Jump to content

User talk:Tarysky: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tarysky (talk | contribs)
→‎ANI notice: (Removed finished situation
Tarysky (talk | contribs)
Added two new rules and removed finished conversation
Line 10: Line 10:
**9) If you leave '''block messages''' here for a stupid reason, know that they will be removed for various reasons.
**9) If you leave '''block messages''' here for a stupid reason, know that they will be removed for various reasons.
**10) Whether I own my talk page or not, it is bad faith, vandalism, bad definition of character for anyone who reverts it. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OWN#Comments][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OWN#Types_of_ownership]
**10) Whether I own my talk page or not, it is bad faith, vandalism, bad definition of character for anyone who reverts it. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OWN#Comments][http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OWN#Types_of_ownership]
**11) [[User:Ericorbit]] is not allowed to make comments on this page for his bad definition of character.
**'''THANK YOU & HAVE BLESSED DAY''' [[User:Tarysky|Tarysky]] ([[User talk:Tarysky#top|talk]]) 16:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
**12) Once again, once your comment is finished, it will be '''removed''' for newer one within ''12 hours''.
::::::::'''THANK YOU & HAVE BLESSED DAY''' [[User:Tarysky|Tarysky]] ([[User talk:Tarysky#top|talk]]) 16:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)




Line 30: Line 32:
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] {{#if:48 hours|You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''|You have been temporarily '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{#if:Disruptive editing|'''Disruptive editing'''|repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. You are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make ''useful'' contributions]] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> Per the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=267768840#Assistance_with_incivility ANI discussion]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
<div class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]] {{#if:48 hours|You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours'''|You have been temporarily '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{#if:Disruptive editing|'''Disruptive editing'''|repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}. You are welcome to [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|make ''useful'' contributions]] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest this block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> Per the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=267768840#Assistance_with_incivility ANI discussion]. [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|How have I done any wrong. I was just editting and Ericorbit came to me be disruptive.}}
{{unblock|How have I done any wrong. I was just editting and Ericorbit came to me be disruptive.}}

== Personal attacks ==

Actually, no, what you did, you called him stupid, your edit summery read ''HE SO STUPID''. That is calling someone stupid, and your first edit that I cited clearly showed you refering to him, not his edits, as stupid. This is personally attacking someone. It doesn't matter if -you- don't see it as a personal attack. The bottom line is that here on wikipedia, it is a personal attack. Period. Either learn to play by our rules or leave. The choice is sometimes yours(eg, if you continue to violate policy, you will be forcefully removed via a block).— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Dæ</font>]][[User talk:Daedalus969|dαlus]]<sup> [[Special:Contributions/Daedalus969|<font color="Green">Contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 05:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
:Not to rude, but I don't play by your rules. I play by Wikipedia's rule. And I have not been disruptive. In case you haven't noticed, I don't go to them, they come to looking for trouble. [[User:Tarysky|Tarysky]] ([[User talk:Tarysky#top|talk]]) 15:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:18, 1 February 2009

  • Please read before commenting
    • 1) Questions - Please leave all request below
    • 2) Do not assume that I reverted your edits without a reason
    • 3) Make sure your question/requested has no spelling errors or it will be removed until corrected
    • 4) Image questions or request should be talked about on your talk page
    • 5) Once your discussion has been solved/finished, the subject will be deleted and removed from my page
    • 6) Deletion of subjects are made for myself, so I know what comments are new and old
    • 7) Please do not reverted my talk page without permission (also refer to #10)
    • 8) If your request is about a personal threat "save it and keep to yourself". I do not make threat/attacks. However I will let you know when you are out of line like some users who will remain nameless.
    • 9) If you leave block messages here for a stupid reason, know that they will be removed for various reasons.
    • 10) Whether I own my talk page or not, it is bad faith, vandalism, bad definition of character for anyone who reverts it. [1][2]
    • 11) User:Ericorbit is not allowed to make comments on this page for his bad definition of character.
    • 12) Once again, once your comment is finished, it will be removed for newer one within 12 hours.
THANK YOU & HAVE BLESSED DAY Tarysky (talk) 16:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Thanks for uploading File:Ledisi Lost and Found.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 20:40, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for Disruptive editing. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Per the ANI discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 04:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Tarysky (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How have I done any wrong. I was just editting and Ericorbit came to me be disruptive.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=How have I done any wrong. I was just editting and Ericorbit came to me be disruptive. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=How have I done any wrong. I was just editting and Ericorbit came to me be disruptive. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=How have I done any wrong. I was just editting and Ericorbit came to me be disruptive. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}