Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 14: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→February 14: Again removing troll - really someone should block him for disruption |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
==== [[Template:Hidden content dispute]] ==== |
|||
:{{Tfd links|Hidden content dispute}} |
|||
Redundant to {{tl|Collapse top}}. Only used on two talk pages. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 16:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC) <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Pigsonthewing|Andy Mabbett]]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); [[User talk:Pigsonthewing|Talk to Andy]]; [[Special:Contributions/Pigsonthewing|Andy's edits]]</span> 16:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==== [[Template:Vndb]] ==== |
==== [[Template:Vndb]] ==== |
||
:{{Tfd links|Vndb}} |
:{{Tfd links|Vndb}} |
||
Revision as of 17:11, 14 February 2013
February 14
- Template:Vndb (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
The VNDB is editable just like Wikipedia. This template is wholly unnecessary. I have also noticed that the website is being used as references (two are used on 11eyes: Tsumi to Batsu to Aganai no Shōjo). A massive revision on anime articles is recommended. JC · Xbox · Talk · Contributions 01:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep - This is a valid template to be used for external links, like {{GameFAQs}} and the {{IMDb}} templates. If it's used as a reference and it's not a reliable source... well that's hardly a problem that should be solved at TfD. Treat it like any other unreliable source used as a reference. :) ·Salvidrim!· ✉ 06:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: Used for ELs, and not referencing. We don't delete imdb and youtube templates for this reason either. If people are misusing the template, fix the issue on the relevant page. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 07:18, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- While it's true that this is symptomatic of the generally egregious quality of our coverage of this subject, so long as this is being used as an extlink and not a reference it's probably not going to help anything by deleting it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:54, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I have to agree to keep. If it is being used as a reference that is indeed a problem but since it is clearly marked as Category:External link templates, it should not be deleted as it has use there. 50.53.15.59 (talk) 12:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with the other keep votes. It's a valid EL template similar to Template:ANN and the others listed by Salvidrim. If it's being used improperly, the solution is education, not deletion.--Atlantima (talk) 13:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep – This is an external link template so there's no real reason to delete it as it is not used for RSing just formatting ELs. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 15:40, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per all of the above. Templating multiple external links to the same site helps with monitoring, and in cases where their URL structure changes. Snowball? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:39, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Virtually a navbox with only links to redlinks besides the main page. Until at least a few of them get created, there'd be no point in having this. ZappaOMati 00:46, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Löschen. If articles can't be created for the red-linked items in four years, it's probably not going to happen (if it does, recreate it at such time). Transcluded in only one article. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:25, 14 February 2013 (UTC)