User talk:Atulsnischal

Welcome!

Hello, Atulsnischal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Leave a message | Send an e-mail

Remember that people's comments on this page may be only one side of a story.

List of Archived Talk Pages
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5* (Current) | 6 | 7 | 8

Hi Atul

Hi Atul,

How do you do? I saw that you have collected a lot of information regarding Mairh rajputs and I have also embarked on the same journey to trace my roots and geneology. Can we correspond over email? My email id is [email protected]. Please drop me a line so that we can collaborate.

Thanks Gaurav —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaurav verma22 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Your large message/spam in different talk pages

Dear Atul, Please do not cut and paste such large, unrelated messages to multiple talk pages. This is akin to internal wikispamming. I am not even commenting on the communal nature of your message, the religious hatred, and also veiled call-to-action to members of particular religions. Wikipedia is not a battleground. I hope you will abide by the rules and refrain from such behavior, given that you have been banned in the past for disruption. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 06:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I didnt mean and any hatered etc. just called for more research for proper clasification of these tribes I noticed misclassified on Wikipedia. I just posted to all related groups, India and Nepal etc. so when interested editors have time they can research these articles. Didnt mean any hatered or spamming etc. as you claimed.

Atulsnischal (talk) 06:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

These are not related groups, and copy-pasting your large rant is Wikispamming. And your message was simply a call-to-action for wikipedians belonging to a certain religion to promote a certain pov. Please refrain from this, and make productive edits in your post-ban activities. --Ragib (talk) 06:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I did what I thought was right, if you can suggest better wording for my message can you kindly suggest, you have taken the liberty of reverting my messages from all related groups.

Atulsnischal (talk) 07:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I suggest you start the discussion in the talk pages of the articles you mentioned. You have not done that yet. I have reverted your large message from the 8 talk pages where you pasted them. Again, wikipedia is not a battleground pitting people from different countries or religions. Please state your problem in the corresponding article's talk pages and provide citations for your claims. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 07:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Your claim that my message is unrelated to India and Nepal, Hinduism etc is totally false as all is related under Greater India. You have gone ahead and given your own meaning to things and censored my comments from all related project pages. You have been doing this for couple of years and I have had problems with you in the past about stalking my edits.

Atulsnischal (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

"

Last Hindus of Afganistan continually being ridiculed as Kafirs (Black robed Kafirs & White robed kafirs), their homeland being called Kafiristan; after recent mass forced conversions to Islam Kafiristan has been renamed Nuristan "the land of the light", also see Kalash people (most obviously Hindu) of Chitral District being denied their legitimate Hindu heritage and being ridiculed as kafirs

Hello

I have noticed on Wikipedia that above people of above region are being ridiculed as kafirs and continually being subjected to ridicule and discrimination as Kafirs not embracing Islam amongst Islamists all around.

In reading the article Kalash it is obviously clear that they are ancient Hindu tribes refering to Indra and Indra's bow, the Rainbow (Indradhanush), they seem to be worshiping Mahadeo another name for Shiva, the refer to Veds etc.

I request a team of interested editors to research these articles and provide links and citations and get them recognized as legitimate Hindu tribes, note the name Kalash can also refer to Shiva's mountain Kailash Parvat etc.

Surrounded by Muslim people they have settled for the name Kafir and have been forced and delinked from Hindus and Hinduism and are under continuous pressure to convert to Islam.

I tried to add links for Indra and Shiva but Afganistani & pakistani editors delink these articles from Hinduism and any mention of it.

Thanks

Atulsnischal (talk) 07:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

"

Above is the message I wrote on the spur of the moment about which this discussion is bout.

Atulsnischal (talk) 07:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

I will when i get time put it in a more neutral language and repost to related projects so more research can be done on this topic by interested editors.

Atulsnischal (talk) 07:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from claiming that I have "stalked" you. Personal attacks such as this will just reinstate your perma-ban for disruption. I noticed that you have recently been unblocked on a "trial" basis, and such personal attacks do not support any good faith in your part.

Now, to your message, I did not notice a single edit from you in recent times to the page you refer to (e.g. the Nuristani people article, Kalash). Yet, in your mass-spammed message quoted above, you claim that you "tried to add links" there. I also do not see any discussion in the talk pages of those articles on this. Yet, you went on to spam a lot of Hinduism related pages to recruit adherents of certain religious adherents in your call-to-action. As I suggested, if you really have good faith in this, please start discussing the issue in the talk pages of the corresponding articles. Your canvassing of this along religious pov tone in certain talk pages does not show your good faith. --Ragib (talk) 07:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

You have been stalking my edits on many previous occasions and we have had discussion about this over the last few years. Also you go on and on about my not contributing in good faith which I always do. You also are now claiming that I am lying about adding links to above article, well the bad faith is from your side.

Here is the links I added to obvious articles to which they point to: [1], we as I was not able to sign in then there is an IP address instead there.

the links got reverted here: [2]

I will really appreciate if you would stop stalking my edits and making wrong meanings out of them and continuously thinking that I have bad intensions, though I should not be so blunt I realize.

Atulsnischal (talk) 07:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)