Talk:Baby 81 incident: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:56, 30 May 2007

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Renamed

I've renamed this article back to Baby 81 (its original name) and removed all references to the child's real name, for obvious reasons. --Tony Sidaway 14:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What obvious reasons are those, Tony? --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a little bizarre, when a google search for "Baby 81" finds BBC reports like these [1][2][3] plus dozens more from other (non-Wikipedia-derived) sources.

Is this child's name a secret? Are we not permitted to have articles on minors now? -- ALoan (Talk) 16:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's what some would like. I'm reverting this. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move this article on a minor back to the name of the minor, or add the name of the minor to the article. There are serious Biographies of living persons concerns here. --Tony Sidaway 20:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name them. Support your claim or I'll revert back again. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The previous article name was that of a four-month-old baby. Please add this to the arbitration case if you wish to dispute Wikipedia's right to act on such concerns. --Tony Sidaway 20:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Four month old baby" is not part of BLP. Again, what justification are you using - if you want to add it to ArbCom go right ahead, but that simply avoids the question. Two separate people are questioning your activity here. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ::Name them.  Support your claim or I'll revert back again. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 ::: The previous article name was that of a four-month-old baby.  Please add this to the arbitration case if you wish to dispute Wikipedia's right to act on such concerns. --[[User talk:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway]] 20:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
+::::"Four month old baby" is not part of BLP.  Again, what justification are you using - if you want to add it to ArbCom go right ahead, but that simply avoids the question.  Two separate people are questioning your activity here. --[[User:Badlydrawnjeff|badlydrawnjeff]] <small>[[User_talk:Badlydrawnjeff|talk]]</small> 20:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)