User talk:Edibobb: Difference between revisions
(26 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
hi please add described categorys for your articles by years and add templates for articles thanks |
hi please add described categorys for your articles by years and add templates for articles thanks |
||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == |
|||
== commons category is misplaced == |
|||
your [[Philoscia]], there is no need to create el section. there is 1 exception, if el section contains atleast one link and we can include commons inline. no need for refbegin and refend also. thank u. <_> [[User:Jindam vani|jindam, vani]] ([[User talk:Jindam vani|talk]]) 12:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> |
|||
== Question about Qbugbot == |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div> |
|||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> |
|||
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
Hi there - I think I may have bungled a ping to you in a recent discussion. Do you think you could weigh in at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tree of Life#Carabidae.org has left the building]] regarding whether Qbugbot could be employed to fix those 7k dead links? Any other comments about how to attack the switch to GBIF or CoL would also be welcome. Cheers --<span style="font-family:Courier">[[User:Elmidae|Elmidae]]</span> <small>([[User talk:Elmidae|talk]] · [[Special:contributions/Elmidae|contribs]])</small> 18:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC) |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> |
|||
== [[Latridae]] and [[Cheilodactylidae]] == |
|||
</div> |
|||
Hi, I have reverted your edits to ''[[Goniistius|Gonistius]]'', [[Wikipedia:FISHES|WP:Fishes]] follows the taxonomy in the 5th Edition of ''[[Fishes of the World]]'' for taxonomic levels above that of genus, this is to maintain stability. This is to discourage each editor choosing the taxonomy they like. This means that the situation of the Morwongs is a mess. The wording you changed reflected that the taxonomy of these families was not settled. All such articles should describe alternative taxonomies. [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 08:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
</div> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> |
|||
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Agonum elongatulum]]== |
|||
:No problem, I didn't realize there was a standard in place. I was going by Fishbase and Eschmeyer's Catalog of Fishes. I'll leave the fish taxonomy alone, since it seems pretty well handled. [[User:Edibobb|Bob Webster]] ([[User talk:Edibobb#top|talk]]) 15:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]] |
|||
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} |
|||
A tag has been placed on [[:Agonum elongatulum]], requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are: |
|||
*It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See [[WP:CSD#A3|section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion]].) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at [[Wikipedia:Stub#Essential information about stubs|Wikipedia:Stub]]. Also please note that articles must be on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notable]] subjects and should provide references to [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verify]] their content. |
|||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Agonum elongatulum|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Agonum+elongatulum|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. [[Special:Contributions/2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDC2:D617:CAB6:BBF1|2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDC2:D617:CAB6:BBF1]] ([[User talk:2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDC2:D617:CAB6:BBF1|talk]]) 21:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC) |
|||
::No worries, have a great weekend! [[User:Quetzal1964|Quetzal1964]] ([[User talk:Quetzal1964|talk]]) 16:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for |
==Disambiguation link notification for July 9 == |
||
An automated process has detected that |
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages. |
||
:[[Melanoplus bowditchi]] |
|||
::added a link pointing to [[Spur-throated grasshopper]] |
|||
:[[Melanoplus confusus]] |
|||
::added a link pointing to [[Spur-throated grasshopper]] |
|||
:[[Melanoplus glaucipes]] |
|||
::added a link pointing to [[Spur-throated grasshopper]] |
|||
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) |
([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 18:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Deliathis == |
|||
== They are found in Australia == |
|||
Hi. You may wonder why I reverted your edits to ''[[Deliathis]]'' - it's because all of the online resources are incorrect; you will note that there are very significant discrepancies between them. Between BioLib and Bezark, at least one of them has the correct spelling in each pair of spellings. The true list of species names is therefore a composite of these two online sources. This genus has been a mess for decades, and people simply can't get their ducks in a row. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 16:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trechimorphus&diff=1149996182&oldid=1148980852&diffmode=source this] edit you placed the sentence "They are found in Australia" after the introduction to a list thereby breaking the flow, and you placed it immediately before the ref that was previously there thereby misattributing the reference. Unfortunately you seem to be editing other articles in the same way and very rapidly - I fear without sufficient regard for the existing texts. [[User:Dorsetonian|Dorsetonian]] ([[User talk:Dorsetonian|talk]]) 18:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC) |
|||
:For example, the names "quadritaeniator" and "imperator" are both nouns. As I'm sure you know, nouns don't get changed as part of gender agreement. The people who erroneously changed these names to "quadritaeniata" and "imperatrix" aren't allowed to do that under the ICZN, those are errors, not allowable spellings. Bezark has them correct, other sources do not. Why the Bezark list has the genders of some of the other names as masculine, I can't say, but at least those are correctly given as feminine in BioLib. I've just sent a message to Larry Bezark, hopefully he can correct them. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 16:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ | |||
::The only one that might be controversial is "buquetii" versus "buqueti" - the former is the original spelling, but under the ICZN the original spelling of patronyms with "-i" versus "-ii" is not automatically protected; if the alternative spellinng is used by more authors, then the original spelling is rejected. The history of usage of this name, as shown [http://titan.gbif.fr/sel_genann1.php?numero=2160 here] indicates that "buqueti" is historically the most common spelling, and therefore to be preserved under ICZN Article 33.4. [[User:Dyanega|Dyanega]] ([[User talk:Dyanega|talk]]) 16:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC) |
|||
⚫ |
Revision as of 19:03, 22 July 2024
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
This is the beginning.
categorys and templates
hi please add described categorys for your articles by years and add templates for articles thanks
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Agonum elongatulum
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Agonum elongatulum, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:BDC2:D617:CAB6:BBF1 (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 9
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Melanoplus bowditchi
- added a link pointing to Spur-throated grasshopper
- Melanoplus confusus
- added a link pointing to Spur-throated grasshopper
- Melanoplus glaucipes
- added a link pointing to Spur-throated grasshopper
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Deliathis
Hi. You may wonder why I reverted your edits to Deliathis - it's because all of the online resources are incorrect; you will note that there are very significant discrepancies between them. Between BioLib and Bezark, at least one of them has the correct spelling in each pair of spellings. The true list of species names is therefore a composite of these two online sources. This genus has been a mess for decades, and people simply can't get their ducks in a row. Dyanega (talk) 16:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- For example, the names "quadritaeniator" and "imperator" are both nouns. As I'm sure you know, nouns don't get changed as part of gender agreement. The people who erroneously changed these names to "quadritaeniata" and "imperatrix" aren't allowed to do that under the ICZN, those are errors, not allowable spellings. Bezark has them correct, other sources do not. Why the Bezark list has the genders of some of the other names as masculine, I can't say, but at least those are correctly given as feminine in BioLib. I've just sent a message to Larry Bezark, hopefully he can correct them. Dyanega (talk) 16:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- The only one that might be controversial is "buquetii" versus "buqueti" - the former is the original spelling, but under the ICZN the original spelling of patronyms with "-i" versus "-ii" is not automatically protected; if the alternative spellinng is used by more authors, then the original spelling is rejected. The history of usage of this name, as shown here indicates that "buqueti" is historically the most common spelling, and therefore to be preserved under ICZN Article 33.4. Dyanega (talk) 16:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the corrections and your help! Bob Webster (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)