Template talk:London Underground rolling stock: Difference between revisions
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Tag: |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
|||
{{WikiProject Trains|subway=yes|UK=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Trains|subway=yes|UK=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject London Transport}} |
|||
{{Tube|class=template}} |
|||
}} |
|||
== [[London Transport]] disambiguation == |
== [[London Transport]] disambiguation == |
||
Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
==Template== |
==Template== |
||
Hate this new template, it looks clumsy, especially compared to the older one. Do we really need so an ugly box at the bottom of each page? [[User:Jsp3970|Jsp3970]] ([[User talk:Jsp3970|talk]]) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
Hate this new template, it looks clumsy, especially compared to the older one. Do we really need so an ugly box at the bottom of each page? [[User:Jsp3970|Jsp3970]] ([[User talk:Jsp3970|talk]]) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Suggestion == |
|||
I think we should have one row for current rolling stock, split into deep tube and sub surface, and former rolling stock in a separate row, similar to [[Template:NYCS rolling stock]] [[User:ElshadK|ElshadK]] ([[User talk:ElshadK|talk]]) 12:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:43, 7 July 2024
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
London Transport disambiguation
[edit]I changed the link on the template from the dab page to the most recent info on TfL. Feel free to leave me a message please if there's a better solution. --AndrewHowse (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
more efficient
[edit]IS there a more efficient way of displaying this data? maybe splinting it into currently used and unused stock
this could even start by colour coding? acasperw (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Template
[edit]Hate this new template, it looks clumsy, especially compared to the older one. Do we really need so an ugly box at the bottom of each page? Jsp3970 (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Suggestion
[edit]I think we should have one row for current rolling stock, split into deep tube and sub surface, and former rolling stock in a separate row, similar to Template:NYCS rolling stock ElshadK (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Template-Class rail transport articles
- NA-importance rail transport articles
- Template-Class Rapid transit articles
- NA-importance Rapid transit articles
- WikiProject Rapid transit articles
- Template-Class UK Railways articles
- NA-importance UK Railways articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Template-Class London Transport articles
- NA-importance London Transport articles
- WikiProject London Transport articles