User talk:Nakon/arc1

K (Archives: 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10)

Page move

The page was moved before without consensus as well. I was moving it back. Enfestid 04:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Please see the additional note I left on your talk page. Naconkantari 04:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Kelly Moore (non-fiction writer)

Hey. You deleted this page as "biography" with "no assertion of significance," and yet Wikipedia has a full section of American true crime authors. (Not to mention countless biographies of un-notable performers and the like.) The article you have deleted THREE times before I had FINISHED "asserting" significance and giving sources, etc. gives information on a best-selling author that you have yet to include on that list.

Ceph

Hi, you deleted the Ceph two times as blatant advertising. Before that I deleted it once as a copyvio. The versions you deleted are copyvio free btw. User:JerkerNyberg seems to be acting in good faith and is wondering what to do. See here and here. I don't know much (basically nothing) about the subject so could you perhaps give hime some hints? Garion96 (talk) 19:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Didar Singh Bains

Please consider undeleting Didar Singh Bains. You deleted this under WP:CSD#A7 (No claim of significance or importance). It seems to me that such satemetns in the article as "one of the richest Sikh farmers in North America" "a leading figure in the Sikh community for the last 20 years". "president of the World Sikh organization" and "founder chairman of the World Kabbadi federation" do constitute an assertion of significance. Obviously better sroucing would be needed for this to survive an AfD, but I think these claims ought to be enough to avoid an A7 speedy. DES ^(talk) 23:46, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Didar Singh Bains. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

User:What love has made of me

Perhaps I'm missing something, but what's so bad about this username? – Luna Santin (talk) 01:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Username was blocked for excessive length. Naconkantari 01:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

That seems rather draconian... – Luna Santin (talk) 01:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Referred to the admin noticeboard. – Luna Santin (talk) 01:52, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Naconkantari, I've unblocked after this has percolated on AN for a bit. Hope it's okay with you, let me know if it's not. Thanks -- Samir 02:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Velvet D'Amour

I'm wondering why you deleted the article a mere 5 mintues after it was written?? I was still in the process of citing references and linking images. If there is some issue with adding models and actresses who are listed in countless media and the IMDB.com, then please send me that Wiki Page so I know the protocal. There are countless others with less merit who still exist on the Wiki. As it stands, the article would prob survive an AfD if discussed by people who actually know about the topic. Should be reinstated for that discussion, at least. AntiVanity 01:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:DRV. Naconkantari 01:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Velvet D'Amour. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Multi-link trunking Page revert???

Never talked with anyone before so it took me a bit to get here....

Why did you revert when I was making edits?

Deleted of protected

I'm new to making pages and i didnt know there was a limit on the save page, I was just playing around figuring out how to make it all work. ArtManiac

Deletion of Spyware terminator

I just rewrote that article and I dont think that in any way, shape, or form does it represent advertising. I agree that the previous version at Spyware terminator was something like an advertisement, but this page was brand new and was meant to address that problem. The page mimiced the layout of the Ad-Aware page, and similar information is shown on that page (release date, download.com downloads, release information, basic features, etc.). It also mimics the Spysweeper, Spybot and Windows Defender pages, which still exist and dont seem to have near as much problems as the Spyware terminator page. By deleting Spyware Terminator and letting those other pages live you are holding it to some unknown double standard. Cableguytk 03:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Please see WP:DRV. Naconkantari 03:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Im there...what am I looking for, please? Cableguytk 03:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

How to request a review of a deletion. Naconkantari 03:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

This isnt a request for deletion. This is a request for a new article not to be deleted. Cableguytk 03:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Spyware_terminator. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Cableguytk 04:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion review of Kelly Moore (non-fiction writer)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kelly Moore (non-fiction writer). Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DES ^(talk) 04:42, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Kim Amidon

Please consider undelteting Kim Amidon. You deleted this under WP:CSD#A7 (No assertion of significance or importance). I think that the text "She and Wallengren both received together a "star" on the Hollywood Walk of Fame for their work on the radio." in the article constitutes an assertion of significence sufficent that it should not be deleted via A7. Whether it would/will survive an AfD is of course another matter. DES ^(talk) 05:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)