Jump to content

User talk:M.V.E.i.: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
M.V.E.i. (talk | contribs)
4,236 edits
No edit summary
Line 137: Line 137:


::DLX, i have been there, i took part in the arguments so don't try to fool me. Your comments were really ennoying because they were full of lies you wrote to make you feel better about your nationality. He already became a good editor, he deleted lies you wrote. He fought against vandalism, because you writing lies in articles is vandalism. My sources are the most real sorces in the world, my family in which everybody fought at The Great Patriotic War 1941-1945, and those who were under Nazi occupation and saw it all. M.V.E.i. 16:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
::DLX, i have been there, i took part in the arguments so don't try to fool me. Your comments were really ennoying because they were full of lies you wrote to make you feel better about your nationality. He already became a good editor, he deleted lies you wrote. He fought against vandalism, because you writing lies in articles is vandalism. My sources are the most real sorces in the world, my family in which everybody fought at The Great Patriotic War 1941-1945, and those who were under Nazi occupation and saw it all. M.V.E.i. 16:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

:::Please at least try to be calm and reasonable, I don't think it is too much to ask. Now, can you give some examples of my "lies" in both talk pages and in article, because as far as I know, I haven't said or inserted anything unsourced. Also, your family is not an acceptable source for Wikipedia, we really rather have '''verifiable''' sources here. And another thing - please give an example of few "good edits" done by Beatles Fab Four. [[User:DLX|DLX]] 16:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:28, 10 May 2007

Welcome!

Hello, M.V.E.i., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Luksuh 19:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:DPCTG.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Littletragedies.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Russfamo2.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Russfamo1.JPG. The copy called Image:Russfamo1.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 18:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense edit in Ashkenazi Jews

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Ashkenazi Jews page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ←Humus sapiens ну? 21:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In general, controversial edits should be discussed at talk page. Please see Image talk:Ashfamo1.JPG and Talk:Ashkenazi Jews#The image. Also, please use edit summary in your edits. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 23:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What part of the previous message you did not understand? The same story in Template:Italian ethnicity. Without consensus your changes won't stick. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 21:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English people pic

I like your version of the English people picture. Just one thing, do you think we could have at least one woman? Someone from an ethnic minority would be a good idea as well. What do you think? Alun 10:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

image onTemplate:Infobox Jew

please review Talk:Jew to understand the coordination and collaboration that took place in choosing the image for the temple (the section "Collage image", "Ashkenazi-centric portrait collage", "Smaller collage" and later "Come one now! How are those pictures fair?" which was a reaction to your edits). This is not to say we are not open to other idea for collage but please talk about on the talk page first. While wikipedia is not an bureaucracy it is also not an anarchy but works by its own rules which you much understand in order to be a valued contributor. I hope that you continue to edit wikipedia, but please "play nice" and understand that you are not the only person trying to make wikipedia the best encyclopedia it can be. Jon513 20:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong address

I did not remove the image. As you can see, I am not alone rejecting it. I would suggest you listen to what people say and try to improve. Using elbows won't work. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ну? 11:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. ←Humus sapiens ну? 11:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned about 3RR but you chose to violate it. Unless you self-revert quickly, you are subject to be reported and blocked. If you continue misbehaving, every subsequent block will become longer and eventually you will be banned. ←Humus sapiens ну? 11:36, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hours later, and you still did not revert. OK, I will let it go this first time, because you are a new user, and in the spirit of good faith. Nobody is against a good photo collage, but a few problems with yours are:

Ownership

Please see WP:OWN and learn our WP:RULES. ←Humus sapiens ну? 19:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss the Ashkenazi_Jews collage here

Talk:Ashkenazi_Jews. Click on "discussion" at the Ashkenazi Jews page. Remember the three reverts rule. --Metzenberg 17:31, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've just made a 4th revert on the Ashkenazi Jews page. That violates the Wikipedia 3Rs rule. --Metzenberg 20:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright information has been provided about the Grigory Perelman image. It appears to be copied from a wire service, but it is not in the wikimedia commons.

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ashfamo1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ashfamo2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --Metzenberg 01:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three Revert Rule

Hi! Wanted to alert you that Wikipedia has a Three Revert Rule which prohibits editors from reverting an article more than 3 times in a 24-hour period. The purpose of the rule is to prevent an edit war between editors with different views from disrupting the encyclopedia. Violating the rule can result in being blocked. I don't feel inclined to enforce the rule as a first step, so I'm not going to check exactly how many reverts you made when, but please discuss differences with other editors rather than using back-and-forth reverting, and please do be aware of the rule and be sure to observe it in the future. If necessaary you can ask an administrator to help you, including protecting the page to prevent further problems. Thanks! Best, --Shirahadasha 15:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Italian people image

Indeed, it looks far better now. Good job. I hope you continue making useful contributions. Sicilianmandolin 16:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ashkenazi Jews

I have protected the page to stop an edit war from disrupting this page. Please discuss this matter on the article's talk page. I would suggest consulting the association of members' advocates or the mediation cabal if you find yourself having difficulty discussing this matter by yourself. Best, --Shirahadasha 17:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got your note. The page is currently protected for the time being, so no-one can edit it for now. Please explain on Talk:Ashkenazi Jews why you think the set of pictures you are proposing is a better choice. Best, --Shirahadasha 18:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please be sure to use the signature button on the edit tools or to add four tildes (~~~~) after your message. This "signs" your name and creates a link to your user page. Best, --Shirahadasha 18:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you were outvoted on this one - some of the other editors who weighed in are regular editors on the page and they would probably have visited it anyway. No worries -- these things happen. Suggest finding something else to help out with or another article of interest for the time being. Best, --Shirahadasha 14:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! It's usually wise to assume good faith on the part of other editors -- helps maintain civility and a pleasant environment for everyone. Best, --Shirahadasha 00:56, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A final thought. I wanted to thank you for coming up with the idea of adding a collage of pictures as a way to help spruce up the article. It's a really good touch. It adds a lot to the way the article looks. Even if others wanted to change some of the individual pictures, having a collage was your idea and you've made a lasting improvement. Best, --Shirahadasha 01:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:8 May 2007.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:8 May 2007.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi friend

Can you add your opinion here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sandstein#.5B.5BUser:Beatles_Fab_Four.5D.5D


Your recent actions

Wikipedia is not forum or soapbox (WP:NOT), not is it a battleground (WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a battleground). Users are required to be civil and use civil language - "people must act with civility toward one another" (WP:CIV). Also, please stop edits to talk archive pages, they are called "Archives" for a reason.

You have been neither civil or reasonable - and you haven't used your edit rights for bettering Wikipedia. Instead you are pushing your very highly POV views (which differ significantly from any source in the world, including Soviet and Russian sources. Next time, please try to give some sources to outrageous claims).

What am I talking about? These: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] - I will not go to older edits then few days, though.

Now, as for user Beatles FF, I did not ask for his block - although, I have started to suspect that it was the best solution. His highly insulting edit summaries, promotion of racial hatred, edit warring without giving any reasons, refusing to discuss things without YELLING, bold and civilly ("Well, I get bored of your annoying comments.", "I presume you are a denier of the Holocost"), editing/deleting others and his own comments, refusing to accept even mildest criticism and taking it as a personal attack... I seriously doubt that he would have become a good editor and contributor to Wikipedia in the near future.

As for you, I do hope that you can find it in your heart to become civil, calm and reliable editor, who can meaningfully contribute to Wikipedia, always following NPOV guidelines, giving sources to your edits in articles - or sources to your claims in talk pages. DLX 16:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DLX, i have been there, i took part in the arguments so don't try to fool me. Your comments were really ennoying because they were full of lies you wrote to make you feel better about your nationality. He already became a good editor, he deleted lies you wrote. He fought against vandalism, because you writing lies in articles is vandalism. My sources are the most real sorces in the world, my family in which everybody fought at The Great Patriotic War 1941-1945, and those who were under Nazi occupation and saw it all. M.V.E.i. 16:23, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Please at least try to be calm and reasonable, I don't think it is too much to ask. Now, can you give some examples of my "lies" in both talk pages and in article, because as far as I know, I haven't said or inserted anything unsourced. Also, your family is not an acceptable source for Wikipedia, we really rather have verifiable sources here. And another thing - please give an example of few "good edits" done by Beatles Fab Four. DLX 16:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:M.V.E.i.&oldid=129853961"