Proposals for new Australian states: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 16:31, 25 June 2024

Since the 19th century, there have been proposals for the creation or incorporation of new states of Australia. Chapter VI of the Constitution of Australia provides for the admission of new states to the federation. Proposals have included admitting territories to statehood, admitting independent countries (or their dependent territories), and forming new states from parts of existing states. However, no new states have been added since the federation of six former British self-governing colonies in 1901, as states of the new Commonwealth of Australia.

Unofficial proposals have involved current territories, especially the Northern Territory (NT) and, to a lesser extent, the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Other long-standing proposals have included negotiating the addition of neighbouring countries, such as New Zealand (as either one or two states), Papua New Guinea, Fiji and East Timor, and the creation of a state for Indigenous Australians.

Procedure

Section 124 of the Constitution of Australia provides for the establishment or admission of new states to the federation. The Federal Parliament may also form a new state by separating territory from an existing state, join multiple states or parts of states, or increase, diminish, or otherwise alter the limits of a state, but in each case, it must have the approval of the parliament(s) of the state(s) in question.^[1]^[2] Section 123 provides that alterations to state boundaries also require the consent of the state's voters via referendum.^[3]

In relation to parliamentary representation, the Joint Select Committee on Electoral Reform in 1985 recommended^[4]^[5] that territories be entitled to:

Separate representation from the ACT or NT once they have more than half a quota of population (for a House of Representatives seat);
A floor of two senators for the ACT and NT each; and
One extra senator for every two lower house members.
That new states should not have representation any more favourable than Territories as prescribed in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.^[5]^[4]^[6]

Historical proposals

Immediately before federation in 1901, the Australian mainland comprised six separate British self-governing colonies. Throughout the 19th century, the borders of these colonies changed often, there were numerous proposals for new colonies and, in some instances, new colonies were gazetted, but later dissolved and incorporated (or reincorporated) into other colonies.

In 1838, the Journal of the Royal Geographical Society published "Considerations on the Political Geography and Geographical Nomenclature of Australia" (1838), in which a major reorganisation of the colonial borders was proposed. The following new colonies were proposed:

"Dampieria", in north-west Australia;^[7]
"Victoria" (not to be confused with the modern Victoria), in South West Western Australia;^[7]
"Tasmania", (not to be confused with the modern Tasmania) in western Arnhem Land and part of the later Kimberley;^[7]
"Nuytsland", covering most of the Nullarbor Plain (except for its western edges);^[7]
"Carpentaria", on the shores of the Gulf of Carpentaria;^[7]
"Flindersland", covering most of the area of the future South Australia;^[7]
"Torresia" in what would become northern Queensland (including far north Queensland);^[7]
"Cooksland" centred on Brisbane, and including northern New South Wales,^[7] and;
"Guelphia" – central and southern New South Wales (which at the time included all of the future Victoria).^[7]

(Van Diemen's Land, later known as Tasmania, was to be preserved in its then current form.^[7]) These proposed colonies were geometric divisions of the continent, and did not take into account soil fertility, aridity or population. This meant that central and western Australia were divided into several states, despite their low populations both then and now.^[7]

For several months in 1846, a Colony of North Australia technically existed, with its capital at Gladstone. The short-lived colony officially included most of the future Queensland (except Brisbane and surrounding areas) and the future Northern Territory. Between the time it was gazetted, in February 1846 and the time it was officially cancelled, that December, the area of the new colony continued to be controlled by the government of New South Wales; at no point did a separate colonial administration of North Australia take control of it.

There was also a proposal in 1857 for the "Seven United Provinces of Eastern Australia" with separate provinces of Flinders Land, Leicharts (sic) Land (taken from the name of Ludwig Leichhardt) and Cooks Land in modern day Queensland (also named from James Cook).^[8]

Auralia

Proposed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the state of Auralia (meaning "land of gold") would have comprised the Western Australian Goldfields, the western portion of the Nullarbor Plain and the port town of Esperance.^[9] Its capital would have been Kalgoorlie.

However, the population in the modern region of Goldfields-Esperance is currently lower than that of the Northern Territory, and there is little evidence of recent support, although the idea of a state centred around Kalgoorlie was proposed in 2003.^[10]

Osttimor

During the process of Portuguese decolonisation in East Timor in 1974, a political party was formed called ADITLA (Associação Democratica para a Integração de Timor-Leste na Austrália, Democratic Association for the Integration of East Timor into Australia) by local businessman Henrique Pereira. It found some support from the ethnic Chinese community, fearful of independence or integration with Indonesia but was disbanded when the Australian government rejected the idea in 1975.^[11]

Illawarra Province

Also known as the Illawarra Territory, this proposed new state would consist of the Illawarra region centred on Wollongong on the New South Wales south coast. Originally this idea arose after disagreements between local landowners and migrants from Sydney in the mid-19th century. However the idea has continued in various incarnations ever since with most movements proposing the state's capital be situated in "Illawarra City", or the amalgamation of the Shellharbour and Kiama local government areas.^{[citation needed]}

North Coast

This proposed state would take in the northern part of New South Wales from Taree to the Queensland Border,^[12] mainly in the north east, and excluding most of north west NSW.

Papua-Neuguinea

Papua New Guinea is physically closest of any country to geographically remote Australia, with some of the Torres Strait Islands (Boigu, Saibai, e.g.) just off the main island of the country. Its Southern part became an Australian colony in 1902, while its Northern part was seized by Australia from Germany in 1914 and administered as a "C" Mandate of the League of Nations from 1920. Both territories were amalgamated after Second World War into a single Australian colony. In 1953, the editor of the conservative Quadrant magazine, Professor James McAuley, wrote that the territory would be "a coconut republic which would do little good for itself", and advocated its "perpetual union" with Australia, with "equal citizenship rights",^[13] but this was rejected by the Australian government.^[14] Papua New Guinea was granted self-government and full independence in 1975.

Princeland

Princeland was a proposed colony of Australia that would have been formed by the western part of Victoria and the south-eastern part of South Australia. The movement began the early 1860s and resulted in a petition to Queen Victoria, which was ultimately rejected on the grounds that it would involve changes to two separate colonies and could not be done without their expressed permissions.^[15]

South Coast

There was a small movement in the 1940s to create a new state in south-east New South Wales and north-east Victoria. The proposed state would have reached from Batemans Bay on the coast to Kiandra in the Snowy Mountains, and as far south as Sale in Victoria. The proposed state capital was Bega. Despite calls from local advocacy groups for a Royal Commission into the idea, it was met with little success.^[16]

Current proposals

Since 2000, proposals for reorganisation have continued to be put forward.^[17] For instance, in 2003, Bryan Pape suggested a reorganisation into about twenty states, each with Senate representation.^[18]

Republicanism, changing mineral wealth and tax distribution have been seen as reasons to revisit federation. Proposals include redivision between the local, state and federal levels of government, either consolidation or fragmentation. It has been argued that new technologies in service delivery are enablers of greater decentralisation or are a reason for greater efficiency in centralisation.

Aboriginal state

There are also supporters of an Aboriginal state, along the lines of Nunavut in Canada. The Aboriginal Provisional Government was established in 1990 for the purpose;^[19] Paul Coe sued the Commonwealth for Aboriginal sovereignty (Coe v Commonwealth [1979] HCA 68) and see Kevin Gilbert 'Treaty 88'. All advocated for an Aboriginal state.^[20] Agence France Presse (21 August 1998) claims Australia blocked a United Nations resolution calling for the self-determination of peoples, because it would have bolstered support for an Aboriginal state within Australia.^[21] Among those supporting such a state are the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation.^[22]

Australian Capital Territory

Supporters of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) becoming a state believe the ACT, with a population only 20% lower than that of Tasmania, is underrepresented in the Australian Parliament.

Despite this, the movement is small and no prominent political figures have given it support as of 2022; further to this, the wording of s.125 of the Australian Constitution implies that the ACT must remain a territory owned by the Commonwealth and cannot become a state.

New England

New England is a region of New South Wales and a proposed state.^[17]

Neuseeland

There have been several proposals for New Zealand to become the seventh state of Australia. One proposal, suggested humorously by the Liberal Senator Ian Macdonald, is that New Zealand's North Island and South Island could become the seventh and eighth states of the Commonwealth.^[23] New Zealand was one of the colonies asked to join in the creation of the Commonwealth of Australia, even by the time the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp) was enacted, that law still provided for New Zealand to be one of the potential states of Australia.^[24] As ties have grown closer, people have made proposals for a customs union, currency union and even a joint defence force. New Zealand and Australia enjoy close economic and political relations, mainly by way of the Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement, Closer Economic Relations (CER) free trade agreement signed in 1983 and the Closer Defence Relations agreement signed in 1990. In 1989, then-Prime Minister of New Zealand Sir Geoffrey Palmer said that New Zealand had "gained most of the advantages of being a state of Australia without becoming one". The two countries, along with the United States, were the original parties of ANZUS.

History

In 1788, Arthur Phillip assumed the position of Governor of New South Wales, claiming New Zealand as part of New South Wales. In 1835, a group of Māori chiefs signed the Declaration of Independence, which established New Zealand as a sovereign nation. A few years later, the Treaty of Waitangi re-established British control of New Zealand. The Federal Council of Australasia was formed with members representing New Zealand, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia and Fiji. Although it held no official power it was a step into the establishment of the Commonwealth of Australia.

In 1890, there was an informal meeting of members from the Australasian colonies, this was followed by the first National Australasian convention a year later. The New Zealand representatives stated it would be unlikely to join a federation with Australia at its foundation, but it would be interested in doing so at a later date. New Zealand's position was taken into account when the Constitution of Australia was written up. Australia, in an attempt to sway New Zealand to join, gave Māori the right to vote in 1902, while Australian Aboriginal people did not fully gain the right to vote at national elections until 1962.^[25] In 1908 and 1912, Australia and New Zealand sent Australasians teams to the Olympic Games. New Zealand and Australian soldiers fought together in 1915 under the name ANZAC.

Australian academic Bob Catley wrote a book titled Waltzing with Matilda: should New Zealand join Australia?, a book arguing that New Zealand should become one with Australia, which was described by New Zealand political commentator Colin James as "a book for Australians".^[26] In December 2006, an Australian Federal Parliamentary Committee recommended that Australia and New Zealand pursue a full union, or at least adopt a common ANZ currency and more common markets. The Committee found that "while Australia and New Zealand are of course two sovereign nations, it seems... that the strong ties between the two countries – the economic, cultural, migration, defence, governmental and people-to-people linkages – suggest that an even closer relationship, including the possibility of union, is both desirable and realistic." This was despite the Australian Treasurer Peter Costello and New Zealand Minister of Finance Michael Cullen saying that a common currency was "not on the agenda".^[27]

A 2010 UMR research poll asked 1000 people in Australia and New Zealand a series of questions relating to New Zealand's becoming the seventh state of Australia. One quarter of the people thought it was something to look into. Over 40% thought the idea was worth debating. More Australians than New Zealanders would support such a move.^[28]

In 2011, New Zealand had a party Join Australia Movement Party which advocated political unity between New Zealand and Australia.^[29] This party ended in 2011.

In 2023 during Labour MP Jamie Strange valedictory speech he said that New Zealanders "shouldn't rule... out" becoming one country with Australia.^[30]

Advantages

A leading factor for the proposal of New Zealand as a state of Australia is the major economic benefits it could bring. However, free trade and open borders now appear to be the maximum extent of public acceptance of the proposal. There are many family connections between the two nations, with around 500,000 New Zealanders living in Australia and 60,000 Australians living in New Zealand as of 2013. Peter Slipper, a former Member of Australia's Parliament, once said, "It's about how can we improve the quality of living for people on both sides of the Tasman" when referring to the proposal.^[31]

Disadvantages

Concerns have been expressed about the need for a common currency.^[32]

A number of disparities that could lead to conflict including the current constitutions (written in Australia, unwritten in New Zealand), the status of political rights (constitutionally entrenched in Australia but not in New Zealand). Some New Zealanders feel they have established a national identity, one which they feel they may lose if they became part of Australia.^[28] Others argue New Zealand is too far away from the mainland of Australia.^[33]

North Queensland

One proposal is that Queensland should be divided by the 22nd parallel with the boundary running just south of Sarina on the coast to the Northern Territory border between Boulia and Mount Isa, and the capital would be Sellheim, near Charters Towers, to overcome rivalry between Mackay, Townsville and Cairns.^[34] The name Capricornia has been proposed for this state.

According to The Courier-Mail in 2010, the majority of North Queensland Mayors were in favour of the separation from Queensland proper. Only two of the hundred delegates at the NQ Local Government Association meeting were against the proposal – the two being Mayor Val Schier (Cairns) and Mayor Ben Callcott (Charters Towers).^[35]

Northern Territory

The Northern Territory (NT) is the most commonly mentioned potential seventh state.

In a 1998 referendum, the voters of the Northern Territory narrowly rejected a statehood proposal that would have given the territory three senators, rather than the twelve held by the other states, although the name "Northern Territory" would have been retained.

With statehood being rejected, it is likely that the Northern Territory will remain a territory for the near future, though former Chief Minister Clare Martin^[36] and the majority of Territorians^[37] are said to be in favour of statehood.

While statehood would under normal circumstances give the Northern Territory 12 senators, the same number of senators as every other state, its population as of 2021 is only 3% of the largest state, New South Wales. This means that whilst one NSW senator represents 682,000 people, one NT senator would represent approximately 21,000 people. By comparison, one Tasmanian senator represents 45,000 people, while one South Australian senator (next smallest state by population) represents 148,000 people. If the NT were only given 3 senators as proposed in the 1998 referendum, each would represent around 63,000 people (along with a higher quota for election)

An alternative name for the new state would be North Australia, which would be shared by two historic regions. The matter was raised again in July 2015, with a further referendum in 2018 being mooted.^[38]

Riverina

Riverina is also a proposed state,^[18] in the Murray River region, on the border between New South Wales and Victoria. The Division of Riverina is currently a smaller area than traditional Riverina, which would include the Division of Farrer. Along with the ACT, it is one of the few landlocked proposed states.

In December 2020, there was a proposal by Northern Victoria MP Tim Quilty to form a new state from Northeastern Victoria and Southeastern New South Wales, because people in regional areas feel like they are neglected by their state governments. There was also a proposal to form three new states. They are: A new state comprising Greater Geelong and Metropolitan Melbourne; Regional Northeastern Victoria and Southeastern New South Wales combing, and Greater Sydney to become separate states.^[39]

Some supporters also propose a "River-Eden" state in the south of NSW and the north of Victoria, which, rather than being landlocked, would stretch eastwards to the coastal town of Eden.^[40]^[17]

References

^ Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Chapter VI Commonwealth of Australia, 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2007. Archived 11 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
^ "Chapter VI. New States". Parliament of Australia. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
^ Brown, A. J (2007). "When does property become territory? Nuclear waste, federal land acquisition and constitutional requirements for state consent" (PDF). Adelaide Law Review. 7: 113–138.
^ ^a ^b Sloane, Michael. "Representation of Commonwealth Territories in the Senate". Parliament of Australia. Papers of Parliament no.64. Commonwealth Parliament. ISSN 1031-976X. Retrieved 3 June 2022. With regard to Senate representation, the ACT and the Northern Territory will have at least two senators, and beyond this they will have one senator for every two members of the House of Representatives they are entitled to. Other Commonwealth territories shall have one senator for every two members.[86] The committee further concluded that: … constitutional change is required so that representation of territories and new states in the Parliament in future occurs according to principles acceptable to the Australian community. Constitutional amendments along the lines of the formulae we have proposed for inclusion in the Electoral Act … would meet the problems and anomalies that have been disclosed to exist under the Constitution at present.[87] Although not directly the subject of this paper, it is noteworthy that this committee recommended that 'no new State should be admitted to the Federation on terms and conditions as to representation in the Parliament more favourable than those prescribed for representation of Territories in the Electoral Act'.[88] This aspect of the report appears to have been directed at preventing the Northern Territory from gaining greater representation should it achieve statehood and was strongly criticised in a dissent by Senator Michael Macklin.[89]
^ ^a ^b R. E Klugman; R. S Hall; John Carrick; M.J. Macklin; R.F. Ray; G.F. Richardson; A.G Griffiths; I.L. Robinson; J.L. Scott; M.E. Aldons; M.J.R MacKellar; B. Harradine; C.W. Blunt; C.A. Jakobsen; A.H. Lamb; M.J. Lee; J.L. Scott; D.W. Nairn (17 February 1986). "Determining the entitlement of Federal Territories and new States to representation in the Commonwealth Parliament" (PDF). House of Representatives Committees Joint Select Committee on Electoral Reform [1983-87]. pp. viii–ix, 56. Retrieved 3 June 2022. The Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory shall be entitled to representation in the Senate on the basis that each Territory shall return one Senator for every two Members of the House of Representatives it is entitled to return [...] [...] The Majority Report in paragraph 4.1 says: It is [the Committee] is strongly of the view that the principles we have determined as appropriate to apply to the representation of Territories in the Parliament should also apply upon the admission of new States to the Federation I see no reason, constitutional or otherwise, as to why this ought be the case.
^ Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 SECT 40 Representation of the Territories in the Senate, retrieved 3 June 2022, (2) Where the number of members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory at a general election is 6 or more, that Territory shall, on and from the day of the general election, be represented in the Senate by one senator for every 2 members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in that Territory.
^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k Wright, Shane (9 August 2021). "From Guelphia to Dampieria: How Australia could have looked". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
^ "Digital Collections – Maps – Map of the proposed seven united provinces of eastern Australia [cartographic material]". National Library of Australia. 1857. Archived from the original on 25 May 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
^ "Auralia". Western Australia and Federation. State Library of Western Australia. Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
^ Gregory, Denis (1 May 2003). "The man who's creating a United States of Australia". Sun-Herald. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
^ "The Chinese and Aditla" p. 58 in Timor: A Nation Reborn, Nicol, Bill, Equinox Publishing, 2002. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]
^ "Your Vote". Archived from the original on 28 August 2007. Retrieved 17 June 2007.
^ McAuley, James "Australia's Future in New Guinea", Pacific Affairs, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Mar. 1953), pp. 59–69. [Accessed 25 May 2008. cited by Kiernan, Ben in "Cover-Up and Denial of Genocide: Australia, the USA, East Timor and the Aborigines" Archived 16 March 2003 at the Wayback Machine Critical Asian Studies, Yale University, p.169
^ "London Constitutional Conference" in Fiji, Brij V Lal, University of London, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, 2006. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]
^ "A Suitable Consort". Australian Broadcasting Commission. Retrieved 15 April 2009.
^ "Nowra supports proposed state in south district". The Canberra Times. 6 September 1948. Archived from the original on 6 December 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
^ ^a ^b ^c Lewis, Daniel (25 January 2005). "Altered states". Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 12 August 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
^ ^a ^b "The man who's creating a United States of Australia". smh.com.au. 11 May 2003. Archived from the original on 23 June 2008. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
^ "Aboriginal Provisional Government". apg.org.au. Archived from the original on 21 February 2012. Retrieved 19 December 2011.
^ "The Failure of Aboriginal Separatism". melbourne.indymedia.org. 28 January 2004. Archived from the original on 27 March 2007. Retrieved 14 November 2006.
^ Minorities at Risk Project (24 May 2004). "Chronology for Aborigines in Australia". MAR: Data. The University of Maryland. Archived from the original on 6 September 2006.
^ "The Sydney Line". The Sydney Line. Archived from the original on 23 February 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2010.
^ New Zealand should become 'seventh and eighth' states of Australia, jokes senator Archived 28 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 25 November 2015
^ Section 6, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 Archived 2 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine (Imperial)
^ Commonwealth Electoral Act (1962).
^ James, Colin (24 July 2001). "How not to waltz Matilda". Colin James. Archived from the original on 5 October 2006. Retrieved 27 June 2006.
^ Dick, Tim, "Push for union with New Zealand" Archived 20 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Sydney Morning Herald, 5 December 2006. Accessed 29 February 2007.]
^ ^a ^b "Full UMR research poll results on Aust-NZ union". Television New Zealand. 14 March 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 4 November 2011.
^ "The Team". Join Australia Movement Party. Archived from the original on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 8 February 2010.
^ MacManus, Joel (23 August 2023). "Jamie Strange's very strange valedictory". The Spinoff. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
^ "Q+A Poll – Should NZ & Australia Become One ?". scoop.co.nz. Archived from the original on 12 August 2010. Retrieved 8 October 2010.
^ Lloyd, Peter J.; Song, Lei Lei (2006). "A currency union between Australia and New Zealand?". Économie internationale. 107 (3): 149–172. doi:10.3917/ecoi.107.0149.
^ Crisp, Rodney (2019). "The Republic of Australia and New Zealand". Griffith Review. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
^ "Push for separation as Queensland splits". News.com.au.
^ "The state of North Queensland?". Menzies House. Archived from the original on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 24 September 2013.
^ Barker, Anne (22 May 2003). "NT statehood back on the agenda". abc.net.au. Archived from the original on 9 April 2014. Retrieved 4 October 2013.
^ House Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (28 May 2007). "Federal implications of statehood for the Northern Territory - Chapter 3: Recent developments towards statehood" (PDF). Parliament of Australia. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2013. Retrieved 4 October 2013.
^ Australia's Northern Territory moves to become nation's seventh state by 2018 Archived 28 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Daily Telegraph, London, 23 July 2015.
^ Piovesan, Anthony (5 December 2020). "Victorian MP puts forward bold proposal for new Australian state". The Courier-Mail. Brisbane, Qld.: Nationwide News. NCA NewsWire.
^ Ian Johnston. "Wodenbury & River-Eden". www.newstates.net. Retrieved 11 March 2023.

External links

[1] Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Chapter VI Commonwealth of Australia, 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2007. Archived 11 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine

[2] "Chapter VI. New States". Parliament of Australia. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 9 May 2019.

[3] Brown, A. J (2007). "When does property become territory? Nuclear waste, federal land acquisition and constitutional requirements for state consent" (PDF). Adelaide Law Review. 7: 113–138.

[:0-4] Sloane, Michael. "Representation of Commonwealth Territories in the Senate". Parliament of Australia. Papers of Parliament no.64. Commonwealth Parliament. ISSN 1031-976X. Retrieved 3 June 2022. With regard to Senate representation, the ACT and the Northern Territory will have at least two senators, and beyond this they will have one senator for every two members of the House of Representatives they are entitled to. Other Commonwealth territories shall have one senator for every two members.[86] The committee further concluded that: … constitutional change is required so that representation of territories and new states in the Parliament in future occurs according to principles acceptable to the Australian community. Constitutional amendments along the lines of the formulae we have proposed for inclusion in the Electoral Act … would meet the problems and anomalies that have been disclosed to exist under the Constitution at present.[87] Although not directly the subject of this paper, it is noteworthy that this committee recommended that 'no new State should be admitted to the Federation on terms and conditions as to representation in the Parliament more favourable than those prescribed for representation of Territories in the Electoral Act'.[88] This aspect of the report appears to have been directed at preventing the Northern Territory from gaining greater representation should it achieve statehood and was strongly criticised in a dissent by Senator Michael Macklin.[89]

[:1-5] R. E Klugman; R. S Hall; John Carrick; M.J. Macklin; R.F. Ray; G.F. Richardson; A.G Griffiths; I.L. Robinson; J.L. Scott; M.E. Aldons; M.J.R MacKellar; B. Harradine; C.W. Blunt; C.A. Jakobsen; A.H. Lamb; M.J. Lee; J.L. Scott; D.W. Nairn (17 February 1986). "Determining the entitlement of Federal Territories and new States to representation in the Commonwealth Parliament" (PDF). House of Representatives Committees Joint Select Committee on Electoral Reform [1983-87]. pp. viii–ix, 56. Retrieved 3 June 2022. The Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory shall be entitled to representation in the Senate on the basis that each Territory shall return one Senator for every two Members of the House of Representatives it is entitled to return [...] [...] The Majority Report in paragraph 4.1 says: It is [the Committee] is strongly of the view that the principles we have determined as appropriate to apply to the representation of Territories in the Parliament should also apply upon the admission of new States to the Federation I see no reason, constitutional or otherwise, as to why this ought be the case.

[6] Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 SECT 40 Representation of the Territories in the Senate, retrieved 3 June 2022, (2) Where the number of members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory at a general election is 6 or more, that Territory shall, on and from the day of the general election, be represented in the Senate by one senator for every 2 members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in that Territory.

[10states-7] ^ ^a ^b ^c ^d ^e ^f ^g ^h ⁱ ^j ^k Wright, Shane (9 August 2021). "From Guelphia to Dampieria: How Australia could have looked". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 12 March 2022.

[8] "Digital Collections – Maps – Map of the proposed seven united provinces of eastern Australia [cartographic material]". National Library of Australia. 1857. Archived from the original on 25 May 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2010.

[9] "Auralia". Western Australia and Federation. State Library of Western Australia. Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 14 April 2016.

[10] Gregory, Denis (1 May 2003). "The man who's creating a United States of Australia". Sun-Herald. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 14 April 2016.

[11] "The Chinese and Aditla" p. 58 in Timor: A Nation Reborn, Nicol, Bill, Equinox Publishing, 2002. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]

[12] "Your Vote". Archived from the original on 28 August 2007. Retrieved 17 June 2007.

[13] McAuley, James "Australia's Future in New Guinea", Pacific Affairs, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Mar. 1953), pp. 59–69. [Accessed 25 May 2008. cited by Kiernan, Ben in "Cover-Up and Denial of Genocide: Australia, the USA, East Timor and the Aborigines" Archived 16 March 2003 at the Wayback Machine Critical Asian Studies, Yale University, p.169

[14] "London Constitutional Conference" in Fiji, Brij V Lal, University of London, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, 2006. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]

[Lateline-15] "A Suitable Consort". Australian Broadcasting Commission. Retrieved 15 April 2009.

[16] "Nowra supports proposed state in south district". The Canberra Times. 6 September 1948. Archived from the original on 6 December 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2010.

[AS-17] Lewis, Daniel (25 January 2005). "Altered states". Sydney Morning Herald. Archived from the original on 12 August 2012. Retrieved 14 December 2012.

[smh.com.au-18] "The man who's creating a United States of Australia". smh.com.au. 11 May 2003. Archived from the original on 23 June 2008. Retrieved 29 April 2010.

[19] "Aboriginal Provisional Government". apg.org.au. Archived from the original on 21 February 2012. Retrieved 19 December 2011.

[20] "The Failure of Aboriginal Separatism". melbourne.indymedia.org. 28 January 2004. Archived from the original on 27 March 2007. Retrieved 14 November 2006.

[21] Minorities at Risk Project (24 May 2004). "Chronology for Aborigines in Australia". MAR: Data. The University of Maryland. Archived from the original on 6 September 2006.

[22] "The Sydney Line". The Sydney Line. Archived from the original on 23 February 2011. Retrieved 29 April 2010.

[23] New Zealand should become 'seventh and eighth' states of Australia, jokes senator Archived 28 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian, 25 November 2015

[24] Section 6, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 Archived 2 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine (Imperial)

[25] Commonwealth Electoral Act (1962).

[26] James, Colin (24 July 2001). "How not to waltz Matilda". Colin James. Archived from the original on 5 October 2006. Retrieved 27 June 2006.

[27] Dick, Tim, "Push for union with New Zealand" Archived 20 February 2008 at the Wayback Machine, Sydney Morning Herald, 5 December 2006. Accessed 29 February 2007.]

[UMR_Poll_Results-28] "Full UMR research poll results on Aust-NZ union". Television New Zealand. 14 March 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 4 November 2011.

[29] "The Team". Join Australia Movement Party. Archived from the original on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 8 February 2010.

[30] MacManus, Joel (23 August 2023). "Jamie Strange's very strange valedictory". The Spinoff. Retrieved 24 August 2023.

[Scoop.co.nz:_Should_NZ_&_Australia_Become_One?-31] "Q+A Poll – Should NZ & Australia Become One ?". scoop.co.nz. Archived from the original on 12 August 2010. Retrieved 8 October 2010.

[32] Lloyd, Peter J.; Song, Lei Lei (2006). "A currency union between Australia and New Zealand?". Économie internationale. 107 (3): 149–172. doi:10.3917/ecoi.107.0149.

[33] Crisp, Rodney (2019). "The Republic of Australia and New Zealand". Griffith Review. Retrieved 21 May 2021.

[34] "Push for separation as Queensland splits". News.com.au.

[35] "The state of North Queensland?". Menzies House. Archived from the original on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 24 September 2013.

[36] Barker, Anne (22 May 2003). "NT statehood back on the agenda". abc.net.au. Archived from the original on 9 April 2014. Retrieved 4 October 2013.

[37] House Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs (28 May 2007). "Federal implications of statehood for the Northern Territory - Chapter 3: Recent developments towards statehood" (PDF). Parliament of Australia. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 October 2013. Retrieved 4 October 2013.

[38] Australia's Northern Territory moves to become nation's seventh state by 2018 Archived 28 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine, The Daily Telegraph, London, 23 July 2015.

[39] Piovesan, Anthony (5 December 2020). "Victorian MP puts forward bold proposal for new Australian state". The Courier-Mail. Brisbane, Qld.: Nationwide News. NCA NewsWire.

[31-40] Ian Johnston. "Wodenbury & River-Eden". www.newstates.net. Retrieved 11 March 2023.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{Use dmy dates|date=January 2018}}
 [[File:Australia history.gif|thumb|300px|right|Evolution of [[Australian states]]]]
-[[Image:Australian ogre 1900.jpg|thumb|250px|Political cartoon from 1900 that shows the weiners of [[Colony of New Zealand|New Zealand]] and [[Colony of Fiji|Fiji]] rejecting the offer to join the [[Federation of Australia]], with [[Zealandia (personification)|Zealandia]] referencing Australia's [[Convicts in Australia|origins as a penal colony]].]]
+[[Image:Australian ogre 1900.jpg|thumb|250px|Political cartoon from 1900 that shows the colonies of [[Colony of New Zealand|New Zealand]] and [[Colony of Fiji|Fiji]] rejecting the offer to join the [[Federation of Australia]], with [[Zealandia (personification)|Zealandia]] referencing Australia's [[Convicts in Australia|origins as a penal colony]].]]
-'''Proposals for new Australian states''' have been numerous since the late 19th and early 20th centuries; however, to date, no [[States and territories of Australia|states]] have been added to Australia since [[Federation of Australia|Federation]] in 1901. Many proposals have suggested an [[Australian Aborigines|Aboriginal]] state which would resemble the [[Inuit|Inuit territory]] of [[Nunavut]] in [[Canada]], while others have suggested incorporating [[New Zealand]], [[Papua New Guinea]] and [[East Timor]]. Other proposals suggest making the [[Northern Territory]] and/or [[Australian Capital Territory]] states.
+<!--There is no need to force a bolded title or phrase into the lead, see MOS:AVOIDBOLD-->Since the 19th century, there have been proposals for the creation or incorporation of new [[States and territories of Australia|states of Australia]]. [[Chapter VI of the Constitution of Australia]] provides for the admission of new states to the federation. Proposals have included admitting [[States and territories of Australia|territories]] to statehood, admitting independent countries (or their dependent territories), and forming new states from parts of existing states. However, no new states have been added since the [[Federation of Australia|federation]] of six former [[Self-governing colony|British self-governing colonies]] in 1901, as states of the new [[Commonwealth of Australia]].
+Unofficial proposals have involved current territories, especially the [[Northern Territory]] (NT) and, to a lesser extent, the [[Australian Capital Territory]] (ACT). Other long-standing proposals have included negotiating the addition of neighbouring countries, such as [[New Zealand]] (as either one or two states), [[Papua New Guinea]], [[Fiji]] and [[East Timor]], and the creation of a state for [[Indigenous Australians]].
 ==Procedure==
-[[Section 124 of the Constitution of Australia]] provides for the establishment or admission of new States to the Federation. It may also increase, diminish, or otherwise alter the limits of a State, form a new state by separating territory from an existing State, or join multiple States or parts of States, but in each case, it must have the approval of the Parliament(s) of the State(s) in question.<ref>[http://www.comlaw.gov.au/comlaw/comlaw.nsf/440c19285821b109ca256f3a001d59b7/19541afd497bc2e4ca256f990081e2cf/$FILE/Constitution.pdf Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Chapter VI] [[Commonwealth of Australia]], 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011143539/http://www.comlaw.gov.au/comlaw/comlaw.nsf/440c19285821b109ca256f3a001d59b7/19541afd497bc2e4ca256f990081e2cf/$FILE/Constitution.pdf |date=11 October 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/~/link.aspx?_id=A392B21B367A449EA878C374B5BECE11&_z=z |title=Chapter VI. New States. |website=Parliament of Australia |language=en-AU |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190509012655/https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/~/link.aspx?_id=A392B21B367A449EA878C374B5BECE11&_z=z |archive-date=2019-05-09 |access-date=2019-05-09}}</ref>
+[[Section 124 of the Constitution of Australia]] provides for the establishment or admission of new states to the federation. The [[Parliament of Australia|Federal Parliament]] may also form a new state by separating territory from an existing state, join multiple states or parts of states, or increase, diminish, or otherwise alter the limits of a state, but in each case, it must have the approval of the parliament(s) of the state(s) in question.<ref>[http://www.comlaw.gov.au/comlaw/comlaw.nsf/440c19285821b109ca256f3a001d59b7/19541afd497bc2e4ca256f990081e2cf/$FILE/Constitution.pdf Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Chapter VI] [[Commonwealth of Australia]], 2003. Retrieved 7 December 2007. {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071011143539/http://www.comlaw.gov.au/comlaw/comlaw.nsf/440c19285821b109ca256f3a001d59b7/19541afd497bc2e4ca256f990081e2cf/$FILE/Constitution.pdf |date=11 October 2007 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/~/link.aspx?_id=A392B21B367A449EA878C374B5BECE11&_z=z |title=Chapter VI. New States. |website=Parliament of Australia |language=en-AU |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190509012655/https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/~/link.aspx?_id=A392B21B367A449EA878C374B5BECE11&_z=z |archive-date=2019-05-09 |access-date=2019-05-09}}</ref> [[Section 123 of the Constitution of Australia|Section 123]] provides that alterations to state boundaries also require the consent of the state's voters via referendum.<ref>{{cite journal|first=A. J|last=Brown|url=https://www8.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AdelLawRw/2007/7.pdf|title=When does property become territory? Nuclear waste, federal land acquisition and constitutional requirements for state consent|journal=Adelaide Law Review|year=2007|volume=7|pages=113-138}}</ref>
 In relation to parliamentary representation, the Joint Select Committee on Electoral Reform in 1985 recommended<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> that territories be entitled to:
@@ Line 13: / Line 16: @@
 * A floor of two senators for the ACT and NT each; and
 * One extra senator for every two lower house members.
-* That new states should not have representation any more favourable than Territories as prescribed in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |authors=R. E Klugman, R. S Hall, John Carrick, M.J. Macklin, R.F. Ray, G.F. Richardson, A.G Griffiths, I.L. Robinson, J.L. Scott, M.E. Aldons, M.J.R MacKellar, B. Harradine, C.W. Blunt, C.A. Jakobsen, A.H. Lamb, M.J. Lee, J.L. Scott, D.W. Nairn |date=1986-02-17 |title=Determining the entitlement of Federal Territories and new States to representation in the Commonwealth Parliament |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=reports/1986/1986_pp1.pdf |access-date=2022-06-03 |website=House of Representatives Committees Joint Select Committee on Electoral Reform [1983-87] |pages=viii-ix, 56 |quote=The Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory shall be entitled to representation in the Senate on the basis that each Territory shall return one Senator for every two Members of the House of Representatives it is entitled to return [...]  [...] The Majority Report in paragraph 4.1 says: It is [the Committee] is strongly of the view that the principles we have determined as appropriate to apply to the representation of Territories in the Parliament should also apply upon the admission of new States to the Federation I see no reason, constitutional or otherwise, as to why this ought be the case.}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Sloane |first=Michael |title=Representation of Commonwealth Territories in the Senate |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/pop64/c07 |access-date=2022-06-03 |website=Parliament of Australia |series=Papers of Parliament no.64 |publisher=Commonwealth Parliament |language=en-AU |issn=1031-976X |quote=With regard to Senate representation, the ACT and the Northern Territory will have at least two senators, and beyond this they will have one senator for every two members of the House of Representatives they are entitled to. Other Commonwealth territories shall have one senator for every two members.[86]  The committee further concluded that:      … constitutional change is required so that representation of territories and new states in the Parliament in future occurs according to principles acceptable to the Australian community. Constitutional amendments along the lines of the formulae we have proposed for inclusion in the Electoral Act … would meet the problems and anomalies that have been disclosed to exist under the Constitution at present.[87]  Although not directly the subject of this paper, it is noteworthy that this committee recommended that ‘no new State should be admitted to the Federation on terms and conditions as to representation in the Parliament more favourable than those prescribed for representation of Territories in the Electoral Act’.[88] This aspect of the report appears to have been directed at preventing the Northern Territory from gaining greater representation should it achieve statehood and was strongly criticised in a dissent by Senator Michael Macklin.[89]}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 SECT 40 Representation of the Territories in the Senate |url=http://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/cea1918233/s40.html |quote=(2)  Where the number of members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory at a general election is 6 or more, that Territory shall, on and from the day of the general election, be represented in the Senate by one senator for every 2 members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in that Territory. |access-date=2022-06-03}}</ref>
+* That new states should not have representation any more favourable than Territories as prescribed in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |author=R. E Klugman |author2=R. S Hall |author3=John Carrick |author4=M.J. Macklin |author5=R.F. Ray |author6=G.F. Richardson |author7=A.G Griffiths |author8=I.L. Robinson |author9=J.L. Scott |author10=M.E. Aldons |author11=M.J.R MacKellar |author12=B. Harradine |author13=C.W. Blunt |author14=C.A. Jakobsen |author15=A.H. Lamb |author16=M.J. Lee |author17=J.L. Scott |author18=D.W. Nairn |date=1986-02-17 |title=Determining the entitlement of Federal Territories and new States to representation in the Commonwealth Parliament |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=reports/1986/1986_pp1.pdf |access-date=2022-06-03 |website=House of Representatives Committees Joint Select Committee on Electoral Reform [1983-87] |pages=viii-ix, 56 |quote=The Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory shall be entitled to representation in the Senate on the basis that each Territory shall return one Senator for every two Members of the House of Representatives it is entitled to return [...]  [...] The Majority Report in paragraph 4.1 says: It is [the Committee] is strongly of the view that the principles we have determined as appropriate to apply to the representation of Territories in the Parliament should also apply upon the admission of new States to the Federation I see no reason, constitutional or otherwise, as to why this ought be the case.}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Sloane |first=Michael |title=Representation of Commonwealth Territories in the Senate |url=https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/pops/pop64/c07 |access-date=2022-06-03 |website=Parliament of Australia |series=Papers of Parliament no.64 |publisher=Commonwealth Parliament |language=en-AU |issn=1031-976X |quote=With regard to Senate representation, the ACT and the Northern Territory will have at least two senators, and beyond this they will have one senator for every two members of the House of Representatives they are entitled to. Other Commonwealth territories shall have one senator for every two members.[86]  The committee further concluded that:      … constitutional change is required so that representation of territories and new states in the Parliament in future occurs according to principles acceptable to the Australian community. Constitutional amendments along the lines of the formulae we have proposed for inclusion in the Electoral Act … would meet the problems and anomalies that have been disclosed to exist under the Constitution at present.[87]  Although not directly the subject of this paper, it is noteworthy that this committee recommended that 'no new State should be admitted to the Federation on terms and conditions as to representation in the Parliament more favourable than those prescribed for representation of Territories in the Electoral Act'.[88] This aspect of the report appears to have been directed at preventing the Northern Territory from gaining greater representation should it achieve statehood and was strongly criticised in a dissent by Senator Michael Macklin.[89]}}</ref><ref>{{Citation |title=Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 SECT 40 Representation of the Territories in the Senate |url=http://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/cth/consol_act/cea1918233/s40.html |quote=(2)  Where the number of members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in the Australian Capital Territory or the Northern Territory at a general election is 6 or more, that Territory shall, on and from the day of the general election, be represented in the Senate by one senator for every 2 members of the House of Representatives to be chosen in that Territory. |access-date=2022-06-03}}</ref>
 ==Historical proposals==
 [[File:Australia 1838.jpg|thumb|This map shows a proposal for subdivisions of Australia from 1838. Note that although the names "Victoria" and "Tasmania" appear, both are geographically distant from the current states of the same name.]]
+Immediately before federation in 1901, the Australian mainland comprised six separate British [[self-governing colonies]]. Throughout the 19th century, the borders of these colonies changed often, there were numerous proposals for new colonies and, in some instances, new colonies were [[government gazette|gazetted]], but later dissolved and incorporated (or reincorporated) into other colonies.
-There were proposals for new colonies in the 19th century that did not come about. [[North Australia]] was briefly a colony between February and December 1846. The Journal of the Royal Geographical Society published ''Considerations on the Political Geography and Geographical Nomenclature of Australia'' in 1838, in which the following divisions were proposed:
+In 1838, the ''Journal of the Royal Geographical Society'' published "Considerations on the Political Geography and Geographical Nomenclature of Australia" (1838), in which a major reorganisation of the colonial borders was proposed. The following new colonies were proposed:
-* Dampieria in northwestern Australia.<ref name=10states/>
+* "Dampieria", in [[North West Australia|north-west Australia]];<ref name=10states/>
-* Victoria in southwestern Australia (not to be confused with the modern [[Victoria, Australia|Victoria]]).<ref name=10states/>
+* "Victoria" (not to be confused with the modern [[Victoria, Australia|Victoria]]), in [[South West (Western Australia)|South West Western Australia]];<ref name=10states/>
-* Tasmania in Western Australia (not to be confused with the modern [[Tasmania]]).<ref name=10states/>
+* "Tasmania", (not to be confused with the modern [[Tasmania]]) in western [[Arnhem Land]] and part of the later [[Kimberley region of Western Australia|Kimberley]];<ref name=10states/>
-* Nuytsland near the [[Nullarbor Plain]].<ref name=10states/>
+* "Nuytsland", covering most of the [[Nullarbor Plain]] (except for its western edges);<ref name=10states/>
-* Carpentaria south of the [[Gulf of Carpentaria]].<ref name=10states/>
+* "Carpentaria", on the shores of the [[Gulf of Carpentaria]];<ref name=10states/>
-* Flindersland in south central Australia.<ref name=10states/>
+* "Flindersland", covering most of the area of the future [[South Australia]];<ref name=10states/>
-* Torresia in northern [[Queensland]].<ref name=10states/>
+* "Torresia" in what would become [[northern Queensland]] (including [[far north Queensland]]);<ref name=10states/>
-* Cooksland centred on [[Brisbane]].<ref name=10states/>
+* "Cooksland" centred on [[Brisbane]], and including northern New South Wales,<ref name=10states/> and;
-* Guelphia in southeastern Australia.<ref name=10states/>
+* "Guelphia" – central and southern New South Wales (which at the time included all of the future [[Victoria (Australia)|Victoria]]).<ref name=10states/>
-* [[Van Diemen's Land]] in modern-day Tasmania.<ref name=10states/>
+([[Van Diemen's Land]], later known as Tasmania, was to be preserved in its then current form.<ref name=10states/>)
+These proposed colonies were geometric divisions of the continent, and did not take into account soil fertility, aridity or population. This meant that central and western Australia were divided into several states, despite their low populations both then and now.<ref name=10states>{{cite news |title=From Guelphia to Dampieria: How Australia could have looked |url= https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/from-guelphia-to-dampieria-how-australia-could-have-looked-20210728-p58dks.html |first=Shane |last=Wright |newspaper=[[The Sydney Morning Herald]] |date=2021-08-09 |access-date=2022-03-12}}</ref>
+For several months in 1846, a Colony of North Australia technically existed, with its capital at [[Gladstone, Queensland|Gladstone]]. The short-lived colony officially included most of the future Queensland (except Brisbane and surrounding areas) and the future Northern Territory. Between the time it was gazetted, in February 1846 and the time it was officially cancelled, that December, the area of the new colony continued to be controlled by the government of New South Wales; at no point did a separate colonial administration of North Australia take control of it.
-These proposed states were geometric divisions of the continent, and did not take into account soil fertility, aridity or population. This meant that central and western Australia were divided into several states, despite their low populations both then and now.<ref name=10states>{{cite news |title=From Guelphia to Dampieria: How Australia could have looked |url= https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/from-guelphia-to-dampieria-how-australia-could-have-looked-20210728-p58dks.html |first=Shane |last=Wright |newspaper=[[The Sydney Morning Herald]] |date=2021-08-09 |access-date=2022-03-12}}</ref>
-There was also a proposal in 1857 for the "Seven United Provinces of Eastern Australia" with separate provinces of Flinders Land, Leicharts (sic) Land (taken from the name of [[Ludwig Leichhardt]]) and Cooks Land in modern day Queensland (also named from [[James Cook]]).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.map-rm3518 |title=Digital Collections – Maps – Map of the proposed seven united provinces of eastern Australia [cartographic material] |publisher=National Library of Australia |access-date=2010-04-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110525004520/http://nla.gov.au/nla.map-rm3518 |archive-date=2011-05-25 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all |year=1857}}</ref>
+There was also a proposal in 1857 for the "Seven United Provinces of Eastern Australia" with separate provinces of Flinders Land, Leicharts (sic) Land (taken from the name of [[Ludwig Leichhardt]]) and Cooks Land in modern day Queensland (also named from [[James Cook]]).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.map-rm3518 |title=Digital Collections – Maps – Map of the proposed seven united provinces of eastern Australia [cartographic material] |publisher=National Library of Australia |access-date=2010-04-29 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110525004520/http://nla.gov.au/nla.map-rm3518 |archive-date=2011-05-25 |url-status=live |year=1857}}</ref>
 ===Auralia===
-[[File:Goldfields colony.jpg|thumb|left|Map showing the proposed boundaries of the new Goldfields colony of "Auralia".]]
+[[File:Goldfields colony.jpg|thumb|Map showing the proposed boundaries of the new Goldfields colony of "Auralia".]]
-Proposed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the state of [[Auralia]] (meaning "land of gold") would have comprised the [[Western Australia]]n Goldfields, the western portion of the [[Nullarbor Plain]] and the port town of [[Esperance, Western Australia|Esperance]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Auralia|url=http://slwa.wa.gov.au/federation/fed/028_gold.htm|website=Western Australia and Federation|publisher=State Library of Western Australia|access-date=14 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707053958/http://slwa.wa.gov.au/federation/fed/028_gold.htm|archive-date=7 July 2017|url-status=live|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Its capital would have been [[Kalgoorlie]].
+Proposed in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the state of [[Auralia]] (meaning "land of gold") would have comprised the [[Western Australia]]n Goldfields, the western portion of the [[Nullarbor Plain]] and the port town of [[Esperance, Western Australia|Esperance]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Auralia|url=http://slwa.wa.gov.au/federation/fed/028_gold.htm|website=Western Australia and Federation|publisher=State Library of Western Australia|access-date=14 April 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707053958/http://slwa.wa.gov.au/federation/fed/028_gold.htm|archive-date=7 July 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Its capital would have been [[Kalgoorlie]].
-However, the population in the modern region of [[Goldfields-Esperance]] is currently lower than that of the [[Northern Territory]], and there is little evidence of recent support, although the idea of a state centred around Kalgoorlie was proposed in 2003.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Gregory|first1=Denis|title=The man who's creating a United States of Australia|url=http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html|access-date=14 April 2016|work=Sun-Herald|date=1 May 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304062203/http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html|archive-date=4 March 2016|url-status=live|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
+However, the population in the modern region of [[Goldfields-Esperance]] is currently lower than that of the [[Northern Territory]], and there is little evidence of recent support, although the idea of a state centred around Kalgoorlie was proposed in 2003.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Gregory|first1=Denis|title=The man who's creating a United States of Australia|url=http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html|access-date=14 April 2016|work=Sun-Herald|date=1 May 2003|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304062203/http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html|archive-date=4 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref>
 ===East Timor===
-During the process of [[Portugal|Portuguese]] decolonisation in [[East Timor]] in 1974, a political party was formed called ADITLA ''Associação Democrática para a Integração de Timor Leste na Austrália'' (Democratic Association for the Integration of East Timor into Australia) by local businessman Henrique Pereira. It found some support from the [[Overseas Chinese|ethnic Chinese]] community, fearful of independence or integration with [[Indonesia]] but was disbanded when the Australian government rejected the idea in 1975.<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=8uxwaCR_71cC&pg=PA58&lpg=PA58&dq=Aditla&source=web&ots=w_LDdYRH-t&sig=h6N8Vgm6ZyGidn1sINs88CiaHFE&hl=en "The Chinese and Aditla"]'' p. 58 in [https://books.google.com/books?id=Z2R3Nk3jUlsC ''Timor: A Nation Reborn'', Nicol, Bill, Equinox Publishing, 2002]. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]</ref>
+During the process of [[Portugal|Portuguese]] decolonisation in [[East Timor]] in 1974, a political party was formed called ADITLA ([[Associação Democratica para a Integração de Timor-Leste na Austrália]], Democratic Association for the Integration of East Timor into Australia) by local businessman Henrique Pereira. It found some support from the [[Overseas Chinese|ethnic Chinese]] community, fearful of independence or integration with [[Indonesia]] but was disbanded when the Australian government rejected the idea in 1975.<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=8uxwaCR_71cC&dq=Aditla&pg=PA58 "The Chinese and Aditla"]'' p. 58 in [https://books.google.com/books?id=8uxwaCR_71cC ''Timor: A Nation Reborn'', Nicol, Bill, Equinox Publishing, 2002]. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]</ref>
 ===Illawarra Province===
-Also known as the [[Illawarra]] Territory, this proposed new state would consist of the Illawarra region  centred on [[Wollongong]] on the New South Wales south coast. Originally this idea arose after disagreements between local landowners and migrants from Sydney in the mid-19th century. However the idea has continued in various incarnations ever since with most movements proposing the state's capital be situated in "Illawarra City", or the amalgamation of the [[Shellharbour]] and [[Kiama]] local government areas.{{citation needed|date=July 2021}}
+Also known as the [[Illawarra]] Territory, this proposed new state would consist of the Illawarra region centred on [[Wollongong]] on the New South Wales south coast. Originally this idea arose after disagreements between local landowners and migrants from Sydney in the mid-19th century. However the idea has continued in various incarnations ever since with most movements proposing the state's capital be situated in "Illawarra City", or the amalgamation of the [[Shellharbour]] and [[Kiama]] local government areas.{{citation needed|date=July 2021}}
 ===North Coast===
-This proposed state would take in the northern part of New South Wales from [[Taree, New South Wales|Taree]] to the Queensland Border,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.newstates.com.au/voting.html |title=Your Vote |access-date=17 June 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070828224054/http://www.newstates.com.au/voting.html |archive-date=28 August 2007 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref> mainly in the north east, and excluding most of north west NSW.
+This proposed state would take in the northern part of New South Wales from [[Taree, New South Wales|Taree]] to the Queensland Border,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.newstates.com.au/voting.html |title=Your Vote |access-date=17 June 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070828224054/http://www.newstates.com.au/voting.html |archive-date=28 August 2007  }}</ref> mainly in the north east, and excluding most of north west NSW.
 ===Papua New Guinea===
 {{main|Territory of Papua and New Guinea}}
-[[Papua New Guinea]] is physically closest of any country to geographically remote Australia, with some of the [[Torres Strait Islands]] just off the main island of the country. [[Territory of Papua|Its Southern part]] became an Australian colony in 1902, while [[Territory of New Guinea|its Northern part]] was seized by Australia from Germany in 1914 and administered as a "C" [[Mandate of the League of Nations]] from 1920. Both territories were amalgamated after Second World War into a single Australian colony. In 1953, the editor of the conservative ''[[Quadrant (magazine)|Quadrant]]'' magazine, Professor [[James McAuley]], wrote that the territory would be "a coconut republic which would do little good for itself", and advocated its "perpetual union" with Australia, with "equal citizenship rights",<ref>McAuley, James ''[https://www.jstor.org/pss/2752903 "Australia's Future in New Guinea"]'', ''Pacific Affairs'', Vol. 26, No. 1 (Mar. 1953), pp. 59–69. [Accessed 25 May 2008. cited by Kiernan, Ben in [http://www.yale.edu/gsp/publications/aborigines.pdf "Cover-Up and Denial of Genocide: Australia, the USA, East Timor and the Aborigines"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030316030745/http://www.yale.edu/gsp/publications/aborigines.pdf |date=16 March 2003 }} ''Critical Asian Studies'', [[Yale University]], p.169</ref> but this was rejected by the Australian government.<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=Z2R3Nk3jUlsC&pg=PA304&lpg=PA304&dq=Fiji+union+with+Australia+statehood&source=web&ots=bx-RlKMl_6&sig=tpaWQm-o8PvIliaoJYvtsrJKcY8&hl=en "London Constitutional Conference"]'' in [https://books.google.com/books?id=Z2R3Nk3jUlsC ''Fiji'', Brij V Lal, University of London, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, 2006]. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]</ref> Papua New Guinea was granted self-government and full independence in 1975.
+[[Papua New Guinea]] is physically closest of any country to geographically remote Australia, with some of the [[Torres Strait Islands]] ([[Boigu]], [[Saibai Island|Saibai]], e.g.) just off the main island of the country. [[Territory of Papua|Its Southern part]] became an Australian colony in 1902, while [[Territory of New Guinea|its Northern part]] was seized by Australia from Germany in 1914 and administered as a "C" [[Mandate of the League of Nations]] from 1920. Both territories were amalgamated after Second World War into a single Australian colony. In 1953, the editor of the conservative ''[[Quadrant (magazine)|Quadrant]]'' magazine, Professor [[James McAuley]], wrote that the territory would be "a coconut republic which would do little good for itself", and advocated its "perpetual union" with Australia, with "equal citizenship rights",<ref>McAuley, James ''[https://www.jstor.org/pss/2752903 "Australia's Future in New Guinea"]'', ''Pacific Affairs'', Vol. 26, No. 1 (Mar. 1953), pp. 59–69. [Accessed 25 May 2008. cited by Kiernan, Ben in [http://www.yale.edu/gsp/publications/aborigines.pdf "Cover-Up and Denial of Genocide: Australia, the USA, East Timor and the Aborigines"] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030316030745/http://www.yale.edu/gsp/publications/aborigines.pdf |date=16 March 2003 }} ''Critical Asian Studies'', [[Yale University]], p.169</ref> but this was rejected by the Australian government.<ref>''[https://books.google.com/books?id=Z2R3Nk3jUlsC&dq=Fiji+union+with+Australia+statehood&pg=PA304 "London Constitutional Conference"]'' in [https://books.google.com/books?id=Z2R3Nk3jUlsC ''Fiji'', Brij V Lal, University of London, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, 2006]. [Accessed 26 May 2008.]</ref> Papua New Guinea was granted self-government and full independence in 1975.
 ===Princeland===
+[[Princeland]] was a proposed colony of Australia that would have been formed by the western part of Victoria and the south-eastern part of South Australia. The movement began the early 1860s and resulted in a petition to Queen Victoria, which was ultimately rejected on the grounds that it would involve changes to two separate colonies and could not be done without their expressed permissions.<ref name="Lateline">{{cite web |title=A Suitable Consort |url=http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2003/hc43.htm |accessdate=2009-04-15 |work=Australian Broadcasting Commission}}</ref>
-{{Main|Princeland}}
-This proposed colony resulted from a movement in the 1860s to create a new colony that incorporated the isolated western Victoria and south-eastern South Australia regions centred on [[Mount Gambier, South Australia|Mount Gambier]] and [[Portland, Victoria|Portland]]. A petition was presented to [[Queen Victoria]], but was rejected.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2003/hc43.htm |title=Lateline – 22/09/2003: A Suitable Consort . Australian Broadcasting Corp |publisher=Abc.net.au |date=22 September 2003 |access-date=29 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100708005449/http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2003/hc43.htm |archive-date=8 July 2010 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
 ===South Coast===
-There was a small movement in the 1940s to create a new state in south-east New South Wales and north-east Victoria. The proposed state would have reached from [[Batemans Bay, New South Wales|Batemans Bay]] on the coast to [[Kiandra, New South Wales|Kiandra]] in the [[Snowy Mountains]], and as far south as [[Sale, Victoria|Sale]] in [[Victoria (Australia)|Victoria]]. The proposed state capital was [[Bega, New South Wales|Bega]]. Despite calls from local advocacy groups for a Royal Commission into the idea, it was met with little success.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/2764438|title=Nowra supports proposed state in south district|work=The Canberra Times|date=6 September 1948|access-date=29 April 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171206152131/http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/2764438|archive-date=6 December 2017|url-status=live|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
+There was a small movement in the 1940s to create a new state in south-east New South Wales and north-east Victoria. The proposed state would have reached from [[Batemans Bay, New South Wales|Batemans Bay]] on the coast to [[Kiandra, New South Wales|Kiandra]] in the [[Snowy Mountains]], and as far south as [[Sale, Victoria|Sale]] in [[Victoria (Australia)|Victoria]]. The proposed state capital was [[Bega, New South Wales|Bega]]. Despite calls from local advocacy groups for a Royal Commission into the idea, it was met with little success.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/2764438|title=Nowra supports proposed state in south district|work=The Canberra Times|date=6 September 1948|access-date=29 April 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171206152131/http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/2764438|archive-date=6 December 2017|url-status=live}}</ref>
 ==Current proposals==
@@ Line 77: / Line 81: @@
 |archive-date=12 August 2012
 |url-status=live
-|df=dmy-all
 }}
-</ref> For instance, in 2003, [[Bryan Pape]] suggested a reorganisation into about twenty states, each with Senate representation.<ref name="smh.com.au">{{cite web |url=http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html |title=The man who's creating a United States of Australia |publisher=smh.com.au |date=11 May 2003 |access-date=29 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080623033958/http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html |archive-date=23 June 2008 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
+</ref> For instance, in 2003, [[Bryan Pape]] suggested a reorganisation into about twenty states, each with Senate representation.<ref name="smh.com.au">{{cite web |url=http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html |title=The man who's creating a United States of Australia |publisher=smh.com.au |date=11 May 2003 |access-date=29 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080623033958/http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/05/10/1052280480600.html |archive-date=23 June 2008 |url-status=live }}</ref>
 [[Republicanism in Australia|Republicanism]], changing mineral wealth and tax distribution have been seen as reasons to revisit federation. Proposals include redivision between the local, state and federal levels of government, either consolidation or fragmentation. It has been argued that new technologies in service delivery are enablers of greater decentralisation or are a reason for greater efficiency in centralisation.
 ===Aboriginal state===
-There are also supporters of an Aboriginal state, along the lines of [[Nunavut]] in Canada. The [[Aboriginal Provisional Government]] was established in 1990 for the purpose;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.apg.org.au/|title=Aboriginal Provisional Government|work=apg.org.au|access-date=19 December 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120221092103/http://www.apg.org.au/|archive-date=21 February 2012|url-status=live|df=dmy-all}}</ref> Paul Coe sued the Commonwealth for Aboriginal sovereignty (''Coe v Commonwealth'' [1979] HCA 68) and see Kevin Gilbert 'Treaty 88'. All advocated for an Aboriginal state.<ref>{{cite web|date=January 28, 2004|title=The Failure of Aboriginal Separatism|url=http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/61201.php|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070327234641/http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/61201.php|archive-date=27 March 2007|access-date=14 November 2006|website=melbourne.indymedia.org}}</ref> [[Agence France Presse]] (21 August 1998) claims Australia blocked [[Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples|a United Nations resolution calling for the self-determination of peoples]], because it would have bolstered support for an Aboriginal state within Australia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/mar/chronology.asp?groupId=90001 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060906104707/http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/mar/chronology.asp?groupId=90001 |archive-date=2006-09-06 |title=Chronology for Aborigines in Australia |author=Minorities at Risk Project |website=MAR: Data |date=2004-05-24 |publisher=The University of Maryland}}</ref> Among those supporting such a state are the [[Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sydneyline.com/Breakup%20of%20Australia.htm |title=The Sydney Line |publisher=The Sydney Line |access-date=29 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110223091319/http://www.sydneyline.com/Breakup%20of%20Australia.htm |archive-date=23 February 2011 |url-status=dead |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
+There are also supporters of an Aboriginal state, along the lines of [[Nunavut]] in Canada. The [[Aboriginal Provisional Government]] was established in 1990 for the purpose;<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.apg.org.au/|title=Aboriginal Provisional Government|work=apg.org.au|access-date=19 December 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120221092103/http://www.apg.org.au/|archive-date=21 February 2012|url-status=live}}</ref> Paul Coe sued the Commonwealth for Aboriginal sovereignty (''Coe v Commonwealth'' [1979] HCA 68) and see Kevin Gilbert 'Treaty 88'. All advocated for an Aboriginal state.<ref>{{cite web|date=January 28, 2004|title=The Failure of Aboriginal Separatism|url=http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/61201.php|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070327234641/http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2004/01/61201.php|archive-date=27 March 2007|access-date=14 November 2006|website=melbourne.indymedia.org}}</ref> [[Agence France Presse]] (21 August 1998) claims Australia blocked [[Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples|a United Nations resolution calling for the self-determination of peoples]], because it would have bolstered support for an Aboriginal state within Australia.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/mar/chronology.asp?groupId=90001  |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060906104707/http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/mar/chronology.asp?groupId=90001 |archive-date=2006-09-06 |title=Chronology for Aborigines in Australia |author=Minorities at Risk Project |website=MAR: Data |date=2004-05-24 |publisher=The University of Maryland}}</ref> Among those supporting such a state are the [[Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.sydneyline.com/Breakup%20of%20Australia.htm |title=The Sydney Line |publisher=The Sydney Line |access-date=29 April 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110223091319/http://www.sydneyline.com/Breakup%20of%20Australia.htm |archive-date=23 February 2011  }}</ref>
 ===Australian Capital Territory===
@@ Line 96: / Line 99: @@
 {{Main|New England New State Movement}}
-[[New England (Australia)|New England]] is a region of [[New South Wales]] and a proposed state. Some supporters also propose a "River-Eden" state in the south of NSW.<ref name=AS />
+[[New England (Australia)|New England]] is a region of [[New South Wales]] and a proposed state.<ref name=AS />
 ===New Zealand===
-There have been several proposals for [[New Zealand]] to become the seventh state of Australia. One proposal, suggested humorously by the [[Liberal Party of Australia|Liberal]] [[Senate of Australia|Senator]] [[Ian Macdonald (Australian politician)|Ian Macdonald]], is that New Zealand's [[North Island]] and [[South Island]] could become the seventh and eighth states of the Commonwealth.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/25/new-zealand-should-become-seventh-and-eighth-states-of-australia-jokes-senator New Zealand should become 'seventh and eighth' states of Australia, jokes senator] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828233602/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/25/new-zealand-should-become-seventh-and-eighth-states-of-australia-jokes-senator |date=28 August 2017 }}, ''[[The Guardian]]'', 25 November 2015</ref> New Zealand was one of the colonies asked to join in the creation of the Commonwealth of Australia, even by the time the ''[[Constitution of Australia|Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act]]'' 1900 (Imp) was enacted, that law still provided for New Zealand to be one of the potential states of Australia.<ref>[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/63-64/12/section/6 Section 6, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302042405/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/63-64/12/section/6 |date=2 March 2012 }} (Imperial)</ref> As [[Australia-New Zealand relations|ties have grown closer]], people have made proposals for a [[customs union]], [[currency union]] and even a joint [[military|defence force]]. New Zealand and Australia enjoy close economic and political relations, mainly by way of the [[Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement]], [[Closer Economic Relations]] (CER) free trade agreement signed in 1983 and the Closer Defence Relations agreement signed in 1990. In 1989, former [[Prime Minister of New Zealand]] [[Geoffrey Palmer (politician)|Sir Geoffrey Palmer]] said that New Zealand had "gained most of the advantages of being a state of Australia without becoming one". The two countries, along with the USA, are in [[ANZUS]], but New Zealand's [[New Zealand's nuclear-free zone|opposition to nuclear weapons]] has weakened this treaty.{{citation needed|date = November 2021}}
+There have been several proposals for [[New Zealand]] to become the seventh state of Australia. One proposal, suggested humorously by the [[Liberal Party of Australia|Liberal]] [[Senate of Australia|Senator]] [[Ian Macdonald (Australian politician)|Ian Macdonald]], is that New Zealand's [[North Island]] and [[South Island]] could become the seventh and eighth states of the Commonwealth.<ref>[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/25/new-zealand-should-become-seventh-and-eighth-states-of-australia-jokes-senator New Zealand should become 'seventh and eighth' states of Australia, jokes senator] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170828233602/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/25/new-zealand-should-become-seventh-and-eighth-states-of-australia-jokes-senator |date=28 August 2017 }}, ''[[The Guardian]]'', 25 November 2015</ref> New Zealand was one of the colonies asked to join in the creation of the Commonwealth of Australia, even by the time the ''[[Constitution of Australia|Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act]]'' 1900 (Imp) was enacted, that law still provided for New Zealand to be one of the potential states of Australia.<ref>[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/63-64/12/section/6 Section 6, Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120302042405/http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/63-64/12/section/6 |date=2 March 2012 }} (Imperial)</ref> As [[Australia-New Zealand relations|ties have grown closer]], people have made proposals for a [[customs union]], [[currency union]] and even a joint [[military|defence force]]. New Zealand and Australia enjoy close economic and political relations, mainly by way of the [[Trans-Tasman Travel Arrangement]], [[Closer Economic Relations]] (CER) free trade agreement signed in 1983 and the Closer Defence Relations agreement signed in 1990. In 1989, then-[[Prime Minister of New Zealand]] [[Geoffrey Palmer (politician)|Sir Geoffrey Palmer]] said that New Zealand had "gained most of the advantages of being a state of Australia without becoming one". The two countries, along with the United States, were the original parties of [[ANZUS]].
 ====History====
@@ Line 108: / Line 111: @@
 In 1890, there was an informal meeting of members from the Australasian colonies, this was followed by the first National Australasian convention a year later. The New Zealand representatives stated it would be unlikely to join a federation with Australia at its foundation, but it would be interested in doing so at a later date. New Zealand's position was taken into account when the Constitution of Australia was written up. Australia, in an attempt to sway New Zealand to join, gave Māori the right to vote in 1902, while Australian Aboriginal people did not fully gain the right to vote at national elections until 1962.<ref>[http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/legis/cth/num_act/cea1962311962260/ Commonwealth Electoral Act (1962).]</ref> In 1908 and 1912, Australia and New Zealand sent [[Australasia at the Olympics|Australasians teams]] to the Olympic Games. New Zealand and Australian soldiers fought together in 1915 under the name [[Australian and New Zealand Army Corps|ANZAC]].
-Australian academic Bob Catley wrote a book titled ''Waltzing with Matilda: should New Zealand join Australia?'', a book arguing that New Zealand should become one with Australia, which was described by New Zealand political commentator [[Colin James (journalist)|Colin James]] as "a book for Australians".<ref>{{cite news |first=Colin |last=James |url=http://www.colinjames.co.nz/other_articles/Australasia_NZ_Books_Jul_01.htm |title=How not to waltz Matilda |publisher=[[Colin James (journalist)|Colin James]] |date=24 July 2001 |access-date=27 June 2006 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061005233132/http://www.colinjames.co.nz/other_articles/Australasia_NZ_Books_Jul_01.htm |archive-date=5 October 2006 |df=dmy-all }}</ref> In December 2006, an Australian Federal Parliamentary Committee recommended that Australia and New Zealand pursue a full union, or at least adopt a common ANZ currency and more common markets. The Committee found that "while Australia and New Zealand are of course two sovereign nations, it seems... that the strong ties between the two countries – the economic, cultural, migration, defence, governmental and people-to-people linkages – suggest that an even closer relationship, including the possibility of union, is both desirable and realistic." This was despite the [[Treasurer of Australia|Australian Treasurer]] [[Peter Costello]] and [[Minister of Finance (New Zealand)|New Zealand Minister of Finance]] [[Michael Cullen (politician)|Michael Cullen]] saying that a common currency was "not on the agenda".<ref>Dick, Tim, ''[http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/push-for-union-with-new-zealand/2006/12/04/1165080877899.html "Push for union with New Zealand"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080220155748/http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/push-for-union-with-new-zealand/2006/12/04/1165080877899.html |date=20 February 2008 }}'', [[Sydney Morning Herald]], 5 December 2006. Accessed 29 February 2007.]</ref>
+Australian academic Bob Catley wrote a book titled ''Waltzing with Matilda: should New Zealand join Australia?'', a book arguing that New Zealand should become one with Australia, which was described by New Zealand political commentator [[Colin James (journalist)|Colin James]] as "a book for Australians".<ref>{{cite news |first=Colin |last=James |url=http://www.colinjames.co.nz/other_articles/Australasia_NZ_Books_Jul_01.htm |title=How not to waltz Matilda |publisher=[[Colin James (journalist)|Colin James]] |date=24 July 2001 |access-date=27 June 2006  |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061005233132/http://www.colinjames.co.nz/other_articles/Australasia_NZ_Books_Jul_01.htm |archive-date=5 October 2006 }}</ref> In December 2006, an Australian Federal Parliamentary Committee recommended that Australia and New Zealand pursue a full union, or at least adopt a common ANZ currency and more common markets. The Committee found that "while Australia and New Zealand are of course two sovereign nations, it seems... that the strong ties between the two countries – the economic, cultural, migration, defence, governmental and people-to-people linkages – suggest that an even closer relationship, including the possibility of union, is both desirable and realistic." This was despite the [[Treasurer of Australia|Australian Treasurer]] [[Peter Costello]] and [[Minister of Finance (New Zealand)|New Zealand Minister of Finance]] [[Michael Cullen (politician)|Michael Cullen]] saying that a common currency was "not on the agenda".<ref>Dick, Tim, ''[http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/push-for-union-with-new-zealand/2006/12/04/1165080877899.html "Push for union with New Zealand"] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080220155748/http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/push-for-union-with-new-zealand/2006/12/04/1165080877899.html |date=20 February 2008 }}'', [[Sydney Morning Herald]], 5 December 2006. Accessed 29 February 2007.]</ref>
-A 2010 UMR research poll asked 1000 people in Australia and New Zealand a series of questions relating to New Zealand's becoming the seventh state of Australia. One quarter of the people thought it was something to look into. Over 40% thought the idea was worth debating. More Australians than New Zealanders would support such a move.<ref name="UMR Poll Results">{{cite news |url=http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/full-umr-research-poll-results-aust-nz-union-3414686 |title=Full UMR research poll results on Aust-NZ union |date=14 March 2010 |work=[[Television New Zealand]] |access-date=4 November 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112021710/http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/full-umr-research-poll-results-aust-nz-union-3414686 |archive-date=12 January 2012 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all }}</ref>
+A 2010 UMR research poll asked 1000 people in Australia and New Zealand a series of questions relating to New Zealand's becoming the seventh state of Australia. One quarter of the people thought it was something to look into. Over 40% thought the idea was worth debating. More Australians than New Zealanders would support such a move.<ref name="UMR Poll Results">{{cite news |url=http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/full-umr-research-poll-results-aust-nz-union-3414686 |title=Full UMR research poll results on Aust-NZ union |date=14 March 2010 |work=[[Television New Zealand]] |access-date=4 November 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120112021710/http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/full-umr-research-poll-results-aust-nz-union-3414686 |archive-date=12 January 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref>
+In 2011, New Zealand had a party [[Join Australia Movement Party]] which advocated political unity between New Zealand and [[Australia]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.joinaustraliamovement.co.nz/the-team-xidc83510.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110211172415/http://www.joinaustraliamovement.co.nz/the-team-xidc83510.html  |archive-date=2011-02-11 |title=The Team |publisher=Join Australia Movement Party |access-date=2010-02-08 }}</ref> This party ended in 2011.
+In 2023 during Labour MP [[Jamie Strange]] [[Valediction|valedictory speech]] he said that New Zealanders "shouldn't rule... out" becoming one country with Australia.<ref>{{Cite web |last=MacManus |first=Joel |date=2023-08-23 |title=Jamie Strange's very strange valedictory |url=https://thespinoff.co.nz/politics/23-08-2023/jamie-stranges-very-strange-valedictory |access-date=2023-08-24 |website=The Spinoff |language=en}}</ref>
 ====Advantages====
-A leading factor for the proposal of New Zealand as a state of Australia is the major economic benefits it could bring. However, [[free trade]] and open borders now appear to be the maximum extent of public acceptance of the proposal. There are many family connections between the two nations, with around 500,000 New Zealanders living in Australia and 60,000 Australians living in New Zealand as of 2013. [[Peter Slipper]], a former Member of Australia's Parliament, once said, "It's about how can we improve the quality of living for people on both sides of the Tasman" when referring to the proposal.<ref name="Scoop.co.nz: Should NZ & Australia Become One?">{{cite web|url=http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1003/S00208.htm|title=Q+A Poll – Should NZ & Australia Become One ?|work=scoop.co.nz|access-date=8 October 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100812031011/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1003/S00208.htm|archive-date=12 August 2010|url-status=live|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
+A leading factor for the proposal of New Zealand as a state of Australia is the major economic benefits it could bring. However, [[free trade]] and open borders now appear to be the maximum extent of public acceptance of the proposal. There are many family connections between the two nations, with around 500,000 New Zealanders living in Australia and 60,000 Australians living in New Zealand as of 2013. [[Peter Slipper]], a former Member of Australia's Parliament, once said, "It's about how can we improve the quality of living for people on both sides of the Tasman" when referring to the proposal.<ref name="Scoop.co.nz: Should NZ & Australia Become One?">{{cite web|url=http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1003/S00208.htm|title=Q+A Poll – Should NZ & Australia Become One ?|work=scoop.co.nz|access-date=8 October 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100812031011/http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1003/S00208.htm|archive-date=12 August 2010|url-status=live}}</ref>
 ====Disadvantages====
-Concerns have been expressed about the need for a common currency,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lloyd|first1=Peter J.|last2=Song|first2=Lei Lei|date=2006|title=A currency union between Australia and New Zealand?|url=https://www.cairn.info/revue-economie-internationale-2006-3-page-149.htm|journal=Économie internationale|volume=107|issue=3 |pages=149–172|doi=10.3917/ecoi.107.0149 }}</ref> about changes to the [[South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone Treaty]],{{citation needed|date=June 2016}} and about the retention of the administrative and political recognition of the ancestral rights of the indigenous [[Māori people|Maori]] population under the [[Treaty of Waitangi]].{{citation needed|date=June 2016}}
+Concerns have been expressed about the need for a common currency.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lloyd|first1=Peter J.|last2=Song|first2=Lei Lei|date=2006|title=A currency union between Australia and New Zealand?|url=https://www.cairn.info/revue-economie-internationale-2006-3-page-149.htm|journal=Économie internationale|volume=107|issue=3 |pages=149–172|doi=10.3917/ecoi.107.0149 }}</ref>
-A number of disparities that could lead to conflict including the current constitutions (written in [[Constitution of Australia|Australia]], [[Uncodified constitution|unwritten]] in [[Constitution of New Zealand|New Zealand]]), the status of political rights (constitutionally [[entrenchment clause|entrenched]] in [[Australian constitutional law#Express rights|Australia]] but not in [[New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990|New Zealand]]). Some New Zealanders feel they have established a national identity, one which they feel they may lose if they became part of Australia.<ref name="UMR Poll Results"/> Others argue New Zealand is too far away from the mainland of Australia.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Crisp|first=Rodney|date=2019|title=The Republic of Australia and New Zealand|url=https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/republic-australia-new-zealand/|url-status=live|access-date=2021-05-21|website=Griffith Review|language=en-US}}</ref>
+A number of disparities that could lead to conflict including the current constitutions (written in [[Constitution of Australia|Australia]], [[Uncodified constitution|unwritten]] in [[Constitution of New Zealand|New Zealand]]), the status of political rights (constitutionally [[entrenchment clause|entrenched]] in [[Australian constitutional law#Express rights|Australia]] but not in [[New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990|New Zealand]]). Some New Zealanders feel they have established a national identity, one which they feel they may lose if they became part of Australia.<ref name="UMR Poll Results"/> Others argue New Zealand is too far away from the mainland of Australia.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Crisp|first=Rodney|date=2019|title=The Republic of Australia and New Zealand|url=https://www.griffithreview.com/articles/republic-australia-new-zealand/|access-date=2021-05-21|website=Griffith Review|language=en-US}}</ref>
 ===North Queensland===
@@ Line 127: / Line 134: @@
 One proposal is that Queensland should be divided by the [[22nd parallel south|22nd parallel]] with the boundary running just south of [[Sarina]] on the coast to the [[Northern Territory]] border between [[Boulia]] and [[Mount Isa]], and the capital would be [[Sellheim, Queensland|Sellheim]], near [[Charters Towers]], to overcome rivalry between [[Mackay, Queensland|Mackay]], [[Townsville]] and [[Cairns]].<ref>{{cite news |title=Push for separation as Queensland splits|url=http://www.news.com.au/top-stories/push-for-separation-as-queensland-splits/story-e6frfkp9-1111113757951|publisher=News.com.au}}</ref> The name Capricornia has been proposed for this state.
-According to ''[[The Courier-Mail]]'' in 2010, the majority of North Queensland Mayors were in favour of the separation from Queensland proper. Only two of the hundred delegates at the NQ Local Government Association meeting were against the proposal – the two being Mayor Val Schier (Cairns) and Mayor Ben Callcott (Charters Towers).<ref>{{cite news|title=The state of North Queensland?|url=http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2010/08/the-state-of-north-queensland.html|publisher=Menzies House|access-date=24 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130926214812/http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2010/08/the-state-of-north-queensland.html|archive-date=26 September 2013|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref>
+According to ''[[The Courier-Mail]]'' in 2010, the majority of North Queensland Mayors were in favour of the separation from Queensland proper. Only two of the hundred delegates at the NQ Local Government Association meeting were against the proposal – the two being Mayor Val Schier (Cairns) and Mayor Ben Callcott (Charters Towers).<ref>{{cite news|title=The state of North Queensland?|url=http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2010/08/the-state-of-north-queensland.html|publisher=Menzies House|access-date=24 September 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130926214812/http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2010/08/the-state-of-north-queensland.html|archive-date=26 September 2013}}</ref>
 ===Northern Territory===
@@ Line 138: / Line 145: @@
 In a [[1998 Northern Territory referendum|1998 referendum]], the voters of the Northern Territory narrowly rejected a statehood proposal that would have given the territory three [[Australian Senate|senators]], rather than the twelve held by the other states, although the name "Northern Territory" would have been retained.
-With statehood being rejected, it is likely that the Northern Territory will remain a territory for the near future, though former [[Chief Minister of the Northern Territory|Chief Minister]] [[Clare Martin]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2003/s860996.htm |title=NT statehood back on the agenda |last1=Barker |first1=Anne |date=22 May 2003 |website=[[abc.net.au]] |access-date=4 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140409131149/http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2003/s860996.htm |archive-date=9 April 2014 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all }}</ref> and the majority of Territorians<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=/laca/ntstatehood/report/chapter3.pdf |title=Federal implications of statehood for the Northern Territory - Chapter 3: Recent developments towards statehood |author=House Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs |date=28 May 2007 |website=[[Parliament of Australia]] |access-date=4 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004215856/http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=%2Flaca%2Fntstatehood%2Freport%2Fchapter3.pdf |archive-date=4 October 2013 |url-status=live |df=dmy-all }}</ref> are said to be in favour of statehood.
+With statehood being rejected, it is likely that the Northern Territory will remain a territory for the near future, though former [[Chief Minister of the Northern Territory|Chief Minister]] [[Clare Martin]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2003/s860996.htm |title=NT statehood back on the agenda |last1=Barker |first1=Anne |date=22 May 2003 |website=[[abc.net.au]] |access-date=4 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140409131149/http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2003/s860996.htm |archive-date=9 April 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> and the majority of Territorians<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=/laca/ntstatehood/report/chapter3.pdf |title=Federal implications of statehood for the Northern Territory - Chapter 3: Recent developments towards statehood |author=House Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs |date=28 May 2007 |website=[[Parliament of Australia]] |access-date=4 October 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131004215856/http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=%2Flaca%2Fntstatehood%2Freport%2Fchapter3.pdf |archive-date=4 October 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> are said to be in favour of statehood.
 While statehood would under normal circumstances give the Northern Territory 12 senators, the same number of senators as every other state, its population as of 2021 is only 3% of the largest state, [[New South Wales]]. This means that whilst one NSW senator represents 682,000 people, one NT senator would represent approximately 21,000 people. By comparison, one Tasmanian senator represents 45,000 people, while one South Australian senator (next smallest state by population) represents 148,000 people. If the NT were only given 3 senators as proposed in the 1998 referendum, each would represent around 63,000 people (along with a higher quota for election)
@@ Line 148: / Line 155: @@
 In December 2020, there was a proposal by Northern Victoria MP Tim Quilty to form a new state from Northeastern Victoria and Southeastern New South Wales, because people in regional areas feel like they are neglected by their state governments. There was also a proposal to form three new states. They are: A new state comprising Greater Geelong and Metropolitan Melbourne; Regional Northeastern Victoria and Southeastern New South Wales combing, and Greater Sydney to become separate states.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.couriermail.com.au/technology/environment/victorian-mp-puts-forward-bold-proposal-for-new-australian-state/news-story/50ee6781191e7c80adaabd6634dd23df |first=Anthony |last=Piovesan |date=2020-12-05 |title=Victorian MP puts forward bold proposal for new Australian state |newspaper=The Courier-Mail |agency=NCA NewsWire |location=Brisbane, Qld. |publisher=Nationwide News}}</ref>
+Some supporters also propose a "River-Eden" state in the south of NSW and the north of Victoria, which, rather than being landlocked, would stretch eastwards to the coastal town of [[Eden, New South Wales|Eden]].<ref name="">{{cite web |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050111212357fw_/http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~vegtam/wodeninfo.html |title=Wodenbury & River-Eden |author=Ian Johnston |work=www.newstates.net |access-date=11 March 2023}}</ref><ref name=AS />
 ==See also==
@@ Line 175: / Line 184: @@
 {{DEFAULTSORT:List Of Proposed States Of Australia}}
-[[Category:Government of Australia]]
+[[Category:Proposed states and territories of Australia| ]]
+[[Category:Australia geography-related lists|States, proposed]]
-[[Category:Proposed states and territories of Australia|*]]
-[[Category:Australia–Papua New Guinea relations]]
 [[Category:Australia–Fiji relations]]
 [[Category:Australia–New Zealand relations]]
+[[Category:Australia–Papua New Guinea relations]]
+[[Category:Government of Australia]]
+[[Category:Lists of proposals|Australian states]]
 [[Category:National unifications]]
-[[Category:Australia geography-related lists|States, proposed]]
 [[Category:Proposals in Australia]]

v t e Global governance and identity
Proposals	United Nations Parliamentary Assembly World constitution World government World federalism World taxation system Flag
Theories	Cosmopolitanism Democratic globalization Democratic mundialization Global apartheid Global citizenship Global governance Globalism Internationalism Transnational governance World currency
Organisations	Global citizens movement World Federalist Movement/Institute for Global Policy World Service Authority Campaign for World Government World Constitution and Parliament Association
Provisional government	Provisional Earth Federation
World portal