User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:58, 16 May 2012

: 632

: 82

: 6

: 22

You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Archive

Talk archives:

Extended content

Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014), Archive 53 (created 20 April, 2015), Archive 54 (created 21 September, 2015), Archive 55 (created 4 March, 2016), Archive 56 (created 25 August, 2016), Archive 57 (created 22 December, 2016), Archive 58 (created 1 May, 2017), Archive 59 (created 1 March, 2018), Archive 60 (created 10 July, 2018), Archive 61 (created 6 March, 2019), Archive 62 (created 13 November, 2019), Archive 63 (created 23 March, 2020), Archive 64 (created 1 September, 2020), Archive 65 (created 13 February, 2021) add new archive

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship

RfA candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Bericht
Significa liberdade	104	6	1	95	22:18, 21 September 2024	4 days, 17 hours	no	report
RfB candidate	S	O	N	S%	Ending (UTC)	Time left	Dups?	Bericht

Last updated by ^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} at 04:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FAI Gliding Commission

You placed a split tag on this article and have not edited the article since. Do you intend to split this article?

Nachricht

Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Ambassadors#How to make the project more attractive to academics.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Pine^(talk)

Talkback

Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Meclee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks for the star

Thanks for sending me a star for my 1,000th edit. Nice to get this. There's still a lot to do so I will now aim for the 10,000 mark. This might take a little time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmccawley (talk • contribs) 21:27, April 25, 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Samir Feriani

On 11 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Samir Feriani, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Tunisian police officer and whistle-blower Samir Feriani became known as "the first 'Prisoner of Conscience' in post-revolutionary Tunisia"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Samir Feriani.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Epom

The article Epom has been re-created, that you nominated for deletion G4? Begonia Brandbygeana (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware of the previous nomination. I came across it while doing research and clean-up of Ad serving. Made substantial improvements to the one that was nominated for deletion. Maybe not? Let me know what you think after comparing the two. From the comments on the previously deleted page was for little covered and no notability. I agreed until I researched a little more. The notability that I saw deals with the invention of the single ad platform. I also tried to make the article "non-advertising" and more objective. Not that big of deal, though if you still think it needs deleted. Let me know. --Morning277 (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, trying to search for citations was hell. Everything that you try to search for about ad serving comes up with some type of affiliate site or promotional website. I was able to find a few articles but the technology about the single platform seems to be relatively new. --Morning277 (talk) 15:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last but not least......I went to the person who deleted the article to obtain a copy of it. I did not realize that you were involved or would have come to you before re-posting. I always do this before resurrecting an article as I like to keep people involved who were part of the original. For that, I apologize. --Morning277 (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Piotrus. You have new messages at Morning277's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Looks like I had less than 7 days. It was deleted last night. --Morning277 (talk) 13:09, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PZL.50 Jastrząb

Aktualnie jestem daleki od samolotów, ale w ciągu dwóch dni zobaczę - mam parę artykułów na dysku (z których pewnie pisałem). Jak rozumiem, chodzi o zaznaczone miejsca. Pozdrawiam. Pibwl ←« 18:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zająłem się tym - zostało jeszcze znalezienie źródła do oczywistej informacji o 100 Hurricane. Jeśli chcesz, mogę Ci podesłać kilka zeskanowanych artykułów o PZl 50 Pibwl ←« 22:45, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

Special report: Wikimedia and the "seismic shift" towards open-access research publication

News and notes: Finance debate drags on as editor survey finds Wikipedia too bureaucratic

WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse

Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week

Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure

Technology report: Cross-wiki watchlist controversy; and is "go file a bug" really a useful response?

Renata3

I don't know that you'll get a response soon. The source I mention has been cited as the official Lithuanian position, unfortunately, it's not something in my collection. VєсrumЬа ►TALK 00:23, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

mail!

Hello, Piotrus. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Regards, Homunculus (duihua) 01:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot. Well, I tried again. Homunculus (duihua) 05:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Piotrus. Would you care to take a look at the Bo Xilai page? I thought this may be of some interest to you. There are two issues that I think would benefit from your input:

First, the page has been the scene of an edit war for the last day and a half. The dispute, as with many previous disputes on this page, concerns a paragraph describing Bo's involvement in the persecution of Falun Gong and consequent lawsuits that were brought against him. Editors previously hammered out a tenuous consensus, which I (regrettably) disrupted with this edit[1]. There is now a lengthy talk page discussion on the matter,[2] which includes some proposed wording for the page. Unfortunately it appears deadlocked, with changes now going undiscussed, and the conversation seems derailed. If you are so inclined, perhaps you could take a look at the various proposals and iterations, and propose a possible compromise.
The page is a good article nominee, and was passed this morning. Wizardman suggested a second opinion would be in order.[3]

Your help would be appreciated, though if you're reluctant to wade in, I would understand. Homunculus (duihua) 18:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passports Infobox

Following your comment at 'Russian passport', which is valid IMO, I've raised the question at Template talk:Infobox Identity document#Date of Issue. Feel free to add your own comment there and hopefully the ambiguity can be resolved. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 08:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Constitution painting

There were two reasons why I decided not to include the girl in the yellow dress in the painting guide:

You can't see her face, so "identifying" her necessarily amounts to wild speculation;
Even if this is Marianna Dekertówna, she doesn't seem to have been particularly notable. I doubt she would meet Wikipedia's notability criteria.

However, if you really think she should be included, I can try to add her. But for now I don't suppose it's necessary. — Kpalion^(talk) 18:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 :Shoot. Well, I tried again. [[User:Homunculus|Homunculus]] ([[User talk:Homunculus|duihua]]) 05:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
+Hi Piotrus. Would you care to take a look at the [[Bo Xilai]] page?  I thought this may be of some interest to you.  There are two issues that I think would benefit from your input:
+* First, the page has been the scene of an edit war for the last day and a half. The dispute, as with many previous disputes on this page, concerns a paragraph describing Bo's involvement in the persecution of Falun Gong and consequent lawsuits that were brought against him.  Editors previously hammered out a tenuous consensus, which I (regrettably) disrupted with this edit[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bo_Xilai&diff=492643402&oldid=492637535].  There is now a lengthy talk page discussion on the matter,[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bo_Xilai#Falun_Gong] which includes some proposed wording for the page.  Unfortunately it appears deadlocked, with changes now going undiscussed, and the conversation seems derailed.  If you are so inclined, perhaps you could take a look at the various proposals and iterations, and propose a possible compromise.
+* The page is a good article nominee, and was passed this morning.  Wizardman suggested a second opinion would be in order.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bo_Xilai/GA1]
+Your help would be appreciated, though if you're reluctant to wade in, I would understand. [[User:Homunculus|Homunculus]] ([[User talk:Homunculus|duihua]]) 18:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 ==Passports Infobox==