Jump to content

User talk:GourangaUK: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎Hi there: thanks
notice of inclusion in report
Line 41: Line 41:
Sorry about removing all the links on the Bhagavad Gita page, I acted too hastily. May I ask your opinion as a neutral observer about the following statements made about me at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABhagavad_Gita&diff=136724549&oldid=136539372 here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGanesham&diff=136725086&oldid=136569503 here]. I'm deliberately leaving my question broadly open ended. Do you share the sentiment that my deletions were the act of a vandal? Any thoughts you might have would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.[[User:TheRingess|TheRingess]] ([[User talk:TheRingess|talk]]) 01:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about removing all the links on the Bhagavad Gita page, I acted too hastily. May I ask your opinion as a neutral observer about the following statements made about me at [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABhagavad_Gita&diff=136724549&oldid=136539372 here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGanesham&diff=136725086&oldid=136569503 here]. I'm deliberately leaving my question broadly open ended. Do you share the sentiment that my deletions were the act of a vandal? Any thoughts you might have would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.[[User:TheRingess|TheRingess]] ([[User talk:TheRingess|talk]]) 01:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks for your reply on my talk page. I agree with the sentiments that you expressed. Have a good day.[[User:TheRingess|TheRingess]] ([[User talk:TheRingess|talk]]) 14:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
:Thanks for your reply on my talk page. I agree with the sentiments that you expressed. Have a good day.[[User:TheRingess|TheRingess]] ([[User talk:TheRingess|talk]]) 14:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Just an FYI, I am currently attempting to involve a fellow editor, who continues to make very serious allegations about me, in an informal mediation process. Following the advice of another editor, I have brought it up on the administrative noticeboard [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#I am unable to engage a user in mediation who continues to make allegations about me|here]]. This editor mentioned my edits to the Bhagavad Gita page. In order to show that I am actively seeking 3rd opinions about my actions I am including a diff to my question and your reply. I hope you don't mind, but should you, I will be more than willing to remove the statement and the links. Once again, thanks for responding.[[User:TheRingess|TheRingess]] ([[User talk:TheRingess|talk]]) 16:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:54, 8 June 2007

"Wikipedia exists in a state of quantum significance flux. It's simultaneously a shining, flawless collection of incontrovertible information, and a debased pile of meaningless words thrown together by uneducated lemurs with political agendas. It simply cannot exist in any state between these two extremes. You can test this yourself by expressing a reasonable opinion about the site in any public space. Whatever words you type, they will be interpreted by readers as supporting one of these two opposing views." - Lore Sjöberg, Wired [1]



Vegetarianism and IQ

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6180753.stm

Gouranga: Pls show/point to me where you have added this link in the topic vegetarianism. I guess this is a very important subject and needs to be added in this topic.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:Arun.blue, 16:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It wasn't added into the article in the end. See discussion on talk page, Regards, Gouranga(UK) 19:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award of a Barnstar

The Barnstar of Diligence
The Barnstar of Diligence is hereby awarded in recognition of extraordinary scrutiny, precision, and community service.

Awarded by Addhoc 21:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disciplic Succession Table?

Hari. I was just considering how we could implement a system that shows the chain of disciplic succession (along with various splits) and have this on the page of each person within that chain. Thoughts? Ideas? I think it would be beneficial for understanding 'lineage'. Chopper Dave 19:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Sorry about removing all the links on the Bhagavad Gita page, I acted too hastily. May I ask your opinion as a neutral observer about the following statements made about me at here and here. I'm deliberately leaving my question broadly open ended. Do you share the sentiment that my deletions were the act of a vandal? Any thoughts you might have would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.TheRingess (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on my talk page. I agree with the sentiments that you expressed. Have a good day.TheRingess (talk) 14:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, I am currently attempting to involve a fellow editor, who continues to make very serious allegations about me, in an informal mediation process. Following the advice of another editor, I have brought it up on the administrative noticeboard here. This editor mentioned my edits to the Bhagavad Gita page. In order to show that I am actively seeking 3rd opinions about my actions I am including a diff to my question and your reply. I hope you don't mind, but should you, I will be more than willing to remove the statement and the links. Once again, thanks for responding.TheRingess (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]