User talk:PLNR

Welcome!

Hello, PLNR! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! PhilKnight (talk) 13:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

August 2013 Egyptian raids

Please check ref 1 and 2

I don't think that Lihaas has problem with my edits.

We shouldn't remove extra information, since there are references.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mazidan (talk • contribs) 17:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

--- supporters of ousted President Mohamed Morsi are the NCSL, and not only the MB. And the references shows the members of the NCSL. I added a very recent reference showing that the NCSL are the current organizers and supports for the running demonstrations. I hope that this address your concerns. Thank you, (Mazidan (talk) 17:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC))

---

I didn't get it. Why to remove an information supported by may references, and put another misleading information. I believe that we should include the complete picture, especially if it's supported by many references. Thanks, (Mazidan (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2013 (UTC))

August 2013 Egyptian raids

Thanks for the CE on the August 2013 Egyptian raids, great job anon.--PLNR (talk) 23:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm glad it was appreciated and thanks for your compliment.173.35.67.177 (talk) 02:52, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aftermath of the 2011 Egyptian revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freedom and Justice Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Question

Re this edit, why was the statement removed? I do not understand your edit summary. Also, what does a non English source have to do with anything? VQuakr (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Because I can't confirm what is said in that source, and I don't want todo a SYN combining it with source I added in the edit before that, adding statement that is actually present a reaction to the attack.(not a reaction to someone else possible reaction to the attack). Anyway if you think you can improve please do, which is why I separated the two edits.--PLNR (talk) 07:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Non-English sources are explicitly allowed. If you feel the material needs independent verification to ensure the text it supports is correct, this would be an item for the talk page, not a reason for removal. BTW, the talkback function is now a part of Twinkle, far right in the pulldowns at least on my skin. VQuakr (talk) 16:38, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

@VQuakr:Confirming anything on our talk page sound absurd to me :) but policy is policy I guess. Also thanks but I don't think I have that Twinkle, though a little bird at the help desk told of away.--PLNR (talk) 07:28, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Syrian civil war sanctions notice

As a result of a community discussion, long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Syrian civil war, broadly construed, have been acknowledged. The community has therefore enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

• Any uninvolved administrator may, at his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
• The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length, bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict, bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics, restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
• Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor shall be given a warning with a link to this decision and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
• Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the decision. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)