Jump to content

Stand-your-ground law: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Controversy: already discussed in first sentence of this paragraph. This statistic is limited to one study in florida, not represented correctly
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 35: Line 35:


When Caucasians use the stand-your-ground defense against black attackers, they are more successful than when African-Americans use the defense against white attackers.<ref name="CSM">{{cite news|title=Racial bias and 'stand your ground' laws: what the data show|date=August 6, 2013|work=Christian Science Monitor|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2013/0806/Racial-bias-and-stand-your-ground-laws-what-the-data-show|accessdate=May 3, 2014}}</ref> In stand-your-ground states, the use of the defense by Caucasians in the shooting of a black person is found to be justifiable 17 percent of the time, while the defense when used by African-Americans in the shooting of a white person is successful 1 percent of the time.<ref name="CSM"></ref> In non-stand-your-ground states, the shooting of a black person by a white is found justified approximately 9 percent of the time.<ref name="CSM"></ref> Justifiable homicides have been found to have increased by 8 percent in states with stand-your-ground laws.<ref name="CSM"></ref>
When Caucasians use the stand-your-ground defense against black attackers, they are more successful than when African-Americans use the defense against white attackers.<ref name="CSM">{{cite news|title=Racial bias and 'stand your ground' laws: what the data show|date=August 6, 2013|work=Christian Science Monitor|url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2013/0806/Racial-bias-and-stand-your-ground-laws-what-the-data-show|accessdate=May 3, 2014}}</ref> In stand-your-ground states, the use of the defense by Caucasians in the shooting of a black person is found to be justifiable 17 percent of the time, while the defense when used by African-Americans in the shooting of a white person is successful 1 percent of the time.<ref name="CSM"></ref> In non-stand-your-ground states, the shooting of a black person by a white is found justified approximately 9 percent of the time.<ref name="CSM"></ref> Justifiable homicides have been found to have increased by 8 percent in states with stand-your-ground laws.<ref name="CSM"></ref>
Defendants claiming "stand your ground" are more likely to prevail if the victim is black. Seventy-three percent of those who killed a black person faced no penalty compared to 59 percent of those who killed a white.

==Questionable cases==


Whatever lawmakers' expectations, "stand your ground" arguments have resulted in freedom or reduced sentences for some unlikely defendants.
An 18-year-old felon, convicted of cocaine and weapons charges, shot and wounded a neighbor in the stomach, then fled the scene and was involved in another nonfatal shootout two days later, according to police.
He was granted immunity in the first shooting. Two men fell into the water while fighting on a dock.
When one started climbing out of the water, the other shot him in the back of the head, killing him. He was acquitted after arguing "stand your ground."
A Seventh-day Adventist was acting erratically, doing cartwheels through an apartment complex parking lot, pounding on cars and apartment windows and setting off alarms.
A tenant who felt threatened by the man's behavior shot and killed him. He was not charged.
A Citrus County man in a longstanding dispute with a neighbor shot and killed the man one night in 2009.
He was not charged even though a witness and the location of two bullet wounds showed the victim was turning to leave when he was shot.
Even chasing and killing someone over a drug buy can be considered standing your ground.
Anthony Gonzalez Jr. was part of a 2010 drug deal that went sour when someone threatened Gonzalez with a gun.
Gonzalez chased the man down and killed him during a high-speed gunbattle through Miami streets.
Before the "stand your ground'' law, Miami-Dade prosecutors would have had a strong murder case because Gonzalez could have retreated instead of chasing the other vehicle.
But Gonzalez's lawyer argued he had a right to be in his car, was licensed to carry a gun and thought his life was in danger.
Soon after the filing of a "stand your ground'' motion, prosecutors agreed to a deal in which Gonzalez pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter and got three years in prison.
"The limitations imposed on us by the 'stand your ground' laws made it impossible for any prosecutor to pursue murder charges,'' Griffith of the Miami-Dade State Attorney's Office said at the time.
"This is certainly a very difficult thing to tell a grieving family member.''


==Related links==
==Related links==

Revision as of 00:43, 8 May 2014

"Stand your ground" redirects here. For other uses, see Stand Your Ground (disambiguation).

In the United States, stand-your-ground law states that a person may justifiably use force in self-defense without an obligation to retreat first. The concept sometimes exists in statutory law and sometimes through common law precedents. One key distinction is whether the concept only applies to defending a home or vehicle, or whether it applies to all lawfully occupied locations. Under these legal concepts, a person is justified in using deadly force in certain situations and the "stand your ground" law would be a defense or immunity to criminal charges and civil suit. The difference between immunity and a defense is that an immunity bars suit, charges, detention and arrest. A defense, such as an affirmative defense, permits a plaintiff or the state to seek civil damages or a criminal conviction but may offer mitigating circumstances that justify the accused's conduct.

More than half of the states in the United States have adopted the castle doctrine, stating that a person has no duty to retreat when their home is attacked. Some states go a step further, removing the duty of retreat from other locations. "Stand Your Ground", "Line in the Sand" or "No Duty to Retreat" laws thus state that a person has no duty or other requirement to abandon a place in which he has a right to be, or to give up ground to an assailant. Under such laws, there is no duty to retreat from anywhere the defender may legally be.[1] Other restrictions may still exist; such as when in public, a person must be carrying firearms in a legal manner, whether concealed or openly.

"Stand your ground" governs U.S. federal case law in which right of self-defense is asserted against a charge of criminal homicide. The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Beard v. U.S. (158 U.S. 550 (1895)) that a man who was "on his premises" when he came under attack and "...did not provoke the assault, and had at the time reasonable grounds to believe, and in good faith believed, that the deceased intended to take his life, or do him great bodily harm...was not obliged to retreat, nor to consider whether he could safely retreat, but was entitled to stand his ground."[2][3]

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. declared in Brown v. United States (1921) (256 U.S. 335, 343 (16 May 1921)), a case that upheld the "no duty to retreat" maxim, that "detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife".[4]

Effect on crime rates

The law's effect on crime rates is disputed between supporters and critics of the law. The third edition of More Guns, Less Crime by John Lott[5] says that states adopting “Stand Your Ground”/"Castle Doctrine" laws reduced murder rates by 9 percent and overall violent crime by 11 percent, and that occurs even after accounting for a range of other factors such as national crime trends, law enforcement variables (arrest, execution, and imprisonment rates), income and poverty measures, demographic changes, and the national average changes in crime rates from year-to-year and average differences across states.

A study by Texas A&M economics professors found that the adoption of stand-your-ground laws caused a statistically significant increase in the raw homicide rate, and had only a very small positive effect on deterrence of crime. The authors of the study were unable to determine what percentage of the increase was justifiable homicide, due to the reporting of homicide to the FBI often lacking notation whether the homicide was justifiable or not.[6][7]

Another analysis of stand-your-ground laws by economists at Georgia State, using monthly data from the U.S. Vital Statistics, found a significant increase in homicide and injury of whites, especially white males.[8] They also analyzed data from the Health Care Utilization Project, which revealed significantly increased rates of emergency room visits and hospital discharges related to gun injuries in states which enacted these laws.

In a 2007 National District Attorneys Association symposium, numerous concerns were voiced that the law could increase crime. This included criminals using the law as a defense for their crimes, more people carrying guns, and that people would not feel safe if they felt that anyone could use deadly force in a conflict. The report also noted that the misinterpretation of clues could result in use of deadly force when there was, in fact, no danger. The report specifically notes that racial and ethnic minorities could be at greater risk because of negative stereotypes.[9]

Florida state representative Dennis Baxley, an author of the law, notes that crime rates in Florida dropped significantly between 2005, when the law was passed, and 2012.[10] However, crime rates had been declining nationally, including a 12% decrease in Florida, since at least 2000.[11] Representative Baxley told Politifact Florida that he does not believe his law is the main reason for the drop in crime rates in Florida, but may be one of several reasons, and Politifact Florida backed his belief with statistics showing that, from 2005-2007, the number of violent crimes actually rose and the once-declining crime rate stalled.

United States

Many states have some form of stand-your-ground law. Alabama,[12] Alaska,[13] Arizona,[14] California,[15][16] Florida,[17] Georgia, Indiana, Iowa,[18] Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana,[14] Maine, Massachusetts (though the term is used very loosely there),[19] Michigan,[14] Mississippi, Missouri, Montana,[14] New Hampshire,[14] North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma,[14] Pennsylvania ,[20] Rhode Island,[21] South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee,[14] Texas,[22] Utah,[23] West Virginia,[14] Wisconsin[24] and Wyoming have adopted Castle Doctrine statutes, and other states (Iowa,[25] Virginia,[26] and Washington) have considered stand-your-ground laws of their own.[27][28][29]

For example, Michigan's stand-your-ground law, MCL 780.972, provides that "[a]n individual who has not or is not engaged in the commission of a crime at the time he or she uses deadly force may use deadly force against another individual anywhere he or she has the legal right to be with no duty to retreat if . . . [t]he individual honestly and reasonably believes that the use of deadly force is necessary to prevent" the imminent death, great bodily harm, or sexual assault of himself or another individual.[30]

Some of the states that have passed or are considering stand-your-ground laws already implement stand-your-ground principles in case law. Indiana and Georgia, among other states, passed stand-your-ground statutes due to possible concerns of existing case law being replaced by the "duty to retreat" in later court rulings. Other states, including Washington[citation needed] and Virginia,[citation needed] have implemented stand-your-ground judicially but have not adopted statutes. West Virginia had a long tradition of "stand your ground" in its case law[31] before codifying it as a statute in 2008. These states did not have civil immunity for self-defense in their previous self-defense statutes.

Florida enacted the first "Stand Your Ground" law in the United States.[32]

Controversy

Stand-your-ground laws are frequently criticized and called "shoot first" laws by critics, including the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.[33] In Florida, self-defense claims tripled in the years following enactment.[33][34] The law's critics argue that Florida's law makes it very difficult to prosecute cases against people who shoot others and then claim self-defense. The shooter can argue that he felt threatened, and in most cases, the only witness who could have argued otherwise is the deceased.[33] This problem is inherent to all self-defense laws, not just stand your ground laws. Before passage of the law, Miami police chief John F. Timoney called the law unnecessary and dangerous in that "[w]hether it's trick-or-treaters or kids playing in the yard of someone who doesn't want them there or some drunk guy stumbling into the wrong house, you're encouraging people to possibly use deadly physical force where it shouldn't be used."[35][36]

In Florida, a task force examining the law has concluded that the law is "confusing."[37] Those testifying to the task force include Buddy Jacobs, a lawyer representing the Florida Prosecuting Attorney's Association. Jacobs recommended the law's repeal, feeling that modifying the law would not fix its problems. Florida governor Rick Scott plans his own investigation into the law.[37] In a July 16, 2013 speech in the wake of the jury verdict acquitting George Zimmerman of charges stemming from the shooting death of Trayvon Martin, Attorney General Eric Holder criticized stand-your-ground laws as "senselessly expand[ing] the concept of self-defense and sow[ing] dangerous conflict in our neighborhoods."[38] The defendant, George Zimmerman, claims he was restrained at the time of the shooting, thus allowing no option for retreat and making it a self-defense case.[39]

When Caucasians use the stand-your-ground defense against black attackers, they are more successful than when African-Americans use the defense against white attackers.[40] In stand-your-ground states, the use of the defense by Caucasians in the shooting of a black person is found to be justifiable 17 percent of the time, while the defense when used by African-Americans in the shooting of a white person is successful 1 percent of the time.[40] In non-stand-your-ground states, the shooting of a black person by a white is found justified approximately 9 percent of the time.[40] Justifiable homicides have been found to have increased by 8 percent in states with stand-your-ground laws.[40]

Related links

References

  1. ^ Florida Statutes Title XLVI Chapter 776
  2. ^ "Kopel DB: "The Self-Defense Cases," 2000". Davekopel.com. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  3. ^ "''Beard v. United States'', 158 U.S. 550 (1895)". Supreme.justia.com. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  4. ^ Brown v. United States, 256 U.S. 335, 343 (1921)
  5. ^ More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws (University of Chicago Press, third edition, 2010).
  6. ^ "Does Strengthening Self-Defense Law Deter Crime or Escalate Violence? Evidence from Castle Doctrine" (PDF). Retrieved 19 September 2012.
  7. ^ "Study Says ‘Stand Your Ground’ Laws Increase Homicides - Law Blog - WSJ". Retrieved 19 September 2012.
  8. ^ McClellan, Chandler; Tekin, Erdal (June 2012). "Stand Your Ground Laws, Homicides, and Injuries". Bulletin on Aging and Health. NBER Working Paper No. 18187.
  9. ^ Jansen, Steven; Nugent-Borakove, M. Elaine. "Expansions to the Castle Doctrine: Implications for Policy and Practice" (PDF). National District Attorneys Association. Retrieved 2013-06-28.
  10. ^ "Half true:Crime rates in Florida have dropped since 'stand your ground,' says Dennis Baxley". Politifact. March 23, 2012. Retrieved March 24, 2012.
  11. ^ "Crime rates in Florida have dropped since 'stand your ground,' says Dennis Baxley". Politifact Florida. Tampa Bay Times and The Miama Herald. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  12. ^ Ala. Code 13A-3-23(b): "A person who is justified under subsection (a) in using physical force, including deadly physical force, and who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and is in any place where he or she has the right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his ground."
  13. ^ http://www.alaskapublic.org/2013/06/20/parnell-signs-bills-resolutions-supporting-gun-rights/
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h Martosko, David (April 1, 2012) "'Stand your ground' laws not just GOP policy, records show" The Daily Caller. Retrieved 2012-04-03.
  15. ^ Penal Code §§ 197, 198.5, Legislative Counsel, State of California, retrieved April 3, 2012
  16. ^ "CALCRIM No. 505. Justifiable Homicide". CaliforniaJuryInstructions.Net. January 2006. Retrieved April 3, 2012.
  17. ^ "Title XLVI Chapter 776: JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE". The 2013 Florida Statutes. The Florida Legislature. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  18. ^ "Iowa Code Section 704.1".
  19. ^ http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartIV/TitleII/Chapter278/Section8a
  20. ^ "Pennsylvania's Stand Your Ground Law Mirrors Florida's", Public Source, March 21, 2012
  21. ^ "11-8-8". Rilin.state.ri.us. Retrieved 2012-01-11.
  22. ^ "Gov. Perry Signs Law Allowing Texans to Protect Themselves", Office of Governor Rick Perry Press Release, March 27, 2007
  23. ^ 76-2-405 "Force in defense of habitation". Utah criminal Code. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  24. ^ Walker signs 'castle doctrine' bill, other measures
  25. ^ "HF2215 An Act relating to the justifiable use of reasonable force and providing a remedy".
  26. ^ "HB 48 Castle doctrine; self-defense and defense of others". Virginia's Legislative Information System.
  27. ^ "Fortifying The Right To Self-Defense". National rifle Association. February 26, 2006.
  28. ^ "Castle Doctrine: Protecting Our Right to Self-Defense". National Rifle Association. (map showing states which have enacted a Castle Doctrine law)
  29. ^ Willing, Richard (March 20, 2006). "States allow deadly self-defense". USA Today. Retrieved April 4, 2006.
  30. ^ "Self-Defense Act". Michigan Legislature. Retrieved 16 July 2013.
  31. ^ See State v. Cain, 20 W.Va. 679 (1882); State v. Laura, 93 W.Va. 250, 116 S.E. 251 (1923); State v. McMillion, 104 W.Va. 1, 138 S.E. 732 (1927); State v. Preece, 116 W.Va. 176, 179 S.E. 524 (1935); State v. Bowyer, 143 W.Va. 302, 101 S.E.2d 243 (1957); State v. Green, 157 W.Va. 1031, 206 S.E.2d 923 (1974); State v. Kirtley, 162 W.Va. 249, 252 S.E.2d 374 (1978); State v. W.J.B., 166 W.Va. 602, 276 S.E.2d 550 (1981)
  32. ^ Chuck, Elizabeth. "Florida had first Stand Your Ground law, other states followed in 'rapid succession'". NBC News. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  33. ^ a b c "Florida 'Stand Your Ground' law could complicate Trayvon Martin teen shooting case". MSNBC. March 20, 2012. Retrieved March 21, 2012.
  34. ^ "Deaths Nearly Triple Since 'Stand Your Ground' Enacted". CBS Miami. 2011-03-20. Retrieved 2012-03-23.
  35. ^ Goodnough, Abby. "Florida Expands Right to Use Deadly Force in Self-Defense". The New York Times. nytimes.com. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  36. ^ Goodman, Howard. "NRA's Behind-the-Scenes Campaign Encouraged 'Stand Your Ground' Adoption". Florida Center for Investigative Reporting. fcir.org. Retrieved March 23, 2012.
  37. ^ a b "Trayvon Martin case: Florida task force told 'stand your ground' law confusing". TheGrio. April 6, 2012. Retrieved April 6, 2012.
  38. ^ Holder, Eric. "Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by Attorney General Eric Holder at the NAACP Annual Convention" (PDF). Retrieved 16 July 2013.
  39. ^ http://reason.com/blog/2013/07/15/zimmermans-prosecutors-did-not-think-the
  40. ^ a b c d "Racial bias and 'stand your ground' laws: what the data show". Christian Science Monitor. August 6, 2013. Retrieved May 3, 2014.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stand-your-ground_law&oldid=607560767"