Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Abbey of the Dormition: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
;Creator:[[User:Godot13|Godot13]] |
;Creator:[[User:Godot13|Godot13]] |
||
* '''Support as nominator''' – [[User:TheFreeWorld|TheFreeWorld]] ([[User talk:TheFreeWorld|talk]]) 21:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC) |
* '''Support as nominator''' – [[User:TheFreeWorld|TheFreeWorld]] ([[User talk:TheFreeWorld|talk]]) 21:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC) |
||
* '''Support''' - Great quality, interesting subject and a robust target article. [[User:Moonreach|Moonreach]] ([[User talk:Moonreach|talk]]) 13:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
* '''Support''' - Great quality, interesting subject and a robust target article. [[User:Moonreach|Moonreach]] ([[User talk:Moonreach|talk]]) 13:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
* '''Support''' No, quality is actually not so great (from Medium format) - probably flat scanner. But span of dynamic range is great and since it is film i support. --[[User:PetarM|Petar Milošević]] ([[User talk:PetarM|talk]]) 10:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |
* '''Support''' No, quality is actually not so great (from Medium format) - probably flat scanner. But span of dynamic range is great and since it is film i support. --[[User:PetarM|Petar Milošević]] ([[User talk:PetarM|talk]]) 10:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
:*This wasn't shot on film, and no scanner. See EXIF data. It was shot with a [[digital camera back]]. It's a digitial photo. Not so sharp at full size, but the large pixel count makes up for it. [[User:Bammesk|Bammesk]] ([[User talk:Bammesk|talk]]) 15:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::* Explaining why best didnt came out. --[[User:PetarM|Petar Milošević]] ([[User talk:PetarM|talk]]) 10:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' --[[User:Carlosmarkos2345|Carlosmarkos2345]] ([[User talk:Carlosmarkos2345|talk]]) 15:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC) |
* '''Support''' --[[User:Carlosmarkos2345|Carlosmarkos2345]] ([[User talk:Carlosmarkos2345|talk]]) 15:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
* '''Support''' [[User:Charlesjsharp|Charlesjsharp]] ([[User talk:Charlesjsharp|talk]]) 20:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
* '''Support''' – [[User:Hamid Hassani|Hamid Hassani]] ([[User talk:Hamid Hassani|talk]]) 02:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Support'''. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 16:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
{{clear}} |
{{clear}} |
||
<noinclude>[[Category:Featured picture nominations]] [[Category:Featured picture nominations/June 2024]]</noinclude> |
<noinclude>[[Category:Featured picture nominations]] [[Category:Featured picture nominations/June 2024]]</noinclude> |
||
Revision as of 10:04, 8 July 2024
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2024 at 21:15:22 (UTC)
- Reason
- High quality and resolution.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Abbey of the Dormition
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Godot13
- Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 21:15, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Great quality, interesting subject and a robust target article. Moonreach (talk) 13:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support No, quality is actually not so great (from Medium format) - probably flat scanner. But span of dynamic range is great and since it is film i support. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- This wasn't shot on film, and no scanner. See EXIF data. It was shot with a digital camera back. It's a digitial photo. Not so sharp at full size, but the large pixel count makes up for it. Bammesk (talk) 15:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Explaining why best didnt came out. --Petar Milošević (talk) 10:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Carlosmarkos2345 (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:38, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Hamid Hassani (talk) 02:36, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support. MER-C 16:52, 6 July 2024 (UTC)