipedia:What is a featured article?|featured article criteria]]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are [[Wikipedia:Featured article review|here]].<!--Template:FARMessage--> [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 03:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 03:37, 24 June 2024
If a rule prevents you from improving Wikipedia, ignore it.
By all means break the rules, and break them beautifully, deliberately and well. That is one of the ends for which they exist ...
Pedantry and mastery are opposite attitudes toward rules. To apply a rule to the letter, rigidly, unquestioningly, in cases where it fits and in cases where it does not fit, is pedantry ... To apply a rule with natural ease, with judgment, noticing the cases where it fits, and without ever letting the words of the rule obscure the purpose of the action or the opportunities of the situation, is mastery.
Put new comments below
Past discussion can be seen through the History page
Responses
[edit] | This user may have left Wikipedia. Reddi has not edited Wikipedia since December 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
- [replies here; sniping addressed ones; user responding to - comments; most "quoted" comments are in italics]
New criticism, comments, and feedback
[edit]From time to time I'll respond here and delete the old content; see history if you want the archive. J. D. Redding 22:50, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
The article Telegeodynamics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTMIRROR / single primary source public domain source material, not a real thing. Also self promotion of one editors book.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
FAR notice
[edit]I have nominated Middle Ages for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Borsoka (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)