Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colegio La Fe: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:28, 4 June 2012

Colegio La Fe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article without sources to prove notability Night of the Big Wind _talk 01:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 02:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see from the deletion sorting crew that this is a Venezuela school. Is there a reason here for deletion? Unscintillating (talk) 03:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Um, being unsourced is a reason for deletion... p b p 04:19, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Being unsourced is a reason for improvement. I see that you're still getting AFD confused with CLEANUP. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 05:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tags asking for inprovement and sources are there for the last half year. So I considered that nobody is going to improve the article. And when nobody cares, it can be deleted because is lacks the notability to attrack any cooperation... Night of the Big Wind _talk 19:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't start this AfD, so your beef is with Night. But being unsourced is a reason for deletion, too. I don't believe that all articles can be sourced their way out of deletion, nor do I believe it would be worth our time to do so with all the articles that possibly could p b p 13:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. I worry that there might be room for consideration of WP:BIAS here. I would prefer seeing some input from local wikipedians before deleting. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 05:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom p b p 13:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ::Um, being unsourced is a reason for deletion... <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">[[User:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00">p</span>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">b</span>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">p</span>]]</span> 04:19, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 :::Being unsourced is a reason for '''''improvement'''''. I see that you're still getting AFD confused with CLEANUP. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''&tilde;[[User:Danjel|danjel]]'''&nbsp;[&nbsp;[[User_talk:Danjel|talk]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]]&nbsp;]</span> 05:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
+::::::The tags asking for inprovement and sources are there for the last half year. So I considered that '''nobody''' is going to improve the article. And when nobody cares, it can be deleted because is lacks the notability to attrack any cooperation... [[User:Night of the Big Wind|<font face="Old English Text MT"><font color="green">Night of the Big Wind</font></font>]] [[User talk:Night of the Big Wind|<font color="maroon"><sub><i>talk</i></sub></font>]] 19:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 ::::I didn't start this AfD, so your beef is with Night.  But being unsourced ''is'' a reason for deletion, too.  I don't believe that all articles can be sourced their way out of deletion, nor do I believe it would be worth our time to do so with all the articles that possibly could <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">[[User:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00">p</span>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">b</span>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">p</span>]]</span> 13:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 *'''Weak Keep'''. I worry that there might be room for consideration of [[WP:BIAS]] here. I would prefer seeing some input from local wikipedians before deleting. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''&tilde;[[User:Danjel|danjel]]'''&nbsp;[&nbsp;[[User_talk:Danjel|talk]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]]&nbsp;]</span> 05:15, 4 June 2012 (UTC)