User talk:Pahari Sahib

RFA

Hi Sahib, over the last month or so, we have crossed each other's path on quite a few occassions. I am really impressed with the way you uphold the Wiki policies and would like to nominate you for Adminstratorship. Do let me know, whether you have any objections to this. Thanks. Shovon (talk) 17:04, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

My reply

PAK urgent and northern areas

hey i just wanted to tell you that a pov tag has been put on pakistans claim on tha PAK article which as you can read is only a few sentences while indias veiw uses strong words like invaders and is totally POV could you remove the POV tag from the pakistans veiw or add it to indias veiw aswell 86.154.149.34 (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again but excess content is being mashed into the introduction pages of PAK and northern areas page and editors like meco first agree on consensus then revert these pages please revert them to there stable version which everyone agreed on 86.156.208.40 (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

If I have been inconsistent that is an issue I must look into. Sometimes I will make reverts not based on the merits of the changes and facts but merely on an assessment that the edit being made was disorderly. If an anonymous user makes sweeping changes without leaving a sober edit summary, chances are big I will revert this on sight without checking very closely the issue at hand. __meco (talk) 11:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Rdrs to Dabs on other Dabs

I thot you deserved a clearer explanation of the reversion of your Rdr bypassing on Palin: in general, Rdrs suffixed with "(disambiguation)" do not reflect past renames, but the need for a flag that editors will read as "don't go looking at the Dab page trying to figure out which article to bypass this link to; the intention of the lk is for interested readers to go examine the Dab page". When they appear on Dab pages, there is IMO an additional intention of following the principle of least astonishment. Thanks for you good work!
--Jerzy•t 18:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Will bear in mind, thanks for explaining :-) Pahari Sahib 02:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Kashmir Cloud

just want to let you know Kashmir cloud the vandal is at it again on PAK and azad kashmir articles hes adding his indian POV on azad kashmir by adding "POK" and deleting it from jammu and kashmir please stop him 86.158.234.151 (talk) 11:52, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Seems to have resolved itself. Pahari Sahib 15:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Karlugh Turks

HI SAHIB I WAS READING THE ARTICLE ON THE TURKS OF BEHALI(THE KARLUGH TURKS) AND WANTED TO ASK YOU IF YOU'D EVER MET A TURK FROM THERE WHO SPOKE OR CLAIMED TO SPEAK TURKISH. ALSO, WOULD YOU HAVE ANY KNOWHOW ABOUT THE MUGHAL TRIBE THAT IS BASED IN PAKISTAN? THANKYOU(Mammadjaana (talk) 16:46, 21 October 2008 (UTC))

Salam sahib what are the origins of the different mughal tribes? My question is that how can pathans and Turks both be moghal at the same time? They both are different races, speak different languages and have different cultures. So how is it, that there is a pathan moghal and a Turk Moghal tribe at the same time?

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mughal_(tribe)" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mammadjaana (talk • contribs) 16:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

See the article on Pashtun people, they do not claim Mughal ancestry, where is the claim that they are Mughal? Pahari Sahib 16:57, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Template talk:Location map Pakistan

What do you say now? Can you agree with the new svg-map? --Obersachse (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, that looks fine now :-) Pahari Sahib 08:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Himalaya

hey pahari hope your fine just wanted to alert you that the himalaya page is being vandalized by a pro indian editor whos introducing that POK term again beside K2 could you revert his edits or at leats explain what being biased is hes confused 86.156.211.67 (talk) 23:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:42, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Samma, Jamot, Sammaat

I did some clean up recently on Samma, merging some duplicate articles and stubs on families that will never make full articles, and separating the history of the Samma Dynasty from the description of the Samma (tribe). I think the results are a bit better, but a long way from encyclopedia quality. Two things bother me:

• I don't understand the relationship between Samma, Jam, Jamot and Sammaat, but suspect the articles get it wrong. Do you have any ideas on where to get clarification?
• More fundamentally, the article on Samma (tribe) seems to be steadily growing, and I suspect may grow to huge size, as contributors add details on the location, language and notable people of their particular family. I see no harmful intent at all, and am extremely reluctant to edit out material that I have no reason to doubt, but none of the material is referenced and some of it does not seem to belong in a encyclopedia.

Any thoughts or advice? Aymatth2 (talk) 02:50, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

First of all you have done pretty well to clean up the article, I think really though ultimately more refs are need. Pahari Sahib 11:26, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

You missed my point, I think ... I predict that a year from now the article will have grown to include 47 sections, each a paragraph describing a different family and its prominent people, none of which will have any refs or be particularly notable, and will still be growing. But I am not going to lose sleep over it. Let it grow! Aymatth2 (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually when I said "ultimately more refs are need", I was kind of thinking that uncited stuff needs to be removed. I've done it before in other articles. Pahari Sahib 08:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

If the name of the tribe was McGregor, I would fully agree - be ruthless. The Scottish hill tribes are exhaustively documented and there is no reason or excuse for including unreferenced material. The Samma are just as important, so deserve the same depth of content, but they are not nearly as well documented, so I am more inclined to be lenient. On the other hand, this content is sort of trivial. Dunno. I will leave it to other editors. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Pahari

Pahari just wanted to say thanks on getting Sikh Empire's name changed to Punjab Empire. It was also a personal desire of mine too so thanks again. P.S. can you also tell me the process of doing so or is it something that only the website administrators can do which means that you're one of them? (talk), 4 December 2008 (UTC)

My reply :-)

Punjab

Ah, I see. Sorry. I need to check the history better.  : ) Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

:-) Pahari Sahib 01:36, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Why do you delete the notable people ?

AssalamoAlikum,

I hope your fine and in the best of your health, I wonder why do you delete the notable people of Mansehra, if you have any problems in references, do let me know about it, I shall provide you with the best of detials.

FEEAMANALLAH —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.174.117 (talk) 14:53, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

References

Wikipedia demands references, I have references to all the information being posted, we must all share the relative information, rather than delete them. So that people might know how much learned people from our area have been evolved.

Next time you delete anything, do give a reason to me, before deleting a specific portion, with reasons.

FEE-AMANALLAH —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nesh3 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

more indian trouble

hi pahari just wanted to let you know the indians are at it again now there preying on nanga parbat and adding there trashy terms POK again please revert as greyanomoly is convinced that its occupied 86.158.236.59 (talk) 14:32, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

This has already been reverted by someone else. It's only one or two editors who make these type of edits. Pahari Sahib 19:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

List of diplomatic missions in Hungary

Thanks you help on some relations Articles. ! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 11:42, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

:-) Pahari Sahib 14:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject?

Hi there, do you know if there is a Princely States WikiProject? If not, it might be a good idea to have one, since many things probably need to be standardized. What do you think? Your renaming of Kashmir and Jammu suggests that there already are some standards or conventions. You might also want to weigh in at WP:FAR#Kingdom of Mysore if you have any interest. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

my reply

Barnstar

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For making bold cleanup edits and saving Dhamial from a sure speedy deletion Scapler (talk) 03:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)