Jump to content

Template talk:London Underground rolling stock: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lfdder (talk | contribs)
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Trains|subway=yes|UK=yes}}
{{WikiProject Trains|subway=yes|UK=yes}}
{{WikiProject London Transport}}
{{Tube|class=template}}
}}


== [[London Transport]] disambiguation ==
== [[London Transport]] disambiguation ==
Line 15: Line 17:
==Template==
==Template==
Hate this new template, it looks clumsy, especially compared to the older one. Do we really need so an ugly box at the bottom of each page? [[User:Jsp3970|Jsp3970]] ([[User talk:Jsp3970|talk]]) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Hate this new template, it looks clumsy, especially compared to the older one. Do we really need so an ugly box at the bottom of each page? [[User:Jsp3970|Jsp3970]] ([[User talk:Jsp3970|talk]]) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

== Suggestion ==

I think we should have one row for current rolling stock, split into deep tube and sub surface, and former rolling stock in a separate row, similar to [[Template:NYCS rolling stock]] [[User:ElshadK|ElshadK]] ([[User talk:ElshadK|talk]]) 12:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:43, 7 July 2024

London Transport disambiguation

[edit]

I changed the link on the template from the dab page to the most recent info on TfL. Feel free to leave me a message please if there's a better solution. --AndrewHowse (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

more efficient

[edit]

IS there a more efficient way of displaying this data? maybe splinting it into currently used and unused stock

this could even start by colour coding? acasperw (talk) 15:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template

[edit]

Hate this new template, it looks clumsy, especially compared to the older one. Do we really need so an ugly box at the bottom of each page? Jsp3970 (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

I think we should have one row for current rolling stock, split into deep tube and sub surface, and former rolling stock in a separate row, similar to Template:NYCS rolling stock ElshadK (talk) 12:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]