Jump to content

2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|none}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2023}}
{{Infobox election
{{Infobox election
Line 15: Line 16:
| party1 = Democratic Party (United States)
| party1 = Democratic Party (United States)
| popular_vote1 = '''1,632,697'''
| popular_vote1 = '''1,632,697'''
| percentage1 = '''55.3%'''
| percentage1 = '''55.35%'''
| image2 = File:Tim Michels.jpg
| image2 = File:Tim Michels (a).jpg
| nominee2 = [[Tim Michels]]
| nominee2 = Tim Michels
| party2 = Republican Party (United States)
| party2 = Republican Party (United States)
| popular_vote2 = 1,301,183
| popular_vote2 = 1,301,183
| percentage2 = 44.1%
| percentage2 = 44.11%
| map_image = {{switcher |[[File:2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin results map by county.svg|250px]] |County results |[[File:2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin by precinct.svg|230px]] |Precinct results |default=1}}
| map_image = {{switcher |[[File:2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin results map by county.svg|260px]] |County results |[[File:2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin by precinct.svg|260px]] |Precinct results |default=1}}
| map_caption = '''Feingold:''' {{legend0|#A5B0FF|40–50%}} {{legend0|#7996e2|50–60%}} {{legend0|#6674de|60–70%}} {{legend0|#584cde|70–80%}} {{legend0|#3933e5|80–90%}} {{legend0|#0D0596|>90%}}<br/>'''Michels:''' {{legend0|#FFB2B2|40–50%}} {{legend0|#E27F7F|50–60%}} {{legend0|#d75d5d|60–70%}} {{legend0|#D72F30|70–80%}} {{legend0|#C21B18|80–90%}} {{legend0|#A80000|>90%}}<br/>'''Tie:''' {{legend0|#D2B1D9}}<br/> '''No data:'''{{legend0|#FFFFFF}}
| map_caption = '''Feingold:''' {{legend0|#A5B0FF|40–50%}} {{legend0|#7996e2|50–60%}} {{legend0|#6674de|60–70%}} {{legend0|#584cde|70–80%}} {{legend0|#3933e5|80–90%}} {{legend0|#0D0596|>90%}}<br />'''Michels:''' {{legend0|#FFB2B2|40–50%}} {{legend0|#E27F7F|50–60%}} {{legend0|#d75d5d|60–70%}} {{legend0|#D72F30|70–80%}} {{legend0|#C21B18|80–90%}} {{legend0|#A80000|>90%}}<br />'''Tie:''' {{legend0|#D2B1D9}}
| title = U.S. Senator
| title = U.S. Senator
| before_election = [[Russ Feingold]]
| before_election = [[Russ Feingold]]
Line 30: Line 31:
}}
}}
{{ElectionsWI}}
{{ElectionsWI}}
The '''2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin''' was held on November 2, 2004. Incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator [[Russ Feingold]] won re-election to a third term. {{As of|2023}}, this was the last time a Democrat won the Class 3 Senate seat from Wisconsin.
The '''2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin''' was held on November 2, 2004. Incumbent Senator [[Russ Feingold]] won re-election to a third term. {{As of|2024}}, this is the last time Democrats won the Class 3 Senate seat from Wisconsin. [[Russ Feingold]] defeated Tim Michels in a landslide despite [[John Kerry]] narrowly winning Wisconsin over Republican presidential nominee [[George W. Bush]] in the [[2004 United States presidential election in Wisconsin|concurrent presidential election]].


==Candidates==
==Candidates==
Line 59: Line 60:


===Republican===
===Republican===
* Russ Darrow<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=7134 | title=Our Campaigns - WI US Senate - R Primary Race - Sep 14, 2004 }}</ref>
* Russ Darrow<ref name="ourcampaigns.com">{{cite web | url=https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=7134 | title=Our Campaigns - WI US Senate - R Primary Race - Sep 14, 2004 }}</ref>
* Robert Gerald Lorge<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail.html?RaceID=7134 | title=Our Campaigns - WI US Senate - R Primary Race - Sep 14, 2004 }}</ref>
* Robert Gerald Lorge<ref name="ourcampaigns.com"/>
* [[Tim Michels]], businessman and army veteran<ref name=CBSRaces/>
* Tim Michels, businessman and army veteran<ref name=CBSRaces/>
* [[Robert Welch (Wisconsin politician)|Robert Welch]], State Senator
* [[Robert Welch (Wisconsin politician)|Robert Welch]], State Senator


Line 112: Line 113:
== General election ==
== General election ==
=== Campaign ===
=== Campaign ===
Michels insisted he has more real world experience than Feingold, someone he called an "extreme liberal" who was out of touch with Wisconsin voters.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-112626866.html|title=MICHELS TOUTS RURAL ROOTS IN JOINING GOP SENATE RACE.(FRONT) - The Capital Times &#124; HighBeam Research|date=November 4, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104080030/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-112626866.html|archive-date=2012-11-04}}</ref> Feingold attacked back by saying that any Republican would be a rubber stamp for President Bush. The incumbent had $2.2 million in the bank, while Michels had already spent $1 million in the primary and had only about $150,000 left.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2004-09-16|title=Michels, Feingold already sparring|url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_6caAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Y0UEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6652,3445599&dq=tim+michels&hl=en|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160428143119/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_6caAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Y0UEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6652,3445599&dq=tim+michels&hl=en|archive-date=2016-04-28|access-date=|website=|publisher=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel|via=news.google.com}}</ref>
Michels insisted he had more real world experience than Feingold, someone he called an "extreme liberal" who was out of touch with Wisconsin voters.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-112626866.html|title=MICHELS TOUTS RURAL ROOTS IN JOINING GOP SENATE RACE.(FRONT) - The Capital Times &#124; HighBeam Research|date=November 4, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121104080030/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-112626866.html|archive-date=2012-11-04}}</ref> Feingold attacked back by saying that any Republican would be a rubber stamp for President Bush. The incumbent had $2.2 million in the bank, while Michels had already spent $1 million in the primary and had only about $150,000 left.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2004-09-16|title=Michels, Feingold already sparring|url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_6caAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Y0UEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6652,3445599&dq=tim+michels&hl=en|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160428143119/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=_6caAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Y0UEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6652,3445599&dq=tim+michels&hl=en|archive-date=2016-04-28|access-date=|website=|publisher=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel|via=news.google.com}}</ref>


During both the primary and general election campaigns, Michel ran a series of ads attacking Feingold for his status as the sole senator to oppose the 2001 [[Patriot Act]]. One of his earliest ads during the primary accused Feingold of putting "his liberal ideology before our safety", while another primary spot featured footage of the [[September 11 attacks|September 11 Attacks]] and a voice-over saying that "our leaders passed new laws to keep us safe. But Russ Feingold voted against those laws."<ref name="Reason 1">{{cite web |last1=Weigel |first1=David |author-link1=David Weigel |title=When Patriots Dissent |url=https://reason.com/2005/11/01/when-patriots-dissent-2/ |website=Reason |access-date=November 13, 2021 |date=November 2005}}</ref> After easily winning the Republican primary against three opponents, Michel released two more anti-Feingold spots focusing on the Patriot Act. One of the ads showed further footage of the September 11 attacks, while another depicted a Middle Eastern spy photographing a Wisconsin [[nuclear power plant]] before Michels appears on-screen and announces that Unlike Russ Feingold, I will support renewing the PATRIOT Act, because we need to be able to track and stop terrorists before they strike again."<ref name="Reason 1" /> Michels reported that one-fifth of his campaign's advertising budget was devoted to making and airing the spots.<ref name="Reason 1" />
During both the primary and general election campaigns, Michel ran a series of ads attacking Feingold for his status as the sole senator to oppose the 2001 [[Patriot Act]]. One of his earliest ads during the primary accused Feingold of putting "his liberal ideology before our safety", while another primary spot featured footage of the [[September 11 attacks|September 11 Attacks]] and a voice-over saying that "our leaders passed new laws to keep us safe. But Russ Feingold voted against those laws."<ref name="Reason 1">{{cite web |last1=Weigel |first1=David |author-link1=David Weigel |title=When Patriots Dissent |url=https://reason.com/2005/11/01/when-patriots-dissent-2/ |website=Reason |access-date=November 13, 2021 |date=November 2005}}</ref> After easily winning the Republican primary against three opponents, Michel released two more anti-Feingold spots focusing on the Patriot Act. One of the ads showed further footage of the September 11 attacks, while another depicted a Middle Eastern spy photographing a Wisconsin [[nuclear power plant]] before Michels appears on-screen and announces that "Unlike Russ Feingold, I will support renewing the PATRIOT Act, because we need to be able to track and stop terrorists before they strike again."<ref name="Reason 1" /> Michels reported that one-fifth of his campaign's advertising budget was devoted to making and airing the spots.<ref name="Reason 1" />


In October, based on a belief that Feingold was vulnerable due in part to his vote on the Patriot Act, the [[National Republican Senatorial Committee|NRSC]] pledged $600,000 in support of the Michel campaign. However, after the Michel commercials generated negative attention and Feingold continued to lead comfortably in most polls, the party rescinded their financial assistance.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://badgerherald.com/news/2004/10/15/republican-committee-p/|title=Republican committee pulls ads for Michels|newspaper=The Badger Herald|last1=Masse|first1=Ryan|date=October 15, 2004|access-date=January 11, 2020}}</ref> On October 1, a poll showed Feingold leading 52% to 39%.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Zielinski|first=Graeme|date=1 October 2004|title=Feingold holds big lead over Michels, poll says|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MWSB&p_theme=mwsb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1057665A96950BA6&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110609093231/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MWSB&p_theme=mwsb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1057665A96950BA6&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM|archive-date=2011-06-09|access-date=|website=nl.newsbank.com}}</ref> In mid October, another poll showed Feingold winning 48% to 43%. A poll at the end of the month showed him leading 51% to 36%.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Zielinski|first=Graeme|date=30 October 2004|title=Feingold, Michels each say campaign is going his way|url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PKgaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=eEUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6021,4541874&dq=tim+michels+poll&hl=en|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160513071902/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PKgaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=eEUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6021,4541874&dq=tim+michels+poll&hl=en|archive-date=2016-05-13|access-date=|website=|publisher=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel|via=news.google.com/}}</ref>
In October, based on a belief that Feingold was vulnerable due in part to his vote on the Patriot Act, the [[National Republican Senatorial Committee|NRSC]] pledged $600,000 in support of the Michel campaign. However, after the Michel commercials generated negative attention and Feingold continued to lead comfortably in most polls, the party rescinded their financial assistance.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://badgerherald.com/news/2004/10/15/republican-committee-p/|title=Republican committee pulls ads for Michels|newspaper=The Badger Herald|last1=Masse|first1=Ryan|date=October 15, 2004|access-date=January 11, 2020}}</ref> On October 1, a poll showed Feingold leading 52% to 39%.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Zielinski|first=Graeme|date=1 October 2004|title=Feingold holds big lead over Michels, poll says|url=http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MWSB&p_theme=mwsb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1057665A96950BA6&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110609093231/http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=MWSB&p_theme=mwsb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=1057665A96950BA6&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM|archive-date=2011-06-09|access-date=|website=nl.newsbank.com}}</ref> In mid October, another poll showed Feingold winning 48% to 43%. A poll at the end of the month showed him leading 51% to 36%.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Zielinski|first=Graeme|date=30 October 2004|title=Feingold, Michels each say campaign is going his way|url=http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PKgaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=eEUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6021,4541874&dq=tim+michels+poll&hl=en|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160513071902/https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PKgaAAAAIBAJ&sjid=eEUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6021,4541874&dq=tim+michels+poll&hl=en|archive-date=2016-05-13|access-date=|website=|publisher=Milwaukee Journal Sentinel|via=news.google.com/}}</ref>
Line 142: Line 143:
! Undecided
! Undecided
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041205033905/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=918 Zogby International]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Zogby International]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041205033905/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=918 Zogby International]</ref>
|October 27–30, 2004
|October 27–30, 2004
|601 (LV)
|601 (LV)
Line 151: Line 152:
|6%
|6%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041108180815/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/Memo-WI-Poll-10.29.04.pdf?ID=913 Tarrance Group (R)]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Tarrance Group|Tarrance Group (R)]]<ref name="Tarrance Group R">[https://web.archive.org/web/20041108180815/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/Memo-WI-Poll-10.29.04.pdf?ID=913 Tarrance Group (R)]</ref>
|October 29, 2004
|October 29, 2004
|500 (LV)
|500 (LV)
Line 160: Line 161:
|9%
|9%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041206223944/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=916 Zogby International]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Zogby International]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041206223944/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=916 Zogby International]</ref>
|October 26–29, 2004
|October 26–29, 2004
|600 (LV)
|600 (LV)
Line 169: Line 170:
|6%
|6%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041108180815/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/Memo-WI-Poll-10.29.04.pdf?ID=913 Tarrance Group (R)]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Tarrance Group|Tarrance Group (R)]]<ref name="Tarrance Group R"/>
|October 28, 2004
|October 28, 2004
|500 (LV)
|500 (LV)
Line 178: Line 179:
|10%
|10%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041208094601/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=913 Zogby International]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Zogby International]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041208094601/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=913 Zogby International]</ref>
|October 25–28, 2004
|October 25–28, 2004
|601 (LV)
|601 (LV)
Line 187: Line 188:
|6%
|6%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041108180815/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/Memo-WI-Poll-10.29.04.pdf?ID=913 Tarrance Group (R)]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Tarrance Group|Tarrance Group (R)]]<ref name="Tarrance Group R"/>
|October 27, 2004
|October 27, 2004
|500 (LV)
|500 (LV)
Line 196: Line 197:
|8%
|8%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041206222535/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=910 Zogby International]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Zogby International]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041206222535/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=910 Zogby International]</ref>
|October 24–27, 2004
|October 24–27, 2004
|601 (LV)
|601 (LV)
Line 205: Line 206:
|5%
|5%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109279155/the-capital-times/ University of Wisconsin]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[University of Wisconsin]]<ref>[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109279155/the-capital-times/ University of Wisconsin]</ref>
|October 23–27, 2004
|October 23–27, 2004
|545 (V)
|545 (V)
Line 214: Line 215:
|13%
|13%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041108180815/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/Memo-WI-Poll-10.29.04.pdf?ID=913 Tarrance Group (R)]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Tarrance Group|Tarrance Group (R)]]<ref name="Tarrance Group R"/>
|October 26, 2004
|October 26, 2004
|500 (LV)
|500 (LV)
Line 223: Line 224:
|9%
|9%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041209102505/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=908 Zogby International]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Zogby International]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041209102505/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=908 Zogby International]</ref>
|October 23–26, 2004
|October 23–26, 2004
|601 (LV)
|601 (LV)
Line 232: Line 233:
|5%
|5%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041108180815/https://www.realclearpolitics.com/Polls/Memo-WI-Poll-10.29.04.pdf?ID=913 Tarrance Group (R)]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Tarrance Group|Tarrance Group (R)]]<ref name="Tarrance Group R"/>
|October 25, 2004
|October 25, 2004
|500 (LV)
|500 (LV)
Line 241: Line 242:
|8%
|8%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041205095805/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=906 Zogby International]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Zogby International]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041205095805/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=906 Zogby International]</ref>
|October 22–25, 2004
|October 22–25, 2004
|601 (LV)
|601 (LV)
Line 250: Line 251:
|5%
|5%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041206215802/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=904 Zogby International]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Zogby International]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041206215802/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=904 Zogby International]</ref>
|October 21–24, 2004
|October 21–24, 2004
|601 (LV)
|601 (LV)
Line 259: Line 260:
|4%
|4%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://web.archive.org/web/20041019022507/http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Wisconsin_Senate.htm Rasmussen Reports]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Rasmussen Reports]]<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20041019022507/http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Wisconsin_Senate.htm Rasmussen Reports]</ref>
|October 14, 2004
|October 14, 2004
|500 (LV)
|500 (LV)
Line 268: Line 269:
|2%
|2%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://schneiderschool.snc.edu/researchandservices/sri/docs/2000/wisurvey-senate-fall04.pdf St. Norbert College]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[St. Norbert College]]<ref>[https://schneiderschool.snc.edu/researchandservices/sri/docs/2000/wisurvey-senate-fall04.pdf St. Norbert College]</ref>
|October 4–13, 2004
|October 4–13, 2004
|401 (LV)
|401 (LV)
Line 277: Line 278:
|11%
|11%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109278355/chicago-tribune/ Chicago Tribune/WGN-TV]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Chicago Tribune]]/[[WGN-TV]]<ref>[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109278355/chicago-tribune/ Chicago Tribune/WGN-TV]</ref>
|October 2004
|October 2004
|
|
Line 286: Line 287:
|10%
|10%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277921/wisconsin-state-journal/ Harris Interactive]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[Harris Insights & Analytics|Harris Interactive]]<ref>[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277921/wisconsin-state-journal/ Harris Interactive]</ref>
|September 22–26, 2004
|September 22–26, 2004
|562 (V)
|562 (V)
Line 295: Line 296:
|9%
|9%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277763/leader-telegram/ University of Wisconsin]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[University of Wisconsin]]<ref>[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277763/leader-telegram/ University of Wisconsin]</ref>
|September 15–21, 2004
|September 15–21, 2004
|485 (LV)
|485 (LV)
Line 304: Line 305:
|9%
|9%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277763/leader-telegram/ ABC News]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[ABC News (United States)|ABC News]]<ref>[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277763/leader-telegram/ ABC News]</ref>
|September 16–19, 2004
|September 16–19, 2004
|775 (LV)
|775 (LV)
Line 313: Line 314:
|4%
|4%
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277005/daily-citizen/ University of Wisconsin]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[University of Wisconsin]]<ref name="University of Wisconsin">[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277005/daily-citizen/ University of Wisconsin]</ref>
|June 15–23, 2004
|June 15–23, 2004
|504 (V)
|504 (V)
Line 335: Line 336:
! Undecided
! Undecided
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277005/daily-citizen/ University of Wisconsin]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[University of Wisconsin]]<ref name="University of Wisconsin"/>
|June 15–23, 2004
|June 15–23, 2004
|504 (V)
|504 (V)
Line 354: Line 355:
! Undecided
! Undecided
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277005/daily-citizen/ University of Wisconsin]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[University of Wisconsin]]<ref name="University of Wisconsin"/>
|June 15–23, 2004
|June 15–23, 2004
|504 (V)
|504 (V)
Line 373: Line 374:
! Undecided
! Undecided
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|[https://www.newspapers.com/clip/109277005/daily-citizen/ University of Wisconsin]
|style="text-align:left;"|[[University of Wisconsin]]<ref name="University of Wisconsin"/>
|June 15–23, 2004
|June 15–23, 2004
|504 (V)
|504 (V)
Line 395: Line 396:
{{Election box candidate with party link no change
{{Election box candidate with party link no change
| party = Republican Party (United States)
| party = Republican Party (United States)
| candidate = [[Tim Michels]]
| candidate = Tim Michels
| votes = 1,301,183
| votes = 1,301,183
| percentage = 44.11%
| percentage = 44.11%
Line 424: Line 425:
}}
}}
{{Election box end}}
{{Election box end}}

====Counties that flipped Republican to Democratic====
* [[Barron County, Wisconsin|Barron]] (largest city: [[Rice Lake, Wisconsin|Rice Lake]])
* [[Brown County, Wisconsin|Brown]] (largest city: [[Green Bay, Wisconsin|Green Bay]])
* [[Burnett County, Wisconsin|Burnett]] (largest village: [[Grantsburg, Wisconsin|Grantsburg]])
* [[Clark County, Wisconsin|Clark]] (largest city: [[Neillsville, Wisconsin|Neillsville]])
* [[Kewaunee County, Wisconsin|Kewaunee]] (largest city: [[Algoma, Wisconsin|Algoma]])
* [[Langlade County, Wisconsin|Langlade]] (largest city: [[Antigo, Wisconsin|Antigo]])
* [[Manitowoc County, Wisconsin|Manitowoc]] (largest city: [[Manitowoc, Wisconsin|Manitowoc]])
* [[Marathon County, Wisconsin|Marathon]] (largest city: [[Wausau, Wisconsin|Wausau]])
* [[Monroe County, Wisconsin|Monroe]] (largest city: [[Sparta, Wisconsin|Sparta]])
* [[Oneida County, Wisconsin|Oneida]] (largest city: [[Rhinelander, Wisconsin|Rhinelander]])
* [[Outagamie County, Wisconsin|Outagamie]] (largest city: [[Appleton, Wisconsin|Appleton]])
* [[Rusk County, Wisconsin|Rusk]] (largest city: [[Ladysmith, Wisconsin|Ladysmith]])
* [[Washburn County, Wisconsin|Washburn]] (largest city: [[Spooner, Wisconsin|Spooner]])
*[[Lafayette County, Wisconsin|Lafayette]] (largest city: [[Darlington, Wisconsin|Darlington]])
*[[Pepin County, Wisconsin|Pepin]] (largest city: [[Durand, Wisconsin|Durand]])
*[[Racine County, Wisconsin|Racine]] (largest city: [[Racine, Wisconsin|Racine]])
*[[Richland County, Wisconsin|Richland]] (largest city: [[Richland Center, Wisconsin|Richland Center]])
*[[Sawyer County, Wisconsin|Sawyer]] (largest city: [[Hayward, Wisconsin|Hayward]])
*[[Winnebago County, Wisconsin|Winnebago]] (largest city: [[Oshkosh, Wisconsin|Oshkosh]])
*[[Polk County, Wisconsin|Polk]] (Largest city: [[Amery, Wisconsin|Amery]])
*[[St. Croix County, Wisconsin|St. Croix]] (Largest city: [[Hudson, Wisconsin|Hudson]])
*[[Taylor County, Wisconsin|Taylor]] (Largest city: [[Medford, Wisconsin|Medford]])
*[[Door County, Wisconsin|Door]] (largest city: [[Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin|Sturgeon Bay]])
*[[Grant County, Wisconsin|Grant]] (largest city: [[Platteville, Wisconsin|Platteville]])
*[[Juneau County, Wisconsin|Juneau]] (largest city: [[Mauston, Wisconsin|Mauston]])
* [[Wood County, Wisconsin|Wood]] (largest city: [[Marshfield, Wisconsin|Marshfield]])
* [[Chippewa County, Wisconsin|Chippewa]] (largest city: [[Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin|Chippewa Falls]])

====Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican====
*[[Florence County, Wisconsin|Florence]] (Largest city: [[Florence (town), Wisconsin|Florence]])


== See also ==
== See also ==
Line 432: Line 465:


== External links ==
== External links ==
;Debates
'''Debates'''
* [https://www.c-span.org/video/?183732-1/wisconsin-senate-debate Wisconsin Senate General Election Debate] on [[C-SPAN]], October 1, 2004
* [https://www.c-span.org/video/?183732-1/wisconsin-senate-debate Wisconsin Senate General Election Debate] on [[C-SPAN]], October 1, 2004
* [https://www.c-span.org/video/?183970-1/wisconsin-senate-debate Wisconsin Senate General Election Debate] on [[C-SPAN]], October 16, 2004
* [https://www.c-span.org/video/?183970-1/wisconsin-senate-debate Wisconsin Senate General Election Debate] on [[C-SPAN]], October 16, 2004
* [https://www.c-span.org/video/?184109-1/wisconsin-senate-debate Wisconsin Senate General Election Debate] on [[C-SPAN]], October 22, 2004
* [https://www.c-span.org/video/?184109-1/wisconsin-senate-debate Wisconsin Senate General Election Debate] on [[C-SPAN]], October 22, 2004


;Official campaign websites (archived)
'''Official campaign websites (archived)'''<br />
Democrats
Democrats
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20041101064359/http://www.russfeingold.org/ Russ Feingold]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20041101064359/http://www.russfeingold.org/ Russ Feingold]

Latest revision as of 22:14, 6 September 2024

2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin

← 1998 November 2, 2004 2010 →
 
Nominee Russ Feingold Tim Michels
Party Democratic Republican
Popular vote 1,632,697 1,301,183
Prozentualer Anteil 55.35% 44.11%

Feingold:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Michels:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Tie:      

U.S. senator before election

Russ Feingold
Democratic

Elected U.S. Senator

Russ Feingold
Democratic

The 2004 United States Senate election in Wisconsin was held on November 2, 2004. Incumbent Senator Russ Feingold won re-election to a third term. As of 2024, this is the last time Democrats won the Class 3 Senate seat from Wisconsin. Russ Feingold defeated Tim Michels in a landslide despite John Kerry narrowly winning Wisconsin over Republican presidential nominee George W. Bush in the concurrent presidential election.

Candidates

[edit]

Democratic

[edit]
Democratic primary results[2]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Russ Feingold 251,915 99.66%
Democratic Scattering 862 0.34%
Total votes 252,777 100.00%

Republican

[edit]
  • Russ Darrow[3]
  • Robert Gerald Lorge[3]
  • Tim Michels, businessman and army veteran[1]
  • Robert Welch, State Senator
Republican Primary results[2]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Tim Michels 183,654 42.43%
Republican Russ Darrow 130,088 30.05%
Republican Robert Welch 99,971 23.09%
Republican Robert Gerald Lorge 18,809 4.35%
Republican Scattering 350 0.08%
Total votes 432,872 100.0%

Minor candidates

[edit]

Libertarian

[edit]
  • Arif Khan, entrepreneur[4]

Independent

[edit]
  • Eugene Hem, perennial candidate and former educator[5]

General election

[edit]

Campaign

[edit]

Michels insisted he had more real world experience than Feingold, someone he called an "extreme liberal" who was out of touch with Wisconsin voters.[6] Feingold attacked back by saying that any Republican would be a rubber stamp for President Bush. The incumbent had $2.2 million in the bank, while Michels had already spent $1 million in the primary and had only about $150,000 left.[7]

During both the primary and general election campaigns, Michel ran a series of ads attacking Feingold for his status as the sole senator to oppose the 2001 Patriot Act. One of his earliest ads during the primary accused Feingold of putting "his liberal ideology before our safety", while another primary spot featured footage of the September 11 Attacks and a voice-over saying that "our leaders passed new laws to keep us safe. But Russ Feingold voted against those laws."[8] After easily winning the Republican primary against three opponents, Michel released two more anti-Feingold spots focusing on the Patriot Act. One of the ads showed further footage of the September 11 attacks, while another depicted a Middle Eastern spy photographing a Wisconsin nuclear power plant before Michels appears on-screen and announces that "Unlike Russ Feingold, I will support renewing the PATRIOT Act, because we need to be able to track and stop terrorists before they strike again."[8] Michels reported that one-fifth of his campaign's advertising budget was devoted to making and airing the spots.[8]

In October, based on a belief that Feingold was vulnerable due in part to his vote on the Patriot Act, the NRSC pledged $600,000 in support of the Michel campaign. However, after the Michel commercials generated negative attention and Feingold continued to lead comfortably in most polls, the party rescinded their financial assistance.[9] On October 1, a poll showed Feingold leading 52% to 39%.[10] In mid October, another poll showed Feingold winning 48% to 43%. A poll at the end of the month showed him leading 51% to 36%.[11]

Predictions

[edit]
Source Ranking As of
Sabato's Crystal Ball[12] Safe D November 1, 2004

Polling

[edit]
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[13]
Margin
of error
Russ
Feingold (D)
Tim
Michels (R)
Arif
Khan (L)
Undecided
Zogby International[14] October 27–30, 2004 601 (LV) ± 4.1% 57% 37% 6%
Tarrance Group (R)[15] October 29, 2004 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 48% 43% 9%
Zogby International[16] October 26–29, 2004 600 (LV) ± 4.1% 57% 37% 6%
Tarrance Group (R)[15] October 28, 2004 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 49% 41% 10%
Zogby International[17] October 25–28, 2004 601 (LV) ± 4.1% 57% 37% 6%
Tarrance Group (R)[15] October 27, 2004 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 51% 41% 8%
Zogby International[18] October 24–27, 2004 601 (LV) ± 4.1% 59% 36% 5%
University of Wisconsin[19] October 23–27, 2004 545 (V) ± 4% 51% 36% 13%
Tarrance Group (R)[15] October 26, 2004 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 52% 39% 9%
Zogby International[20] October 23–26, 2004 601 (LV) ± 4.1% 57% 38% 5%
Tarrance Group (R)[15] October 25, 2004 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 52% 40% 8%
Zogby International[21] October 22–25, 2004 601 (LV) ± 4.1% 54% 41% 5%
Zogby International[22] October 21–24, 2004 601 (LV) ± 4.1% 54% 42% 4%
Rasmussen Reports[23] October 14, 2004 500 (LV) ± 4.5% 53% 43% 2% 2%
St. Norbert College[24] October 4–13, 2004 401 (LV) ± 5% 56% 33% 11%
Chicago Tribune/WGN-TV[25] October 2004 57% 33% 10%
Harris Interactive[26] September 22–26, 2004 562 (V) ± 4% 52% 39% 9%
University of Wisconsin[27] September 15–21, 2004 485 (LV) ± 4.5% 53% 38% 9%
ABC News[28] September 16–19, 2004 775 (LV) ± 3.5% 51% 45% 4%
University of Wisconsin[29] June 15–23, 2004 504 (V) ± 4% 36% 12% 52%
Hypothetical polling
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[13]
Margin
of error
Russ
Feingold (D)
Russ
Darrow (R)
Undecided
University of Wisconsin[29] June 15–23, 2004 504 (V) ± 4% 40% 16% 44%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[13]
Margin
of error
Russ
Feingold (D)
Robert
Welch (R)
Undecided
University of Wisconsin[29] June 15–23, 2004 504 (V) ± 4% 36% 10% 54%
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[13]
Margin
of error
Russ
Feingold (D)
Robert Gerald
Lorge (R)
Undecided
University of Wisconsin[29] June 15–23, 2004 504 (V) ± 4% 39% 10% 51%

Results

[edit]
General election results[30]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Russ Feingold (incumbent) 1,632,697 55.35%
Republican Tim Michels 1,301,183 44.11%
Libertarian Arif Khan 8,367 0.28%
Independent Eugene A. Hem 6,662 0.23%
Write-in 834 0.03%
Total votes 2,949,743 100.00%
Democratic hold

Counties that flipped Republican to Democratic

[edit]

Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "2004 SENATE RACES" (PDF). CBS News. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  2. ^ a b "Archived copy". elections.state.wi.us. Archived from the original on May 14, 2005. Retrieved July 20, 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. ^ a b "Our Campaigns - WI US Senate - R Primary Race - Sep 14, 2004".
  4. ^ "In Wisconsin, a Muslim Libertarian for Senate". The Pluralism Project. July 6, 2004. Retrieved January 10, 2020.
  5. ^ Thoreson, Bridget (October 27, 2004). "Incumbent Feingold faces competition in Senate race". Marquette Wire. Retrieved January 11, 2020.
  6. ^ "MICHELS TOUTS RURAL ROOTS IN JOINING GOP SENATE RACE.(FRONT) - The Capital Times | HighBeam Research". November 4, 2012. Archived from the original on November 4, 2012.
  7. ^ "Michels, Feingold already sparring". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. September 16, 2004. Archived from the original on April 28, 2016 – via news.google.com.
  8. ^ a b c Weigel, David (November 2005). "When Patriots Dissent". Reason. Retrieved November 13, 2021.
  9. ^ Masse, Ryan (October 15, 2004). "Republican committee pulls ads for Michels". The Badger Herald. Retrieved January 11, 2020.
  10. ^ Zielinski, Graeme (October 1, 2004). "Feingold holds big lead over Michels, poll says". nl.newsbank.com. Archived from the original on June 9, 2011.
  11. ^ Zielinski, Graeme (October 30, 2004). "Feingold, Michels each say campaign is going his way". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on May 13, 2016 – via news.google.com/.
  12. ^ "The Final Predictions". Sabato's Crystal Ball. Retrieved May 2, 2021.
  13. ^ a b c d Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  14. ^ Zogby International
  15. ^ a b c d e Tarrance Group (R)
  16. ^ Zogby International
  17. ^ Zogby International
  18. ^ Zogby International
  19. ^ University of Wisconsin
  20. ^ Zogby International
  21. ^ Zogby International
  22. ^ Zogby International
  23. ^ Rasmussen Reports
  24. ^ St. Norbert College
  25. ^ Chicago Tribune/WGN-TV
  26. ^ Harris Interactive
  27. ^ University of Wisconsin
  28. ^ ABC News
  29. ^ a b c d University of Wisconsin
  30. ^ "2004 Fall General Election results" (PDF). Wisconsin Government Accountability Board. November 2, 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 13, 2015. Retrieved March 30, 2015.
[edit]

Debates

Official campaign websites (archived)
Democrats

Republicans