Talk:International Nuclear Event Scale: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Lucens accident rating: new section |
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|||
{{WikiProject Disaster management |
{{WikiProject Disaster management |importance=mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Energy |
{{WikiProject Energy |importance=mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Environment |
{{WikiProject Environment |importance=mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject Science Policy|importance=mid}} |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
|archive = Talk:International Nuclear Event Scale/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = Talk:International Nuclear Event Scale/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{auto archiving notice|age=180}} |
|||
== Church Rock and Santa Susana == |
|||
Why is there no mention of [[Church Rock uranium mill spill]] or the meltdown of the [[Sodium Reactor Experiment]] at the [[Santa Susana Field Laboratory]]? Church Rock was at least level 4 if not 5. It released more radiation than Three Mile Island. '''[[User:Barticus88|<span style='color:#ffffff; background:#55CC44'> Randall Bart </span>]][[User talk:Barticus88|<span style='color:#ffffff; background:#CC7766'> Talk </span>]]''' |
|||
:This isn't intended to be an exhaustive list; some examples are given. Incidentally, if either of those accidents was ever assigned an INES rating, it doesn't appear to be listed in either article. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 01:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== External links modified == |
|||
Hello fellow Wikipedians, |
|||
I have just modified 2 external links on [[International Nuclear Event Scale]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/810427446|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes: |
|||
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110413145944/http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_05.html to http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_05.html |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www.ujv.gov.si/nc/en/splosno/cns/news/article/12088/5400/ |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://200.0.198.11/comunicados/18_12_2006.pdf |
|||
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to http://www-news.iaea.org/news/topics/topic/erfs/erf/default.asp?VersionNum=1&TopicID=660 |
|||
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/INES-2009_web.pdf |
|||
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. |
|||
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}} |
|||
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 04:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]] for deletion == |
== Nomination of [[:Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale]] for deletion == |
||
| Line 43: | Line 22: | ||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> |
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> |
||
== Second (1958) Chalk River incident should also be in this list == |
|||
== Lucens accident rating == |
|||
My guess is that the 1958 incident would be level 4, but I have not been able to find any source that confirms this. (Fuel rod was damaged and caught fire, reactor was damaged, interior of building + 0.4 sq km contaminated.) https://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionD.htm#nru1958 |
|||
Note that the [[List of civilian nuclear accidents]] article lists it as level 5, but this may be due to a misreading of the following source discussing the 1952 incident: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph241/zerkalov1/docs/mukhopadhyay.pdf [[User:KaiaVintr|KaiaVintr]] ([[User talk:KaiaVintr|talk]]) 18:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
The article classifies the Lucens accident as 5, but the wikipedia page on Lucens Reactor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucens_reactor) shows it as 4. |
|||
:I don't think we need more examples in the table; we already arguably have too many. [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::Suggestion is based on the fact that Sellafield appears in the list eight times, and calling the Chalk River accident the "first" naturally makes people wonder about the others. But anyway, if no reference can be found for the rating, then not much can be done. [[User:KaiaVintr|KaiaVintr]] ([[User talk:KaiaVintr|talk]]) 18:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 21:34, 10 July 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Nuclear Event Scale article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nomination of Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale, which is related to and cited in this article, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Second (1958) Chalk River incident should also be in this list
[edit]My guess is that the 1958 incident would be level 4, but I have not been able to find any source that confirms this. (Fuel rod was damaged and caught fire, reactor was damaged, interior of building + 0.4 sq km contaminated.) https://www.nuclearfaq.ca/cnf_sectionD.htm#nru1958
Note that the List of civilian nuclear accidents article lists it as level 5, but this may be due to a misreading of the following source discussing the 1952 incident: http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2016/ph241/zerkalov1/docs/mukhopadhyay.pdf KaiaVintr (talk) 18:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think we need more examples in the table; we already arguably have too many. VQuakr (talk) 18:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Suggestion is based on the fact that Sellafield appears in the list eight times, and calling the Chalk River accident the "first" naturally makes people wonder about the others. But anyway, if no reference can be found for the rating, then not much can be done. KaiaVintr (talk) 18:59, 5 June 2024 (UTC)