User talk:Torqueing

Please click here to leave me a new message.

Controversy

My most controversial edit is probably this one CheeseDreams 13:50, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

User pic

Hi! I stumbled across your user pic today and, as part of the wikipedia image tagging project, marked that you release it into the public domain for copyright purposes. If this is at all innacurate, feel free to correct it. --InShaneee 20:31, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hillman Imp

Exactly - Hillman Imps didn't appear until the 1970s - after all of my relatives who were involved with car making had died! Poetlister 19:36, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

I don't drive, but I have plenty of friends happy to give me lifts. :-) Poetlister 16:17, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Athletics-stub

Hi Cokehabit - thought you'd like to know that there is now (finally!) an {{athletics-stub}}. Grutness...wha? 13:09, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Concerning Fvwm

Haha, if you could not tell, I have not been on wikipedia lately. You asked for my fvwm config a while ago--this I can give. You got AIM? Jabber? Anything? I could self host it with lighttpd or apache2 or something, too. Just let me know if you really want it.

MM23 17:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Pickle

Hi, the reason why Pickle redirects to Pickled cucumber is because pickle is the word we use for this in the United States.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 15:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Scousers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Scousers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:51, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:With-alan-cox.jpg

Hi,

I'm assuming that the photograph (Image:With-alan-cox.jpg) is yours and that it is you in the pink t-shirt. Any objection to my adding that information to the image description? AlistairMcMillan 20:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Ingo Molnár

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Ingo Molnár, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 16:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Chef

I will kindly ask that you not make nonconstructive edits to this article again, as you are a regular editor I have decided to not post a vandalism warning on your page.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 03:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

You took a properly sourced citation and changed it to your point of view which is against the policy WP:NPOV. I also did not threaten you, the statement meant exactly the opposite that I was taking your edit on the assumption of "good faith."--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 03:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Even so, you completely plagiarized the BBC website. My "notion" is not incorrect either as I wrote the original properly sourced information on Chef de Cuisine from a world-wide recognized text on culinary arts. Even reworded, the citation on BBC is from a POV "lifestyle" web source. I don't wish to argue this further as I put in a request for outside comment instead to avoid edit warring.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 03:54, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Dog pyometrial uterus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dog pyometrial uterus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:58, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

That's my bad, I didn't catch that the userpage matched yours. My sincerest apologies for the delay. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 21:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Changes to King & related

Hi Cokehabit, I see you've made changes to the contents of King and related articles. It appears that you made these changes without using edit summaries and I'm unable to find the related discussion where there was consensus to move content around. Can you elaborate? Thanks! Franamax (talk) 03:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Cobra Group Page

Please keep reference to rip of report off this article, it does not add value and has no real susbtance —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.2.91.213 (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Cokehabit. Specifically, what the IP means is the ripoffreport does not appear to qualify as a verifiable and reliable source. Please read the guidelines on what a "good" reference is. Wikipedia articles should have balanced information (i.e., good and bad), but with criticism it's especially important to have good sources. Cheers, tedder (talk) 23:30, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Hooray!

Thanks for finding a source for the criticism! Have a cookiebiscuit for your efforts. Cheers, tedder (talk) 01:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)