Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gastrosexuality: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:27, 5 July 2024

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 14:27, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gastrosexuality

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed attempt at neologism from 2008, apparently part of a commercial promotion. Appears to have originated in the Daily Mail, which is not usable as a source. RS usage that I can find is one Irish Times mention. There's a HuffPost article that turns out to be a reblog of the Daily Mail piece. There's a Times article that admits it's an advertising feature. That's it. This was an article, then it was a redirect, then it was restored as an ill-sourced article. I'm pretty sure a single usage of an advertising promotional term is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article, and it would be a dicdef in any case. David Gerard (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article does not meet Wikipedia's standards for citation and a reliable source and isn't notable enough.Yakov-kobi (talk) 00:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Social science. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A single, possibly promotional use wouldn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. It might be better suited for a dictionary definition. Waqar💬 18:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination, and all of the above. TH1980 (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete The article as it is now is poorly sourced and not so well written. But I plugged gastrosexual into Google Scholar and got plenty of decent-looking hits from a range of years: [1] This is not a term that flared up in 2008 and then died out quickly. If there's a Wikipedian willing to put in the work, this could scrub up into a keepable article. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
-===[[:Gastrosexuality]]===
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}}
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''delete'''‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ⇌ [[User talk:Jake Wartenberg|Jake Wartenberg]] 14:27, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
+===[[:Gastrosexuality]]===
 <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude>
 :{{la|1=Gastrosexuality}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gastrosexuality|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 June 28#{{anchorencode:Gastrosexuality}}|View log]]</noinclude> | [[Special:Diff/1231525748/cur|edits since nomination]])
 :({{Find sources AFD|title=Gastrosexuality}})
-Failed attempt at neologism from 2008, apparently part of a commercial promotion. Appears to have originated in the Daily Mail, which is not usable as a source. RS usage that I can find is [https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/food-and-drink/restaurant-reviews/bunsen-burger-gastrosexual-satisfaction-1.1436878 one Irish Times mention]. There's a [https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/introducing-the-gastrosex_n_114323 HuffPost article] that turns out to be a reblog of the Daily Mail piece. There's a [https://www.thetimes.com/article/the-rise-of-the-gastrosexual-f5mrdt0dp0l Times article] that admits it's an advertising feature. That's it. This was an article, then it was a redirect, then it was restored as an ill-sourced article. I'm pretty sure a single usage of an advertising promotional term is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
+Failed attempt at neologism from 2008, apparently part of a commercial promotion. Appears to have originated in the Daily Mail, which is not usable as a source. RS usage that I can find is [https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/food-and-drink/restaurant-reviews/bunsen-burger-gastrosexual-satisfaction-1.1436878 one Irish Times mention]. There's a [https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/introducing-the-gastrosex_n_114323 HuffPost article] that turns out to be a reblog of the Daily Mail piece. There's a [https://www.thetimes.com/article/the-rise-of-the-gastrosexual-f5mrdt0dp0l Times article] that admits it's an advertising feature. That's it. This was an article, then it was a redirect, then it was restored as an ill-sourced article. I'm pretty sure a single usage of an advertising promotional term is not sufficient for a Wikipedia article, and it would be a dicdef in any case. [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 *<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Food and drink|list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 19:50, 28 June 2024 (UTC)</small>
+*'''Delete''' This article does not meet Wikipedia's standards for citation and a reliable source and isn't notable enough.[[User:Yakov-kobi|Yakov-kobi]] ([[User talk:Yakov-kobi|talk]]) 00:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
+*<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting|deletion sorting]] lists for the following topics: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sexuality and gender|Sexuality and gender]] and [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Social science|Social science]]. '''[[User:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">WC</span>''<span style="color:#999933">Quidditch</span>'']]''' [[User talk:Wcquidditch|<span style="color:red">☎</span>]] [[Special:Contribs/Wcquidditch|<span style="color:#999933">✎</span>]] 01:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)</small>
+* '''Delete''': A single, possibly promotional use wouldn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. It might be better suited for a dictionary definition. [[User:Iwaqarhashmi|'''<span style="background:#FF0000;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 lightgray">Waqar</span>''']][[User talk:Iwaqarhashmi|<span style="background:#0000FF;padding:2px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">💬</span>]] 18:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC) <!--VCB Iwaqarhashmi-->
+* '''Delete''' as per nomination, and all of the above. [[User:TH1980|TH1980]] ([[User talk:TH1980|talk]]) 02:02, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
+*'''Weak delete'''  The article ''as it is now'' is poorly sourced and not so well written. But I plugged gastrosexual into Google Scholar and got plenty of decent-looking hits from a range of years: [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C31&q=gastrosexual&btnG=]  This is not a term that flared up in 2008 and then died out quickly. If there's a Wikipedian willing to put in the work, this could scrub up into a keepable article. [[User:Darkfrog24|Darkfrog24]] ([[User talk:Darkfrog24|talk]]) 03:23, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>