Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Scibaby: Difference between revisions
→Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz: adding one |
→Suspected sockpuppets: added one |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* {{checkuser|1=ClimateOracle}} |
* {{checkuser|1=ClimateOracle}} |
||
* {{checkuser|1=WavePart}} |
* {{checkuser|1=WavePart}} |
||
* {{checkuser|1=Weakopedia}} |
|||
<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
<!-- Please duplicate the templates above ({{checkuser}} and {{checkIP}}) to list more accounts--> |
||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Evidence submitted by [[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] </span>====== |
||
Revision as of 23:47, 2 June 2010
Scibaby
- Scibaby (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
01 June 2010
Suspected sockpuppets
- ClimateOracle (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- WavePart (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Weakopedia (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Stephan Schulz
The usual. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Added WavePart. Hipocrite (talk) 10:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Bayesian algorithm says "Reply hazy, try again." Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- Doubtful about Wavepart being scibaby - but no doubt that hir is a sock of some kind. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Added Weakopedia. Probably not Scibaby, but definitely someone per first edit, general stalkery behavior of various persons and username/userpage being obvious not-new-user territory. Note that Ombudsperson Lar has stated in [1] - " If I were a current CU (as an Ombudsman I am recused from any CU activity) I'd probably run a check, it's within the CU remit to do that when we think things are "off"," so no need to be concerned about the Ombudspersons coming down on you. Hipocrite (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users
No reasoning but suspicious is given. I am suspicious that these blocks are helping Wikipedia to guide new editors to productive contributions. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.
- Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
- Current status –
Endorsed for Checkuser attention. Requested by Stephan Schulz (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Clerk endorsed Tim Song (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)