Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 October 24: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:31, 24 October 2012

Category:Wikipedians who are not a Wikipedian

Propose deleting Category:Wikipedians who are not a Wikipedian - Template:Lc1

Nominator's rationale: False descriptor - none of these users are described as not a wikipedian apart from Malleus - and that was detracted - as such this is a disruptive and derisive cat - Youreallycan 00:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, is this just totally going over your head? Kennedy wasn't really a Berliner either. Drmies (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't be sorry - I see only friends - the cat is disruptive and a violation of user guidelines though - Youreallycan 00:18, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, if I'm being disruptive then maybe I'm breaking the fourth pillar, and thus I'm not a Wikipedian. Or, it's not adding to the encyclopedia, in which case I'm disregarding the first and I'm not a Wikipedian. Or I'm declaring my solidarity, thereby violating NPOV, the second pillar, and thus I'm not a Wikipedian. Or you should ignore all rules, allowing me to be a Wikipedian in my non-neutral, policy-breaking, disruptive manner. That's the fifth pillar. Drmies (talk) 00:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - Your just being disruptive - Youreallycan 00:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's an expression of solidarity. Every editor needs support. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would argue that this is a reasonable self descriptor for anyone who wants to edit the encyclopedia that (almost) anyone can edit but doesn't want to belong to the 'club' of wikipedians. But I cannot because I'm a wikipedian who isn't a wikipedian and only wikipedians who are wikipedians should comment on wikipedian matters on wikipedians. Or something like that. I think. --regentspark (comment) 00:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Given I have been just as rude and swear just as much as Malleus then obviously I am not a Wikipedian. Darkness Shines (talk) 00:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide a decent rationale within guidelines - I like is is not going to be counted - Youreallycan 00:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm not a living person either. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
like it is not a valued keep - Youreallycan 00:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *'''Comment''' I would argue that this is a reasonable self descriptor for anyone who wants to edit the encyclopedia that (almost) anyone can edit but doesn't want to belong to the 'club' of wikipedians. But I cannot because I'm a wikipedian who isn't a wikipedian and only wikipedians who are wikipedians should comment on wikipedian matters on wikipedians. Or something like that. I think.  --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 00:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' Given I have been just as rude and swear just as much as Malleus then obviously I am not a Wikipedian. [[User:Darkness Shines|Darkness Shines]] ([[User talk:Darkness Shines|talk]]) 00:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
+*:Please provide a decent rationale within guidelines - I like is is not going to be counted - <font color="purple">[[User:Youreallycan|You]]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">[[User talk:Youreallycan|can]]</font> 00:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' - [[On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog|I'm not a living ''person'' either]].&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 00:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
+*: like it is not a valued keep - <font color="purple">[[User:Youreallycan|You]]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">[[User talk:Youreallycan|can]]</font> 00:31, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 <!-- Please add the newest nominations to the top -->